Symptomatic Disc Research Articles

Current thinking in the management of temporomandibular disorders in children: A narrative review

The aim of this narrative review is to discuss current opinions on paediatric temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) due to their increasing incidence in routine secondary care maxillofacial clinics. A MEDLINE and EMBASE search was performed of the literature published in the past three years concerning paediatric TMD. Of 261 papers identified, 89 were selected for relevance, of which 52 full texts were eligible and 41 included. The narrative of this paper follows three domains: myogenous and arthogenous pain, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and reconstruction. The principles of treating mild TMD in children are similar to those in adults, with even more emphasis on the management of psychosocial issues and self-care. The use of medication, however, needs to be more cautious. Symptomatic disc displacement should be treated to reduce inflammation, so early arthrocentesis or arthroscopy is relevant. Controversy exists on disc repositioning to reduce or even reverse condylar degeneration in the growing condyle. If undertaken it should ideally be performed arthroscopically by surgeons with significant experience. Arthritic disease is usually associated with JIA so a multidisciplinary approach is the focus of treatment. The role of arthroscopy in the management of symptoms is increasing but it does not prevent disease progression. Surgical correction may be required for secondary deformity. Reconstruction remains a challenge with no ideal autogenous method. Alloplastic joints are gaining popularity, but the long-term outcomes are unknown. Surgery can be undertaken with minimal morbidity, and the use of joint replacements, even as space maintainers, may therefore be more beneficial than repeated failed autogenous treatments.

Five-year Follow-up of a Prospective Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Trial Evaluating a PEEK-on-Ceramic Cervical Disc Replacement.

Prospective trial comparing the investigation group to propensity matched historic control group. To evaluate 5-year results of single-level PEEK-on-ceramic cervical total disc replacement (TDR) compared to a propensity matched anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) control group. Cervical TDR has gained acceptance as treatment for symptomatic disc degeneration. The design and materials used in these devices continue to evolve. Data were collected in the Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial for the PEEK-on-ceramic Simplify(®) Cervical Artificial Disc (n=150) with comparison to a propensity matched ACDF control group (n=117). All patients were treated for single-level cervical disc degeneration with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Clinical outcome was based on composite clinical success (CCS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scales (VAS) assessing pain, re-operations, and satisfaction. Radiographic measures included segmental range of motion (ROM), disc space height, and heterotopic ossification (HO). Evaluations were performed pre-operatively and post-operatively within 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12 months, and annually thereafter. At 5-year follow-up, CCS was significantly greater with TDR than ACDF (91.1% vs. 74.6%; P<0.01). In the TDR group, the mean NDI score was 63.3 pre-operatively, reduced significantly to 23.1 at 6 weeks and remained below 20 throughout 5-year follow-up. In the ACDF group, the mean pre-operative NDI score was 62.4, decreasing to 33.7 at 6 weeks, and ranged from 25.9 to 21.5 throughout follow-up. Mean NDI scores were significantly lower in TDR group at all post-operative points (P<0.05). Mean TDR ROM was 7.3o pre-operatively and 10.1o at 5 years. Bridging HO occurred in 9%. With TDR, there were 6 re-operations (4.0%) vs. 11 (9.4%) with ACDF (P>0.40). PEEK-on-ceramic TDR produced significantly improved outcomes maintained throughout 5-year follow-up, were similar or superior to ACDF, supporting TDR in appropriately selected patients.

Clinical Implementation of Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion: Addressing Market Access Challenges.

