Surgical Freedom Research Articles

Comparative Anatomic Analysis of Neuronavigated Transmastoid-Infralabyrinthine Approaches for Jugular Fossa Pathologies: Short Anterior Rerouting Versus Nonrerouting and Tailored Nonrerouting Techniques.

Access to the jugular fossa pathologies (JFPs) via the transmastoid infralabyrinthine approach (TI-A) using the nonrerouting technique (removing the bone anterior and posterior to the facial nerve while leaving the nerve protected within the fallopian canal) or with the short-rerouting technique (rerouting the mastoid segment of the facial nerve anteriorly) has been described in previous studies. The objective of this study is to compare the access to Fisch class C lesions (JFPs extending or destroying the infralabyrinthine and apical compartment of the temporal bone with or without involving the carotid canal) between the nonrerouting and the short-rerouting techniques. Also, some tailored steps to the nonrerouting technique (NR-T) were outlined to enhance access to the jugular fossa (JF) as an alternative to the short-rerouting technique. Neuronavigated TI-A was performed using the nonrerouting, tailored nonrerouting, and short-rerouting techniques on both sides of 10 human head specimens. Exposed area, horizontal distance, surgical freedom, and horizontal angle were calculated using vector coordinates for nonrerouting and short-rerouting techniques. The short-rerouting technique had significantly higher values than the NR-T ( P < .01) for the exposed area (169.1 ± SD 11.5 mm 2 vs 151.0 ± SD 12.4 mm 2 ), horizontal distance (15.9 ± SD 0.6 mm vs 10.6 ± SD 0.5 mm 2 ), surgical freedom (19 650.2 ± SD 722.5 mm 2 vs 17 233.8 ± SD 631.7 mm 2 ), and horizontal angle (75.2 ± SD 5.1° vs 61.7 ± SD 4.6°). However, adding some tailored steps to the NR-T permitted comparable access to the JF. Neuronavigated TI-A with the short-rerouting technique permits wider access to the JF compared with the NR-T. However, the tailored NR-T provides comparable access to the JF and may be a better option for class C1 and selected class C2 and C3 JFPs.

Transorbital Approach Clipping of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm: A Virtual Reality Morphometric Anatomic Study

The transorbital approach (TOA) has a unique advantage to the more common lateral approaches as it provides direct access to the anterior middle fossa and medial sylvian fissure (SF) without significant dissection or retraction. However, when to use the TOA for surgical treatment of MCA aneurysms remains unclear. This study details the feasibility of clipping unruptured middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms via the TOA by highlighting the anatomic features that either facilitate or hinder the approach. Virtual reality (VR) models of 25 MCA aneurysms from CT angiograms of actual patients were rendered with the relevant anatomic structures, including the neighboring temporal lobe and SF. TOA was performed on the models in VR and the globe was translated medially and inferiorly, replicating retraction used intraoperatively. Anatomic data, including the area of surgical freedom (AOF) at the aneurysm, were recorded. Trials of aneurysm clipping were conducted in VR and each aneurysm was classified as "possible" or "impossible" candidates for clipping via TOA. Separately, the relationship between surgical view and SF visualized was analyzed. Sixteen aneurysms were eliminated as candidates for TOA treatment either through VR clip trial and/or because the SF was inaccessible. The remaining 9 (36%) were candidates for TOA. Comparing the details of these two aneurysm categories with Mann Whitney U tests, there was a statistically significant difference in the AOF of the TOA approach and the width of the aneurysm dome. A clinical case report is also provided highlighting the VR rehearsal similarity with surgery. Given the minimally-invasive, technically-challenging approach, the feasibility and safety of TOA for MCA aneurysms must be evaluated before wide clinical adoption. This study identified AOF, aneurysm width, and SF accessibility as three features that may significantly impact the possibility of clipping MCA aneurysms via TOA.

Deskeletonizing the Sigmoid Sinus Is Noncompulsory in Skull Base Surgery: 3D Modeling of the Translabyrinthine Approach

Abstract Objectives Sigmoid sinus (SS) compression and injury is associated with postoperative SS occlusion and corresponding morbidity. Leaving the SS skeletonized with a thin boney protection during surgery might be favorable. This study quantifies the effect of the SS position on the operative exposure in the translabyrinthine approach and assesses the feasibility of retracting a skeletonized SS. Methods Twelve translabyrinthine approaches were performed on cadaveric heads with varying SS retraction: skeletonized stationary (TL-S), skeletonized posterior retraction (TL-R), and deskeletonized collapsing of the sinus (TL-C). High-definition three-dimensional reconstruction of the resection cavity was obtained. The primary outcome, “surgical freedom” (mm2), was the area at the level of the craniotomy from which the internal acoustic porus could be reached in an unobstructed straight line. Secondary outcomes include the “exposure angle,” “angle of attack,” and presigmoid depth. Results During TL-R, surgical freedom increased by a mean of 41% (range: 9–92%, standard deviation [SD]: 28) when compared to no retraction (TL-S). Collapsing the SS in TL-C provided a mean increase of 52% (range: 19–95%, SD: 22) compared to TL-S. In most cases, the exposure is the greatest when the SS is collapsed. In 40% of the specimens, the provided exposure while retracting (TL-R) instead of collapsing (TL-S) the sinus is equal or greater than 50% of other specimens in which the sinus is collapsed. Conclusion In cases with favorable anatomy, a translabyrinthine resection in which the skeletonized SS is retracted provides comparably sufficient exposure for adequate and safe tumor resection.

