Surgery For Lumbar Disc Herniation Research Articles

Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Lumbar Decompression or Disc Herniation

ABSTRACTMany people experience low back pain caused by degenerative disease of the lumbar spine; this includes spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, disc degeneration, and disc herniation. Conservative management of degenerative disease, which includes physical therapy, lifestyle modifications, and medications, is the initial approach. If this approach fails, a surgical procedure may be the next step. Previously, open lumbar surgery would have been the planned procedure; today, minimally invasive spine surgery gives patients another choice. Perioperative nurses should understand how minimally invasive spine surgery differs from the open procedure, the steps involved during a minimally invasive procedure, the benefits of this type of procedure, and nursing considerations for patients undergoing minimally invasive spinal procedures.

Comparative analysis of operative time, blood loss, and X-ray parameters: Two-dimensional navigation guided percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy vs. conventional microscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation

PurposeThis retrospective comparative study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of two-dimensional (2D) navigation-guided percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy in comparison to conventional microscopic surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), based on operative time, blood loss, and X-ray examination parameters. MethodsClinical data of patients who underwent either 2D navigation-assisted endoscopic (2D-NAE) discectomy or conventional microscopic surgery for LDH were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics, perioperative data, clinical outcomes (including visual analog scale [VAS] scores, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] scores, and Modified MacNab criteria), and complications were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 95 patients were included, with 80 having complete follow-up data. The 2D navigation group comprised 47 patients, while the conventional microscopic surgery group had 33 patients. Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores at each follow-up time point (P < 0.05). The perioperative analysis favored the 2D navigation-assisted group, with a significantly shorter operative time (42.77 ± 7.56 vs. 59.33 ± 3.30 min; p < 0.01) and lower blood loss (10.34 ± 2.24 vs. 11.55 ± 2.20 ml; p = 0.02). The number of X-ray examinations required was similar between the two groups (2.34 ± 0.48 vs. 2.39 ± 0.56; p = 0.65), and post-operative hospitalization durations were comparable (p = 0.5). Clinical efficacy, as reflected by VAS scores for legs and ODI scores, showed no significant differences between the groups. Additionally, the Modified MacNab criteria indicated similar rates of excellent and good outcomes. ConclusionBoth 2D-NAE discectomy and conventional microscopic surgery demonstrated comparable therapeutic outcomes for LDH, with favorable clinical efficacy and safety profiles. However, 2D-NAE surgery may offer additional benefits, including shorter operative times, reduced blood loss, and fewer X-ray examinations.

Spine

The October 2024 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Analysis of risk factors for non-fusion of bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a clinical retrospective study; Does paraspinal muscle mass predict lumbar lordosis before and after decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis?; Return to work after surgery for lumbar disk herniation: a nationwide registry-based study; Can the six-minute walking test assess ambulatory function impairment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy?; Complications after adult deformity surgery: losing more than sleep; Frailty limits how good we can get in adult spine deformity surgery.

Utilization of condoliase therapy versus surgery for lumbar disc herniation and comparison of post-treatment motor improvement

Study DesignDouble-center retrospective study. PurposeUtilization trends in interventional treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) have not yet been examined. Furthermore, limited information is currently available on motor recovery with condoliase therapy. Therefore, the present study investigated utilization trends in treatment for LDH and the effects of condoliase therapy on muscle weakness. MethodsThis retrospective, double-center study involved patients with leg pain caused by LDH who received interventional treatment between September 2017 and August 2022. LDH patients were divided into two groups: an operative treatment group and condoliase therapy group. The period between September 2017 and August 2022 was divided into 5 equal parts and changes in the percentage of intervention treatment were examined. Motor recovery was also assessed in the two groups. Patients receiving condoliase therapy were divided into two groups: an effective group and non-effective group. Sex, age, the body mass index, duration of symptoms, herniation level, neurological and radiographic findings, a visual analog scale for leg pain, and the Oswestry disability index were examined in the two groups. ResultsSubjects included 226 males and 115 females with a mean age of 49.2 years, mean BMI of 22.8, and mean duration of symptoms of 5.0 months. The utilization of condoliase therapy for LDH surpassed surgery in the third year after its introduction. In the fourth year, condoliase therapy became the main treatment for LDH. Lower limb muscle strength improved in 76 % of cases receiving condoliase therapy. ConclusionsCondoliase therapy has become an intermediate treatment before surgery in our institutions. Motor recovery in patients receiving condoliase therapy was not inferior to that after surgery; however, in cases with severe muscle weakness with manual muscle test ≤3, the improvement rate was approximately 60 %. These results will be useful for clinicians when providing informed consent and selecting condoliase therapy.