Background: The traditional open midline posterior cervical spine fusion procedure has several shortcomings. It can cause soft tissue damage, muscle atrophy, compromise of the lateral masses and painful prominent posterior cervical instrumentation or spinous process if there is dehiscence of the fascia. Additionally, patients frequently experience the rapid development of adjacent segment disease, which can result in the reemergence of debilitating pain and functional impairment. Clinical relevance: Tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion is an alternative method for treating patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. However, widespread clinical adoption has been challenged by ambiguity, misunderstandings and misinterpretations regarding appropriate procedural reimbursement coding. Technological advancement: The tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion procedure was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 (CORUS™ Spinal System and CAVUX® Facet Fixation System (CORUS/CAVUX); Providence™ Medical Technology). This technique addresses the concerns with traditional spine fusion methods by achieving the stability and outcomes of posterior cervical fusion without the morbidity associated with significant muscle stripping in the traditional approach. This technology uses specialized implants and instrumentation to perform all of the steps required to facilitate bone fusion and provide stability while minimizing tissue disruption. The technique involves extensive bone preparation for fusion and placement of specialized stabilization implants that span the facet joint, promoting natural bone growth and fusion while reducing the need for extensive exposure. This procedure provides an effective, less invasive solution for patients with cervical degenerative disc disease. Reimbursement and coding clarity: The article provides a comprehensive rationale for appropriate reimbursement coding for tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion. This is a critical aspect for the adoption and accessibility of medical technologies. This information is crucial for practitioners and healthcare administrators, ensuring that innovative procedures are accurately coded and reimbursed. Procedural details and clinical evidence: By detailing the procedural steps, instruments used and the physiological basis for the procedure, this article serves as a valuable educational resource for spine surgeons and payers to appropriately code for this procedure. Conclusions: The description of work for CORUS/CAVUX is equivalent to the current surgical standard of lateral mass screw fixation with decortication and onlay posterior grafting to facilitate posterior fusion. Thus, it is recommended that CPT codes 22600/22840 be used, as they best reflect the surgical approach, instrumentation, decortication, posterior cervical fusion and bone grafting procedures.

The Efficacy of Second-Generation Cervical Spine Arthroplasty: A 5-Year Perspective

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the surgical outcomes of second-generation cervical arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic cervical disc degeneration at approximately 5 years of follow-up.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent elective cervical spine arthroplasty at our institution with the use of a second-generation cervical prosthesis. The inclusion criteria were: (1) patients aged 25 to 50 years, (2) patients undergoing primary cervical surgery, (3) a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiological data were collected and analyzed for patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results: Thirty-seven patients were identified. The mean final follow-up was 75.1 months (range, 62.5–92.2 months). Statistically significant improvement was observed at the end of follow-up in the cervical disability index, neck pain, and radicular pain (p&lt;0.001). In total, 89.1% of patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied. During follow-up, 4 patients required reintervention, including 2 for adjacent segment syndrome, 1 for possible implant failure, and 1 for a prevertebral collection. The mean mobility of the operated segment at 5 years was 8.1 (standard deviation, 5.91). Additionally, radiologically, 1 patient exhibited heterotopic ossification, and 5 patients had asymptomatic adjacent segment syndrome.Conclusion: Promising outcomes are associated with second-generation cervical arthroplasty in the management of symptomatic cervical disc degeneration. The improvement in clinical scores, preservation of segmental mobility, and low incidence of complications such as heterotopic ossification and reintervention underscore the potential benefits of second-generation cervical arthroplasty.

Lumbar Disc Herniation—the Significance of Symptom Duration for the Indication for Surgery.

Lumbar disc surgery is among the more common spinal procedures. In this paper, we report the current treatment recommendations for patients with symptomatic disc herniation. This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed using the terms [timing] AND [lumbar disc herniation], supplemented by other relevant articles and guidelines. Symptoms resolve in 60% to 80% of patients with herniated discs in 6-12 weeks, and in 80% to 90% over the long term (≥ 1 year). According to the guidelines, 6-12 weeks of conservative treatment are recommended in the absence of significant neu - rologic deficits. Early surgery is indicated in case of worsening pain or new onset of neurologic deficits. Lumbar disc herniation associated bladder or bowel dysfunction (cauda equina syndrome) is considered an absolute surgical emergency that requires immediate decompression (within 24 to 48 hours). Patients with severe motor deficits (MRC ≤ 3/5) benefit from early intervention and should be offered surgery within three days, if possible, for the best chance of recovery. The degree of weakness and the duration of symptoms have been identified as risk factors for incomplete recovery. Early surgery can be considered in patients with mild paresis (MRC 4/5) in case of functional impairment (e.g., quadriceps paresis). Longer symptom duration and lower motor scores are associated with worse outcome and a lower chance of neurologic recovery. The recovery rate for motor deficits ranges from 33% to 75%, depending on the timing and modality of treatment as well as the motor score.