AB004. Transsylvian approach for radical resection of insular gliomas: emphasizing the importance of the transsylvian approach for elderly patients with Zone II and III insular gliomas.

Insular gliomas present significant challenges due to their deep-seated location and proximity to critical structures, including sylvian veins, middle cerebral arteries (MCAs), lenticulostriate arteries, long insular arteries, and functional cortices and white matter tracts. The Berger-Sanai classification categorizes them into four zones (I-IV), providing a framework for understanding insular gliomas. The key factors for successful insular glioma removal are achieving the greatest insular exposure and surgical freedom. There are two main types of approach methods, such as transsylvian approach with meticulous wider dissection of the sylvian fissure and transcorticosubcortical approach with intraoperative functional brain mapping under awake surgery to remove the functionally silent cortices and white matter tracts. Because splitting the distal sylvian fissure is more challenging, a transcortical approach through the parietorolandic operculum in awake patients has been reported to be more effective access to the posterior insular gliomas (Zone II and III) in the dominant hemisphere. The object of this study emphasize the importance of the transsylvian approach for radical resection of insular gliomas. We retrospectively analyzed our experiences with radically resected insulo-opercular gliomas. Basically, we pursue the transsylvian approach for resecting insular gliomas without removal of any normal brain. Motor pathways running beneath the parietorolandic operculum can be damaged by ischemia caused by sacrificing the medullary arteries (MAs) arising from the pial arteries of the M3 and M4 portions of the MCA. Motor deficit after resection of this area was significantly found in the elderly patients. This phenomenon might be described by the age-associated decreasing the vascular reserve capacity. Autopsy brains showed that the sclerotic rate of the MAs increased with age and hypertension. Even with the intraoperative functional brain mapping, we cannot avoid the ischemic complication caused by sacrificing the MAs during stepwise removal of the functionally silent cortices and white matter tracts. We make a suggestion not to remove the parietorolandic operculum in elderly patients with insular gliomas located at Zone II and III. Distal transsylvian approach should be applied.

Endoscopic Transorbital Resection of Temporal Pole Cavernoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

An endoscopic transorbital approach has been recently included in the neurosurgical armamentarium.1 We present a case of a 31-year-old female patient with a history of recent-onset refractory epilepsy related to a left temporal pole cavernoma operated through a superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach. The operative video shows the key surgical steps to ensure optimal surgical freedom, adequate exposure, and complete tumor resection.2 The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient obtained seizure control and good cosmetic results without postoperative complications. The brain computed tomography and MRI showed the size of bone removal and confirmed the complete removal of the lesion, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, the patient is epileptic seizures-free without medications. An endoscopic transorbital approach provides adequate exposure of the temporal pole, allowing safe tumor resection. Complication avoidance encompasses careful dissection of palpebral muscles, dynamic orbital retraction, and neuronavigation guidance; sphenoidal drilling according to key anatomic landmarks (eg, sagittal crest3); and anatomic knowledge of the cavernous sinus and internal carotid artery and its tributaries course from a transorbital perspective4 and reconstruction filling the empty spaces using fat, fascia lata, or dural substitutes. All procedures performed were approved by the ethics committee of both centers and in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The patient consented to the procedure and to the publication of her images, and appropriate consent was obtained for publication of cadaveric images.

Comparison of endoscopic multiport approaches to the petrous apex: contralateral transmaxillary versus contralateral medial transorbital corridor.

