You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Female Urology (I)1 Apr 20131572 HOW SUCCESSFUL IS SUBURETHRAL SYNTHETIC TAPE REMOVAL? Michael Belsante, Casey Seideman, Neema Saraiya, Gary Lemack, and Philippe Zimmern Michael BelsanteMichael Belsante Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Casey SeidemanCasey Seideman Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Neema SaraiyaNeema Saraiya Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Gary LemackGary Lemack Dallas, TX More articles by this author , and Philippe ZimmernPhilippe Zimmern Dallas, TX More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3122AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Suburethral synthetic tape removals (STR) have risen as the rate of mid urethral slings (MUS) has increased for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence (SUI). We review our experience with mid and long-term outcomes after STR. METHODS Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent STR1 for any indication from 2006-2011, with at least 6 months follow-up, was performed, including: indication for removal, pre and post-operative symptoms defined by the Urogenital Distress Inventory questionnaire (UDI-6) and a global quality of life score (QoL), as well as perioperative outcomes and need for future procedures. Cure was strictly defined as continent, no dyspareunia, sexually active if active pre-operatively, and not requiring additional medical or surgical therapy. Continence was determined using UDI-6 scores, pad use and patient report. Dyspareunia was per patient report. Statistical analysis included Chi square and paired T-tests. RESULTS Of 147 patients, 131 met inclusion criteria. Indications for STR were: obstructive symptoms including urge incontinence and retention (60%), persistent SUI (33%), dyspareunia or pain (28%), erosion or extrusion (26%) and recurrent UTI (16%). Over half of patients (56%) had multiple indications for STR. The original type of MUS was: 67 TVT (51%), 32 TOT (24%), 11 TVT-O (8%), 7 minisling (5%), and 14 unknown (11%). Mean age, parity, and BMI were 61 years (30-85), 2.5 (0-6), and 28.8 (17-46) respectively. Mean time from tape placement to removal was 33 (3-172) months. Mean length of follow-up was 21 months (6-74). There were no intraoperative complications (urethral injury or blood transfusion), and mean and median length of stay was 1.2 (0-9) and 1 day respectively. Concomitant surgeries in 63 (48%) patients included cystocele repair (19), rectus fascia sling (8), both (5) and a variety of other surgeries (31). Subsequent reoperation for SUI included injectables (27), rectus fascia slings (4) or both (5). Of 77 patients with UDI-6 and QoL scores preoperatively, total UDI- 6 score (0-18) improved from 10.7 to 7.3 at last follow up visit (p<0.001), and QoL (0-10) decreased from 8.6 to 4.3 (p<0.001). Resolution of dyspareunia was achieved in 73% of patients who complained of dyspareunia pre STR. Cure after STR was achieved in 33 patients (25%). CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients who undergo STR due to complications after MUS experience improvement in symptoms, however cure is uncommon. 1 Can J Urol, 19:6424-6430, 2012 © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e645 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Michael Belsante Dallas, TX More articles by this author Casey Seideman Dallas, TX More articles by this author Neema Saraiya Dallas, TX More articles by this author Gary Lemack Dallas, TX More articles by this author Philippe Zimmern Dallas, TX More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract