Surgical Repair Of Acute Type Research Articles

Utility of double arterial cannulation for surgical repair of acute type A dissection.

Outcomes of planned and unplanned (rescue) double arterial cannulation (DAC) in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were investigated retrospectively. The study involved 805 patients who were divided into 4 groups according to the cannulation strategy: single cannulation of the femoral artery (n = 338), axillary artery (n = 256), left ventricular apex (n = 52) or ascending aorta (n = 5) (total, n = 57), and DAC (n = 154). Patients who underwent DAC were divided between planned (n = 132) and rescue (n = 22) usage. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Both unmatched and propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Shock (39%, 19%, 33% and 14%, in the femoral artery, axillary artery, left ventricular apex/ascending aorta and DAC, respectively) and leg malperfusion (5%, 16%, 16% and 26%, respectively) differed significantly (P < 0.001), but in-hospital mortality did not (9%, 8%, 18% and 7%, respectively; P = 0.096). The 5-year survival rates were 79.4%, 79.7%, 78.6% and 82.2%, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis showed no statistically significant differences in in-hospital mortality rates (10%, 12%, 14% and 9%, respectively; P = 0.78) and 5-year survival rates (78.4%, 72.3%, 82.3% and 78.0%, respectively). The leading vessel combination and indications for planned and rescue DAC were the femoral and axillary arteries (98%) and true lumen narrowing and/or leg malperfusion (34%), and the axillary followed by femoral (77%) artery and low cardiopulmonary bypass flow (36%). In-hospital mortality in the planned and rescue DAC groups was 7% and 9%, respectively. DAC seems effective for both prevention and management of intraoperative malperfusion.

Effect of massive blood transfusion on late outcomes after surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection.

Massive blood transfusion (MBT) increased mortality and morbidity after cardiac surgery. However, a mid-term follow-up study on repair surgery of acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) with MBT was lacking. This study aimed to assess the impact of perioperative MBT on late outcomes of surgical repair for AAAD.There were 3209 adult patients firstly received repair surgery for AAAD between 2005 and 2013, were identified using Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Primary interest variable was MBT, defined as transfused red blood cell (RBC) ≥10 units.The outcomes contained in-hospital mortality, surgical-related complications, all-cause mortality, respiratory failure, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) during follow-up period. Higher in-hospital mortality (37.7% vs 11.6%; odds ratio, 4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.30–4.85), all-cause mortality (26.1% vs 13.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.36–2.04), and perioperative complications were noted in the MBT group. A subdistribution hazard model revealed higher cumulative incidence of CKD (13.9% vs 6.5%; HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.47–2.60) and respiratory failure (7.1% vs 2.7%; HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.52–3.61) for the MBT cohort. A dose-dependent relationship between amount of transfused RBC (classified as tertiles) and cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality, incident CKD, and respiratory failure was found (P of trend test <.001).Patients with MBT had worse late outcomes following surgical repair of AAAD. The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality, incident CKD, and respiratory failure increased with the amount of transfused RBC in a dose-dependent manner.

"Aorta-clamp" technique for surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection-5 min circulatory arrest at 30 °C.

Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA), which causes perioperative complications, is the foundation of surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD). To extensively replace the dissected aorta and avoid the negative impacts of HCA, we developed an "aorta-clamp" technique and examined its efficacy in repairing AAAD. From November 2014 to August 2016, we recruited 59 consecutive patients (51.3±10.9 years) with AAAD into this study. We performed total arch replacement combined with an elephant trunk implantation using the "aorta-clamp" technique under a 30 °C HCA with continual bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion. The average HCA time was 4.9±1.0 min. Twenty-three patients had increased serum creatinine (sCr) before surgery, suggesting an AAAD-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). The sCr level returned to normal in five patients after operation and in 15 before discharge. Six patients (10.2%) with preoperative AKI required postoperative dialysis, and two of these patients (3.4%) died of multiple organ failure. Two patients (3.4%) required re-exploration due to bleeding. One patient (1.7%) exhibited temporary neurologic deficits. There were no late deaths. Computed tomography (CT) examination confirmed the patency of the anastomotic sites and thrombus obliteration of the residual false lumen. Using the "aorta-clamp" technique with continual bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion, total arch replacement combined with an elephant trunk implantation can be performed under five minutes of mild (30 °C) HCA. Our data suggest that this technique for the surgical repair of AAAD is a safe, feasible and effective surgical approach with satisfactory early outcomes.