Accessing the petrous apex (PA) via an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is challenging due to its posterior and lateral anatomical relationship with the paraclival carotid artery. Typically, the EEA requires the mobilization or compression of the vessel and the use of angled-lens endoscopes and instruments. A sublabial contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) corridor has been used to overcome these challenges. Still, it requires extensive osteo-meatal disruption and drilling of the medial pterygoid process, which risks the vidian nerve and increases nasal morbidity. Furthermore, the CTM corridor positions the endoscope in the same horizontal plane as the instruments passing through the nostrils, leading to fencing. The authors propose a novel minimally invasive route to the PA, the precaruncular contralateral medial transorbital (cMTO) corridor, to address these issues. This anatomical study compares the EEA+CTM and EEA+cMTO corridors in accessing the PA. The authors dissected 14 fresh, preinjected cadaveric specimens (28 sides) using neuronavigation to complete EEA, cMTO, and CTM on each side. In addition to qualitative analysis, they measured and compared the working distance between the entry point (nose, orbit, maxilla) and the petrosal process of the sphenoid bone (PPSB), superomedial PA, and foramen lacerum (FL); angle of attack (AoA); area of surgical freedom; endoscope-instrument fencing angle; and visual angle for each approach. The cMTO corridor provided the shortest working distance to the petroclival region (PA = 67.4 ± 4.47 mm, PPSB = 67.57 ± 4.33 mm, and FL = 66.30 ± 4.77 mm) compared to the CTM (PA = 75.85 ± 3.63 mm, PPSB = 76 ± 3.96 mm, and FL = 74.52 ± 4.26 mm) and to the EEA (PA = 85.16 ± 3.16 mm, PPSB = 84.55 ± 3.02 mm, and FL = 83.42 ± 3.21 mm, p < 0.001). Both CTM and cMTO corridors had a similar visual angle to the PA (20.72° ± 2.16° and 21.63° ± 1.84°, respectively), offering a similar but significantly better visualization than EEA alone (44.71° ± 3.24°, p < 0.001). The cMTO corridor provided better instrument maneuverability than the CTM, as evidenced by a significantly greater fencing angle (30.9° ± 4.9°) than with the CTM (21.7° ± 4.02°, p < 0.001). The vertical AoAs for the EEA, cMTO, and CTM corridors were 9.79° ± 1.75°, 10.65° ± 0.82°, and 9.82° ± 1.43°, respectively (p = 0.009), whereas in the horizontal plane, these were 9.29° ± 1.51°, 9.10° ± 0.73°, and 10.49° ± 1.43° (p < 0.001), respectively. Both the CTM and cMTO corridors offered similar areas of surgical freedom (678.06 ± 99.5 mm2 and 673.59 ± 104.8 mm2, p = 0.986), but they were more significant than that provided by the EEA 487.29 ± 112.9 mm2 (p < 0.001). The EEA+cMTO multiport technique may be a better alternative than the EEA+CTM multiport approach for targeting the petroclival region. However, clinical validation is required to confirm these laboratory findings.

Combined Petrosal Intertentorial Approach: A Cadaveric Study of Comparison With the Standard Combined Petrosectomy.

The combined petrosal intertentorial approach (CPIA) has been proposed as an alternative to standard combined petrosal approach (SCPA). CPIA has been designed to maintain integrity of the temporal dura with a view to reduce temporal lobe morbidity and venous complications. This study has been designed to perform a quantitative comparison between these approaches. Five human specimens were used for this study. CPIA was performed on one side and SCPA on the opposite side. The area of exposure (petroclival and brainstem), surgical freedom, and angles of attack to a predefined target were measured and compared. SCPA provided a significantly larger petroclival area of exposure (6.81 ± 0.60 cm2) over the CPIA (5.59 ± 0.59 cm2), P = .012. The area of brainstem exposed with SCPA was greater than with CPIA (7.17 ± 0.84 vs 5.63 ± 0.72, P = .014). The area of surgical freedom was greater in SCPA rather than in CPIA (8.59 ± 0.55 and 7.13 ± 0.96 cm2, respectively, P = .019). There was no significative difference between CPIA and SCPA in the vertical angles of attack for the Meckel cave, Dorello canal, and root entry zone of cranial nerve VII. Conversely, the horizontal angles of attack permitted by the CPIA were significantly smaller for the Meckel cave (52.36° ± 5.01° vs 64.4° ± 5.3°, P = .006) and root entry zone of cranial nerve VII (30.7° ± 4.4° vs 40.1° ± 6.2°, P = .025). CPIA is associated with a reduction in terms of the area of surgical freedom (22%), skull base (18%), brainstem exposure (17%), and horizontal angles of attack (18%-23%) when compared with SCPA. This loss in terms of exposure is counterbalanced by the advantage of keeping the temporal lobe covered by an extra layer of meningeal tissue, thus possibly reducing the risk of temporal lobe injury and venous infarction. These results need to be validated with adequate clinical experience.

The classical supraorbital minicraniotomy to approach the areas of origin of anterior skull base meningiomas: Anatomical nuances influencing accessibility, operability, and frontal lobe retraction.