Endoscopic Versus Traditional Thoracic Discectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series and Meta-Analysis.

Surgical treatment for symptomatic thoracic disc herniations (TDH) involves invasive open surgical approaches with relatively high complication rates and prolonged hospital stays. Although advantages of full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) are well-established in lumbar disc herniations, data are limited for the endoscopic treatment of TDH despite potential benefits regarding surgical invasiveness. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of potential benefits of FESS for the treatment of TDH. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were systematically searched for the term "thoracic disc herniation" up to March 2023 and study quality appraised with a subsequent meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications, need for instrumentation, and reoperations. Simultaneously, we performed a multicenter retrospective evaluation of outcomes in patients undergoing full endoscopic thoracic discectomy. We identified 3190 patients from 108 studies for the traditional thoracic discectomy meta-analysis. Pooled incidence rates of complications were 25% (95% CI 0.22-0.29) for perioperative complications and 7% (95% CI 0.05-0.09) for reoperation. In this cohort, 37% (95% CI 0.26-0.49) of patients underwent instrumentation. The pooled mean for estimated blood loss for traditional approaches was 570 mL (95% CI 477.3-664.1) and 7.0 days (95% CI 5.91-8.14) for length of stay. For FESS, 41 patients from multiple institutions were retrospectively reviewed, perioperative complications were reported in 4 patients (9.7%), 4 (9.7%) required revision surgery, and 6 (14.6%) required instrumentation. Median blood loss was 5 mL (IQR 5-10), and length of stay was 0.43 days (IQR 0-1.23). The results suggest that full endoscopic thoracic discectomy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic TDH. When compared with open surgical approaches, FESS dramatically diminishes invasiveness, the rate of complications, and need for prolonged hospitalizations. Full endoscopic spine surgery has the capacity to alter the standard of care for TDH treatment toward an elective outpatient surgery.

New Axially Expandable Oblique Cage Designed for Anterior to Psoas (ATP) Approach: Indications-Surgical Technique and Clinical-Radiological Outcomes in Patients with Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease.

Background: Standard oblique cages cannot cover endplates side-to-side, which is an important biomechanical factor for reducing the risk of cage subsidence and for restoring correct segmental lordosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiological and clinical results of a new oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) axially expandable cage. Methods: This is a prospective observational case-control study. From March 2018 to June 2020, 28 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative disease underwent an ATP approach, with the insertion of a new axially expandable cage, which was used as a stand-alone procedure or followed by posterior percutaneous pedicle fixation. Results: Twenty-eight patients in both groups met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was 31.2 months (range of 13-37). The clinical results were not significantly different, although in the control group, two major intraoperative complications were recorded, and slight improvements in ODI and SF-36 scores were observed in the study group. The radiological results showed a less frequent incidence of subsidence and a higher rate of fusion in the study group compared to controls. Conclusions: The axially expandable oblique cage for lumbar inter body fusion, specifically designed for the ATP approach, represents an innovation and a technical improvement. The insertion and the axial expansion technique are safe and easy. The large footprint could obtain solid and effective arthrodesis, potentially reducing the risk of subsidence.

Allogeneic Disc Progenitor Cells Safely Increase Disc Volume and Improve Pain, Disability, and Quality of Life in Patients With Lumbar Disc Degeneration-Results of an FDA-Approved Biologic Therapy Randomized Clinical Trial.

