Comparison of endoscopic multiport approaches to the petrous apex: contralateral transmaxillary versus contralateral medial transorbital corridor.

Beyond qualitative evidence legitimizing endoscopic corridors through contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) and endonasal ipsilateral transpterygoid (ITP) corridors to the petrous apex and petroclival region, surgical feasibility by direct quantitative comparative anatomy is sparse. Our cadaveric study addresses this by performing the CTM approach followed by ITP extension to quantify the extent of petrous apex resection, instrument maneuverability, and working distance to petrous apex. Anatomic dissections were performed bilaterally on 5 latex-injected human cadaveric heads (10 petrous bones). After CTM dissections were quantified, the ITP approach was added enlarging initial exposure. Differences were measured with statistical significance when P values are < .05. The mean petrosectomy volume was 0.958 cm 3 with CTM and 1.987 cm 3 with CTM + ITP, corresponding to 14.53% and 30.52% petrous apex resection, respectively. Craniocaudal instrument mobility was more limited in the lateral extent of dissection compared with the midline for both CTM (8.062° vs 14.416°) and CTM + ITP (5.4° vs 14.4°). The CTM approach achieved the lateral-most dissection at the body of the petrous apex (15.936 mm), with lateralization more limited in the superior petroclival region (9.628 mm) and the inferior petroclival region (8.508 mm). Angle of surgical maneuverability increased superiorly vs inferiorly in the CTM approach (mean 12.596° vs 8.336°, respectively). The CTM approach offered the shortest mean working distance (88.624 mm) to the petroclival region compared with the bi-nares approach (100.5 mm). CTM + ITP achieved greater lateralization in the superior (21.237 mm) and inferior (22.087 mm) aspects of the petroclival region compared with the CTM approach. Operative considerations are discussed in accessing target neurovascular structures through the uniquely shaped corridors formed by the CTM or combined CTM + ITP. Allowing mobilization of the internal carotid artery laterally and eustachian tube inferiorly, addition of the ITP allowed for larger petrosectomy than CTM alone, especially in the inferior and lateral aspects of the petrous bone.

OBJECTIVE The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been shown to be an effective means of accessing lesions of the petrous apex. Lesions that are lateral to the paraclival segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA) require lateralization of the paraclival segment of the ICA or a transpterygoid infrapetrous approach. In this study the authors studied the feasibility of adding a contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) corridor to provide greater access to the petrous apex with decreased need for manipulation of the ICA. METHODS Using image guidance, EEA and CTM extension were performed bilaterally on 5 cadavers. The anterior wall of the sphenoid sinus and rostrum were removed. The angle of the surgical approach from the axis of the petrous segment of the ICA was measured. Five illustrative clinical cases are presented. RESULTS The CTM corridor required a partial medial maxillectomy. When measured from the axis of the petrous ICA, the CTM corridor decreased the angle from 44.8° ± 2.78° to 20.1° ± 4.31°, a decrease of 24.7° ± 2.58°. Drilling through the CTM corridor allowed the drill to reach lateral aspects of the petrous apex that would have required lateralization of the ICA or would not have been accessible via EEA. The CTM corridor allowed us to achieve gross-total resection of the petrous apex region in 5 clinical cases with significant paraclival extension. CONCLUSIONS The CTM corridor is a feasible extension to the standard EEA to the petrous apex that offers a more lateral trajectory with improved access. This approach may reduce the risk and morbidity associated with manipulation of the paraclival ICA.

