Surgical Epicondylar Axis Research Articles

Comparison of the femoral condylar ellipse line and the surgical epicondylar axis: 3D measurement by MRI scans in healthy Chinese people.

The sagittal shapes of the femoral condyles were thought to consist of circles. However, the line connecting the centers of circles was not consistent with the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) which was commonly used in surgery. Recently, ellipses have been proposed as an alternative method to represent the sagittal femoral condylar shape. Does the condylar ellipse line (CEL) coincide with the SEA in 3D MRI reconstruction analysis? From May to August 2021, a total of 80 healthy subjects were scanned by MRI on the right knee in this retrospective study. The ellipses on the most distal slices of the medial and lateral condyles were determined. A line connecting the centers of the medial and lateral ellipses was the CEL. A line connecting the deepest point of the medial sulcus and the most prominent point of the lateral epicondyle was the SEA. Angular measurement of the SEA and the CEL relative to the posterior condylar line (PCL) and the distal condylar line (DCL) was performed on an axial and coronal view of the 3D model, respectively. Measurements were compared between males and females by using the independent-samples t-test. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the relationship between SEA-PCL and CEL-PCL, SEA-DCL, and CEL-DCL. On the axial view, the mean SEA-CEL was 0.35° ± 0.96°. SEA-PCL (2.91° ± 1.40°) had a high correlation with CEL-PCL (3.27° ± 1.11°) (r = 0.731, p < 0.001). On the coronal view, the mean coronal SEA-CEL was 1.35° ± 1.13°. SEA-DCL (1.35° ± 1.13°) had a low correlation with CEL-DCL (0.18° ± 0.84°) (r = 0.319, p = 0.007). On the sagittal view, the outlet points of the CEL on the medial and lateral epicondyles were anatomically located in the anteroinferior direction to the SEA. CEL traversed the medial and lateral epicondyles, which has a mean deviation of 0.35° with SEA on axial view and a mean deviation of 0.18° with DCL on coronal view. This study suggested that the ellipse approach is an improved scheme for representing the femoral condylar shape.

Progression of varus deformity in osteoarthritic knees induces anterior paradoxical motion of the femur during early knee flexion.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the position of the femur relative to the tibia throughout range of motion in the osteoarthritic knee to evaluate knee kinematics and assess its relationship with the degree of varus deformity. In this study, 116 preoperative knees with varus deformity were evaluated using a navigation system. The internal-external, anteroposterior, and mediolateral positions of the femur relative to the tibia were measured at maximum extension, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 105°, and 120°, and maximum flexion angles. From these parameters, two-dimensional translation of the surgical epicondylar axis was projected onto the tibial axial plane, and the femoral movement was evaluated relative to the tibia. In addition, the knees were retrospectively classified into three groups according to their degrees of preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle: mild (< 10°), moderate (10°-20°), and severe (> 20°). Then, the differences in each parameter between these groups were investigated. The Steel-Dwass test was performed to identify the difference among three groups. Statistical significance was set at p values < 0.05. There was a significant difference in the anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia among the three groups, especially from extension to early flexion (p < 0.05). The anteroposterior position at knee extension deviated posteriorly according to the progression of varus deformity. Rotational and mediolateral translation were not significantly different among the groups. Normal knee kinematics were diminished in almost all cases in each group. In addition, anterior paradoxical motion of the femur during early knee flexion was observed in 45.6% (n = 26), 57.1% (n = 28), and 80.0% (n = 8) of cases in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia at knee extension was significantly more posterior in patients with than in those without anterior paradoxical motion (p < 0.0001). The anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia changed according to the progression of varus deformity in osteoarthritic knees, especially from knee extension to early flexion. Posterior deviation of the femur at knee extension induced its anteroposterior movement relative to the tibia, resulting in anterior paradoxical motion. III.

"Grand-piano sign" as a femoral rotational indicator in both varus and valgus knees: a simulation study of anterior resection surface in total knee arthroplasty.

The "Grand-piano sign" is a popular indicator of the appropriate rotational alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of the study was to investigate the shape of the anterior femoral resection surface of varus and valgus knees. A cohort of 80 varus knees and 40 valgus knees (hip-knee-ankle angle > 2° for varus and < -2° for valgus knees) matched for age, sex, height, body weight, and KL grade was made using propensity score matching. Virtual TKA was performed using 3 patterns of components (anterior flange flexion angles of 3°, 5°, and 7°). The anterior femoral resection surface was evaluated for 3 patterns of rotational alignments: parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis (NR, neutral rotation), 3° internal rotation (IR), and 3°external rotation (ER) relative to the surgical epicondylar axis. In each anterior femoral resection surface, the vertical height of medial and lateral condyles was measured, and the ratio of the medial to the lateral height (M/L ratio) was evaluated. The M/L ratio in NR for both varus and valgus knees was 0.57 to 0.64, with no significant difference between the cohorts (p value > 0.05). The M/L ratio showed a similar pattern of increasing at IR and decreasing at ER in both varus and valgus knees. The variation in the M/L ratio with malrotation in valgus knees was smaller than in varus knees. During TKA, the anterior femoral resection surface was similar in varus and valgus knees; however, the variation with malrotation was smaller in valgus knees than in varus knees. TKA for valgus knees requires precise surgical technique and careful intraoperative assessment. IV, Case series.

Different tibial rotational axes can be applied in combination according to the tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament distance in total knee arthroplasty

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance is representative of the true lateralization of tibial tuberosity in isolation and its influence on the accuracy of the Akagi line and medial third of the tibial tuberosity (MTTT).MethodsA total of 135 osteoarthritis patients with varus knees who undergoing computed tomography scans were enrolled to establish three-dimension models of the knees. Tibial width (TW), tibial tuberosity lateralization (TTL), posterior cruciate ligament lateralization (PCLL), knee rotation angle (KRA) and tibial rotational axes were measured and investigated their correlations with TT-PCL distance. Based on the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the influence of TT-PCL distance on the distributions of mismatch angles of tibial rotational axes was investigated with a safe zone (-5° to 10°).ResultsTT-PCL distance was in significantly positive correlation with TW (r = 0.493; P < 0.001) and TTL (r = 0.378; P < 0.001) which was different with PCLL (r = 0.147; P = 0.009) and KRA (r = -0.166; P = 0.054). All tibial rotational axes were significantly positively correlated with TT-PCL distance (P < 0.001). The mismatch angles between the vertical line of the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and the Akagi line and MTTT were -1.7° ± 5.3° and 7.6° ± 5.6° respectively. In terms of the optimal cut-off value of 19 mm for TT-PCL distance, the Akagi line applied as tibial rotational axis ensures 87.3% of the positions of tibial components within the safe zone when TT-PCL distance > 19 mm, and MTTT ensures 83.3% when TT-PCL distance ≤ 19 mm.ConclusionTT-PCL distances cannot reflect the true lateralization of tibial tuberosity in isolation but can aid in the combination of the Akagi line and MTTT in varus knees. The patients with TT-PCL distance > 19 mm are recommended to reference the Akagi line for tibial rotational alignment. MTTT is recommended to the patients with TT-PCL distance ≤ 19 mm. The study will aid surgeons in deciding which reference may be used by measuring TT-PCL distance using a preoperative CT.

Surgical epicondylar axis is not orthogonal to the femoral mechanical knee axis in valgus knees with primary osteoarthritis: Three-dimensional analysis according to knee coronal alignment in 112 patients

