Surgical Safety Checklist Research Articles

Structures, processes and outcomes between first referral and referral hospitals in low-income and middle-income countries: a secondary preplanned analysis of the FALCON and ChEETAh randomised trials

First referral hospitals, often known as district hospitals, are neglected in the discourse on universal health coverage in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, these hospitals are important for delivering...

The WHO surgical safety checklist for cesarean section in an Ethiopian teaching hospital: a prospective cross-sectional study

Background: Implementing the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is crucial for preventing post-surgical complications, including surgical site infections, in low-resource settings such as Ethiopia. The country has the lowest measured rate of safe surgery worldwide, with a significant unmet need for safe and affordable surgical care. The WHO checklist can improve maternal health equity by enhancing surgical and obstetric care safety, ultimately improving maternal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Objective: This study aimed to assess the compliance, completeness, and determinants of using the WHO’s Surgical Safety Checklist during cesarean section (CS). Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of a large tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Primary data were collected from observations of clinical interactions in the obstetrics operating room (OR) during CSs. The rates of performing the checklist and completing each section were analyzed. Results: Of 250 observed CSs, 26.4% were elective, and 73.6% were emergency procedures. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 45 years, with a median age of 28. The overall compliance rate for the WHO surgical safety checklist was 98%, with 100% compliance for elective procedures and 97.2% for emergency procedures. The completeness rates for sign-in, time-out, and sign-out were 80.1%, 66.4%, and 45.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The study revealed high compliance but low completeness rates for the surgical safety checklist during CS. A noticeable distinction was observed, with elective procedures exhibiting superior compliance and completeness rates compared to emergency procedures. This could be attributed to the sense of urgency and limitations in available time.

Patient Readiness for Surgery: A Quality Improvement Initiative

ABSTRACTThe use of a surgical safety checklist can help prevent sentinel events; however, a lack of adherence to the checklist can result in inadequate preoperative patient readiness and negative outcomes. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to address preoperative concerns that prevent patient readiness in a military hospital. To change practice, the project involved the use of an evidence‐based practice model and Kurt Lewin's change theory. The primary investigator provided an educational initiative on the required checklist for perioperative personnel and collected data on key elements (ie, consent completion, laboratory test results, antibiotic availability, checklist completion) for 30 days after the initiative. Consent completion rates were 100% both before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis (chi‐square [χ2]) showed significant improvement for the remaining three elements. The results were the most significant for laboratory test results (χ21 = 33.496, P < .00001).

Development of the scoliosis research society spinal deformity surgery safety checklist.

Spine deformity surgery is a complex multi-step procedure that has a relatively high complication rate. The use of surgical safety checklists has been shown to reduce perioperative adverse events, but existing lists are varied and non-specific for spinal deformity surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive surgical checklist for complex spinal corrective surgery. An electronic survey consisting of 187 surgical checklist items that had been developed and used by a group of SRS members over a 5-year period was distributed to the Scoliosis Research Society Safety and Value Committee membership. The survey sections included: (1) pre-operative area, (2) initial operating room visit, (3) before turning, (4) positioning, (5) prepare and drape, (6) pre-incision timeout, (7) intraoperative, (8) finishing implant placement and confirming imaging, (9) final rods and locking, (10) prior to closure, (11) closure, (12) turn to supine, and (13) checkout/debriefing. Respondents graded each item on a five-point Likert scale based on their perceived importance and feasibility for inclusion in the checklist. Features graded as "moderately important" or "very important" to include by at least 70% of respondents were considered to meet the cutoff for inclusion-based standard Delphi practices. Study data were collated using REDCap. A total of 25 surgeons completed the survey in its entirety. The overall checklist "package" was shortened to 9 individual checklist modules, with 2 to 16 items per checklist. In terms of individual checklist items, 40% of items (74 of 187) met the cutoff for inclusion; 17 of these items were graded as "very important," which included verifying the presence of implantable devices, reviewing the surgical plan and positioning with the surgical staff, securing the endotracheal tube, bite block confirmation, prone and lateral positioning, neuromonitoring baseline readings, double-checking that the implant screw caps were locked prior to closure, and confirming that the patient was moving bilateral lower extremities before leaving the operating room when possible. This study has led to the development of a specific spinal deformity surgical checklist of 74 (many specific to spine surgery) items that were considered important for inclusion; 17 were considered "very important".