Contemporary skull base surgeons must understand transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approaches to the petrous apex (PA). We provide an anatomic overview and comparison of main approaches to the PA through illustrative anatomic dissections. On 10 sides of 5 specimens, transcranial approaches to the PA including the anterior petrosal, transcochlear, and retrosigmoid with suprameatal extension were performed. For endoscopic endonasal approaches, the transclival approach was performed in the midline of 5 specimens and its contralateral transmaxillary extension was performed on 10 sides. The anterior petrosal approach offers an anterolateral view of the PA bounded by petrous ridge posteromedially, internal auditory canal posterolaterally, greater superficial petrosal nerve anterolaterally, and lateral boundary of cranial nerve V, the Gasserian ganglion, and V3 anteromedially; it exposes the middle fossa and, once the PA is removed, the superomedial cerebellopontine angle. The transcochlear approach affords a lateral view of the PA defined medially and inferiorly by inferior petrosal sinus, posteriorly by posterior fossa dura, anteriorly by the petrous internal carotid artery, and superiorly by the superior petrosal sinus and middle fossa dura. Through a retrosigmoid approach, the PA is bounded by the superior petrosal sinus superiorly, the sagittal plane of cranial nerve VI medially, and the axial and sagittal plane of the internal auditory canal porus inferiorly and laterally, respectively. It affords a panoramic view of the posterior fossa and access to Meckel's cave after PA drilling. Endoscopic endonasal approaches target the anteromedial PA, and it is demarcated by a triangle consisting of cranial nerve VI posterolaterally, the paraclival segment of the internal carotid artery anteriorly, and the petroclival synchondrosis inferiorly and medially. The addition of the contralateral transmaxillary approach enhances lateral access up to the internal auditory canal. We provide a comprehensive overview of the main approaches to the PA through illustrative anatomic dissections and representative cases.

Surgical approaches to the petrous apex region are extremely challenging; while subtemporal approaches and variations represent the milestone of the surgical modules to reach such deep anatomical target, in a constant effort to develop minimally invasive neurosurgical routes, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been tested to get a viable corridor to the petroclival junction. Lately, another ventral endoscopic minimally invasive route, i.e., the superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach, has been proposed to access the most lateral aspect of the skull base, including the petrous apex region. Our anatomic study aims to compare and combine such two endoscopic minimally invasive pathways to get full access to the petrous apex. Three-dimensional reconstructions and quantitative and morphometric data have been provided. Five human cadaveric heads (10 sides) were dissected. The lab rehearsals were run as follows: (i) preliminary pre-operative CT scans of each specimen, (ii) pre-dissection planning of the petrous apex removal and its quantification, (iii) petrous apex removal via endoscopic endonasal route, (iv) post-operative CT scans, (v) petrous apex removal via endoscopic transorbital route, and (v) final post-operative CT scan with quantitative analysis. Neuronavigation was used to guide all dissections. The two endoscopic minimally invasive pathways allowed a different visualization and perspective of the petrous apex, and its surrounding neurovascular structures. After both corridors were completed, a communication between the surgical pathways was highlighted, in a so-called connection area, surrounded by the following important neurovascular structures: anteriorly, the internal carotid artery and the Gasserian ganglion; laterally, the internal acoustic canal; superiorly, the abducens nerve, the trigeminal root, and the tentorium cerebelli; inferomedially, the remaining clivus and the inferior petrosal sinus; and posteriorly, the exposed area of the brainstem. Used in a combined fashion, such multiportal approach provided a total of 97% of petrous apex removal. In particular, the transorbital route achieved a mean of 48.3% removal in the most superolateral portion of the petrous apex, whereas the endonasal approach provided a mean of 48.7% bone removal in the most inferomedial part. The difference between the two approaches was found to be not statistically significant (p= 0.67). The multiportal combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach to the petrous apex provides an overall bone removal volume of 97% off the petrous apex. In this paper, we highlighted that it was possible to uncover a common path between these two surgical pathways (endonasal and transorbital) in a so-called connection area. Potential indications of this multiportal approach may be lesions placed in or invading the petrous apex and petroclival regions that can be inadequately reached via transcranial paths or via an endonasal endoscopic route alone.