BackgroundDuring total knee arthroplasty (TKA), most surgeons align the femoral component along the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) considering it as orthogonal to the femoral mechanical axis. However, it is still unclear how SEA coronal alignment varies according to the native coronal knee alignment. The main goal of this study was to analyze the SEA orientation according to the native coronal knee morphotype. MethodsA total of 112 patients underwent a three-dimensional (3D) -planning-based TKA. The SEA was then determined by locating the epicondyles on 3D models. The 3D femoral and tibial mechanical axes were marked and the femoral (FMA) and tibial (TMA) mechanical angles were measured. The native HKA angle was measured as FMA + TMA. The SEA orientation angles were measured in the coronal (SEA-α) and axial (SEA-β) plane. SEA orientation was compared between the valgus, neutral, and varus knees. ResultsThe mean SEA-α angle was 90.2 ± 3° and the mean axial SEA-β angle was 92.2 ± 1.3°. The SEA-α angle was significantly higher in the valgus group compared with the neutral group (92.3 ± 2.9°, 90 ± 2.9°, P = 0.0009) whereas there was no significant difference in the SEA-α angle between the varus and the neutral group (89.7 ± 2.3°, 90 ± 2.9°, P = 0.32). ConclusionsIn contrast to the neutral and varus knees, the SEA was not orthogonal to the femoral mechanical axis in patients undergoing TKA for primary osteoarthritis. Our results suggest adapting the coronal alignment of the femoral component during TKA, while maintaining an average 2° valgus in valgus knees. By contrast, with varus and neutral knees, our data support the use of a mechanical alignment.

Cartilage assessment using preoperative planning MRI for femoral component rotational alignment

BackgroundSurgical planning of posterior referencing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using computed tomography (CT) might lead to over-rotation of the femoral component because CT could not detect cartilage thickness of the posterior femoral condyle. The purpose of this study was to examine the rotational alignment difference of the femoral component between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT. MethodsFor elderly varus osteoarthritic patients, 66 varus osteoarthritic knee patients that underwent primary TKA were selected. Twenty-seven young patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were selected as control. After the transepicondylar axis (CEA), the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and the posterior femoral condylar line (PCL) were drawn on CT and on MRI at the same angles as CT. Then, the practical PCL was drawn on MRI considering the cartilage thickness (the cartilage PCL). The angle between the SEA and the cartilage PCL (the cartilage posterior condylar angle (PCA)) was measured as preoperative planning. To investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI measurement, the cartilage thickness on posterior femoral condyles was directly measured during TKA. ResultsThe cartilage PCA for varus osteoarthritic patients averaged 1.3 ± 1.3°. The cartilage PCA was 1.8 ± 1.0° significantly smaller than the bone PCA (the PCA measured on CT). Meanwhile, the cartilage PCA was 0.2 ± 0.4° significantly larger than the bone PCA in young people. The preoperative angle measurement on MRI strongly correlated with the direct measurement of cartilage thickness during TKA. ConclusionThere was 1.8° of divergence between MRI and CT in varus osteoarthritic patients due to cartilage degeneration of the medial femoral condyle. Cartilage assessment using MRI was useful for femoral component rotational alignment.

Preoperative Virtual Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery Using a Computed Tomography-based 3-dimensional Model With Variation in Reference Points and Target Alignment to Predict Femoral Component Sizing

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the size differences of 19 different femoral component placements from the standard position in total knee arthroplasty using 3-dimensional virtual surgery. MethodsThree-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the computed tomography data of 101 varus osteoarthritic knees. The distal femoral bone was cut perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis (MA) in the coronal plane. Twenty different component placements consisting of 5 cutting directions (perpendicular to MA, 3° and 5° extension relative to MA [3°E-MA and 5°E-MA, respectively], and 3° and 5° flexion relative to MA [3°F-MA and 5°F-MA, respectively]) in the sagittal plane, 2 rotational alignments (clinical epicondylar axis [CEA] and surgical epicondylar axis [SEA]), and 2 rotational types of anterior reference guide (central [CR] and medial [MR]) were simulated. ResultsThe mean anteroposterior dimension of femur ranged from 54.3 mm (5°F-MA, SEA, CR) to 62.5 mm (5°E-MA, CEA, MR). The largest and smallest differences of anteroposterior dimension from the standard position (3°F-MA, SEA, and CR) were 7.1 ± 1.3 mm (5°E-MA, CEA, and MR) and −1.2 ± 0.2 mm (5°F-MA, SEA, and CR), respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that flexion cutting direction, SEA, and CR were associated with smaller component size. ConclusionsThe femoral component size can be affected easily by not only cutting direction but also the reference guide type and the target alignment. Our findings could provide surgeons with clinically useful information to fine-tune for unintended loose or tight joint gaps by adjusting the component size.

Rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components should be avoided in JOURNEY II bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundJOURNEY II bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) knee system, a guided motion total knee arthroplasty (TKA), has been reported to reproduce physiological knee kinematic motion with good clinical outcomes. However, this guided system may be sensitive to the femorotibial rotational alignment. MethodForty-four patients (50 knees) who underwent JOURNEY II BCS TKA were included in this retrospective study. The 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) and range of motion were assessed pre-operatively and one year postoperatively. The femoral component rotational angle relative to the surgical epicondylar axis and the tibial component rotational angle relative to Akagi’s line were measured postoperatively. The absolute difference between the femoral and tibial component rotational angles was defined as femorotibial component rotational mismatch. The correlation between the parameters of these rotational alignments and postoperative clinical outcomes was evaluated. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off point of the femorotibial component rotational mismatch. ResultsMean femoral and tibial component rotational angles were 0.4° (internal rotation) and 0.7° (external rotation), respectively. The rotational mismatch of the femorotibial component was 3.2°. There were negative correlations between femorotibial rotational mismatch and clinical outcomes, including objective knee indicators, patient satisfaction, functional activities, and total 2011 KSS. The area under the curve of the femorotibial component rotational mismatch was 0.768 and the cut-off value identified by the Youden index was 2.8°. ConclusionsExcessive rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial components can negatively influence the clinical outcomes of JOURNEY II BCS TKA.

Sagittal femoral bowing contributes to distal femoral valgus angle deviation in malrotated preoperative radiographs

BackgroundThe coronal whole-leg radiograph is generally used for preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty. The distal femoral valgus angle (DFVA) is measured for distal femoral bone resection using an intramedullary guide rod. The effect of coronal and sagittal femoral shaft bowing on DFVA measurement in the presence of malrotation or knee flexion contracture has not been well reported. The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate the effects of whole-leg malrotation and knee flexion contracture on the DFVA in detail, (2) to determine the additional effect of coronal or sagittal femoral shaft bowing.MethodsWe studied 100 consecutive varus and 100 valgus knees that underwent total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preoperative CT scans were used to create digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) images in neutral rotation (NR, parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis), and at 5° and 10° external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR). The images were also reconstructed at 10° femoral flexion. The DFVA was evaluated in each DRR image, and the angular variation due to lower limb malposition was investigated.ResultsThe DFVA increased as the DRR image shifted from IR to ER, and all angles increased further from extension to 10° flexion. The DFVA variation in each position was 1.3° on average. A larger variation than 2° was seen in 12% of all. Multivariate regression analysis showed that sagittal femoral shaft bowing was independently associated with a large variation of DFVA. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that more than 12° of sagittal bowing caused the variation.ConclusionIf femoral sagittal bowing is more than 12°, close attention should be paid to the lower limb position when taking whole-leg radiographs. Preoperative planning with whole-leg CT data should be considered.

Surgical Epicondylar Axis of the Knee and Its Relationship to the Axial Tibia Alignment in Knee Osteoarthritis: The Concept of Proximal Twist Tibia.

The proximal tibia and distal femur are intimately linked with the biomechanics of the knee and they are to be considered in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the proximal tibial torsion (PTT) in relation to surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) in a healthy cohort and a pathological cohort affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA). We retrospectively analyzed computed tomography of OA knee of 59 patients before they underwent TKA and nonarthritic knee of 39 patients as control. Posterior condylar angle (PCAn), femoral tibial torsion (SEA-proximal tibial condyle [PTC] and SEA-PTT), PTT (PTC-PTT and posterior condylar axes [PCAx]-PTC), and distance between tibial tuberosity and the trochlear groove (TT-TG) were measured. No differences were found for gender, age, TT-TG, and PCAn angles. Statistically significant differences were found for all the other angles considered. Significant correlation was found between tibial torsion and SEA-PTT angles, between PCAx-PTC and SEA-PTC, between SEA-PTT and SEA-PTC, and between PCAx-PTC and SEA-PTT. All measures, except TT-TG and PCAn angles, showed high validity (area under the curve [AUC] > 75%) in associating with OA, with SEA-PTT displaying the highest validity with an AUC of 94.38%. This is the first study to find significant differences in terms of proximal tibia geometry and anatomy between nonarthritic and OA knees. From our results, we reported that OA group was characterized by a greater internal rotation of tibia with respect to SEAs compared with control group. Since the design of the study cannot evaluate a cause-effect relationship, further studies need to be performed to assess the potential implications of these anatomic differences for knee OA and arthroplasty surgeries.