Progenitor cells derived from intervertebral disc tissue demonstrated immunomodulatory and regenerative properties in preclinical studies. We report the safety and efficacy results of a US Food and Drug Administration-approved clinical trial of these cells for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Sixty patients with symptomatic single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease (mean age 37.9 years, 60% men) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase I/Phase II study at 13 clinical sites. They were randomized to receive single intradiscal injections of either low-dose cells (N = 20), high-dose cells (N = 20), vehicle alone (N = 10), or placebo (N = 10). The primary endpoint was mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain improvement >30% at 52 weeks. Disc volume was radiologically assessed. Adverse events (AEs), regardless of whether they were related to treatment, were reported. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 4, 12, 26, 52, 78, and 104 weeks posttreatment. At week 52, the high-dose group had a mean VAS percentage decrease from baseline (-62.8%, P = 0.0005), achieving the endpoint of back pain improvement >30%; the mean change was also significantly greater than the minimal clinically important difference of a 20-point decrease (-42.8, P = 0.001). This clinical improvement was maintained at week 104. The vehicle group had a smaller significant decrease in VAS (-52.8%, P = 0.044), while the low-dose and placebo groups showed nonsignificant improvements. Only the high-dose group had a significant change in disc volume, with mean increases of 249.0 mm3 (P = 0.028) at 52 weeks and 402.1 mm3 (P = 0.028) at 104 weeks. A minority of patients (18.3%) reported AEs that were severe. Overall, 6.7% of patients experienced serious AEs, all in the vehicle (n = 1) or placebo (n = 3) groups, none treatment related. High-dose allogeneic disc progenitor cells produced statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in back pain and disc volume at 1 year following a single intradiscal injection and were safe and well tolerated. These improvements were maintained at 2 years post-injection. NCT03347708-Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Injectable Disc Cell Therapy, a Treatment for Symptomatic Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Anterior cervical hybrid constructs reduce superior adjacent segment burden compared to multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Traditional surgical treatment for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet the increased risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) requiring additional surgery exists and may result in limiting long-term surgical success when it occurs. Disc arthroplasty can preserve or restore physiologic range of motion (ROM), decreasing adjacent level stress and subsequent surgery. For patients with multilevel pathology requiring at least a 1-level fusion, interest is growing in anterior cervical hybrid (ACH) surgery as a partial motion-preserving procedure to decrease the adjacent level burden. This radiographic study compares postoperative superior adjacent segment motion between ACH and ACDF. Secondarily, total global motion, construct motion, inferior adjacent segment motion, and sagittal alignment parameters were compared. This is a single-center, multi-surgeon, retrospective cohort study of 2- and 3-level ACH and ACDF cases between 2013 and 2021. Degrees of motion were analyzed on flexion/extension views using Cobb angles to measure global (C2-C7) construct and adjacent segment lordosis. Neutral lateral X-rays were analyzed for alignment parameters, including global lordosis, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and T1 slope (T1S). Differences were determined by independent t-test and Fisher's exact test. Of 100 patients, 38% were 2-level cases (47% ACH, 53% ACDF) and 62% were 3-level cases: (52% ACH, 48% ACDF). Postoperatively, superior adjacent segment motion increased with ACDF and decreased with ACH (-1.3°±5.3° ACH, 1.6°±4.6° ACDF, P=0.005). Postoperatively, the ACH group had greater ROM across the construct (16.3°±8.7° ACH, 4.7°±3.3° ACDF, P<0.001) and total global ROM (38.0°±12.8° ACH, 28.0°±11.1° ACDF, P<0.001). ACH resulted in a significant reduction of motion loss across the construct (-10.0°±11.7° ACH, -18.1°±10.8° ACDF, P<0.001). Postoperative alignment restoration was similar between both cohorts (-2.61°±8.36° ACH, 0.04°±12.24° ACDF, P=0.21). Compared to ACDF, hybrid constructs partially preserved motion across operative levels and had greater postoperative global ROM without increasing superior adjacent segment mobility or sacrificing alignment restoration. This supports the consideration of ACH in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical pathology requiring at least a 1-level fusion and suggests a propensity for long-term success by reducing the superior adjacent segment burden.

Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients with Long-term Follow-up.

This was a retrospective study combined with attempted prospective patient contact to collect current data. The purpose of this study was to investigate long-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing lumbar hybrid surgery (total disc replacement (TDR) at one level and fusion at an adjacent level. Many patients with symptomatic lumbar disc degeneration are affected at more than one level. Lumbar TDR was introduced as a fusion alternative; however, some disc levels are not amenable to TDR and fusion is preferable at such levels. Hybrid surgery was introduced as an option to fusing multiple levels. A consecutive series of 305 patients undergoing lumbar hybrid surgery was identified beginning with the first case experience in 2005. Operative and clinical outcome data including visual analog scales (VAS) assessing back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and re-operations were collected. The mean follow-up duration was 67.1 months. There were statistically significant improvements (P<0.01) in the mean values of all three clinical outcome measures: VAS back pain scores improved from 6.7 to 3.3; leg pain improved from 4.3 to 2.0; and ODI scores improved from 45.5 to 24.6. There were no significant differences in pain and function scores for patients with minimum 10-year follow-up vs. those with shorter follow-up duration. Re-operation occurred in 16.1% of patients, many of which involved removal of posterior instrumentation at the fusion level (6.2% of study group, 38.8% of re-operations). Re-operation involving the TDR level occurred in 9 patients (2.9%), only 3 of which (1.0%) involved TDR removal/revision. This study supports that for many patients with multilevel symptomatic disc degeneration, hybrid surgery is a viable surgical option. Significant improvements were demonstrated in pain and function scores with no diminished improvement in scores among patients with more than 10-year follow-up.

