IntroductionThe ability to interpret cross‐sectional anatomy in radiological scans is a necessary diagnostic skill for clinicians. The skills to spatially translate three‐dimensional (3‐D) anatomy into a two‐dimensional (2‐D) plane of section is challenging for beginner anatomy students. However, the capability to build these skills is critical for their medical and research training.AimThe following lesson was employed with the objective to aid first year medical and graduate students at Boston University School of Medicine in applying their understanding of 3‐D anatomy to interpret 2‐D transverse sections of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis of human cadavers. Turning Technologies “Turning Point” application was used to measure students’ change in understanding of the material before and after.MethodsThe lesson began with an assessment of cross‐sectional knowledge using the Turning Point application on students’ phones. The students then participated in a lecture designed to systematically guide them through a general screening of osteological landmarks, muscles, blood vessels, organs, and other visceral structures at each vertebral level on cross‐sectional images of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. Students were guided on how to recognize the general topography and obviously identifiable organs in each section. They were then taught more specifically how to identify increasingly challenging anatomical features, such as organ‐specific structures, based on their previous 3‐D and 2‐D knowledge of the larger structures in the section. This lecture portion of the lesson gave students a system for how to apply and interpret 3‐D anatomy and transpose it into a 2‐D cross‐section. After the lecture portion of the lesson, students were asked to answer a series of practical‐style questions using the Turning Point app. Question types included multiple choice, short answer, and “hot spot” style.ResultsIn total, 42 students participated in the lesson. The overall class pre‐test average was 60.31 ± 26.79% while the post‐test average was 72.40 ± 13.28%. A comparison of individual pre‐test vs. post‐test scores using Wilcoxon Signed‐Ranks test revealed a significant improvement in student’s performance (p=0.0098, two‐tailed). Average scores of questions in each anatomical region were assessed (thorax: 67.21 ± 32.46%, abdomen: 71.71 ± 18.82%, pelvis: 70.76 ± 34.43%).ConclusionBased on student performance and feedback, this teaching method is an effective tool for improving students’ confidence and knowledge in interpretation of cross‐sectional anatomy. By using a systematic teaching approach with robust identification markers, Turning Point was an effective addition to help build students understanding and confidence in the material.Support or Funding InformationNo funding was received
Read full abstract