The classical supraorbital minicraniotomy (cSOM) constitutes a minimally invasive alternative for the resection of anterior skull base meningiomas (ASBM). Surgical success depends strongly on optimal patient selection and surgery planning, for which a careful assessment of tumor characteristics, approach trajectory, and bony anterior skull base anatomy is required. Still, morphometrical studies searching for relevant anatomical factors with surgical relevance when intending a cSOM for ASBM resection are lacking. Bilateral cSOM was done in five formaldehyde-fixed heads toward the areas of origin of ASBM. Morphometrical data with potential relevant surgical implications were analyzed. The more tangential position of the cSOM with respect to the olfactory groove (OG) led to a reduction in surgical freedom (SF) in this area compared to others (P < 0.0001). Frontal lobe retraction (FLR) was also higher when approaching the OG (P < 0.05). Olfactory nerve mobilization was higher when accessing the planum sphenoidale (PS), tuberculum sellae (TS), and anterior clinoid process (ACP) (P < 0.0001). OG depth and the slope of the sphenoid bone between the PS and TS predicted lower SF and higher frontal retraction requirements along the OG and TS, respectively (P < 0.05). In contrast, longer distances to the ACP tip predicted lower SF over this structure (P < 0.01). Although clinical validation is still needed, the present anatomical data suggest that assessing minicraniotomy's position/extension, OG depth, the sphenoid's slope, and distance to ACP-tip might be of particular relevance to predict FLR, maneuverability, and accessibility when considering the cSOM for ASBM resection, thus helping surgeons optimize patient selection and surgical strategy.

Advantages and caveats of endoscopic to the infratemporal fossa as isolated and combined techniques.

Identify the benefits and caveats of combining minimal access approaches to the infratemporal fossa (ITF), such as the endoscopic transnasal, endoscopic transorbital, endoscopic transoral, and endoscopic sublabial transmaxillary approaches to address extensive lesions not amenable to a single approach. The study provides anatomical metrics including area of exposure and degree of surgical freedom. Five human cadaveric specimens (10 sides) were dissected to expose and methodically analyze the anatomical intricacies of the ITF using the following minimal access approaches: endoscopic transnasal transpterygoid (EETA), endoscopic sublabial transmaxillary, endoscopic transorbital via infraorbital foramen, and endoscopic transoral techniques. Area of exposure at the pterygopalatine fossa and surgical freedom at the ITF were obtained for each approach. The endoscopic sublabial transmaxillary sinus and the combined approach afford a significantly greater exposure than an isolated EETA. The difference in exposure (mean) between the endoscopic sublabial transmaxillary and EETA was 1.62 ± 0.85 cm2 (p < 0.001), and the difference between the combined approach and EETA was 4.25 ± 0.85 cm2 (p < 0.001). Combining minimal access endoscopic approaches to the ITF can provide significantly greater exposure than an isolated EETA; thus, providing enhanced access to address lesions with extensive involvement of the ITF, especially those with superolateral and inferolateral extensions. In addition, some approaches may have an adjunctive role to the resection, such as the endoscopic transoral approach offering the potential for early control of the internal maxillary artery and its branches, some of which may be supplying the tumor in the ITF; or the endoscopic transorbital approach yielding a direct line of sight to the superior ITF and middle cranial fossa. NA.

Quantitative Analysis of the Supraorbital, Transorbital Microscopic, and Transorbital Neuroendoscopic Approaches to the Anterior Skull Base and Paramedian Vasculature

Abstract Objectives Our objective was to compare transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery (TONES) with open craniotomy and analyze the effect of visualization technology on surgical freedom. Design Anatomic dissections included supraorbital craniotomy (SOC), transorbital microscopic surgery (TMS), and TONES. Setting The study was performed in a neurosurgical anatomy laboratory. Participants Neurosurgeons dissecting cadaveric specimens were included in the study. Main Outcome Measures Morphometric analysis of cranial nerve (CN) accessible lengths, frontal lobe base area of exposure, and craniocaudal and mediolateral angle of attack and volume of surgical freedom (VSF) of the paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA), terminal ICA, and anterior communicating artery (ACoA). Results The mean (standard deviation [SD]) frontal lobe base parenchymal exposures for SOC, TMS, and TONES were 955.4 (261.7) mm2, 846.2 (249.9) mm2, and 944.7 (158.8) mm2, respectively. Access to distal vasculature was hindered when using TMS and TONES. Multivariate analysis estimated that accessing the paraclinoid ICA with SOC would provide an 11.2- mm3 increase in normalized volume (NV) compared with transorbital corridors (p &lt; 0.001). There was no difference between the three approaches for ipsilateral terminal ICA VSF (p = 0.71). Compared with TONES, TMS provided more access to the terminal ICA. For the ACoA, SOC produced the greatest access corridor maneuverability (mean [SD] NV: 15.6 [5.6] mm3 for SOC, 13.7 [4.4] mm3 for TMS, and 7.2 [3.5] mm3 for TONES; p = 0.01). Conclusion SOC provides superior surgical freedom for targets that require more lateral maneuverability, but the transorbital corridor is an option for accessing the frontal lobe base and terminal ICA. Instrument freedom differs quantifiably between the microscope and endoscope. A combined visualization strategy is optimal for the transorbital corridor.