Analyses of imaging presentations, full endoscopic and pathological features of a novel interlaminar ligament

BackgroundTo analyze the characteristics of an unnamed interlaminar ligaments(ILL) through magnetic resonance image (MRI), endoscopy and pathological examination.MethodA retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of patients who underwent posterior endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis from January 2021 to February 2022 at our medical center. The height, width and cross-sectional thickness of the ligament was analyzed using T2 weighted MRI. Meanwhile, the morphological and pathological characteristics were also compared with those of the ligamentum flavum to highlight the differences between above mentioned ligaments.ResultForty-three patients were included in this study, including 27 males and 16 females, with an average age of 46.6 ± 12.1y. There were 20 cases of lumbar disc herniation and 23 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis. The width, length, thickness of the ILL, the thickness of LF and surgical time in the lumbar disc group were 17.7 ± 3.5 mm, 4.3 ± 1.3 mm, 18.3 ± 3.5 mm, 5.3 ± 1.9 mm, 53.2 ± 14.5 min, respectively. In the lumbar spinal stenosis group, the corresponding parameters were 16.0 ± 3.1 mm, 4.1 ± 1.6 mm, 17.6 ± 4.8 mm, 6.3 ± 0.8 mm, 61.8 ± 12.4 min, respectively. The intergroup difference in thickness of the ligamentum flavum was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The difference in surgical time was also established(P = 0.04). Endoscopic differences were identified as to the location of the anchor points and appearances among the two ligaments. Significant differences in the density and direction of fibrous structures were also observed under biopsy. Under endoscopy, significant difference as to the grade of ILL thickness was established when compared regarding disease spectrum (P = 0.09.)ConclusionThe interlaminar ligament is a structure that has not yet been officially named, which has significant structural differences from those of the ligamentum flavum. For posterior endoscopic procedure, its clinical significance lies in its ability to serve as the endpoint of soft tissue channel establishment. The thickness of the ligamentum flavum in MRI and the thickness of ILL under endoscopy vary according to the disease spectrum.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Recurrent Hernia and Other Postoperative Complications After Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Recurrent Hernia and Other Postoperative Complications After Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Qualitative Evaluation of Paraspinal Musculature After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Study.

To quantify fatty infiltration and degree of paraspinal muscle degeneration in patients submitted to tubular microdiscectomy and conventional open microdiscectomy. A prospective cohort of patients was submitted to microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation after failure of conservative treatment. Selection of the technique was based on the surgeon's preference. Analysis of the multifidus muscle was performed using the Goutallier system and the percentage of fat in the muscle. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was used, and statistical analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon test and Spearman correlation test using a significance level of 5%. Thirty-two patients were included in the study. The percentage of fatty infiltration in the muscle increased on both sides of the spine 1 year after surgery, although only the ipsilateral side presented statistical significance in patients submitted to conventional microdiscectomy (43.3% preoperative and 57.8% postoperative). Muscular degeneration increased significantly ipsilateral to the disc herniation according to the Goutallier classification (grades 1-2) for both interventions. No statistically significant difference was found for fatty infiltration scores or for the degree of muscular degeneration of the multifidus in the comparative analysis of the methods. Muscular damage resulting from surgery of lumbar disc herniation significantly increases fatty infiltration and degeneration of the multifidus. Muscular degeneration was associated with worsening back pain. While no significant difference was found between the techniques, the tubular minimally invasive approach shows a tendency for less muscle damage. These findings highlight the importance of minimizing muscle injury during surgery to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes.

P294. Surgery for lumbar disc herniation: surgeon's clinical judgment versus actual improvement in patient reported outcomes

P294. Surgery for lumbar disc herniation: surgeon's clinical judgment versus actual improvement in patient reported outcomes

Outcome of intradiscal condoliase injection therapy for patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Retrospective cohort study. This study aimed to compare data from patients who received intradiscal condoliase (chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase) injection for primary lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and recurrent LDH. Chemonucleolysis with condoliase for LDH is a treatment with relatively good results and a high safety profile; however, few studies have reported recurrence after LDH surgery. The study participants were 249 patients who underwent intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH at nine participating institutions, including 241 patients with initial LDH (group C) and eight with recurrent LDH (group R). Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, disease duration, intervertebral LDH level, smoking history, and diabetes history were evaluated. Low back pain/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment. Low back pain NRS scores (before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment, respectively) in group C (4.9 → 2.6 → 1.8) showed significant improvement until 1 year after treatment. Although a tendency for improvement was observed in group R (3.5 → 2.8 → 2.2), no significant difference was noted. Groups C (6.6 → 2.4 → 1.4) and R (7.0 → 3.1 → 3.2) showed significant improvement in the leg pain NRS scores after treatment. Group C (41.4 → 19.5 → 13.7) demonstrated significant improvement in the ODI up to 1 year after treatment; however, no significant difference was found in group R (35.7 → 31.7 → 26.4). Although intradiscal condoliase injection is less effective for LDH recurrence than for initial cases, it is useful for improving leg pain and can be considered a minimally invasive and safe treatment method.