Cannulation strategies, circulation management and neuroprotection for type A intramural hematoma: tips and tricks.

The circulation management strategies and operative techniques that are essential for the successful surgical repair of acute type A intramural hematoma (ATAIMH) are similar to those utilized for acute type A aortic dissection. This article reviews the neuroprotection strategies and arterial cannulation sites used in the treatment of patients with ATAIMH.

Invited Commentary

The ancient wisdom “practice makes perfect” has essentially been proved in almost every surgical specialty worldwide, yet Umana-Pizano and colleagues1 present a thought-provoking observation. They should be commended for their 18-year retrospective analysis in the unique setting of surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection at a well-recognized center of excellence. They clearly demonstrated that high-volume surgeons, rather than low-volume surgeons in a high-volume center, produce the best clinical outcomes.

Risk factor analysis of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome after type A aortic dissection repair surgery.

To investigate the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients undergoing surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection.This retrospective study involved 270 patients who underwent surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection between January 2009 and December 2015. Data on clinical characteristics and outcomes were collected. Patients who immediately died after surgery and with preoperative myocardial dysfunction were excluded. The included patients were divided into the ARDS (ARDS patients who met the Berlin definition) and non-ARDS groups. Primary outcome was postoperative ARDS, according to the 2012 Berlin definition for ARDS and was reviewed by 2 qualified physicians with expertise in critical care and cardiac surgery. Outcomes of interest were the incidence and severity of risk factors for ARDS in this population, and perioperative outcomes and survival rates were compared with patients with or without ARDS.A total of 233 adult patients were enrolled into this study; of these, 37 patients (15.9%) had ARDS. Three, 20, and 14 patients had mild, moderate, and severe ARDS, respectively, according to the Berlin definition, with no significant difference in age, sex, and underlying disease. The ARDS group had lower mean oxygenation index (OI) than the non-ARDS group in the first 3 days post-surgery and demonstrated an improvement in lung function after the fourth day. Postoperative complication risks were higher in the ARDS group than in the non-ARDS group. However, no significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups (10.8% vs 5.6%, P = .268). Additionally, there was also no significant difference in the 3-year mortality rate between the 2 groups (P of log-rank test = .274). Postoperative hemoglobin level (odds ratio [OR]: 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62–0.99) and perioperative blood transfusion volume (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03–1.12) were associated with ARDS risk.Postoperative ARDS after type A aortic dissection repair surgery was associated with risks of postoperative complications but not with risk of in-hospital mortality or 3-year mortality. A higher perioperative blood transfusion volume and a lower postoperative hemoglobin level may be risk factors for ARDS.

Propensity and impact of autologous platelet rich plasma use in acute type A dissection