1234 The Transposition Technique of Internal Carotid Artery in Endonasal Endoscopic Surgery: Beyond the Lateral Boundary of Middle Line Approach

INTRODUCTION: There was no report regarding the transposition technique of ICA in endonasal endoscopic surgery (EES) METHODS: Six cadaveric heads (3 arterial and venous injected, 1 embalmed artery injected, 1 fresh artery injected) were prepared for dissection. The trabecular fiber (parasellar ligaments) in cavernous sinus(CS), small branches of ICA, dura, bony structures along ICA were meticulously dissected and photographed. The endoscopic dissections were performed using 0° (4-mm-diameter, 18-cm-long) rod lens endoscopes (Karl Storz). 36 cases (Jan 2014 to June 2022) underwent EES ICA transposition were reviewed. RESULTS: The trabecular fiber and small branches of ICA formed four sets of limiting structures around ICA: the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior group. The medial group consisted of carotid clinoid ligaments (12/12), inferior hypophyseal artery (11/12), inferior parasellar ligament (6/12). The lateral groupcomprised inferolateral trunk (12/12), the sympathetic nerve plexus (12/12), the trabecular fibers between ICA and CN3 (6/12),CN4 (5/12), CN6 (12/12). The anterior group consisted of trabecular fibers between the proximal dural ring and the ICA (7/12). The posterior group was made of trabecual fibers (8/12) around the post genu and posterior wall of CS. Proximal and distal dura ring was the main dura structures impeding mobilizing ICA. The anterior clinoid and lingual process obstructed ICA lateral transposition. Grade 1 (inner CS limiting structures), Grade 2 (inner CS + dura ring open), Grade 3 (inner CS + dura ring + bony remove) transposition were used in 24 (66.7%), 9 (25%), 3 (8.3%) cases respectively. CSF leakage (2.7%), ICA injury (2.7%), new transient CN palsy (8.3%), permanent CN palsy (5.4%) were developed postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The EES ICA transposition technique is technically feasible and could be graded according to extent of freeing the limiting structures. It is a novel technique worth exploring in suitable cases to enlarge the working zone and surgical freedom in middle line approaches.

A quantitative comparative surgical analysis of the endoscopic transorbital approach and frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach for extradural exposure of the cavernous sinus.

Recently, the endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach (SETA) has emerged as a potential alternative to access the cavernous sinus (CS). Several previous studies have attempted to quantitatively compare the traditional open anterolateral skull base approaches with transorbital exposure; however, these comparisons have been limited to the area of exposure provided by the bone opening and trajectory, and fail to account for the main avenues of exposure provided by subsequent requisite surgical maneuvers. The authors quantitatively compare the surgical access provided by the frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic (FTOZ) approach and the SETA following applicable periclinoid surgical maneuvers, evaluate the surgical exposure of key structures in each, and discuss optimal approach selection. SETA and FTOZ approaches were performed with subsequent applicable surgical maneuvers on 8 cadaveric heads. The lengths of exposure of cranial nerves (CNs) II-VI and the cavernous internal carotid artery; the areas of the space accessed within the supratrochlear, infratrochlear, and supramaxillary (anteromedial) triangles; the total area of exposure; and the angles of attack were measured and compared. Exposure of the extradural CS was comparable between approaches, whereas access was significantly greater in the FTOZ approach compared with the SETA. The lengths of extradural exposure of CN III, V1, V2, and V3 were comparable between approaches. The FTOZ approach provided marginally increased exposure of CNs IV (20.9 ± 2.36 mm vs 13.4 ± 3.97 mm, p = 0.023) and VI (14.1 ± 2.44 mm vs 9.22 ± 3.45 mm, p = 0.066). The FTOZ also provided significantly larger vertical (44.5° ± 6.15° vs 18.4° ± 1.65°, p = 0.002) and horizontal (41.5° ± 5.40° vs 15.3° ± 5.06°, p < 0.001) angles of attack, and thus significantly greater surgical freedom, and provided significantly greater access to the supratrochlear (p = 0.021) and infratrochlear (p = 0.007) triangles, and significantly greater exposure of the cavernous internal carotid artery (17.2 ± 1.70 mm vs 8.05 ± 2.37 mm, p = 0.001). Total area of exposure was also significantly larger in the FTOZ, which provided wide access to the lateral wall of the CS as well as the possibility for intradural access. This is the first study to quantitatively identify the relative advantages of the FTOZ and transorbital approaches at the target region following requisite surgical maneuvers. Understanding these data will aid in selecting an optimal approach and maneuver set based on target lesion size and location.

Supraorbital keyhole approaches in the first 3 years of practice: outcomes and lessons learned. Patient series.