Surgical options in thoracic disc herniation: Evaluating long-term outcomes of 21 cases based on a single-center 10-year experience.

Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is a rare pathology that is addressed with relatively challenging surgical approaches, the choice and technical execution of which have been well described in the literature. Interestingly, long-term outcomes, including surgical site pain-related disability, the need for instrumentation, and commonly occurring complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-pleural fistula have not been widely addressed. Here, we address the complication profiles and long-term outcomes of different surgical approaches for TDH. We conducted a retrospective review of 21 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for TDH between 2000 and 2010. We assessed post-operative complications such as CSF-pleural fistulas, as well as long-term outcomes using Frankel grades, the EQ-5D-3L, and the Visual Analog Scale. We also looked at the need for instrumentation postoperatively. 21 consecutive patients (13 females, 8 males) with a mean age of 55.3 years (Standard deviation 8.1) underwent thoracic discectomy for symptomatic TDH. Surgical approaches included posterolateral thoracotomy (52%, n = 11), costotransversectomy (43%, n = 9), and transpedicular (5%, n = 1). Herniations were classified as soft (38%, n = 8), calcified (38%, n = 8), or calcified-transdural (24%, n = 5). Postoperatively, all patients with calcifiedtransdural herniations undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy (100%, n = 5) developed CSF-pleural fistulas, which resolved spontaneously without the need for surgical re-exploration. 89% (n = 16) of patients exhibited sustained improvement in Frankel scores. Persistent wound site pain was reported by 50% (n = 7) of patients. Despite favorable neurological outcomes, patients with symptomatic TDHs can experience long-term surgical site pain, and therefore, a move toward minimally invasive exposure in such cases should be considered. Postoperative complications such as CSF-pleural fistulas are unlikely to require surgical intervention and thus can be managed conservatively.

Altered serum cytokines in patients with symptomatic disk herniation and depressive symptoms.

An increasing number of studies have indicated the important role of cytokines in the development of depressive disturbances (DD). In medically ill patients, cytokines can provoked sickness behavior, the signs of which resemble DD. This results in alterations in behavior to limit energy expenditure and redirect it to cope with particular diseases. The aim of our study was to investigate the role of pro-inflammatory IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β and anti-inflammatory IL-10 and TGF-β in DD observed in patients suffering from pain caused by disk herniation (DH) qualified for surgery. The intensity of DD assessed by using Beck Depression Inventory, pain intensity, and functional impairment were evaluated in 70 patients with DH who were qualified for surgery. Pro-inflammatory serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, anti-inflammatory TGF-β, and IL-10 were measured. Elevated serum levels of TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-6 were found in the group with moderate and severe depressive symptoms (SD) compared with the groups with mild (MD) or no depressive symptoms (ND). TGF-β levels were negatively correlated with pain intensity, as assessed using the Present Pain Intensity scale in SD. Functional impairment measured using the Oswestry Disability Index was the most advanced in SD group. Results of our study can suggest association between depressive disturbances and anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β and IL-10. Functional impairment of SD group is more severe but serum levels of TGF-β and IL-10, which are involved in the healing processes, are increased.

Comparison of Cervical Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients with Symptomatic Cervical Disc Herniation.