The Impact of Demographic Characteristics, Obesity, Surgical Level, and Intervertebral Disc Properties on Recurrence of Lumbar Disc Herniation

This study focused on identifying factors influencing recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) by analyzing demographic data, body mass index (BMI), and radiologic disc properties in patients undergoing single-level unilateral lumbar disc herniation surgery. Our retrospective analysis included 2 groups from our clinic: Group 1 (n= 41) with patients experiencing RLDH requiring a second surgery, and Group 2 (n= 73) with patients having a single surgery and no recurrence over at least a 5-year follow-up. We assessed age, sex, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), BMI, Pfirrmann disc degeneration type, herniation types (protrusion, extrusion, and sequestration), and surgical level. The mean ages of Groups 1 and 2 were 48.93 ± 13.47 and 44.4 ± 11.79 years, respectively, with no significant age difference (P= 0.064). Gender distribution was also not significantly different, with 63.41% males in Group 1 and 56.16% in Group 2 (P= 0.450). DM prevalence was similar in both groups (P= 0.727). Notably, HT was significantly lower in Group 2 (P= 0.018). The average BMI was comparable between groups (P= 0.607), and no significant difference in Pfirrmann disc degeneration scores was observed (P= 0.547). Radiologic disc type distributions did not significantly differ (P= 0.448). Most surgeries in both groups were at the L4-5 level, with no significant differences in surgical levels (P= 0.456). We found that factors like gender, age, DM, obesity, surgical level, disc degeneration, and disc types do not significantly impact RLDH. However, the higher occurrence of HT in recurrent cases indicates a potential area for further research.

Histopathologic degenerative score as a predictor of minimal clinically important difference in pain and functionality following surgical treatment for disc herniation.

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) often results in significant pain and disability, and histopathologic evaluation of intervertebral discs offers critical insights into treatment outcomes. This prospective observational study explores histopathologic (HP) changes in intervertebral discs (IVD) and their association with clinical outcomes following surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). A cohort of 141 patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed LDH surgery underwent HP evaluation using a semi-quantitative Histopathologic Degeneration Score (HDS). Preoperatively and at a six-month follow-up, comprehensive clinical assessment included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculated from ODI and VAS. Results indicated significant associations between higher HDS and adverse clinical outcomes, including persistent pain and greater disability post-surgery. Specifically, HDS ≥ 7 was predictive (OR = 6.25, 95%CI: 2.56-15.23) of disability outcomes measured with MCID-ODI (AUC: 0.692, 95%CI: 0.609-0.767, P < 0.001), and HDS ≥ 8 was predictive (OR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.04-2.77) of persistent pain measured with MCID-VAS (AUC: 0.628, 95%CI: 0.598-0.737, P = 0.008), highlighting the diagnostic potential of HDS in assessing postoperative recovery. This study underscores the potential of HP evaluation using HDS to provide valuable insights into disease progression and outcomes in LDH patients, complementing conventional radiologic methods. The findings support the application of personalized treatment strategies based on HP findings while acknowledging challenges in interpretation and clinical implementation.

