Successful Partnerships Research Articles

Review of Community-Based Conservation Initiatives for Protecting a Primary Atlantic Forest Remnant: A Case Study

Effective forest conservation should go hand in hand with collaboration of the surrounding local communities. Bringing advancement and relief to marginalized communities is pivotal for conservation initiatives, with the objective of cultivating a sustainable ecosystem while protecting indigenous biodiversity. The linchpin for developing successful partnerships begins with fostering a shared understanding of the intricate relationship between humanity and the natural environment. This awareness can be nurtured by interactive education and tangible outcomes that illuminate the profound long-term benefits of conscientious environmental stewardship. Therefore, an emphasis on community-driven conservation and environmental education becomes imperative, serving as a conduit for disseminating crucial information, fostering practical knowledge, and nurturing the attitudes and skills essential in the quest for environmental protection and sustainable development. Education, in this context, operates as a reciprocal process, demanding that educators glean insights from the local populace to effectively tailor strategies that elevate and empower them toward sustainable advancement. This dynamic interaction is where capacity development (CD) becomes indispensable. This paper delves into the unfolding of a series of conservation endeavors, initially driven by Anita Studer’s commitment to preserving a fragment of the primary Atlantic Forest in northeastern Brazil. Evolving into a four-decade educational journey, the actions taken showcase enduring ripple effects across 14 states in Brazil, presenting a comprehensive survey of applied techniques in this unique context. The resources required to achieve collective conservation goals witness a continual upswing, a trend expounded in this paper. Hence, we have chronicled the history, methodology, and projects that transpired in response to the ever-evolving community needs. We will also look at the results and discuss the advancement that ensues following the CBD targets and goals presented at the 2022 UN Biodiversity Conference.

Repositioning for the future: African hand-washing innovation Shesha Geza streamlines its strategic direction

Learning outcomes After completion of this case study, students should be able to reflect on the concept of creating shared value and then determine whether Shesha Geza can be referred to as a shared value company and, if so, what level of shared value it demonstrates. They will be able to subjectively and objectively understand the possible meaning of when a social enterprise embarks on a strategy to scale the organisation; clarity of construct will enable managers to better plan and successfully implement scalability goals. They will also be able to recognise, once scalability goals are better understood and planned, that there are a multitude of intra-organisational levers and drivers that may contribute to the organisation’s ability to scale its operations, which are related to specific internal organisational capabilities of social enterprise companies. In addition, there are situational factors that may affect the business either positively or negatively in relation to the scalability success of which a social entrepreneur should be aware. Case overview/synopsis In April 2021, Dean Boniface and his brother, Roger, had just signed off a new informational video for their Shesha Geza innovation, a low-cost hand-washing station designed for use at commuter hubs and high-traffic areas across the African continent. The unit used diluted chlorine instead of alcohol-based sanitisers to ensure a more expedient and sustainable solution, one better suited to Africa’s logistical challenges. Boniface, the co-founder of Vue Architects, had conceptualised the idea of the hand-washing hub during South African Government’s enforced COVID-19 lockdown from 27 March 2020 to 1 May 2020. Shesha Geza’s speed to market was a key contributor to its successful response in solving a critical social need. Throughout 2020, Boniface and his team built successful partnerships and secured an impressive order pipeline within a short span. Export opportunities across Africa, installations and maintenance of a sizable number of units across South Africa and the development of a behavioural change programme aimed at hygiene in schools kept the momentum going in the business. However, a year into the business and the future sustainability of a crisis–response enterprise and the ability of a shared value enterprise to scale were playing on Boniface’s mind. He was worried about the future of the small resource-constrained business. Holding onto the mental map of everything the team had learned over the past year, Boniface was confident about one thing: “All the programmes we build around Shesha Geza are value-adds to our current business. Hand hygiene will not diminish after COVID-19; it will continue to be an important social issue across the African continent.” Complexity academic level This case is intended for discussion in post-graduate-level courses such as an MBA and in postgraduate courses focused on business model innovation or on creating shared value. This case is suitable for use in the environment of business courses in relation to environmental situational factors that may affect the ability to scale social enterprises or strategic implementation courses, considering the still pervasive challenge of scaling increasingly important social impact enterprises. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 11: Strategy.

Validation of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire.