BackgroundCoagulopathy in patients undergoing open repair of acute type A aortic dissection using cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic circulatory arrest is a common complication. Autologous platelet rich plasma is an intraoperative blood conservation technique, which has been shown in previous studies to promote hemostasis, leading to a reduction of blood product transfusions during elective aortic surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of autologous platelet rich plasma as a blood conservation technique during open surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection. MethodsWe reviewed all acute type A aortic dissection cases using hypothermic circulatory arrest, excluding patients presenting in extremis. Perioperative transfusion requirements and clinical outcomes were analyzed. The end points analyzed included early mortality, postoperative stroke, renal dysfunction, prolonged ventilation, coagulopathy, and length of postoperative intensive care unit stay. Parsimonious and saturated propensity scores were calculated for platelet rich plasma use, and all outcomes were propensity adjusted. ResultsBetween 2003 and 2014, 85 of 391 acute type A aortic dissection repairs used autologous platelet rich plasma. Mean age of patients was 58 ± 15 years, and 70% were male. Obstructive sleep apnea (22% vs 13%, P = .04) and baseline ejection fraction (57% ± 6.7% vs 55% ± 10%; P = .014) were higher in the autologous platelet rich plasma group. Intraoperative propensity-adjusted blood products, 2 units fewer packed red blood cells (P = .001), 4 units fewer fresh-frozen plasma (P = .001), 6 units fewer platelets (P = .001), 1.3 units fewer cell-savers (P = .002), and 5 units fewer cryoprecipitate (P = .001) were significantly reduced by autologous platelet rich plasma use. Significant unadjusted reduction in postoperative reoperation for bleeding (8% vs 17%, P = .046) after autologous platelet rich plasma was reported, although propensity adjustment eliminated significance (P = .079). No difference in stroke, cardiac, or renal complications was observed. Postoperative transfusion needed during the first 3 days was significantly reduced in the autologous platelet rich plasma group: 2 units fewer packed red blood cells (P = .13), 2 units fewer fresh-frozen plasma (P = .018), and 5 units fewer platelets (P = .001), when compared with those without autologous platelet rich plasma. Ventilation time was reduced by 3 days (P = .002), and intensive care length of stay was reduced by 3 days (P = .063) after intraoperative autologous platelet rich plasma use. ConclusionsThe use of autologous platelet rich plasma in patients undergoing open repair of acute type A aortic dissection was associated with a reduction in intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusions, as well as decreased early postoperative morbidity.

Effect of β-blocker therapy on late outcomes after surgical repair of type A aortic dissection

ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of β-blocker therapy on long-term outcomes in patients after surgical repair of type A aortic dissection. MethodsA total of 4275 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent surgical repair between 2004 and 2013, were identified using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A 1-year observational interval since discharge was used to determine β-blocker usage and medication adherence in survivors. β-Blocker usage was defined as medication prescription within 1 year. All others were defined as non–β-blocker users. Propensity score matching analysis was performed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, aortic reoperation, and readmission for any cause. ResultsA total of 396 patients of each group were deemed eligible for analysis. The risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the β-blocker group compared with the non–β-blocker group (16.2% vs 23.7%; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.89). The risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events was lower in the β-blocker group compared with the non–β-blocker group (19.2% vs 29.0%; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.82). Survival curves of β-blocker users were compared according to number of prescription days and showed that more days of β-blocker usage was associated with a lower risk of mortality (adjusted P for linear trend < .001). Conclusionsβ-Blocker usage had a protective effect on long-term outcomes in patients after surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection. Strict medication adherence of β-blocker therapy was associated with a survival benefit.

Effects of Sex on Early Outcome following Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Results from The Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (NORCAAD).

Background Female sex is known to have increased perioperative mortality in cardiac surgery. Studies reporting effects of sex on outcome following surgical repair for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) have been limited by small cohorts of heterogeneous patient populations and have shown diverging results. This study aimed to compare perioperative characteristics, operative management, and postoperative outcome between sexes in a large and well-defined cohort of patients operated for ATAAD. Methods The Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection study included patients with surgical repair of ATAAD at eight Nordic centers between January 2005 and December 2014. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results Females represented 373 (32%) out of 1,154 patients and were significantly older (65 ± 11 vs. 60 ± 12 years, p < 0.001), had lower body mass index (25.8 ± 5.4 vs. 27.2 ± 4.3 kg/m 2 , p < 0.001), and had more often a history of hypertension (59% vs. 48%, p = 0.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8% vs. 4%, p = 0.033) compared with males. More females presented with DeBakey class II as compared with males with dissection of the ascending aorta alone (33.4% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.003). Hypothermic cardiac arrest time (28 ± 16 vs. 31 ± 19 minutes, p = 0.026) and operation time (345 ± 133 vs. 374 ± 135 minutes, p < 0.001) were shorter among females. There was no difference between the sexes in unadjusted intraoperative death (9.1% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.17) or 30-day mortality (17.7% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.99). In a multivariable analysis including perioperative factors influencing mortality, no difference was found between females and males in 30-day mortality (odds ratio: 0.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.62–1.38, p = 0.69). Conclusions This study found no association between sex and early mortality following surgery for ATAAD, despite females being older and having more comorbidities, yet also presenting with a less widespread dissection than males.

Is it justified to apply a modified Cabrol fistula in surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection?