Return to Work After Surgery for Lumbar Disk Herniation

Study Design. An observational registry-based study. Objective. We investigated the long-term patterns of sick leave among patients undergoing surgery for lumbar disk herniation using two nationwide databases to study the achievement of post-surgery return to work (RTW). Summary of Background Data. The ability to RTW is increasingly recognized as an essential outcome measure for spine surgery. Methods. The study included 13,698 patients aged 18 to 60 on sick leave undergoing surgery for lumbar disk herniation from January 2007 through January 2019. Data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) and the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV) were linked. Certified sick leave around the time of surgery was assessed. The patients were further categorized according to the length of pre-surgery sick leave, and the rate of sustainable RTW for the different groups was compared using survival analysis. The association between successful surgical outcomes, defined by a 30% improvement in Oswestry Disability Index score, and achievement of sustainable RTW was analyzed using a logistic regression model. Results. Two years after surgery, 76% of the patients had returned to work. Shorter pre-surgery sick leave was associated with a higher proportion and rate of achieved sustainable RTW: Among patients with sick leave of less than 30 days, a total of 99% achieved sustainable RTW (median 46 d); only 40% of patients with longer-lasting work assessment allowance achieved the same goal within two years. Successful surgical outcomes were associated with sustainable RTW for all patient groups, but the impact of surgical success on RTW declined as sick leave extended beyond 180 days. Conclusion. Most patients had returned to work two years after lumbar disk herniation surgery. Shorter pre-surgery sick leave was associated with achieving faster and more sustainable RTW. Successful surgical outcomes had less impact on patients with extended sick leave. Level of Evidence III

Effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine nursing on functional rehabilitation and postoperative complications in patients undergoing percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation

Effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine nursing on functional rehabilitation and postoperative complications in patients undergoing percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation

Treatment of lumbar disc herniation with robot combined with unilateral biportal endoscopic technology: A case report

BACKGROUND This reported procedure combines the orthopedic surgical robot with the unilateral biportal endoscopy-lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF), utilizing the UBE's wide viewing field and operating space to perform minimally invasive decompressive fusion of the lesioned segment, and the orthopedic surgical robot's intelligence and precision to perform percutaneous pedicle screw placement. The advancement of this procedure lies in the superposition of advantages and offsetting disadvantages of the two new technologies, and the maximum effect of treatment is achieved with maximum minimization of invasiveness and precision under the monitoring of imaging instruments to maximize the benefit of patients, and this review reports a case of multiple-segment lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for lumbar disc herniation via robot-assisted UBE for reference. CASE SUMMARY A 44-year-old patient presented to our hospital. Combining various clinical data, we diagnosed the patient with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy, lumbar spondylolisthesis, and lumbar spinal stenosis. We developed a surgical plan of "UBE decompression + UBE-LIF + orthopedic surgery robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation for internal fixation". The results were satisfactory. CONCLUSION We present an extremely rare case of multiple-segment lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for lumbar disc herniation via robot-assisted UBE and achieved good results. Therefore, the technique is worthy of clinical promotion.

A Case Report of Chronic Functional Constipation after Lumbar Interbody Fusion That Improved Following Comprehensive Traditional Korean Medicine Treatment

This case report describe the effectiveness of combination treatment with Korean medicine for chronic functional constipation after lumbar interbody fusion. A female patient was treated for constipation lasting more than 6 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. For assessment, we used a NRS and Health-related Quality of Life Instrument with 8-Item Questionnaire (HINT-8). To assess changes in stool appearance, we used the Bristol Stool Scale. After 2 months of treatment, the NRS decreased from 8 to 1, the HINT-8 total score increased from 25 to 13, and the Bristol stool scale also improved. This case suggests that combined treatment with herbal medicine can improve symptoms of chronic constipation.

Examination of Pain, Quality of Life, Disability, and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disc Surgery with and without COVID-19

Aim: This study aims to examine pain, disability, anxiety, and quality of life in patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery with and without COVID-19. Material and Method: Eighty patients who were diagnosed with LDH and planned surgery between March and September 2023 were included in the study. 50% of the patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 for at most six months, according to the positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. 50% of the patients had no symptoms of COVID-19, ranging from mild to severe, and the PCR test was negative (-). The patients' pain level, disability, anxiety, and quality of life were evaluated and compared between the groups with and without COVID. Results: The mean scores of physical roles, physical function, mental health, body pain, and social function on the SF-36 quality of life scale in the LDH+COVID-19 (+) patient group were significantly lower than those in LDH+COVID-19 (-) (p

Nursing management of abortive form of herpes zoster in a patient undergoing open surgery for lumbar disc herniation

Nursing management of abortive form of herpes zoster in a patient undergoing open surgery for lumbar disc herniation

Construct validation of the Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index and the impact of diseases on patient-reported outcome measures in preoperative patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and disk herniation: a single-center observational study