Different rotational alignment of tibial component should be selected for varied tibial tubercle locations in total knee arthroplasty.

The main purpose of this study was to identify how the accuracy of the tibial rotation reference axes varied in populations with different tibial tubercle locations. We hypothesized that the accuracy of the axes of tibial rotation would be affected by the changes of tibial tubercle locations. Surgical epicondylar axis (SEA), medial third of the patellar tendon (1/3MPT), medial third of the tibial tuberosity (1/3MTT), medial border of the tibial tuberosity (MTT) and Akagi line were drawn. The angle between SEA and horizontal line with the angle between the four tibial rotation axes and the horizontal line was compared by T test. Then, the correlation between TTTG with the angles between the four axes and SEA vertical lines was analyzed. The TTTG was divided into three subgroups (TTTG < 10mm, 10mm ≤ TTTG < 15mm, TTTG ≥ 15mm), then t test was performed for the angles between the vertical lines of the SEA and the four rotation axes of the tibia in each group. Among the four tibial rotation axes, only the difference between MTT and the line perpendicular to SEA had no statistical significance (NS.). The four tibial rotational axes were all positively correlated with TTTG (p < 0.001). When TTTG ≥ 15mm, Akagi line was 2.5° ± 6.9°internally rotated to the line perpendicular to SEA, while the 1/3MPT and MTT was 0.9° ± 5.3°and 1.3° ± 5.9°externally rotated to the line perpendicular to the SEA when TTTG < 10mm and 10mm ≤ TTTG < 15mm, respectively. MTT showed the best consistency with SEA. TT-TG had a significant positive correlation with all four tibial rotational axes. In patients with TTTG < 10mm, 10mm ≤ TTTG < 15mm and TTTG ≥ 15mm, the 1/3MPT, MTT and Akagi line demonstrated good alignment consistency with SEA, respectively.

Reliability of tibial anterior crest as the anatomical reference of rotating alignment for tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

This study aimed to research whether anterior tibial crest is a reliable anatomical reference for rotational alignment of tibial component in TKA. The study included 122 patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) examination for unilateral lower extremity trauma with normal contralateral lower extremities, including 89 males and 33 females, with an average age of(51.4±16.4) years old(ranged 18 to 81 years old). Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) was used to mark 11 lines including the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) connecting the most prominent points of the lateral epicondyle and the deepest point of the sulcus on the medial epicondyle of the femur, axis of medial border of patellar tendon (MEPT)connecting the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and medial border of the patellar tendon at the level of a standard tibial cut from 8 mm distal of the lateral tibial joint surface, transverse axis of tibia (TAT) at the level of a standard tibial cut from 8 mm distal of the lateral tibial joint surface, Akagi line connecting the projected middle of the PCL and medial border of the patellar tendon at the tibial attachment, the axis of the medial 1/3 of patellar tendon(M1/3) connecting the projected middle of PCL and the medial 1/3 of the patellar tendon at the patellar tendon attachment level, Insall line connecting the projected middle of the PCL and the medial 1/3 of tibial tubercle, the axis of medial border of tibial tubercle (MBTT) connecting the projected middle of the PCL and medial border of tibial tubercle, as well as the axis of the proximal anterior tibial crest (PATC), axis 1 of the middle anterior tibial crest (MATC1), axis 2 of the middle anterior tibial crest (MATC2) and the axis of the distal anterior tibial crest (DATC) which were marked by connecting the 4 equidistant points on the sharp anterior tibial crest and the projected middle of the PCL. The angles between TAT and SEA as well as the angles between other axes and the perpendicular to SEA were measured. Pairwise differences among the 10 tibial axes were examined using One-Way ANOVA and paired t-test. The angles between the axes of MEPT, Akagi line, M1/3, Insall line, MBTT, PATC, MATC1, MATC2, DATC and the perpendicular to SEA were (-1.6 ±4.5)° , (1.4 ±5.0)° , (10.2±5.1)°, (11.9±5.4)°, (3.6±4.8)°, (12.0±6.9)°, (7.2±8.6)°, (7.1±10.4)°, (6.6±13.5)°, respectively. The angle between TAT and SEA was (4.1±5.3)°. MEPT was external rotation compared to SEA. M1/3, Insall line and PATC were significantly greater than Akagi line, MBTT, TAT (P<0.001). MATC1, MATC2 and DATC were also significantly greater than Akagi line, MBTT axis and TAT (P<0.001). However, MATC1, MATC2 and DATC were also significantly less than M1/3 axis, Insall line and PATC(P<0.01). There were no significant statistical differences between MATC1, MATC2 and DATC(P>0.05). The middle tibial anterior crest can be used as a reference for rotational alignment of tibial component in TKA, and its reliability is better than Insall line, but worse than Akagi line, TAT and MBTT.