ObjectiveOpen repair of acute type A aortic dissection frequently results in oozing from the suture lines. A modified fistula technique was developed to rapidly control oozing and allow closing the chest immediately and safely. The efficiency of this modified fistula technique in surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection was evaluated. MethodsThis was a retrospective study. From January 2015 to December 2016, 172 patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent emergency surgical repair in our center. Among them, 76 were treated with the modified Cabrol fistula technique (fistula group), and the others did not receive this modified technique (nonfistula group). The clinical data of all patients were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. ResultsThe preoperative data, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic crossclamp time, selective cerebral perfusion, and lower body arrest time of the 2 groups were similar. The chest closure time was shorter in the fistula group. The postoperative drainage, amount of red blood cell transfusion, incidence of reopening for hemostasis, mechanical ventilation support time, duration of intensive care unit stay, incidence of postoperative dialysis, and 30-day mortality were significantly lower in the fistula group than in the nonfistula group. ConclusionsDuring surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection, a modified Cabral fistula technique can rapidly control oozing and effectively improve the short-term outcomes.

Locational impact of luminal communication on aortic diameter changes and reintervention in acute type I aortic dissection.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the locational impact of a luminal communication on aortic diameter changes and reintervention after surgical repair of acute type I aortic dissection. Between 2009 and 2017, 304 patients underwent operation for acute type I aortic dissection. Among them, 93 patients were enrolled. The luminal communications were analysed in segment 1 (the proximal descending thoracic aorta), segment 2 (the distal descending thoracic aorta) and segment 3 (the abdominal aorta). The aortic diameter was measured at the pulmonary artery bifurcation, coeliac axis, maximal abdominal aorta and maximal thoraco-abdominal aorta using serial follow-up computed tomography scans. The linear mixed model was used, and the rate of freedom from reintervention was analysed. In the adjusted analysis, the initial diameter of the maximal abdominal aorta and the first luminal communication in segment 1 was statistically significant. However, the slope value of the maximal abdominal aorta was smaller than that of the first luminal communication in segment 1 (0.024 vs 0.198). The 3-year freedom from reintervention rate was significantly higher in patients without a luminal communication than in those with an initial luminal communication in segment 1 (96% vs 47%, log rank, P = 0.003). A luminal communication at the proximal descending thoracic aorta (segment 1) is a significant factor for an increasing aortic diameter and reintervention after surgical repair of acute type I aortic dissection.

Emergency Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in Octogenarians Without Patient Selection

Octogenarians are often declined an emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection on grounds of high mortality rate and short life expectancy. Our policy is to accept all patients at any time and never to refuse an emergency operation, even for octogenarians. From April 2004 to September 2017, 319 patients underwent surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution. We compared the clinical results between the 55 elderly patients (≥80 years old; older group) and the 264 nonelderly patients (≤79 years old; younger group). The primary end point was early mortality, and the secondary end point was long-term mortality. The older group had a higher proportion ofwomen (74.5% vs 46.6%), a lower body mass index (21.4 vs 23.8 kg/m2), and a lower proportion of smokers (20.0% vs 46.2%). In the two groups (older vs younger), postoperative stroke occurred in 12.7% versus 11.4% and hospital mortality in 10.2% versus 10.9%, with no significant statistical difference. In multivariate analysis, older age of 80 years or older was not a significant risk factor for hospital mortality. Among the hospital survivors, the actuarial survival rate at 8 years was 52.5% in the older group and 85.0% in the younger group (p= 0.005). Emergency surgical repair for type A aortic dissection in octogenarians without patient selection resulted in similar rates of mortality and morbidity as younger patients. Octogenarians should not be refused this life-saving emergency operation.

Treatment with transfemoral bare-metal stent of residual aortic arch dissection after surgical repair of acute type an aortic dissection.