Supraorbital keyhole approaches (SKAs) have garnered criticism for a limited surgical exposure, restrictive surgical freedom, blind spots, and the learning curve. This retrospective study of patients who underwent SKA aims to explore the outcomes, technical nuances, and the learning curve reflected in a single surgeon's experience in the initial 3 years of practice. A total of 20 SKA operations were performed in 19 patients. Gross- or near-total resection was achieved in 14 of 17 tumor cases. The mean blood loss was 80.5 mL, the mean duration of surgery was 5 hours, and the median stay was 3 days. Endoscopic augmentation was used in 11 cases in which additional tumor removal occurred in 8 of the 11 cases. There were no cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage or wound infection. A 30-day readmission and typical narcotics after discharge were seen in one patient each. When comparing two halves of a neurosurgery practice over 3 years, the duration of surgery was significantly longer in the later year, which is likely due to operating on a larger tumor size as the years progressed. No cases required static retractors or conversion to larger craniotomies. Careful case selection and respecting the learning curve allows the safe incorporation of SKA in the early stages of neurosurgical practice.

Contralateral Nasofrontal Trephination: A Novel Corridor for a "Dual Port" Approach to the Petrous Apex.

Expanded endonasal approaches (EEAs) have proven safe and effective in treating select petrous apex (PA) pathologies. Angled endoscopes and instruments have expanded indications for such approaches; however, the complex neurovascular anatomy surrounding the petrous region remains a significant challenge. This study evaluates the feasibility, anatomic aspects, and limitations of a contralateral nasofrontal trephination (CNT) route as a complementary corridor improving access to the PA. Expanded endonasal and CNT approaches to the PA were carried out bilaterally in 15 cadaveric heads with endovascular latex injections. The distance to the PA, angle between instruments through the 2 approach portals, and surgical freedom were measured and compared. Three-dimensional DICOM-based modeling and visualization indicate that the CNT route reduces the distance to the target located within the contralateral PA by an average of 3.33 cm (19%) and affords a significant increase in the angle between instruments (15.60°; 54%). Furthermore, the vertical vector of approach is improved by 28.97° yielding a caudal reach advantage of 2 cm. The area of surgical freedom afforded by 3 different approaches (endonasal, endonasal with an endoscope in CNT portal, and endonasal with an instrument in CNT portal) was compared at 4 points: the dural exit point of the 6th cranial nerve, jugular foramen, foramen lacerum, and petroclival fissure. The mean area of surgical freedom provided by both approaches incorporating the CNT corridor was superior to EEA alone at each of the surgical targets ( P = <.001). The addition of a CNT portal provides an additional avenue to expand on the classical EEA to the PA. This study provides insight into the anatomic nuances and potential clinical benefits of a dual-port approach to the PA.

Morphometric Comparison of Endoscopic Endonasal Transpterygoid and Precaruncular Contralateral Medial Transorbital Approaches to Sphenoid Sinus Lateral Recess.

The endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach (TPA), minimally invasive compared with the sublabial transmaxillary and transcranial approaches, still accounts for morbidity in benign lateral recess of sphenoid sinus (LRSS) pathologies. Others have suggested an alternative route to the LRSS, the endoscopic contralateral medial transorbital approach (cMTO). However, no quantitative evidence exists to support the clinical application of this approach. This cadaveric study, in a controlled laboratory setting, provides a morphometric comparison of the TPA and cMTO for accessing the LRSS. The study also details the anatomy and technical nuances for optimizing the cMTO corridor. Ten fresh preinjected human cadaveric specimens (20 sides) were dissected with neuronavigation, completing endoscopic cMTO and TPA on each side. Four parameters-working distance to lateral recess, surgical exposure area, angle of attack (AoA), and surgical freedom-were measured for each approach. Relevant osteological measurements in 10 dried human skulls were recorded. The mean distance from the superior margin of the lacrimal sac impression to the inferior margin of the trochlear fossa was 10.29 ± 1.13 mm, and that from the anterior ethmoidal artery foramina to the posterior lacrimal crest was 9.63 ± 1.23 mm. The mean exposure area around the LRSS was significantly higher in TPA (614.09 ± 40.38 mm2) than in cMTO (391.19 ± 59.01 mm2, P = .001). The mean AoA was 9.83° and 10.24° in the cMTO and TPA, respectively, in the craniocaudal direction (P = .529). In the horizontal plane, it was 9.29° and 10.76° (P = .012). There was no significant difference in surgical freedom between the cMTO and TPA (804.61 and 806.05 mm3, respectively; P = .993). Although comparatively limited exposure area, the cMTO approach has a similar AoA and surgical freedom as TPA and offers better visualization and ergonomic advantages. cMTO provides a feasible, less morbid, multiport technique for benign sphenoid sinus lateral recess pathologies.

The biportal transorbital approach: quantitative comparison of the anterior subfrontal craniotomy, bilateral transorbital endoscopic, and microscopic approaches.