Three-dimensional morphology of the distal femur based on surgical epicondylar axis in the normal elderly population

BackgroundWe aimed to analyze the surface morphology of the distal femur in three dimensions for the healthy elderly, based on the concept that the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) is a better surrogate for the flexion–extension axis of the knee joint. MethodsWe studied 77 healthy elderly volunteers (40 males and 37 females; age, 68 ± 6 years). The medial and lateral contact lines were calculated three-dimensionally, using the highest points of the medial and lateral condyles in 201 cross-sectional planes around the SEA (every 1°, −60° (hyperextension) to 140° (flexion)). A piecewise fitting function consisting of two linear segments was applied to detect the inflection point of the constant radii in the sagittal plane. The main assessment parameters were knee flexion angle at the inflection point of the radius (inflection angle), mean radius from 0° to the inflection angle (constant radius), and coronal tilt angle of the contact line. ResultsThe inflection angles, constant radii, and coronal tilt angles were 78.2 ± 8.6°, 26.1 ± 2.3 mm, and −0.6 ± 3.2° and 65.6 ± 9.2°, 23.9 ± 2.2 mm, and 6.2 ± 3.2° in the medial and lateral condyles, respectively (all, P < 0.001). The coronal alignment was 88.7 ± 2.2°. ConclusionsThe medial and lateral femoral condyles showed asymmetrical morphologies with the almost ‘constant’ radius of sagittal curvature from 0° to around 80° and 65° of knee flexion, respectively.

Evaluation of an operation support system using the femoral anterior tangent line to determine intraoperative femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThe femoral anterior tangent (FAT) line refers to a line parallel to the anterior surface of the distal femur in the axial plane. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new operation support system which uses the FAT line to set the femoral component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsA total of 170 consecutive knees in 139 patients undergoing primary TKA with the JIGEN (Jig Engaged Three-dimensional (3D) Pre-Operative Planning Software for TKA) operation support system was examined. The JIGEN system creates 3D models of bones using computed tomography data, allowing for surgical simulations such as positioning of implants while calculating positions of the intramedullary alignment rod (IM rod) and surgical jig. We retrospectively analyzed the FAT line angle relative to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) on the axis plane perpendicular to the IM rod and evaluated the accuracy of the femoral component alignment after TKA with the 3D measurement system. ResultsThe FAT line was 9.6° ± 3.7° (range, 1.4°–20.4°) internally rotated relative to the SEA. The average absolute error was 1.4° ± 1.1° in the coronal plane, 2.0° ± 1.5° in the sagittal plane, and 1.6° ± 1.3° in the axial plane. The femoral component outliers (i.e., >3° away from the goal alignment) were 7.7% in the coronal plane, 20.6% in the sagittal plane, and 10.3% in the axial plane. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the FAT line is a reliable and reproducibly identifiable axis for the accurate determination of proper rotational alignment in TKA. An operation support system which uses the FAT line for determining intraoperative femoral component rotation can effectively achieve highly accurate positioning of the femoral component in TKA.