Here we evaluate the usefulness of transfemoral uncovered stent implantation to avoid secondary conventional surgery for residual type A aortic dissection (TAAD) of the aortic arch after ascending aorta replacement. From June 2009 to April 2015, 11 patients were treated with transfemoral implantation of uncovered stents in the aortic arch after surgical replacement of ascending aorta performed on average 4.7±2.3 years earlier. An enlarged dissected aortic arch or a dangerous median growth of more than 5 mm/yr or impending rupture presenting as chest pain were indications for treatment. The dissected aortic tracts diameter must not exceed 45 mm. Five patients (45.5%) were treated with Djumbodies Dissection System, 6 patients (54.5%) with Jotec E-XL aortic stent. There were no perioperative deaths or permanent neurologic complications. Primary procedural success was obtained in all patients and the residual TAAD in aortic arch was obliterated, with disappearance of the false lumen. Median intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 24 hours; post-operative hospital stay was 5.2±1.4 days. One death, not aortic related, occurred during follow-up period (mean 5.2±1.9 years). Descending thoracic aorta diameter significantly increased in 3 patients (27.3%): one patient (9.0%) needed a secondary conventional surgery, the other 2 (18.2%) of a distal extension with PETTICOAT approach. Endovascular approach with uncovered metal bare stent is surely an evolving strategy to perform a purely endovascular treatment, indicated only for treatment of an aortic arch with a diameter of less than 40 or 45 mm, to avoid progressive thoracic aortic dilatation and/or rupture.

A new paradigm in the management of acute type A aortic dissection: Total aortic repair

The currently accepted guidelines of open surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection include the resection of the primary entry tear, replacement of the ascending aorta and “hemi-arch” with an open distal anastomosis, and aortic valve resuspension and some form of obliteration of the aortic root false lumen. The principal aim is protection against aortic rupture, aortic regurgitation, and coronary ischemia and restoration of antegrade preferential true lumen perfusion. Proponents argue that this operation is tailored to be in the armamentarium of most cardiac surgeons and deliver the lowest early operative risk while leaving the infrequent long-term sequelae to be dealt with electively by experienced aortic centers. Although this may sound to be a compelling argument, the actual outcomes suggest that it falls significantly short of achieving its noble goals on both acute and chronic counts. This led us to develop a seemingly more radical paradigm, which aims to achieve total aortic healing in the acute phase. We describe a total aortic repair technique for acute type A aortic dissection consisting of “branch first” total arch repair, followed by thoracoabdominal stenting and balloon rupture of the septum. The total aortic repair technique ensures that the aortic valve, ascending aorta, and arch are surgically securely repaired, and provides complete decompression of the false lumen as well as internal support in the remainder of the aorta. This has provided excellent early results and will hopefully minimize future complications and interventions.

Differential outcomes of open and clamp-on distal anastomosis techniques in acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectivesOpen-distal anastomosis is the preferred technique over clamp-on technique for surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). The aim of this study was to define how outcomes of ATAAD were affected by the use of either technique. MethodsNordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection includes 8 academic cardiothoracic hospitals in 4 Nordic countries. The cohort consisted of 1134 patients, 153 clamp-on and 981 open-distal, from 2005 to 2014. ResultsPatients who underwent operation with the clamp-on were younger, more frequently had coronary artery disease, bicuspid aortic valve, hypotension/shock or syncope, and a greater PennClass than open-distal patients. Postoperative cerebral vascular accident occurred less frequently in clamp-on (14/153, 10%) compared with the open-distal group (190/981, 20%). Clamp-on had greater 30-day mortality (39/153, 25%) than the open-distal group (158/981, 16%), and 5-year survival was also worse in clamp-on (61.8% ± 4.4%) compared with the open-distal group (73.0% ± 1.6%). The open-distal technique was used more frequently in greater-volume hospitals but was not independently associated with 30-day mortality. Preoperative condition was an independent risk factor whereas hospital volume and later year of operation were beneficial in regard to short-term outcome. Open-distal was independently associated with improved mid-term survival. ConclusionsPatients who underwent operation with the clamp-on were sicker on presentation and had worse short- and mid-term survival compared with the open-distal group. Patients in the open-distal group had greater rates of cerebrovascular complications. The results support the routine use of open-distal anastomosis as the primary operative strategy for ATAAD, although clamp-on can be performed successfully in select cases.