The aim of this study was to assess the surgical use and applicability of a biportal bitransorbital approach. Single-portal transorbital and combined transorbital transnasal approaches have been used in clinical practice, but no study has assessed the surgical use and applicability of a biportal bitransorbital approach. Ten cadaver specimens underwent midline anterior subfrontal (ASub), bilateral transorbital microsurgery (bTMS), and bilateral transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery (bTONES) approaches. Morphometric analyses included the length of the bilateral cranial nerves I and II, the optic tract, and A1; the area of exposure of the anterior cranial fossa floor; craniocaudal and mediolateral angles of attack (AOAs); and volume of surgical freedom (VSF; maximal available working volume for a specific surgical corridor and surgical target structure normalized to a height of 10 mm) of the bilateral paraclinoid internal carotid arteries (ICAs), bilateral terminal ICAs, and anterior communicating artery (ACoA). Analyses were conducted to determine whether the biportal approach was associated with greater instrument freedom. The bTMS and bTONES approaches provided limited access to the bilateral A1 segments and the ACoA, which were inaccessible in 30% (bTMS) and 60% (bTONES) of exposures. The average total frontal lobe area of exposure (AOE) was 1648.4 mm2 (range 1516.6-1958.8 mm2) for ASub, 1658.9 mm2 (1274.6-1988.2 mm2) for bTMS, and 1914.9 mm2 (1834.2-2014.2 mm2) for bTONES exposures, with no statistically significant superiority between any of the 3 approaches (p = 0.28). The bTMS and bTONES approaches were significantly associated with decreases of 8.7 mm3 normalized volume (p = 0.005) and 14.3 mm3 normalized volume (p < 0.001) for VSF of the right paraclinoid ICA compared with the ASub approach. No statistically significant difference in surgical freedom was noted between all 3 approaches when targeting the bilateral terminal ICA. The bTONES approach was significantly associated with a decrease of 105% in the (log) VSF of the ACoA compared with the ASub (p = 0.009). Although the biportal approach is intended to improve maneuverability within these minimally invasive approaches, these results illustrate the pertinent issue of surgical corridor crowding and the importance of surgical trajectory planning. A biportal transorbital approach provides improved visualization but does not improve surgical freedom. Furthermore, although it affords impressive anterior cranial fossa AOE, it is unsuitable for addressing midline lesions because the preserved orbital rim restricts lateral movement. Further comparative studies will elucidate whether a combined transorbital transnasal route is preferable to minimize skull base destruction and maximize instrument access.

Automated algorithm aided capacity and confidence boost in surgical decision-making training for inferior clivus.

To assess the impact of automated algorithms on the trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence for individualized surgical planning. At Chinese PLA General Hospital, trainees were enrolled to undergo decision-making capacity and confidence training through three alternative visual tasks of the inferior clivus model formed from an automated algorithm and given consecutively in three exemplars. The rationale of automated decision-making was used to instruct each trainee. Following automated decision-making calculation in 50 skull base models, we screened out three optimal plans, infra-tubercle approach (ITA), trans-tubercle approach (TTA), and supra-tubercle approach (STA) for 41 (82.00%), 8 (16.00%), and 1 (2.00%) subject, respectively. From September 1, 2023, through November 17, 2023, 62 trainees (median age [range]: 27 [26-28]; 28 [45.16%] female; 25 [40.32%] neurosurgeons) made a decision among the three plans for the three typical models (ITA, TTA, and STA exemplars). The confidence ratings had fine test-retest reliability (Spearman's rho: 0.979; 95% CI: 0.970 to 0.988) and criterion validity with time spent (Spearman's rho: -0.954; 95%CI: -0.963 to -0.945). Following instruction of automated decision-making, time spent (initial test: 24.02 vs. 7.13 in ITA; 30.24 vs. 7.06 in TTA; 34.21 vs. 12.82 in STA) and total hits (initial test: 30 vs. 16 in ITA; 37 vs. 17 in TTA; 42 vs. 28 in STA) reduced significantly; confidence ratings (initial test: 2 vs. 4 in ITA; 2 vs. 4 in TTA; 1 vs. 3 in STA) increased correspondingly. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed for the above comparisons. The education tool generated by automated decision-making considers surgical freedom and injury risk for the individualized risk-benefit assessment, which may provide explicit information to increase trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence.

Transorbital Surgical Corridor: An Anatomic Analysis of Ocular Globe Retraction and the Associated Exposure for the Transpalpebral Orbital Rim Preserving Endoscopic Orbitotomy (TORPEDO) Approach.