Conceptualizing and testing factors that contribute to the success of community-academic partnerships are critical to understanding their contributions to the health and well-being of communities. Most measures to date focus on factors that contribute to the development of new partnerships, and only a few have been adequately tested and validated. Methods. The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study followed a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach and a multiphase process that included the construction and pilot testing of a questionnaire, and a national survey to validate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in long-standing CBPR partnerships (existing ≥ six years). All members within partnerships were recruited to complete the survey (55 partnerships with 563 partners). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha statistics, and a pairwise correlations approach to assess discriminant and convergent validity, and assessed internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Results. All MAPS Questionnaire dimensions demonstrated strong validity and reliability and demonstrated agreement over time. Conclusion. The MAPS Questionnaire includes seven dimensions and 81 items related to the MAPS conceptual model and provides a scientific, in-depth measurement tool that allows long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity.

Academic Collaboration JAMS-boree: JAMS, Anime Expo, and Fan Connections

This introduction to JAMS Volume 4 discusses the successful partnering of JAMS and Mechademia, and Anime Expo to put on an amazing academic symposium. It also discusses an increase in JAMS' readership.

Internet of Drones and Terrestrial Networks: A Successful Partnership

Internet of Drones and Terrestrial Networks: A Successful Partnership

The Role of Influencer Marketing in Building Authentic Brand Relationships Online

Influencer marketing is a dynamic digital strategy that leverages social media influencers to promote products or brands to a targeted audience. It has evolved with the rise of platforms like Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, providing individuals a stage to build substantial followings. Brands now collaborate with influencers to connect authentically with their demographics. Over time, influencer marketing has progressed from endorsements to include sponsored content, product placements, and influencer-generated material, emphasizing authenticity and trust in influencer selection. The objective of this review is to explore the dynamics of influencer marketing, from its evolution to its ethical considerations, effective campaign crafting, risk mitigation, and future trends, emphasizing its significance in the digital age. In the influencer marketing landscape, there are various influencer types, including celebrities, micro-influencers, and nano-influencers. Celebrities offer broad reach but may lack personal connection, while micro-influencers engage specific niche audiences, and nano-influencers have hyper-local, engaged communities. Crafting effective influencer campaigns entails defining clear objectives, selecting the right influencers, creating engaging content, implementing a multi-channel approach, and fostering audience engagement. Measuring success beyond vanity metrics focuses on quantifiable outcomes for a more accurate evaluation. Mitigating risks involves addressing authenticity, regulatory compliance, audience relevance, content quality, metrics, scalability, and potential negative publicity, ensuring successful influencer partnerships. Future trends include virtual influencers and AI-driven campaigns, with influencer marketing evolving toward authenticity and long-term partnerships.

The GSA KAER Toolkit: A Framework to Activate Primary Care in the Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias

AbstractThe Gerontological Society of America (GSA) developed the KAER Toolkit to support primary care teams in increasing awareness of brain health in older adults, increase detection of cognitive impairment, initiate earlier diagnostic evaluations, and make referrals for supportive services for people with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD.)The GSA KAER model identifies four steps which are essential for improving health‐related outcomes and well‐being for people living with ADRD and their families: Kickstart the Brain Health Conversation, Assess for Cognitive Impairment, Evaluate for Dementia, and Refer to Community Resources. The regularly updated evidence‐based tools and resources showcased in the toolkit were identified by consensus, gathering a diverse range of expert contributors and stakeholders to highlight best practices that research has shown to be most effective. The kit includes practical approaches which primary care teams can use to integrate these tools into their practice workflows.The GSA program director for this initiative, who has shepherded its development and implementation since its inception, will provide insight into the framework’s development; its components, publications, supporting podcasts, and webinars; its wide‐ranging recognition, including by the National Institutes of Health and the National Alzheimer’s Project Act; and will review the projects to support its dissemination which have been funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Finally, we will describe successful partnerships which the GSA has built with a number of large organizations, including the Alzheimer’s Association and the Gerontological Advanced Practice Nurses Association, who are now spreading awareness about it and facilitating training based on its principles in health systems across the United States.