Three Degrees External to the Posterior Condylar Axis Has Little Relevance in Femoral Component Rotation: A Computed Tomography-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty Simulation Study

BackgroundFemoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has a significant impact on balance and patellofemoral kinematics. However, normal anatomic relationships between rotational axes are poorly understood. As such, we sought to characterize anatomic femoral rotational axes in patients undergoing primary TKA. MethodsWe identified 100 patients who underwent a primary TKA with a preoperative computed tomography scan. The angles between the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and the anterior-posterior (AP) axis to the posterior condylar axis (PCA) were measured independently by a musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologist and a fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon. We simulated an ideal TKA in which the femoral component was placed exactly 3° external to the PCA and measured resulting rotation. ResultsThe SEA was on average 1.5° externally rotated to the PCA (range 3.1° internal to 7.0° external). The AP axis was on average 4.5° externally rotated to the PCA (range 2.3° internal to 10.3° external). The AP axis was a mean 2.7° externally rotated to the SEA (range 6.3° internal to 10.3° external). Routinely setting femoral rotation 3° external to the PCA would result in only 51 (51%) TKAs within ±2° of the SEA and 23 (23%) femoral components internally rotated relative to the SEA. ConclusionNormal anatomic rotational axes of arthritic knees are highly variable, with a 10° range in the SEA and 16° range in the AP axis. Routinely setting femoral rotation 3° external to the PCA will yield significant error in aligning the femoral component with either the SEA or AP axis.

Is it possible to predict the final component gap in flexion before femoral posterior condylar osteotomy in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty?

BackgroundIn total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with posterior condylar osteotomy using anatomical landmarks, predicting the final flexion gap is impossible, as it differs with the presence or absence of the posterior cruciate ligament. We compared the predicted flexion gap, based on pre-femoral posterior condylar osteotomy measurements, with the postsurgical final flexion gap in cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. MethodsOne hundred knees of patients with osteoarthritis were included: 35 underwent CR, and 65 PS TKA. Distal femoral and proximal tibial osteotomy using the measured resection technique was performed. An anterior and posterior femoral osteotomy guide was set parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis, and the predicted flexion gap was measured using a seesaw tensor attached to the guide. After all procedures, the final component gap in flexion was measured using a similar seesaw tensor at the patella reduction position and was compared with the predicted gap. ResultsThe correlation coefficients for predicted vs. final component gap were 0.45 (P < 0.05) in CR and 0.82 (P < 0.001) in PS. The mean differences between predicted and final gaps were 1.8 mm for CR and 1.0 mm for PS. In 34.3% of CR cases, the gap difference was more than 2 mm. ConclusionIt is possible to predict the final flexion gap before femoral posterior condylar osteotomy, with a strong correlation observed between predicted and final component gaps in PS TKA. However, in CR, more than 30% of the cases showed unexpectedly large final flexion gaps.

The accuracy of femoral component rotational measurements using computed tomography\u2014a cadaveric study

BackgroundCT scans can be used to assess the rotational alignment of the femoral component following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is done by calculating the posterior condylar angle (PCA).However, the methods used may not account for the biomechanical functionality of the TKA components. This cadaveric study aimed to determine whether the axis of scanning (mechanical or anatomical) alters the results of PCA calculations.MethodsCT scans of 12 cadaveric adult femora were performed along the anatomical axis and the mechanical axis. The PCA was determined on each CT scan by measuring the relationship of the prosthetic posterior condyles to the surgical epicondylar axis of the femur. The mechanical and anatomical axis groups were further subdivided into best-fit and multi-slice subgroups. As a control, the posterior condylar angle was also calculated on photographic images of each femur. Bland-Altman plots were used to determine the correlation between the PCA values obtained from the different scanning axes and measurement techniques.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the PCA measurements derived from anatomical and mechanical axis CT scans. The Pearson correlation co-efficient also indicated good correlation between the two scanning axes.ConclusionThe axis of scanning does not significantly affect the PCA measurements. Therefore, the measurements may be reliably used for clinical decision-making, regardless of the axis of CT scanning.