Background: We aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of cervical biportal endoscopic spine surgery (C-BESS) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with symptomatic cervical disc herniation. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of four-year clinical data involving 318 cases of symptomatic cervical disc herniation, with 156 patients undergoing the ACDF and 162 patients receiving the C-BESS. Preoperative and postoperative one-year data were collected. Results: The numeric rating scale and neck disability index showed statistically significant improvement for both ACDF and C-BESS groups. While showing a longer operation time and more blood loss during surgery compared to the ACDF group, the C-BESS group demonstrated a learning effect as the surgeon's proficiency increased with more cases. There was no significant difference in the postoperative length of hospitalization between the two methods. The subgroup with predominant arm pain revealed the statistical difference in arm pain intensity changes between the two groups (p < 0.001). The rates of complication were 2.6% for the ACDF group and 1.9% for the C-BESS group. Conclusions: C-BESS and ACDF are effective surgical treatments for patients with symptomatic single-level cervical disc herniation in relieving relevant pain intensities and pain-related disabilities.

Endoscopic decompression of the spinal canal in symptomatic thoracic disc disease. A case report

The risk of disc herniation in the thoracic spine is much less common than in cervical and lumbar segments. It occurs in about 0.25 to 0.75% of reported cases [1]. Osteoarthritis of the intervertebral disc is most common between 30 and 50 years of age. Unlike in the case of disc herniation of the cervical spine, classic anterior access to the spinal canal is not possible due to the vascular structures of the thorax. A modified posterior approach similar to procedures applied in the area of the lumbar spine, is used to decompress discopathy i.e., a hernia located laterally. An important problem, however, is hernias that compress the spinal cord anteriorly. We present a case report of endoscopic decompression of the thoracic spine in the course of central disc herniation from the posterior approach using the unilateral bi-portal technique (UBE).

Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided Posterolateral Thoracic Discectomy: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Symptomatic thoracic disk herniations can be challenging to treat. Various surgical approaches have been reported in the literature, but the ideal approach is still a topic of controversy. We present a step-by-step surgical video highlighting the utilization of continuous, real-time intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) guidance for thoracic discectomy through a posterolateral approach. The background and rationale for the procedure and a detailed presentation of the sequence of surgical steps are detailed in the operative video. We believe that real-time IOUS can be used not only to gain an understanding of the ventral anatomy and to verify decompression after discectomy but it can also be used in a real-time fashion to guide the maneuvers for discectomy itself. Advantages of using real-time IOUS include real-time monitoring of the spinal cord during mobilization of the disk-osteophyte complex and direct visualization of the dura-disk herniation interface, which may enhance the safety of surgery. The patient consented to the procedure and the publication of her image.

Is the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Justified During Lumbar Anterior Approach Surgery?

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) became widely used in spine surgery to reduce the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury. However, the proliferation of IONM has fallen into question based on effectiveness and costs, with a lack of evidence supporting its benefit for specific spine surgery procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of IONM and the rate of neurological injury associated with anterior lumbar spinal surgery. This was a retrospective study on a consecutive series of 359 patients undergoing lumbar anterior approach surgery for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), total disc replacement (TDR), or hybrid (ALIF with TDR) for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. Patients undergoing any posterior spine surgery were excluded. Operative notes were reviewed to identify any changes in IONM and the surgeon's response. Clinic notes were reviewed up to 3 months postoperatively for indications of iatrogenic nerve injury. There were 3 aberrant results with respect to IONM. Changes in IONM of a lower extremity occurred for 1 patient (0.3%). The surgeon evaluated the situation and there was no observable reason for the IONM change. Upon waking, the patient was found to have no neurological deficit. There were 2 cases of neurologic deficits in this population, which were classified as false-negatives of IONM (0.56%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 1.8%). In both cases, the patients were found to have a foot drop after the anterior approach surgery. In this study, there was 1 false-positive and 2 false-negative results of IONM. These data suggest that IONM is not beneficial in this population. However, many surgeons may feel obligated to use IONM for medicolegal reasons. There is a need for future studies to delineate cases in which IONM is beneficial and the type of monitoring to use, if any, for specific spine surgery types. This study questions the routine use of IONM in anterior lumbar approach surgery for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. This has significant implications related to the cost of this practice.

Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Adjacent Segment Disease: Implications following Spinal Fusion Surgery

Spinal fusion is a common and effective option for patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disorders. However, concerns have raised over the probability of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDe) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi) following spinal instrumentation. Current study sought to document evidence on the incidence of ASDe and ASDi after lumbar fusion surgery and the risk factors precipitating adjacent pathologies. Given the benefits of spinal fusion surgery, it remains unclear whether adjacent pathologies are attributed to the natural degeneration or the adjacent fusion.