Assessing use of the WHO surgical safety checklist for pediatric surgery in Senegal: A nationwide survey

Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the surgical safety checklist (SSC) to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality; however, its use in low- and middle-income countries is still low. Methods We conducted a survey from January 2 to 22, 2024, in public hospitals’ pediatric surgery departments and units in Senegal to assess the use of the WHO SSC or an adapted version. Results The participation rate was 100% (23 hospitals), with 11 second-level hospitals (47.8%) and 10 (43.5%) having at least two pediatric surgeons. All hospitals had an anesthetist nurse, and 18 hospitals (78.3%) had at least two scrub nurses. For the surgical workload, 14 hospitals (60.9%) had five to 10 surgical interventions weekly. Eleven hospitals (47.8%) had training on use of the SSC, and 8 of the 23 hospitals (34.8%) used the SSC. The WHO SSC nonutilization was mainly due to a lack of training in nine hospitals (60%) and SSC unavailability in five hospitals (33.3%). Members of 22 hospitals (95.6%) were available for training on use of the SSC. Conclusion The WHO SSC is poorly used in pediatric operating rooms of public hospitals in Senegal. The main reasons for nonutilization are remediable.

The association between surgical complications and compliance to the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: A retrospective analysis of hospital records.

The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), now used by healthcare providers worldwide, has proved to be useful in the improvement of patients' health through the reduction of mortality and morbidity after surgery. In the Emilia-Romagna region in Italy the SSC is accompanied by a document that registers any non-conformity (NC) identified during SSC completion. This study aimed to investigate the association between surgical complications and checklist compliance, in terms of incompleteness and presence of NCs, using data from the Modena Local Health Unit (LHU). We used data from surgeries performed in the Modena LHU between 2018 and 2022, with their SSC and related NC document. We estimated relative risks (RRs) of complications fitting three modified Poisson regression models. Model 1 included checklist incompleteness and NC presence, Model 2 adjusted Model 1 for patients' sex and age group, and Model 3 adjusted Model 2 for the other potential confounders. We also performed a sensitivity analysis estimating the same three models including death outcomes as complications. We found an increased risk of complications for both checklist incompleteness (unadjusted RR [uRR]= 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17 to 3.54) and presence of NCs (uRR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.71 to 3.22). Results were consistent after adjustment and in the sensitivity analysis. Improving checklist compliance can reduce the risk of surgical complications. In particular, NCs are a risk factor that must be further investigated to better understand their relationship with complications. We believe that NCs data recording is helpful for both researchers in the scope of surgical complications, and healthcare professionals in the operating room.

Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in resource-limited Somalia: a new standard in surgical safety

BackgroundSurgical safety remains a critical global health concern, with complications from surgical procedures resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been shown to reduce surgical complications and mortality rates. However, its implementation and impact in resource-limited settings like Somalia remain understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the WHO SSC in selected hospitals in Mogadishu, Somalia, and assess its impact on surgical safety practices.MethodsA pre- and post-intervention study was conducted in 15 randomly selected hospitals in Mogadishu, Somalia. The intervention involved a comprehensive training program on the WHO SSC for surgical teams. Data on hospital characteristics, surgical details, and adherence to the SSC were collected over two periods: pre-intervention (April 12th to May 4th, 2024) and post-intervention (May 12th to June 3rd, 2024). The primary outcome was the adherence to the SSC, categorized as good (> 60%) or poor (≤ 60%). Descriptive statistics, McNemar’s test, and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis.ResultsAdherence to the WHO SSC significantly improved post-intervention, with 98.8% of surgical cases demonstrating good adherence compared to 37% pre-intervention (p < 0.001). The mean adherence score increased from 51.6% (SD = 29.6) to 94.1% (SD = 8.2). Significant improvements were observed for most individual checklist items, including patient identity confirmation, surgical site marking, anesthesia machine checks, and pulse oximeter use (p < 0.001). Team dynamics and communication also improved significantly post-intervention. Hospital type, size, years of service, funding source, surgical department, surgery type, urgency, and staff numbers were associated with checklist adherence pre-intervention.ConclusionThe implementation of a comprehensive training intervention significantly improved adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in resource-limited hospitals in Mogadishu, Somalia. The findings highlight the feasibility and effectiveness of the SSC in enhancing surgical safety practices, team communication, and patient outcomes in challenging healthcare environments. Tailored implementation strategies, ongoing training, and cultural adaptation are crucial for the successful adoption of the SSC in resource-constrained settings.

