Hadith is the second source of Islamic legislation after the Quran. Due to the importance of this matter, scholars have given significant attention and concern to ensuring the authenticity and validity of the transmission of each hadith. Various branches of Hadith studies have been organized and established by scholars to ensure that this goal is achieved. Among the most important branches of Hadith studies is the science of al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil, which discusses the credibility of a hadith narrator to determine whether their narration is directly accepted, accepted with supporting evidence, or rejected. Many hadith scholars discuss the science of al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil, and they undoubtedly have their own research methods.Imam Abu Hanifah, on the other hand, is a prominent figure in the field of Islamic jurisprudence and has a number of hadiths attributed to him. Therefore, he cannot escape the comments of scholars of al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil and their views on the credibility of Imam Abu Hanifah in narrating hadiths. This article aims to uncover the importance of assessing the status of a hadith narrator using the scale of al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil. This study uses library methods to gather information on the comments of al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil regarding Imam Abu Hanifah, and then analyzes the methods of scholars in their evaluation of his status. This study is expected to clarify the importance of analyzing the status of hadith narrators according to the scale of al-Jarh wa al-Ta'dil.