Malrotation of whole-leg radiograph less than 10 degrees does not influence preoperative planning in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Coronal whole-leg radiography is generally used for preoperative open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) planning. Nevertheless, malrotational whole-leg radiographs could affect the planning, and the effects could possibly be strengthened by the knee flexed position. Consecutive 51 varus osteoarthritis knees that underwent OWHTO were included. The digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) images parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis (neutral rotation; NR), 5° and 10° external rotation (ER) or internal rotation (IR), were reconstructed from preoperative CT. Preoperative weight-bearing line percentage (WBL%), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), planned opening angle, and planned postoperative MPTA were measured with OWHTO planning in each DRR image. Correlations among the measured differences relative to NR images and knee flexion angle were investigated. As the DRR image shifted from ER to IR, the differences in preoperative WBL% and MPTA gradually increased, whereas those in the opening angle gradually decreased, although all differences in the opening angle were within 0.5° on an average. Opening angle differences remarkably correlated with knee flexion angle, and knees with>10° flexion contracture had>1° difference in 10° ER or IR images. Planned postoperative MPTA had relatively high consistency regardless of whole-leg malrotation. The opening angle measurement using malrotated radiographs less than 10° would be clinically reliable in cases without knee flexion contracture. Nevertheless, extreme care should be taken in cases with>10° knee flexion contracture. The MPTA after medial opening would be a consistent and reliable parameter in whole-leg alignment evaluation.

Referencing the substitute anteroposterior line of the tibia improves rotational alignment of the tibial component in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThere is no consensus regarding how best to determine the tibial rotational alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to clarify whether using the substitute anteroposterior (sAP) line of the tibia, as has recently been proposed, can improve tibial rotation. MethodsThe study included 57 consecutive medial UKAs. From May 2015 to September 2016, 28 knees in 28 patients underwent UKA using the medial intercondylar ridge (MIR) line as the tibial anteroposterior (AP) reference (MIR group). From October 2016 to March 2018, 29 knees in 29 patients underwent UKA using the sAP line (sAP group). In both groups, the external rotation angle of the tibial component relative to a line perpendicular to the surgical epicondylar axis was measured using computed tomography-based three-dimensional preoperative planning software for TKA and UKA. ResultsThe mean external rotation angles of the tibial component in the MIR and sAP groups were 5.2° ± 8.5° (range, −12.4° to 20.8°) and 0.7° ± 3.2° (range, −6.0° to 7.4°), respectively (unpaired t test, P = 0.014). The variation in the external rotation angle of the tibial component was significantly smaller in the sAP group than in the MIR group (F test, P < 0.0001), as was the number of the outliers with more than ±5° error (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.0001). ConclusionsThe use of the sAP line as the AP reference could improve and stabilize the rotational orientation of the tibial component in UKA procedures.

The tibial lateral axis is a novel extraarticular landmark for detection of the tibial anteroposterior axis.

Although the tibial rotation axis is significant in knee arthroplasty, no reliable extraarticular landmark has been proposed. We hypothesized that the tibial lateral axis (TLA), a tangential line of the lateral tibial surface, is perpendicular to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and compared it to other existing landmarks by 3D-CT. Fifty legs in 25 consecutive patients were studied. Using their preoperative CT, the TLAs were identified on slices at 10-50% of the total length of the tibia and the measured differences of angles against the line perpendicular to the SEA (the tibial AP axis) were calculated. The differences between the SEA and the femoral and tibial posterior condylar axis, Akagi's line and the line between the medial intercondylar spine and the medial border of the patellar tendon (sAP line)(intraarticular), the ankle axis, and the transmalleolar axis (extraarticular) were also calculated and compared. The mean values of TLA at 10%, 20%, 30% were virtually parallel to the SEA (0.97° ± 4.84°, 0.02° ± 4.61°, 1.10° ± 4.97°, respectively). They were equivalent to existing intraarticular landmarks and superior to existing extraarticular landmarks, and these levels corresponded to the tip to the lower end of the tibial tubercle (at 10.8% and 17.0% of total tibial length). The proximal TLAs can be an extraarticular bony landmark that indicates the line perpendicular to the SEA. A prospective study is needed to prove the validity and accuracy of the axes clinically.