The Role of WHO Surgical Checklists in Reducing Postoperative Adverse Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Surgical safety remains a critical aspect of modern healthcare, particularly as the number of surgical procedures continues to rise, placing greater demands on resources and increasing the potential for errors. In response to this challenge, various mitigation strategies have been implemented to improve operative outcomes. One such strategy, introduced by the WHO in 2008, is the Surgical Safety Checklist. Despite its widespread adoption globally, its acceptance remains limited in developing countries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, specifically the sign-in, time-out, and sign-out components, on reducing post-operative adverse effects in surgical patients. A single-step search strategy was employed across multiple databases, including Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Database, ProQuest, Index Copernicus, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Additionally, reference lists of identified reports and articles were manually searched to identify further relevant studies. Only studies published in English before September 2022 that focused exclusively on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist were included. Studies on other checklists or those with confounding factors, such as international surgical outcomes studies, were excluded from this analysis. After screening 17,821 publications based on their titles and abstracts, 93 studies met the initial inclusion criteria and underwent full retrieval and assessment for methodological quality. Ultimately, 13 studies were deemed of sufficient quality to be included in the review. Among these, 10 studies reported outcomes related to complication rates, with nine of them demonstrating a decrease in complication rates following checklist implementation. Similarly, 13 studies reported outcomes related to mortality rates, with 12 reporting a decrease in mortality rates associated with checklist use. In conclusion, the application of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has been shown to improve surgical outcomes by reducing post-operative adverse effects, including mortality and complication rates. However, further research is warranted to assess the checklist's impact on the quality of life of surgical patients, which would contribute to enhancing its overall acceptability. Continued investigation into these areas will help further strengthen the evidence supporting the widespread adoption and effective implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist across diverse healthcare settings globally.

The impact of human factors on veterinary anaesthesia

Human factors are an evidence-based science that consider how external factors and personal circumstances influence work behaviours and the reasons why events happen. It has been frequently studied in professions where mistakes can have disastrous consequences, such as aviation and human medicine, and is now becoming more considered in veterinary medicine. Understanding how human factors influence the safe delivery of anaesthesia means more safety measures can be put in place for both the wellbeing of patients and veterinary staff. These measures include surgical safety checklists, open communication between colleagues and the use of adverse event reporting platforms.

Perioperative mortality of caesarean section in North-West Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study

ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess 7-day perioperative maternal mortality and risk factors at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital.DesignA single-centre prospective cohort study.SettingA tertiary hospital in North-West Ethiopia, 01 June 2019 to...

Evaluating the Impact of the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist on Clinical Outcomes and Implementation Strategies: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review evaluates the impact and implementation strategies of the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) across diverse healthcare settings since its introduction in 2008. Our comprehensive analysis synthesizes findings from various study designs, including randomized controlled trials, qualitative studies, and meta-analyses, focusing on the checklist's effectiveness in reducing surgical complications and enhancing safety cultures within surgical teams. Despite its widespread endorsement and documented benefits, the review highlights significant variability in implementation quality and adherence, influenced by cultural, institutional, and procedural factors. The findings suggest that optimized adaptation and contextual application of the WHO SSC are crucial for maximizing its clinical benefits, particularly in low-resource settings. This review not only confirms the checklist's efficacy in improving surgical outcomes but also underscores the need for evidence-based strategies to enhance its global implementation and effectiveness.

WHO Surgical Safety Checklist compliance rate at a large tertiary hospital in Vietnam.

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has been instrumental in reducing surgical deaths by 47% globally since its inception in 2009. A study was conducted to assess the compliance of hospital staff with the Surgical Safety Checklist and identify potential barriers to its implementation at a large tertiary public hospital in Vietnam. The study analysed 135 surgical cases between February and September 2021 using the Pareto principle with eight error categories, including (1) patient identification, (2) equipment, (3) risk management, (4) blood loss, (5) allergy, (6) items left inside the patient, (7) surgical specimens and (8) patient safety and recovery management. Compliance with the Surgical Safety Checklist was between 77% and 93%, with five categories accounting for more than 80% of errors. Periodic monitoring and staff training can improve compliance and help reduce errors for better patient safety. Long-term solutions addressing infrastructure challenges are also crucial.