Editorial

We present a Special Issue, “Technologies and Dispute Resolution,” of the Brazilian Journal for Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR. In the digital era, technologies increasingly capture and transform different spheres of our lives. On the one hand, we must admit that the mentioned technologies have the potential to improve the area significantly. That is why conducting research in this area, finding issues of the use of technologies in dispute resolution, and prospects of its development are significant. This issue comprises 17 (seventeen) papers from around the world evidencing the international vocation of the journal. Its five years of existence and the diversity of authors and writings confirm this. We thank all the journal readers, authors, and Editora Fórum from Belo Horizonte for the successful partnership and excellent work.

Understanding the evolution of trust in a participatory health research partnership: A qualitative study.

Advancements in evaluating the impact of participatory health research (PHR) have been made through comprehensive models like the community-based participatory research (CBPR) conceptual model, which provides a useful framework for exploring how context and partnership processes can influence health research design and interventions. However, challenges in operationalising aspects of the model limit our understanding and evaluation of the PHR process. Trust is frequently identified as an important component of the CBPR model, which supports the development of key partnership outcomes, such as partnership synergy. However, trust continues to be limited to a binary view (as present or absent), which is problematic given its inherently dynamic and temporal nature. The aim of this qualitative study is to understand the evolution of trust in the national public and patient involvement (PPI) network in Ireland. Participants from the PPI network (n = 15/21) completed a semistructured interview discussing the evolution of trust by reviewing four social network maps derived from a previous longitudinal study. Following Braun and Clarke, we used reflexive thematic analysis, to iteratively develop, analyse and interpret our mediated reflection of the data. Participants described the evolution of trust as a function of three contextual factors: (1) the set-up and organisation of the network, (2) how people work togetherand (3) reflection on the process and outcomes. Their descriptions across these themes seemed to vary depending on partnership type with National Partners and Site Leads having more opportunities to demonstrate trust (e.g., via leadership roles or more resources), compared to Local. Thus, visibility and the opportunity to be visible, depending on the set-up and organisation of the network and how people work together, seemingly play an important role in the evolution of trust over time. Based on these findings, we provide important questions for reflection across themes that could be considered for future PHR partnerships. Given that the opportunity and visibility to build and maintain trust over time may not be equally available to all partners, it is important to find ways to invest in and commit to equitable relationships as the key to the success (i.e., longevity) of partnerships. We reflect on/offer important implications for those engaging in PHR partnerships and those who fund such research. A Research Advisory Group comprising four research partners (representing academic, serviceand community organisations) from the PPI Ignite Network provided input and approval for the research objectives of this study as well as previously published work informing this study. Informal consultation occurred with members of this group to discuss findings from this study, assisting with the way findings are presented and described, to be accessible for diverse audiences. Two Research Advisory Group members were involved in the interpretation of the results, and one is a co-author of this manuscript (Zoe Hughes).

Personalized medicine in a community health system: the NorthShore experience.

Genomic and personalized medicine implementation efforts have largely centered on specialty care in tertiary health systems. There are few examples of fully integrated care systems that span the healthcare continuum. In 2014, NorthShore University HealthSystem launched the Center for Personalized Medicine to catalyze the delivery of personalized medicine. Successful implementation required the development of a scalable family history collection tool, the Genetic and Wellness Assessment (GWA) and Breast Health Assessment (BHA) tools; integrated pharmacogenomics programming; educational programming; electronic medical record integration; and robust clinical decision support tools. To date, more than 225,000 patients have been screened for increased hereditary conditions, such as cancer risk, through these tools in primary care. More than 35,000 patients completed clinical genetic testing following GWA or BHA completion. An innovative program trained more than 100 primary care providers in genomic medicine, activated with clinical decision support and access to patient genetic counseling services and digital healthcare tools. The development of a novel bioinformatics platform (FLYPE) enabled the incorporation of genomics data into electronic medical records. To date, over 4,000 patients have been identified to have a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a gene with medical management implications. Over 33,000 patients have clinical pharmacogenomics data incorporated into the electronic health record supported by clinical decision support tools. This manuscript describes the evolution, strategy, and successful multispecialty partnerships aligned with health system leadership that enabled the implementation of a comprehensive personalized medicine program with measurable patient outcomes through a genomics-enabled learning health system model that utilizes implementation science frameworks.

Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe re-conceptualization of patients’ and caregivers’ roles in research from study participants to co-researchers (“patient partners”) has led to growing pains within and outside the research community, such as how to effectively engage patients in research and as part of interdisciplinary teams. To support the growth of more successful research partnerships by developing a shared understanding of how patient partners conceptualize and contribute to their role, this study aimed to explore patient partners’ motivations for engagement and understanding of their role.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with participants (n = 13) of an online survey of activities and impacts of patient engagement in Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research projects. Eligibility criteria included being a patient partner that indicated interest in interview participation upon survey completion, the ability to read/write in English and provide informed consent. Data were analyzed thematically using an inductive, codebook thematic analysis.ResultsIlluminating the lived/living patient and caregiver experience was central to how most patient partners conceptualized the role in terms of its definition, purpose, value, and responsibilities. Participants also identified four additional categories of motivations for becoming a patient partner and contributions that patient partners make to research that build upon and are in addition to sharing their lived/living experiences. Lastly, participants highlighted important connotations of the term patient partner, including temporal and context-specific considerations for the term “patient” and what “partner” may imply about the nature of the research relationship.ConclusionsAt the onset of partnership, academic researchers and patient partners must create the space necessary to discuss and understand each other’s underlying motivations for partnering and their perspectives on the purpose, value, and responsibilities of the patient partner role. These early conversations should help unearth what research partners hope to get out of and feel that they are able to contribute to engaging, and in such contribute to the development of reciprocal relationships that work towards shared and valued goals.Trial registration Not applicable.

The Role of Parent-Teacher Partnership in Promoting Numeracy Skills among Primary School Students

This study aimed to explore the perspectives of teachers and parents regarding parent-teacher partnerships in promoting numeracy skills. A qualitative research design was used, and data were collected through focus group discussions with ten teachers and ten parents from a primary school in the Division of Toledo City. The data were analyzed thematically, and five themes emerged: the importance of parent-teacher partnerships, communication, parental involvement, teacher support, and resources. The findings indicated that parent-teacher partnerships were crucial in promoting numeracy skills, and effective communication was essential for building trust and collaboration. Participants emphasized the need for parental involvement, including regular attendance at parent-teacher meetings and supporting numeracy development at home. Teacher support was also identified as crucial, including the provision of clear explanations of numeracy concepts and strategies. Finally, participants highlighted the importance of having access to resources, including instructional materials and professional development opportunities for teachers and parents. These findings provide insights into the factors that contribute to successful parent-teacher partnerships in promoting numeracy skills and highlight the importance of collaboration and communication between parents and teachers.

Using a CBPR Approach to Guide Successful Recruitment for an Online Questionnaire: The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Case Study.

The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study team effectively used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to recruit 55 long-standing CBPR partnerships to participate in an online questionnaire to assess factors associated with partnership success. Our recruitment was guided by interconnected values of collaboration, transparency, and relationship-building to maintain fidelity to CBPR principles throughout the process. We operationalized these values into a series of strategies to recruit partnerships and sustain their involvement, including establishing primary points of contact, offering incentives for completion, personalizing recruitment materials, and practicing flexibility in our approach. We aim to inform public health researchers on the strategies that enabled our team to achieve 100% of our study recruitment goal, with the intent that our recommendations can be applied by others to enhance their recruitment efforts and reach their data collection goals for future public health research.

Stanford Vax Crew: A Model for Agile, Community-Centered Vaccination Campaigns.

Stanford Vax Crew, one of the largest medical-student-led vaccination programs in the United States, serves as a case study of a successful community-university partnership that adapted its existing operations to enable COVID-19 vaccine distribution. It offers a model for agile, community-centered vaccination campaigns that harness diverse stakeholder strengths to promote vaccine access and uptake in underserved communities. This case study aims to outline the history and structure of the community-university partnership model developed through Stanford Vax Crew, describe key observations of factors that contributed to the scalability of the model, and provide experience-based recommendations for future community-university collaborations.

