Nasopharyngography has been performed int ermittently for many years. Most of the reports concerning contrast studies of the nasopharynx have been in the foreign literature (1–3, 5). In the United States, nasopharyngography is performed in various centers, but it has not gained widespread acceptance. With advances in head and neck surgery and the radiothe rapy of nasopharyngeal cancers, however, additional methods of diagnosis are needed. In our prac t ice, contrast-medium nasopharyngography has been of considerable aid in the diagnosis of benign lesions, as well as in localizati on of the malignant, and supp lements the present methods of clinical examination. The nonradiographic technics available for nasopharyngeal examination include indirect visualization with mirrors, palpation, rhinoscopy, and nasopharyn goscopy (3). Attempts at radiographic methods of examination of the nasopharynx have been several. Lateral roentgenograms with soft-tissue technics have been useful , but not the frontal views with soft-tissue technics, as here the bony st ructures of the skull are superimposed and obscure the air-tissue contrast. Laminagrap hy has been tried, but with visualization which has often left something to be desired. Roentgenographic methods of visualization are not designed to replace direct methods. Rather, they are to supplement them as a barium swallow evalu ation of the esophagus supplements direct esophagoscopy. Both give information, but findings of one method supplement and confirm those of the other. The area is first filled with contrast material, then emptied. The air-contrast studies with the mucosa coated with medium have overcome the major problems in roentgenographic visualization. We feel these air-contrast films are the real addition to nasopharyngography and the anatomic evaluation of the nasopharynx. Various contrast materials have been employed for nasopharyngograms. Lipiodol was one of the first (2, 3), but it proved too dense for optimal ante roposterior visualization and did not coat the mucous membranes for good air-contrast studies. Oily Dionosil has proved satisfactory. A water-soluble, moderately viscous medium would be ideal, but none is available. We have had good results with a 1.25–1.5 per cent solution of car boxymethylcellulose and Micropaque (6, 7). This mixture fills the nasopharynx slowly but coats well for air-contrast visualizati on. Our technic for nasopharyngography is shown in Figure 1. Preliminary films are obta ined in the anteroposterior vertical and cross-table lateral positions with a 40-in target-film distance. This insures both adequate penetration and also films for comparison with th e contrast studies. Too, if needed, subt raction films may be obtained at a later time for bett er visualization. The equipment is simple. No anesthesia is necessary. If the patient has a raw or irritated nasal mucosa, th en spraying a topical anesth etic before instillation of medium could be useful, but in general it is not necessary.
Read full abstract