Cervical Disc Displacement in Military Pilots.

Cervical disc displacement (CDD) may disqualify pilots from flying and have a profound impact on military unit capability. The objective of this retrospective database review is to characterize the incidence and demographic predictors of symptomatic cervical spine disc displacement in pilots of fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft and ground-based controls. The Defense Military Epidemiology Database was queried for first-occurrence ICD-9 code 722.0: CDD cases from 2007 to 2015. Injury count rates among aircraft groups and overall incidence per 1,000 person-years were calculated and standardized for age, gender, and military rank, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared to determine significance. There were 934 new cases of CDD among active duty U.S. Military pilots during the study period. The overall incidence of CDD in all pilots during this time frame was 2.715 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 2.603-2.830). Helicopter pilots had a significantly higher incidence compared to all other aircraft pilots and crew at 3.79 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 3.48-4.13). This finding remained statistically significant after standardizing for age, gender, and rank. Among all military officers, increasing age was a risk factor for CDD. The U.S. Military helicopter pilots have an increased risk compared to fixed-wing pilots and non-pilot controls. CDD remains a rare, though career-threatening, condition. Increased education and awareness training are warranted for both helicopter pilots and flight physicians to recognize signs and symptoms of cervical pathology. Continued investigations into preventive measures to minimize injury and time unfit for flight are warranted.

The Contemporary Management of Temporomandibular Joint Intra-Articular Pain and Dysfunction

The understanding of the causes of temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction has evolved over 50years. Historically, the term internal derangement has been used to describe the abnormal relationship between the articular disc, condyle, and glenoid fossa, which was thought to correlate with patient symptoms. It is now known that the pathophysiology of intra-articular pain and dysfunction (IPD) involves synovitis, capsular impingement, symptomatic disc displacement, or a combination of these. Symptomatic disc displacement should only be considered to be a potential source of IPD after synovitis and capsular impingement have been treated. This philosophy provides the opportunity for most patients with IPD to be initially treated nonsurgically or with minimally invasive procedures such as arthrocentesis or arthroscopy.

A comparative and prospective study of surgical outcomes of cervical artificial disc to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease of cervical spine in a tertiary care center of Eastern India

Background: Cervical disc degeneration is known to be a primary cause of neck pain and neurologic symptoms and can cause significant morbidity. Degeneration can be related to radiculopathy or myelopathy due to compression of spinal nerves and/or spinal cord. Disc pathology may manifest clinically as localized and radicular pain, myelopathy, and spinal joint instability. If severe, such as in degenerative disc disease, infections, and trauma, surgical methods are indicated. Some studies reported that compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical artificial disc (CAD) could provide better neurological outcomes and reduce the rate of adjacent segment degeneration, whereas other studies reported no difference between the two procedures. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of CAD to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in cervical spine. Materials and Methods: It was a comparative study with prospective design conducted among 40 symptomatic cervical disc degenerative disease patients (20 patients undergoing CAD and the remaining 20 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) at the Department of Neurosurgery, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, 1PGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, from January 2021 to December 2022. Respective surgical procedures were done. All patients were required to return for follow-up. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed at 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, postoperatively, and last follow-up (more than 18 months). Clinical effectiveness was evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score (17 points system, 1994 revised edition), and neck disability index (NDI) score. Results: Improvement in NDI, VAS, and JOA index was found to be more in CAD as compared to ACDF group with a statistically significant difference as P&lt;0.05. Subsequent surgical intervention was reported among four subjects, out of which one belonged to the CAD group while the rest three to ACDF. Overall success was found to be more in the CAD group (75%) as compared to the ACDF group (55%), though no significant difference was revealed as P&gt;0.05. Conclusion: The findings of the present study support the superior longevity and better outcome of CDA, as compared with ACDF, with regard to need for subsequent surgical intervention and also support better improvement in symptoms in subsequent follow-up in patients undergoing CDA as compared to ACDF despite having comparable mean operative time and blood loss.