Objectives This study aimed to establish the anatomical landmarks for performing a contralateral transmaxillary approach (CTM) to the petrous apex (PA) and petroclival region (PCR), and to compare CTM with a purely endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Design EEA and CTM to the PA and PCR were performed bilaterally in eight human anatomical specimens. Surgical techniques and anatomical landmarks were described, and EEA was compared with CTM with respect to ability to reach the contralateral internal acoustic canal (IAC). Computed tomographic scans of 25 cadaveric heads were analyzed and the "angle" and "reach" of CTM and EEA were measured. Results Entry to the PA via a medial approach was limited by (1) abducens nerve superiorly, (2) internal carotid artery (ICA) laterally, and (3) petroclival synchondrosis inferiorly (Gardner's triangle). With CTM, it was possible to reach the contralateral IAC bilaterally in all specimens dissected, without dissection of the ipsilateral ICAs, pterygopalatine fossae, and Eustachian tubes. Without CTM, reaching the contralateral IAC was possible only if: (1) angled endoscopes and instruments were employed or (2) the pterygopalatine fossa was dissected with mobilization of the ICA and resection of the Eustachian tube. The average "angle" and "reach" advantages for CTM were 25.6-degree greater angle of approach behind the petrous ICA and 1.4-cm more lateral reach. Conclusion The techniques and anatomical landmarks for CTM to the PA and PCR are described. Compared with a purely EEA, the CTM provides significant "angle" and "reach" advantages for the PA and PCR.

Objective: The foramen lacerum is a key landmark in endoscopic endonasal approaches. Several skull base lesions may involve the foramen lacerum region, most typically chondrosarcomas, but also pathologies affecting the cavernous sinus, Meckel's cave, petrous apex, clivus, nasopharynx, eustachian tube, and jugular foramen. Safe exposure of the lacerum segment of the carotid artery remains a challenge in endoscopic endonasal surgery. In our previous study, the surgical anatomy of the foramen lacerum was investigated; here we continue to propose a novel and reliable landmark, the pterygosphenoidal triangle, to facilitate access in endoscopic endonasal translacerum approach.

The cavernous internal carotid artery (cICA) and its branches can make it challenging to approach the lateral portion of the retrocarotid area of the cavernous sinus (RcACS) and surrounding areas during the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). This can sometimes require more invasive transcranial approaches, causing a higher risk of complications. We sought to explore the feasibility of adding a contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) corridor to improve access to the RcACS during EEA. We performed EEA and CTM extensions on 6 cadavers (12 sides) using image guidance. The depth of the surgical corridor, the surgical exposure, the angle of attack, and the trajectory to the anterior genu of the cICA were measured. Two illustrative clinical cases are presented. Compared with the contralateral transnasal approach, the CTM corridor provided a 10.76 (5.32)-mm shorter distance ( P < .001), 36.23% (20.70%) larger surgical exposure ( P < .001), and a 24.6° (3.4°) more parallel trajectory to the anterior genu of the cICA ( P < .001). The mean angle of the lateral nasal wall line and the middle eye line was equal to the mean angle of the contralateral transnasal ( P = .075) and CTM ( P = .262) approaches, respectively. The CTM corridor allowed us to achieve near-total resection of the RcACS and beyond in 2 invasive adenomas with significant lateral extension. The CTM corridor is a feasible addition to standard EEA to access the RcACS and beyond, providing a more medial-to-lateral trajectory and improved access. The middle eye line can be used as a reference to help select patients for this approach.

The petrous apex is one of the most challenging areas of the skull base to access. We present a case of residual petrous apex chordoma posterolateral to the paraclival segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA) resected with combined endoscopic endonasal and contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) approaches, without lateralization of the ICA. This case demonstrates the value of the CTM corridor in resecting petrous apex lesions that are posterolateral to the paraclival segment of the ICA.