EP335 - Audit of the Use of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and its Awareness, Perception and Acceptability Amongst Theatre Personnel in a Tertiary Hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract Aims The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) was developed to prevent perioperative adverse events. This study aimed to assess the utilization of the SSC and evaluate awareness and acceptability among theatre staff at a tertiary centre in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods We conducted a prospective audit of the SSC utilization during elective and emergency surgery, and a survey of awareness, perception and acceptability amongst theatre personnel (nurses, surgeons and anaesthetists) using a 15-item self-administered questionnaire between May 2022 and January 2023. Results 117 surgeries were observed for compliance with SSC and 81 theatre personnel took part in the survey. The checklist was used in 52.1% of all surgeries, 80% and 5.4% of major and minor surgeries respectively. In Time Out phase, activities were stopped in 23% of cases, and scrub nurses were asked relevant questions 31-47% of the time. Sign Out was the least completed phase. Three of five questions were asked 23-48% of the time. 28% of respondents who previously witnessed adverse events agreed that they could have been prevented by proper implementation of the SSC. 65.4% of members of the surgical team had not had any formal training on the SSC. There was no difference in its awareness, perception and acceptability based on profession of the respondents. Conclusion SSC was not fully utilized during the audit period. Lack of formal training may be contributory. There is broad awareness of SSC and its ability to prevent advert events. Key words: WHO, Surgical Safety Checklist, Awareness

FP6.10 - Improving Compliance &amp; Implementation of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist At a Tertiary Level Hospital in India: A continuous process

Abstract Aim To complete an audit on the level of compliance with the WHO surgical safety checklist in surgical operating theatres at a Tertiary level hospital in India. Method A total of 40 general surgeries were observed at the operating theatres at a tertiary-level hospital in India to confirm the practice of the WHO surgical safety checklist. The study was conducted for 1 month in September 2021. The results were compared with standard guidelines and further analyzed. Interventions were carried out through a series of rigorous departmental meetings and discussions with the medical and nursing staff. A re-audit was conducted. Results Of all the operations audited, 45% Sign-In and only 1% Sign-Out were performed in the first cycle. After the re-audit, a significant change was reported as the Sign-In improved to 80%, and a 55% Sign-Out was conducted. The Time-Out was observed to increase from 15% to 65%. Compliance in the final third cycle showed improvement in Sign-In at 95%, Sign-Out at 85%, and Time-Out at 90%. Conclusion Though in the first cycle of our audit, the compliance to the SSCL was found to be suboptimal, significant improvement was demonstrated in the second cycle and eventually in the final third cycle bringing it closer to 100% compliance, after rigorous awareness programs and training sessions. Compliance with all items in the checklist and active participation by all medical and nursing staff is mandatory for the successful implementation of the Surgical safety checklist.

A Knowledge Assessment of the Surgical Safety Checklist among Operating Room Nurses in Malaysia

Surgical complications present a significant challenge worldwide. To address this issue, the World Health Organisation (WHO) introduced the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) as a means to decrease complications and fatalities during surgery. Nurses play a critical role in ensuring patient safety throughout the operation. A clear understanding of the checklist promotes effective communication within the surgical team, fosters a safety culture, and reduces complications. However, limited research has been conducted in accessing knowledge of operating room (OR) nurses regarding SSC, especially in the context of Malaysian healthcare. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the level of knowledge of SSC among OR nurses in Malaysia. A quantitative approach with a descriptive design was used, involving ninety (90) OR nurses from Sultan Ahmad Shah Medical Centre (SASMEC@IIUM). The nurses completed a self-administered questionnaire and the results revealed good knowledge of the preoperative phase checklist (68.9%), intraoperative phase checklist (73.3%), and postoperative phase checklist (77.8%). However, a minority of nurses (around 20–30% across three different phases) needed improvement. This study suggests that the SSC has been effectively implemented at SASMEC@IIUM. However, it also emphasises the importance of ongoing education to ensure that all nurses have a thorough understanding of the checklist.

226. PHILOSOPHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SURGICAL INNOVATION

Abstract Background Innovation in surgery has been viewed as synonymous with progress. This is not always the case as many new innovative processes, devices and techniques do not yield same results in "real world" as they do in the experimental stage. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the role of philosophical experiment in the process of appraisal of surgical innovation. Methods A thought experiment was conducted analysing past surgical innovations. Introduction of electrosurgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, surgical safety checklist and laparoscopic aortic aneurysm repair were tested. All consequences (known and hypothetical) of these innovations were considered in attempt to establish a more holistic metric of success. Results Significant limitations exist in the current assessment methods of innovation "success" which is commonly defined based on the results of a study of chosen pre-set metrics (main outcome). The utility of key metric used to assess innovation (e.g. lengths of hospital stay or visual pain scores) is limited by the choice of these outcomes. This reduces the changes of detecting rate, but possibly, much more significant unintended effects both advantageous and harmful (e.g. discovery of insulin vs thalidomide). The magnitude of detectable change is dictated by practicality of powering controlled studies and exposes results to the sensitivity bias. Unanticipated effects of the innovation are frequently not discovered until it is adopted on a large scale. Various outcomes of innovation are non-commensurable and further complicate the definition of "success". A novel innovation outcome assessment process is proposed: net global utility, a composite outcome measure which considers all potential effects of innovation (clinical, social, economic, ethical and other). Net global utility is a subjective measure that allows observer to compare non-commensurable values by not using them in isolation. One of the main advantages of net global utility is that it only requires knowledge of available metrics and principles of logical argument, providing an easy assessment tool to boost local oversight of introduction of innovation and policy-making. It includes calculation of risk (probability x consequence) which allows to account for improbable but highly consequential outcomes. Net global utility is compared to the best available alternative and derives internal face validity from this. Net global utility encompasses potential incidental future benefits as well as assessment of innovation against the test of justice. Conclusion Defining success in surgical innovation can be challenging. The use of thought experiment and logical argument is described to introduce a novel metric "net global utility" allowing for composite assessment of innovation success. Various previous surgical innovations used to demonstrate the application of the net global utility.

A crucial step towards a safer healthcare system: Embracing the WHO surgery checklist in Pakistan.

Mistakes happen. We all make mistakes that makes us human. But when a surgeon makes mistake, it costs lives. Being surgeon, a little negligence might make catastrophic incidents happen. An unintentionally retained needle in the abdominal cavity or surgery of a normal limb instead of faulty gall bladder can have serious consequences not only for the patient and the patient-physician relation but also for the healthcare system. Such negligence events have become common in Pakistan. In Faisalabad, it was reported that a patient with gall stones was mixed up with a patient of limb surgery having the same name that led to inappropriate surgical procedures performed on both.[1] In Abbottabad, an incident was reported where the patient had to undergo an arm surgery but an eye surgery was performed in a private hospital. [2] Everyone blamed the surgeon and the health care system but no one dared to dig into the cause. Why are such childish mistakes happening? And if happened once how is this being repeated? How could a surgeon, a practically learned man make such non-sense? The answer to all these questions lies in the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. “Safe Surgery Save Lives” was initiated by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2007 in order to alleviate the number of such unwanted events encountered in the surgical procedures. For the purpose of improving patient safety with least of the resource utilization, WHO came on board with safety checklist in 2008.[3] The WHO 19-item checklist is based on advocating safety checks and a good communication among surgery team members during perioperative periods. It also contains a time-out procedure. In Pakistan, in spite of the great effectiveness, the time-out is either not practiced or is done by some junior, and not by the operating surgeon at the preoperative time. A time-out is a short interval before incision during which it is confirmed that the patient on the surgery bed is the correct one, the procedure to be performed on it is exact and at the required part of body either marked or unmarked.[4] The surgeon should be present at the time-out and all members should guarantee the correct patient, procedure and site. Patient participation in the time-out process is also advised. Majority of the patients show great compliance and satisfaction for participating in the time-out procedure. ---Continue

Impact of team performance on the surgical safety checklist on patient outcomes: an operating room black box analysis.