Endovascular aortic repair versus open surgical repair for acute type B thoracic aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Endovascular aortic repair versus open surgical repair for acute type B thoracic aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Identification of CTA-Based Predictive Findings for Temporary and Permanent Neurological Dysfunction after Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

The aim of this study was to determine CT risk findings predictive of temporary neurological dysfunction (TND) and permanent neurological dysfunction (PND) after surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). A total of 255 patients (41 ± 16 years, 79% male) with ATAAD underwent aortic CT angiography (CTA) and surgical repair consecutively from January 2013 to June 2016. The CTA findings of the 255 patients for the thoracic aorta and carotid artery were analysed to identify risk factors predictive of TND and PND. Thirty-eight patients (15%) suffered TND, and 18 (7%) exhibited PND. Common carotid artery (CCA) dissection (OR = 4.63), lower enhancement of unilateral ICA (OR = 3.02) and aortic arch tears (OR = 2.83) were predictors of postoperative TND, while PND was best predicted by retrograde ascending aorta (aAO) dissection (OR = 5.62) and aortic arch tears (OR = 6.74). In CCA dissection, the extent of the entire CCA and proximal ICA (P = 0.014), a low-enhancement false lumen with re-entry (P = 0.000) and a severely narrowed true lumen without re-entry (P = 0.005) significantly increased the risk of postoperative TND. In patients with ATAAD, specific CT findings allow the individual risk of postoperative TND and PND to be identified and may guide subsequent surgical management.

Novel risk factors for the healthcare associated infections (HAIs) in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD).

Risk factors for healthcare associated infections (HAIs) following surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) has not been well defined. This was a retrospective study of patients treated between Jan 2013 and May 2016 at the large tertiary teaching hospital in Jiangsu, China. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association patients with acute TAAD who underwent ascending aortic and arch replacement under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) and healthcare associated infections during hospitalization. Of the final 210 patients with aortic dissection (AD) admitted to our hospital, 100 patients had TAAD (100/210, 47.62%), which were then allocated to the HAIs group (n=36) and Non-HAIs group (n=64). We found that DCHA >29 min [odds ratio (OR) =2.60, 95% confidential interval (CI), 1.01-6.80, P=0.048], preoperative PLT <171×109/L (OR =3.62; 95% CI, 1.33-9.79; P=0.011) and D-dimer >4.25 mg/L (OR =2.83; 95% CI, 1.07-7.47; P=0.035) were independently associated with the occurrence of HAIs for the patients with TAAD following surgical repair. Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic of the model suggested perfect model discrimination from a perfect fit (χ2=4.77, P=0.6883). Logistic model was verified when the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was equal to 0.7665. TAAD patients with longer DHCA time, lower preoperative PLT, higher serum D-dimer would significantly increase the risks after surgical repair of arch replacement.

Total aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection: a new paradigm.

The currently accepted guidelines of open surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) include the resection of the primary entry tear, replacement of the ascending aorta and "hemi-arch" with an open distal anastomosis, and aortic valve resuspension and some form of obliteration of the aortic root false lumen. The principal aim being protection against aortic rupture, aortic regurgitation, and coronary ischemia and restoration of antegrade preferential true lumen perfusion. Proponents argue that this operation is tailored to be in the armamentarium of most cardiac surgeons and deliver the lowest early operative risk, while leaving the infrequent long-term sequelae to be dealt with electively by experienced aortic centres. While a superficially compelling argument, the actual outcomes suggest that it falls significantly short of achieving its noble goals on both acute and chronic counts. This led us to develop a seemingly more radical but in practise safe paradigm, which aims to achieve total aortic healing in the acute phase.

Endovascular treatment of acute Type A aortic dissection-the Endo Bentall approach.

Outcome after classical surgical repair of acute Type A aortic dissection has steadily improved over the years and several modifications in cannulation and perfusion added to this achievement. However, subgroups remain where results of classical surgical repair still have room for improvement, particularly patients with severe preoperative malperfusion as well as elderly patients with a limited physiological reserve. So far, only small case series or case reports have been published on the endovascular treatment of dissected ascending aortas. However, a tube alone is not sufficient to fix the entire complex underlying problem in the vast majority of patients with acute Type A aortic dissection. In addition, these published reports are either due to a favorable anatomy or due to very localized disease processes, which are the exception and not the rule. The concept of an endovascular valve-carrying conduit may significantly increase the number of patients suitable for endovascular therapy and it may soon be common practice.