Objective The endoscopic endonasal approach has emerged as an excellent option for the treatment of lesions involving the petroclival fissure (PCF). Here, we investigate the surgical anatomy of the ventral PCF and its application in endoscopic endonasal surgery. Methods Sixteen head specimens were used to investigate the anatomical features of PCF and relevant technical nuances in translacerum, extreme medial, and contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) approaches. Two representative endoscopic endonasal surgeries involving the PCF were selected to illustrate the clinical application. Results From the endoscopic endonasal view, the ventral PCF is presented as a lazy L sign, which is divided into two distinct segments: (1) upper (or petrosphenoidal) segment, which extends vertically from the foramen lacerum inferiorly to the junction of the petrosal process of sphenoid bone and petrous apex superiorly, and (2) lower (or petroclival) segment, which extends inferolaterally from the foramen lacerum to the ventral jugular foramen. Approaching both segments of the ventral PCF first requires full exposure of the foramen lacerum, followed either by exposure of the anterior wall of cavernous sinus and paraclival internal carotid artery for upper segment access, or transection of pterygosphenoidal fissure and Eustachian tube mobilization for lower segment access. Combined with a CTM approach, the lateral extension of the surgical access can be improved for both upper and lower segment PCF approaches. Conclusion This study provides a detailed investigation of the microsurgical anatomy of the ventral part of PCF, relevant surgical approaches, and technical nuances that may facilitate its safe exposure intraoperatively.

Triangular corridors have been used as reliable surgical entry points for open transcranial approaches to the petrous apex (PA) and petroclival region (PCR). The endoscopic endonasal approaches have grown rapidly in the last decade, and the indications have advanced. The knowledge of accurate and reliable anatomic landmarks through endoscopic endonasal route is essential and remain to be established. The purpose of this study was to describe the feasibility and surgical exposure of the anteromedial petrous (Gardner's) triangle as a novel corridor to the PA and PCR. Five anatomic specimens were dissected. The PA and PCR were accessed through endoscopic endonasal approaches and contralateral transmaxillary approach. The limits of the anteromedial petrous (Gardner's) triangle were identified and dissected and associated measurements performed. The dissection was divided into 6 steps. The limits of the anteromedial petrous (Gardner's) triangle were identified and defined by the paraclival internal carotid artery anterolaterally, the abducens nerve posteromedially, and the petroclival synchondrosis inferiorly. Three lines were established following the limits of the triangle. The mean distance of the anterolateral limit was 10.03 mm (SD = 0.94), of the posteromedial limit was 20.06 mm (SD = 2.90), and of the inferior limit was 17.99 mm (SD = 2.99). The mean area was 87.56 mm 2 (SD = 20.06). The 3 anatomic landmarks with a critical role to safely define the triangle were the pterygosphenoidal fissure, the petrosal process of the sphenoid bone, and the petroclival synchondrosis. The anteromedial (Gardner's) triangle is a well-defined bone corridor which provides access to the entire petrous bone and petroclival junction through endoscopic endonasal route. Regardless of the anatomic variations or tumor location, the landmarks of the abducens nerve, paraclival internal carotid artery, and petroclival synchondrosis are key for understanding lateral access to tumors extending from the clivus.

OBJECTIVE The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers direct access to midline skull base lesions, and the anterior transpetrosal approach (ATPA) stands out as a method for granting entry into the upper and middle clival areas. This study evaluated the feasibility of performing EEA for tumors located in the petroclival region in comparison with ATPA. METHODS On 8 embalmed cadaver heads, EEA to the petroclival region was performed utilizing a 4-mm endoscope with either 0° or 30° lenses, and an ATPA was performed under microscopic visualization. A comparison was executed based on measurements of 5 heads (10 sides). Case illustrations were utilized to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of EEA and ATPA when dealing with petroclival conditions. RESULTS Extradurally, EEA allows direct access to the medial petrous apex, which is limited by the petrous and paraclival internal carotid artery (ICA) segments laterally. The ATPA offers direct access to the petrous apex, which is blocked by the petrous ICA and abducens nerve inferiorly. Intradurally, the EEA allows a direct view of the areas medial to the cisternal segment of cranial nerve VI with limited lateral exposure. ATPA offers excellent access to the cistern between cranial nerves III and VIII. The quantitative analysis demonstrated that the EEA corridor could be expanded laterally with an angled drill up to 1.8 times wider than the bone window between both paraclival ICA segments. CONCLUSIONS The midline, horizontal line of the petrous ICA segment, paraclival ICA segment, and the abducens nerve are the main landmarks used to decide which approach to the petroclival region to select. The EEA is superior to the ATPA for accessing lesions medial or caudal to the abducens nerve, such as chordomas, chondrosarcomas, and midclival meningiomas. The ATPA is superior to lesions located posterior and/or lateral to the paraclival ICA segment and lesions with extension to the middle fossa and/or infratemporal fossa. The EEA and ATPA are complementary and can be used independently or in combination with each other in order to approach complex petroclival lesions.