Partnerships with religious leaders to promote family planning in rural Tanzania: an open-label, cluster randomised trial

Family planning benefits maternal-child health, education, and economic wellbeing. Despite global efforts, an unsatisfied demand for family planning persists in sub-Saharan Africa. Based on previous successful partnerships, the aim of this study was to determine whether an educational intervention for religious leaders would increase community knowledge, demand for, and ultimately uptake of family planning. In this open-label, cluster randomised trial in Tanzania, 24 communities were randomised (1:1) to intervention or control arm. Communities, defined as the catchment area of a single public health facility, were eligible if they were at least 15 km from Mwanza City and had not previously participated in a health intervention for religious leaders. Random allocations were determined by coin toss and were not revealed to clinicians at health facilities in intervention and control communities, nor to the data entry team; however, due to the nature of the intervention, masking of religious leaders in the intervention communities was not possible. All Christian religious institutions were invited to send four leaders to an educational intervention that incorporated cultural, theological, and medical teaching about family planning. The primary outcome was contraceptive uptake at the community health facility during the year post intervention versus the year before the intervention. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03594305. 75 communities in three districts were assessed for eligibility. 19 communities were excluded and 56 were eligible for study inclusion and were placed in random order to be invited to participate. The first 24 communities that were invited agreed to participate and were randomly assigned to receive the educational intervention either during the trial or after trial completion. Between July 10, 2018 and Dec 11, 2021, we provided the intervention in 12 communities and compared contraceptive uptake with 12 control communities. All were followed up for 12 months. In intervention communities, contraceptive uptake increased by a factor of 1·47 (95% CI 1·41-1·53) in the post-intervention (prospective) versus pre-intervention (historical) year (geometric mean of contraceptive uptake, 466 in the prospective year vs 312 in the historical year), versus 1·24 (95% CI 1·20-1·29) in control communities (geometric mean, 521 in the prospective year vs 429 in the historical year). The rate of change in contraceptive uptake was greater in intervention communities (between-group ratio of geometric mean ratios over time, 1·19 [95% CI 1·12-1·25]; p<0·0001). The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased contraceptive uptake (geometric mean, 365 during the pandemic in communities that had the majority of their prospective 12-month data collection periods occur after March 16, 2020, vs 494 before the pandemic; geometric mean ratio, 0·72 [95% CI 0·57-0·90]; p=0·0040). This intervention offers a scalable model, leveraging influence of trusted religious leaders to increase knowledge and uptake of family planning. New strategies such as this could help to overcome setbacks that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. John Templeton Foundation and Weill Cornell Medicine Dean's Diversity and Healthcare Disparity Award. For the Kiswahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Evaluation of a novel biomechanics-informed walking frame, developed through a Knowledge Transfer Partnership between biomechanists and design engineers.

Walking aids such as walking frames offer support during walking, yet paradoxically, people who self-report using them remain more likely to fall than people who do not. Lifting of walking frames when crossing door thresholds or when turning has shown to reduce stability, and certain design features drive the need to lift (e.g. small, non-swivelling wheels at the front). To overcome shortfalls in design and provide better stability, biomechanists and industrial engineers engaged in a Knowledge Transfer Partnership to develop a novel walking frame that reduces the need for lifting during everyday tasks. This paper presents the results for the final prototype regarding stability, safety and other aspects of usability. Four studies were conducted that explored the prototype in relation to the current standard frame: a detailed gait lab study of 9 healthy older adults performing repeated trials for a range of everyday tasks provided mechanical measures of stability, a real-world study that involved 9 users of walking frames provided measures of body weight transfer and lifting events, two interview studies (5 healthcare professionals and 7 users of walking frames) elicited stakeholder perceptions regarding stability, safety and usability. Analysis of healthy older adults using a standard walking frame and the prototype frame demonstrated that the prototype increases stability during performance of complex everyday tasks (p < 0.05). Similarly, gait assessments of walking frame users in their home environment showed that the prototype facilitated safer usage patterns and provided greater and more continuous body weight support. Interviews with healthcare professionals and users showed that the prototype was perceived to be safe and effective and hence more usable. The outcomes of the separate studies all support the same conclusion: the prototype is an improvement on the status quo, the typical front-wheeled Zimmer frame for indoor use which has not changed in design for decades. The significance of this work lies in the success of the Knowledge Transfer Partnership and in biomechanics-informed design leading to improvements, which in future may be applied to other walking aids, to benefit walking aid users by promoting safer, more stable use of their aid.

