BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cellular bone matrices (CBM) are allograft products that combine demineralized bone with viable cancellous bone prepared to retain cells with skeletal tissue differentiation capabilities. Using an athymic rat model of posterolateral fusion, several commercially-available human CBMs were compared: Trinity ELITE (TEL; OrthoFix, Lewisville, TX, United States), ViviGen (VIV; DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, United States), Cellentra (CEL; Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, United States), Osteocel Pro (OCP; NuVasive, San Diego, CA, United States), Bio4 (BIO; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, United States) and map3 (MAP; RTI Surgical, Marquette, MI, United States). Iliac crest bone from syngeneic rats was used as a control to approximate the human gold standard. METHODS To allow for lot-to-lot variability, three different lots of each implant type were procured and each was used to implant five rats, for a total of 15 9-10 week old male rats per implant type. Each implant was stored, thawed, and prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions and all implantations occurred within the manufacturers’ time allowance for use after preparation. After anesthesia and preparation, a single posterior midline longitudinal skin and subcutaneous incision and bilateral longitudinal paraspinal myofascial incisions were made to expose the transverse processes and intertransverse membranes at the L4-5 level. The processes were decorticated and 0.3 cc of allograft implant or freshly harvested syngeneic iliac bone graft was placed bilaterally. Surgeons were blinded as to which implant was which. Incisions were closed with sutures to avoid any interference with in vivo animal microCT scans performed within 48 hours of surgery on all rats. The rats were euthanized 6 weeks after surgery and the lumbar spines harvested. A second microCT scan was taken and compared with the microCT taken at the time of implantation to assess fusion and bone remodeling. Stable fusion was also evaluated by manual palpation by three independent, blinded reviewers. MicroCT analysis was performed by an independent CRO (ImageIQ, Cleveland, OH, USA). All assessments were done by experienced evaluators blinded to the treatments. Anonymity of implant type was rigorously kept to avoid any bias. RESULTS By manual palpation, 5/15 (33%) rats of the syngeneic bone group were fused at 6 weeks. While TEL had 8/15 (53%) and CEL 11/15 (73%) rats with stable fusion, only 2/15 (13%) of VIV-implanted spines were fused and 0/15 (0%) of the OCP, BIO and MAP CBMs produced stable fusion. The TEL and CEL groups were significantly different from the other CBMs but not different from each other. MicroCT analysis indicated percentage increases in bone volume from the first measurement to the second for all groups, but only TEL and CEL had significant increases over the syngeneic bone control (TEL 65% and CEL 73% vs. syngeneic bone 21%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Because the CBMs tested have distinct formulations and are likely processed differently, it is not surprising that the results would be different between the groups. While map3 has cells added at the time of surgery, the other CBMs are processed with cells adherent to the bone matrix. The claimed live cell and stem cell contents differ between products. Trinity ELITE and Cellentra were found to be significantly better than other implants at forming new bone and achieving fusion. The other CBMs did not produce greater bone formation than the control and were very poor at forming a solid fusion. These results suggest that there may be large differences in the ability of different CBMs to elicit a successful fusion in the posterolateral spine. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Read full abstract