The petrous apex (PA) is one of the most challenging areas in skull base surgery because it is surrounded by numerous critical neurovascular structures. The authors analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and transorbital approach (TOA) procedures for lesions involving PA to determine the perspectives and proper applications of these two approaches. The authors included patients younger than 80 years with lesions involving PA who were treated between May 2015 and December 2019 and had regular follow-up MR images available for analysis. Patients with meningioma involving petroclival regions were excluded. The authors classified PA into three regions: superior to the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery (p-ICA) (zone 1); posterior to p-ICA (zone 2); and inferior to p-ICA (zone 3). Demographic data, preoperative clinical and radiological findings, surgical outcomes, and morbidities were reviewed. A total of 19 patients with lesions involving PA were included. Ten patients had malignant tumor (chondrosarcoma, chordoma, and osteosarcoma), and 6 had benign tumor (schwannoma, Cushing's disease, teratoma, etc.). Three patients had PA cephalocele (PAC). Thirteen patients underwent EEA, and 5 underwent TOA. Simultaneous combined EEA and TOA was performed on 1 patient. Thirteen of 16 patients (81.3%) had gross- or near-total resection. Tumors within PA were completely resected from 13 of 16 patients using a view limited to only the PA. Complete obliteration of PAC was achieved in all patients. Postoperative complications included 2 cases of CSF leak, 1 case of injury to ICA, 1 fatality due to sudden herniation of the brainstem, and 1 case of postoperative diplopia. EEA is a versatile surgical approach for lesions involving all three zones of PA. Clival tumor spreading to PA in a medial-to-lateral direction is a good indication for EEA. TOA provided a direct surgical corridor to the superior portion of PA (zone 1). Patients with disease with cystic nature are good candidates for TOA. TOA may be a reasonable alternative surgical treatment for select pathologies involving PA.

Objective This study aimed to objectively compare maneuverability at the contralateral medial orbit when approached through the traditional endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and EEA with transeptal window (TW). Study Design Anatomic dissections were performed bilaterally on three latex-injected cadaveric heads. Approaches were performed sequentially; initially, an EEA was fashioned. Binostril access was achieved through a 2-cm posterior septectomy. The second stage pertained to the TW dissection. Area of exposure (AoE), surgical freedom (SF), and angles of attack (AoA) were measured along the contralateral medial orbital wall and compared for each approach. Additionally, the study presents an illustrative case describing the application of the EEA + TW for resection of an intraorbital schwannoma. Results Compared with EEA, EEA + TW yielded a significantly greater AoE along the contralateral medial orbital wall (39.45 vs. 48.45 cm 2 , respectively; p = 0.002). SF was statistically different between the EEA and EEA + TW (1153.25 vs. 2256.33 cm 2 , respectively; p = 0.002). AoA in the horizontal plane were significantly broader with the EEA + TW (6.36 vs. 4.9 degrees by EEA; p = 0.015). A 50-year-old male with a right medial extraconal orbital tumor was successfully treated through an EEA using the transeptal corridor to access the medial orbital region. No long-term complications were encountered after 31 months of follow-up. Conclusion EEA + TW is a minimally invasive technique that maximizes exposure and maneuverability within the medial orbital wall, allowing resection of lesions that extend anteriorly. EEA + TW limits disruption of the nasal septum and overcomes the obstacle that intranasal anatomy represents for instrumentation.