Surgical safety checklists reduce adverse events, but monitoring adherence to checklists is confounded by observation bias. The ORBB platform can monitor checklist compliance and correlate compliance with outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the association between checklist compliance and patient outcomes using the ORBB platform. This is a retrospective analysis of data from the electronic medical record of cases performed in ORBB-equipped operating rooms at a single quaternary referral center. All patients who did not opt out and underwent surgery at UT Southwestern Medical Center in ORBB-equipped rooms from August 2020 to September 2022 were included. The ORBB platform was set-up in five operating rooms and surgical safety checklist compliance was monitored by way of AI-based video review. Overall, 4581 patients were included in this analysis.. Performance on the checklist was associated with lower mortality (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98; P < 0.05), and decreased length of stay (estimate [E]: -0.02days; 95% CI, -0.03 to -0.005; P < 0.05). Performance during "timeouts" was associated with mortality (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P < 0.05). "Debriefings" were independently associated with mortality (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99; P < 0.05), length of stay (Estimate, -0.0009days; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.001; P < 0.05), and ICU admission (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P < 0.05). Procedures performed by surgical teams who performed better on the surgical safety checklist tended to have better outcomes. This innovative technology could substantially enhance our ability to understand and mitigate threats to patients in real-time.

Implementation of the TALK© clinical self-debriefing tool in operating theatres: a single-centre interventional study

BackgroundDebriefing in operating theatre environments leads to benefits in mortality, efficiency, productivity, and safety culture; however, it is still not regularly performed. TALK© is a simple and widely applicable team self-debriefing method to collaboratively learn and improve. MethodsAn interventional study introducing TALK© for voluntary clinical debriefing was carried out in operating theatre environments in a UK National Health Service hospital over 18 months. It explored compliance with the Five Steps to Safer Surgery and changes in behaviour in surgical teams regarding consideration and completion of debriefing. ResultsTeam briefing and compliance with the WHO surgical safety checklist were performed consistently (>95% and >98%, respectively) throughout the study, which included 460 surgical lists. Consideration of debriefing increased at all data collection periods after intervention, from 35.6% to 60.3–97.4% (P≤0.003). Performance of debriefing, which was 23.3% at baseline, reached 39% at 6 months (P=0.039). Team planning of actions for improvement during debriefing also increased (P<0.001). A decline in performance of debriefing and subsequent improvement actions was observed after 6 months, albeit rates were above baseline at 18 months. The most reported reason not to carry out a debriefing was ‘lack of issues’. After implementation, nurses and allied healthcare professionals increased their contribution to initiating and leading debriefing. Reported barriers were <18% at baseline, and decreased after intervention. ConclusionsA simple intervention introducing TALK© for voluntary debriefing in theatres prompted significant changes in team behaviour and sustained growth regarding consideration and performance of debriefing, especially in the first 6 months.

Visual Mapping of Operating Theater Team Dynamics and Communication for Reflexive Feedback and Surgical Practice Optimization.

Effective operating theater (OT) communication and teamwork are essential to optimal surgical outcomes. We mapped the OT team dynamics and infection control practices using visual methods to guide reflexive feedback and optimize perioperative practices. Data were gathered from adult gastrointestinal surgical teams at a tertiary hospital in India using observations, sociograms (communication mapping tool), and focus group discussions (FGDs). Our methods aimed to map team communication, roles and responsibilities in infection-related practices, and door openings. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Data were gathered from 10 surgical procedures (over 51 hours) using 16 sociograms, 15 traffic flow maps, and 3 FGDs. Senior surgeons directly influence team hierarchies, dynamics, and communication. While the surgeons, anesthetic residents, and technicians lead most tasks during procedures, the scrub nurse acts as a mediator coordinating activity among role players across hierarchies. Failing to provide the scrub nurse with complete details of the planned surgery leads to multiple door openings to fetch equipment and disposables. Traffic flow observed in 15-minute intervals corresponds to a mean frequency of 56 door openings per hour (min: 16; max: 108), with implications for infection control. Implementing the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist was inconsistent across pathways and does not match reported compliance data. Human factors research is important in optimizing surgical teamwork. Using visual methods to provide feedback to perioperative teams on their communication patterns and behaviors, provided an opportunity for contextualized enhancement of infection prevention and control practices.