The Issue of Equity Taking Research on Partnership Program Development to Scale in Practice

Looking to the future, a very challenging topic in the U. S. and in other nations is the “scaleability” of research-based (or evidence-based) results of partnership programs and practices. After more than three decades of studies by countless researchers that confirm the importance of school, family, and community partnerships for student success in school, it is imperative to translate research to good policy and useful practice so that more schools—indeed all schools— organize effective programs to engage parents, other family members, and community partners in ways that support student success in school. There are opportunities in each nation to attain this imperative and there are challenges that limit progress. What have we learned about both opportunities and challenges to press forward so that schools develop and sustain goal-linked partnership programs to increase student achievement, good behavior, postsecondary planning, and other indicators of success? This question is at the heart of the equity issues discussed at ERNAPE-Lisboa.

Success and Challenges of Community Bicycle Advocacy Organizations in Reaching Underserved Populations.

Bicycling, as forms of recreation and travel, offers many positive physical and mental health benefits, though there are still many disparities in bicycling rates among underserved populations in the United States. Community bicycling advocacy organizations/coalitions promote and advocate for increased bicycling; however, have been shown to have a lack of organizational capacity for equitable programming to diverse populations (racial/ethnic minorities, women, low-income, LGBTQ+ communities, youth). The purpose of this study was to understand the current practices for providing underserved populations bicycling programming among advocacy organizations and to find major barriers and helpful tools for equitable programming. This was conducted in a volunteer sample of U.S. bicycle advocacy organizations. An interview (n = 23) assessed organizational function, successful programs, and barriers to reaching underserved populations. Several themes emerged from the interviews. Participants stated that the lack of organizational leadership and member diversity, along with a lack of trust with underserved communities, presented major barriers to providing equitable programming. Partnering with other community organizations that place an emphasis on serving diverse populations was noted to have potential for increasing successful programming by allocating resources and connections. Although barriers exist for bicycle advocacy organizations when attempting to reach underserved and diverse populations, groups should focus on creating successful and diverse partnerships to increase the capacity for providing equitable programming.

Framework for PPP partner selection in K-12 educational facility procurement

Procurement procedures to select a private partner are of immense importance to the success of public-private partnerships in the K-12 education sector. The current approaches to private-partner selection mainly rely on generic evaluations of a limited number of criteria, which do not adequately address partnership risks during construction and operation or guarantee the quality of furnished educational services during the facility lifecycle. There is a crucial necessity to develop a customized method for the selection of the private partner in educational private-partnership projects. Guided by the principal author's firsthand experience as the chair of the evaluation committee, a private-partner selection framework is developed to reduce partnership risks and evaluate the quality of proposed educational public-private partnerships. To check for risk attributes and exclude high-risk partners, an early risk-reduction stage is proposed. In addition, to account for the specific nature of educational facility procurements, a technical evaluation phase that assesses design quality, functionality and facility management services is integrated into the proposal evaluation stage. The viability and effectiveness of the developed framework are validated by an application example which illustrates that the proposed risk reduction stage and the technical evaluation phase enable the selection process to be more effective, while pursuing value for money and guaranteeing the transparency of the partnership.

Participant and Stakeholder Perceptions of the Food FARMacy Emergency Food Assistance Program for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

BackgroundFood FARMacy is a clinical-community emergency food assistance program developed in response to food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Few qualitative studies have examined participant, and clinical and community stakeholder experiences with these food assistance programs. ObjectiveTo examine the motivations, experiences, and perceptions of Food FARMacy participants and program stakeholders. DesignA qualitative study using in-depth interviews between March 2021 and July 2021. Participants and settingTwenty-four Food FARMacy participants and 10 program stakeholders in New York, NY (Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens) older than age 18 years were interviewed. Statistical analyses performedInterviews were recorded, transcribed, translated, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Participant and program stakeholder interviews were analyzed separately. Themes that were salient in both groups were combined for reporting. ResultsBoth program participants and stakeholders perceived: pandemic-related demands combined with reduced resources motivated participation; convenience, safety, and ease of access facilitated program retention; participants valued fresh produce and diversity of foods; the program improved diet and health; minimizing food waste was a priority; and social cohesion was an unexpected program benefit. Two additional themes among only program stakeholders also were identified: aligned values, flexibility, and communication were key to successful partnerships; and trust between community partners and community members drove programmatic success. ConclusionsResults suggest that a multisite clinical-community partnership to provide emergency food assistance in New York City can be leveraged to reduce barriers to healthy food access and address food insecurity during crises.