The eustachian tube (ET) limits endoscopic endonasal access to the infrapetrous region. Transecting or mobilizing the ET may result in morbidities. This study presents a novel approach in which a subtarsal contralateral transmaxillary (ST-CTM) corridor is coupled with the standard endonasal approach to facilitate access behind the intact ET. Eight cadaveric head specimens were dissected. Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) (i.e., transpterygoid and inferior transclival) were performed on one side, followed by ST-CTM and sublabial contralateral transmaxillary (SL-CTM) approaches on the opposite side, along with different ET mobilization techniques on the original side. Seven comparative groups were generated. The length of the cranial nerves, areas of exposure, and volume of surgical freedom (VSF) in the infrapetrous regions were measured and compared. Without ET mobilization, the combined ST-CTM/EEA approach provided greater exposure than EEA alone (mean ± SD 288.9 ± 40.66 mm2 vs 91.7 ± 49.9 mm2; p = 0.001). The VSFs at the ventral jugular foramen (JF), entrance to the petrous internal carotid artery (ICA), and lateral to the parapharyngeal ICA were also greater in ST-CTM/EEA than in EEA alone (p = 0.002, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively). EEA alone, however, provided greater VSF at the hypoglossal canal (HGC) than did ST-CTM/EEA (p = 0.01). The SL-CTM approach did not increase the EEA exposure (p = 0.48). The ST-CTM/EEA approach provided greater exposure than EEA with extended inferolateral (EIL) or anterolateral (AL) ET mobilization (p = 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). The ST-CTM/EEA also increased the VSF lateral to the parapharyngeal ICA in comparison with EEA/EIL ET mobilization (p < 0.001) but not with EEA/AL ET mobilization (p = 0.36). Finally, the VSFs at the HGC and JF were greater in EEA/AL ET mobilization than in ST-CTM/EEA without ET mobilization (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004, respectively). Combining the EEA with the more laterally and superiorly originating ST-CTM approach allows greater exposure of the infrapetrous and ventral JF regions while obviating the need for mobilizing the ET. The surgical freedom afforded by the combined approaches is greater than that obtained by EEA alone.

The jugular tubercle (JT) is a bony prominence located between the basilar and condylar parts of the occipital bone, superior to the hypoglossal canal. This study compares the volume of the JT removed, the overall area of exposure and the surgical corridor among the far lateral approach (FLA), far medial approach (FMA), and contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) corridor. Using image guidance, 10 cadaveric specimens were dissected: The JT was drilled through FMA and CTM in 10 sides, whereas FLA was performed on the opposite 10 sides. The surgical corridor and overall area of exposure were measured. A subanalysis was conducted to compare the angle of the surgical trajectory between FMA and CTM. Computed tomography scan volumetric measurements were used to compare the approaches. Five illustrative cases are presented. The angle of the surgical trajectory to the JT was significantly greater for CTM (33.8° ± 7.1°) compared with FMA (14.3° ± 2.6°, P < .001). The area of exposure was significantly larger with FLA (410.7 ± 78.1 mm2) and CTM (436.8 ± 44.8 mm2) compared with FMA (270.7 ± 21.9 mm2, P < .001). In addition, CTM (212.2 ± 32.2 mm2) provided a significantly wider surgical corridor than FMA (82.7 ± 12.4 mm2, P < .001) and showed a trend toward greater exposure compared with FLA (P = .05). The mean percentage of JT resected was 56.7% for FLA, 40.4% for FMA, and 94% for CTM (P < .05). Open and endoscopic approaches are complementary for addressing lesions in the inferior clival and petroclival regions. The CTM approach represents a feasible extension of the standard endoscopic endonasal approach, increasing the surgical corridor angle and providing greater lateral exposure than the FMA. In addition, CTM enables a substantially greater volume of JT resection compared with both FLA and FMA.