The problem of preserving the personal integrity in a situation of cardinal changes is considered. The complexity of considering the question of the relationship between stability and the transformation of value orientations in the context of personality psychology is shown. The productivity of the analysis of the problem of holism and the dynamic connection of value orientations from the standpoint of the aesthetic paradigm is analyzed. The role of society and cultural values as a large system that changes the perception and internalization of culture by a person is shown. In this context, a large system can be considered as a ratio of culture and subculture, information about which changes not only the content of the subculture, but also the culture as a whole. The options for maintaining harmony between development and sustainability, dynamics-stability of values are considered, in which the space of subculture is created as a subsystem in the general space of the cultural field. At the same time, such a subculture can exist autonomously, without coming into conflict with a large system of values of society, such as, for example, the variant of the subculture created by Dali and Gala. Other versions of information subsystems of culture, both in science and in art, can gradually change the information field of culture as a whole in such a way that it practically merges with the content of a particular subcultural subsystem (quantum physics, atonal music, impressionism). The role of cultural capital in maintaining the integrity of the individual and its variability in a situation of multiple and cardinal transformations of society is revealed. The connection of the constant value of the first level of cultural capital as an investment in the development of subsequent generations with a large information system of culture is shown. An analysis of different levels of cultural capital and their content in different situations and with varying degrees of changes is given. The connection of these levels and the degree of their variability with the motivation of a person and the standards of behavior at different times and in different cultural contexts is shown. It is proved that different variants of behavior in the cultural field can be considered as different types of dynamic stability of the personality.