The transorbital approach varies by the extent of bony removal and the target. Orbital rim-sparing transorbital approach with removal of only the orbit's posterior wall provides optimal cosmetic results, without the need for reconstruction. The size of this corridor, limited by the medial globe retraction, has not yet been defined and is difficult to determine in cadavers because of postmortem tissue desiccation. By using patient-specific models in virtual reality, precise areas and degrees of surgical freedom (AOF and DOF, respectively) provided by globe retraction were calculated. These measurements define a potential maximum safe AOF and DOF, as well as the globe retraction, needed to achieve a sufficient surgical corridor. Using a virtual reality system, transorbital rim-preserving craniectomies were performed. The axial and sagittal DOF as well as AOF were calculated lateral to the globe, limited by the orbital rim and globe, with an anterior clinoid target. The DOFs and AOFs were calculated for each degree of medial globe retraction and analyzed using paired t tests. With only 5 mm of retraction, the AOF was 886 mm 2 , while at 10 mm, the AOF was 1546 mm 2 . This increase between 5 and 10 mm allowed for the largest increase in surgical working corridor ( P = .02). At 15 mm of retraction (previously studied point at which intraocular pressure raises), the AOF averaged 2189 mm 2 and axial DOF averaged 23.1°. Eighteen DOF (a previously studied point needed to achieve sufficient working space for 2 instruments) was achieved at 11 mm on average, generating 1675 mm 2 AOF. Globe retraction of 11 mm is needed to achieve sufficient DOF for 2 surgical instruments, and 15 mm of retraction is a conservative limit that provides comparable AOFs with similar cranial approaches.

Combined subtarsal contralateral transmaxillary retroeustachian and endoscopic endonasal approaches to the infrapetrous region.

The eustachian tube (ET) limits endoscopic endonasal access to the infrapetrous region. Transecting or mobilizing the ET may result in morbidities. This study presents a novel approach in which a subtarsal contralateral transmaxillary (ST-CTM) corridor is coupled with the standard endonasal approach to facilitate access behind the intact ET. Eight cadaveric head specimens were dissected. Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) (i.e., transpterygoid and inferior transclival) were performed on one side, followed by ST-CTM and sublabial contralateral transmaxillary (SL-CTM) approaches on the opposite side, along with different ET mobilization techniques on the original side. Seven comparative groups were generated. The length of the cranial nerves, areas of exposure, and volume of surgical freedom (VSF) in the infrapetrous regions were measured and compared. Without ET mobilization, the combined ST-CTM/EEA approach provided greater exposure than EEA alone (mean ± SD 288.9 ± 40.66 mm2 vs 91.7 ± 49.9 mm2; p = 0.001). The VSFs at the ventral jugular foramen (JF), entrance to the petrous internal carotid artery (ICA), and lateral to the parapharyngeal ICA were also greater in ST-CTM/EEA than in EEA alone (p = 0.002, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively). EEA alone, however, provided greater VSF at the hypoglossal canal (HGC) than did ST-CTM/EEA (p = 0.01). The SL-CTM approach did not increase the EEA exposure (p = 0.48). The ST-CTM/EEA approach provided greater exposure than EEA with extended inferolateral (EIL) or anterolateral (AL) ET mobilization (p = 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). The ST-CTM/EEA also increased the VSF lateral to the parapharyngeal ICA in comparison with EEA/EIL ET mobilization (p < 0.001) but not with EEA/AL ET mobilization (p = 0.36). Finally, the VSFs at the HGC and JF were greater in EEA/AL ET mobilization than in ST-CTM/EEA without ET mobilization (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004, respectively). Combining the EEA with the more laterally and superiorly originating ST-CTM approach allows greater exposure of the infrapetrous and ventral JF regions while obviating the need for mobilizing the ET. The surgical freedom afforded by the combined approaches is greater than that obtained by EEA alone.

The Role of the Transeptal Window in Endoscopic Endonasal Access to the Contralateral Orbit.

Objective This study aimed to objectively compare maneuverability at the contralateral medial orbit when approached through the traditional endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and EEA with transeptal window (TW). Study Design Anatomic dissections were performed bilaterally on three latex-injected cadaveric heads. Approaches were performed sequentially; initially, an EEA was fashioned. Binostril access was achieved through a 2-cm posterior septectomy. The second stage pertained to the TW dissection. Area of exposure (AoE), surgical freedom (SF), and angles of attack (AoA) were measured along the contralateral medial orbital wall and compared for each approach. Additionally, the study presents an illustrative case describing the application of the EEA + TW for resection of an intraorbital schwannoma. Results Compared with EEA, EEA + TW yielded a significantly greater AoE along the contralateral medial orbital wall (39.45 vs. 48.45 cm 2 , respectively; p = 0.002). SF was statistically different between the EEA and EEA + TW (1153.25 vs. 2256.33 cm 2 , respectively; p = 0.002). AoA in the horizontal plane were significantly broader with the EEA + TW (6.36 vs. 4.9 degrees by EEA; p = 0.015). A 50-year-old male with a right medial extraconal orbital tumor was successfully treated through an EEA using the transeptal corridor to access the medial orbital region. No long-term complications were encountered after 31 months of follow-up. Conclusion EEA + TW is a minimally invasive technique that maximizes exposure and maneuverability within the medial orbital wall, allowing resection of lesions that extend anteriorly. EEA + TW limits disruption of the nasal septum and overcomes the obstacle that intranasal anatomy represents for instrumentation.