PurposeThe primary objective was to validate the construct validity of the Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in preoperative patients aged 60 years or older undergoing lumbar spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and lumbar disk herniation (LDH). Additionally, as a secondary aim, we explored the impact of these diseases on quality of life (QOL).MethodsThe analysis included 199 preoperative patients aged 60 and above who were scheduled for lumbar spine surgery. To assess QOL, Japanese versions of the COMI, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L), and SF-12v2 were employed. The study assessed the validity of the COMI and compared demographic and clinical characteristics between the LSS (147 cases) and LDH (52 cases) groups. It used multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) to examine the impact of diseases (LSS and LDH) on each patient-reported outcome measure while considering covariates.ResultsCompared to the LSS group, the LDH group showed more difficulty with the COMI summary score (LSS/LDH [mean]: 6.9/8.1, p < 0.001), ODI score (46.8/57.4, p < 0.001), and EQ-5D utility (0.53/0.43, p < 0.001). The LDH group also reported more difficulties in the COMI-function, COMI-symptom-specific well-being, COMI-disability, ODI-personal care, ODI-social life, and SF-12v2-bodily pain subscales. MANCOVA demonstrated that these results were not influenced by covariates such as gender and medical history.ConclusionsThis study highlights the distinct impact of LSS and LDH on preoperative QOL in older patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Tailored interventions are essential to address the specific challenges posed by these conditions and improve patient-centered outcomes and postoperative recovery.

Repeat Discectomy or Instrumented Surgery for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: An Overview of French Spine Surgeons' Practice.

Retrospective multicenter cohort study. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (ReLDH) is a common condition requiring surgical intervention in a large proportion of cases. Evidence regarding the appropriate choice between repeat microdiscectomy (RD) and instrumented surgery (IS) is lacking. To understand the indications for either of the procedures and compare the results, we aimed to provide an overview of spine surgeon practice in France. This retrospective, multicenter analysis included adults who underwent surgery for ReLDHs between December 2020 and May 2021. Surgeons were asked which of the following factors determined their therapeutic choice: radio-clinical considerations, non-discal anatomical factors, patient preference, or surgeon background. Data on preoperative clinical status and radiologic findings were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed and compared using propensity scores preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The study included 150 patients (72 IS and 78 RD). Radioclinical elements, anatomical data, patient preferences, and surgeon background influenced the choice of RD in 57.7%, 1.3%, 25.6%, and 15.4% of the cases, respectively, and IS in 34.7%, 6.9%, 13.9%, and 44.5% of the cases, respectively. At 12 months, patient satisfaction, return to work, and changes in PROMs were not significantly different between the groups. The decision-making process included both objective and subjective factors, resulting in patient satisfaction in 80.3% to 81.5% of cases, with significant clinical improvement in radicular symptoms in 75.8% to 91.8% of cases, and quality of life in 75.8% to 84.9% of cases, depending on the procedure performed.

Risk Factors for Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease in Middle-aged and Older Women: A Prospective Case-Control Study of 2370 Subjects.

Given the distinct physiological and societal traits between women and men, we propose that there are distinct risk factors for lumbar degenerative disc disease surgeries, including lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), in middle-aged and older populations. However, few studies have focused on middle-aged and older women. This study aims to identify these risk factors specifically in this population. In this case-control study, the study group comprised 1202 women aged ≥ 45 years who underwent operative treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDH, n = 825; LSS, n = 377), and the control group comprised 1168 women without lumbar disease who visited a health examination clinic during the same period. The study factors included demographics (age, body mass index [BMI], smoking, labor intensity, and genetic history), female-specific factors (menopausal status, number of deliveries, cesarean section, and simple hysterectomy), surgical history (number of abdominal surgeries, hip joint surgery, knee joint surgery, and thyroidectomy), and systemic diseases (hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyper-low-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of associated factors. The risk factors for surgical treatment of LDH in middle-aged and older women included BMI (OR = 1.603), labor intensity (OR = 1.189), genetic history (OR = 2.212), number of deliveries (OR = 1.736), simple hysterectomy (OR = 2.511), hypertriglyceridemia (OR = 1.932), and hyper-low-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia (OR = 2.662). For surgical treatment of LSS, the risk factors were age (OR = 1.889), BMI (OR = 1.671), genetic history (OR = 2.134), number of deliveries (OR = 2.962), simple hysterectomy (OR = 1.968), knee joint surgery (OR = 2.527), hypertriglyceridemia (OR = 1.476), hyper-low-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia (OR = 2.413), and diabetes (OR = 1.643). Cerebrovascular disease was a protective factor against surgery for LDH (OR = 0.267). BMI, genetic history, number of deliveries, simple hysterectomy, hypertriglyceridemia, and hyper-low-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia were independent risk factors for surgical treatment of both LDH and LSS in middle-aged and older women. Two disparities were found: labor intensity was a risk factor for LDH patients, and knee joint surgery and diabetes were risk factors for LSS patients.