Structure Of Nuclear Receptors Research Articles

Harnessing nuclear receptors to modulate hepatic stellate cell activation for liver fibrosis resolution.

With the recent approval of Resmetirom as the first drug targeting nuclear receptors for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), there is promising way to treat MASH-associated liver fibrosis. However, liver fibrosis can arise from various pathogenic factors, and effective treatments for fibrosis due to other causes remain elusive. The activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) represents a central link in the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis. Therefore, harnessing nuclear receptors to modulate HSC activation may be an effective approach to resolving the complex liver fibrosis caused by various factors. In this comprehensive review, we systematically explore the structure and physiological functions of nuclear receptors, shedding light on their multifaceted roles in HSC activation. Recent advancements in drug development targeting nuclear receptors are discussed, providing insights into their potential as rational and effective therapeutic targets for modulating HSC activation in the context of liver fibrosis. By elucidating the intricate interplay between nuclear receptors and HSC activation, this review contributes to the discovery of new nuclear receptor targets in HSCs for resolving hepatic fibrosis.

Study of novel androgen receptor V770 variant in androgen insensitivity syndrome patients reveals the transitional state of the androgen receptor ligand binding domain homodimer.

We report the discovery of the androgen receptor missense mutation V770D, that was found in two sisters suffering from complete androgen insensitivity. Experimental validation of AR V770 variants demonstrated that AR V770D was transcriptionally inactive due to the inability to dimerize and a reduced ligand binding affinity. The more conservative AR V770A variant showed a dimerization defect at low levels of DHT with a partial recovery of the transcriptional activity and of the receptor's ability to dimerize when increasing the DHT levels. With V770 located outside of the proposed LBD dimerization interface of the AR LBD homodimer crystal structure, the effects of the V770A mutation on AR dimerization were unexpected. We therefore explored whether the AR LBD dimerization interface would be better described by an alternative dimerization mode based on available human homodimeric LBD crystal structures of other nuclear receptors. Superposition of the monomeric AR LBD in the homodimeric crystal structures of GR, PR, ER, CAR, TRβ, and HNF-4α showed that the GR-like LBD dimer model was energetically the most stable. Moreover, V770 was a key energy residue in the GR-like LBD dimer while it was not involved in the stabilization of the AR LBD homodimer according to the crystal structure. Additionally, the observation that 4 AIS mutations impacted the stability of the AR LBD dimer while 16 mutations affected the GR-like LBD dimer, suggested that the AR LBD dimer crystal is a snapshot of a breathing AR LBD homodimer that can transition into the GR-like LBD dimer model.

Importins involved in the nuclear transportation of steroid hormone receptors: In silico and in vitro data.

The nuclear receptor superfamily (NRS) consists of 48 receptors for lipophilic substances and is divided into 7 different subfamilies, with subfamily 3 comprising steroid hormone receptors. Several nuclear receptors usually bind their cognate ligands in the cytosol and the complex (mono- or dimerized) is transported to the nucleus, where it acts as a transcription initiating factor for a number of genes. The general structure of nuclear receptors consists of an N-terminal activating domain (A/B), important for the binding of activating or inhibitory co-factors, the DNA-binding domain (C), responsible for the association of the receptor-ligand-co-factor complex to the nucleus, the ligand-AF2 domain (E/F), where ligand binding occurs as well as that of ligand-dependent activating/inhibiting factors, and a flexible/non-structured domain (D), linking the DBD and LBD, called hinge region, on which a significant number of post-translational modifications occur. This hinge domain, for the sub-class of steroid receptors, is a non-structured domain and was reported as mainly responsible for the nuclear transport of steroid receptors, since it contains a specific amino acid sequence (Nuclear Localization Signal-NLS), recognized by importin α. In addition to the importin α/β complex, a number of other importins have been discovered and reported to be responsible for the nuclear transport of a number of significant proteins; however, the corresponding recognition sequences for these importins have not been identified. Recently, we have reported the identification of the NLS sequences for importins 4, 5 and 7. In this work, we provide in silico data, followed by experimental in vitro validation, showing that these alternative importins are responsible for the nuclear transportation of steroid hormone receptors such as ERα, AR and PR, and therefore they may consist of alternative targets for the pharmacological manipulation of steroid hormone actions. Moreover, we provide additional in silico data for the hinge region of steroid hormone receptors which is highly enriched with NLS sequences for importins 4, 5 and 7, in addition to the recognition NLS for importin α/β.

Helix 12 stabilization contributes to basal transcriptional activity of PXR

Pregnane X receptor (PXR) plays an important role in xenobiotic metabolism. While ligand binding induces PXR-dependent gene transcription, PXR shows constitutive transcriptional activity in the absence of ligands when expressed in cultured cells. This constitutive activity sometimes hampers investigation of PXR activation by compounds of interest. In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanism of PXR activation. In the reported crystal structures of unliganded PXR, helix 12 (H12), including a coactivator binding motif, was stabilized, while it is destabilized in the unliganded structures of other nuclear receptors, suggesting a role for H12 stabilization in the basal activity of PXR. Since Phe420, located in the loop between H11 and H12, is thought to interact with Leu411 and Ile414 to stabilize H12, we substituted alanine at Phe420 (PXR-F420A) and separately inserted three alanine residues directly after Phe420 (PXR-3A) and investigated their influence on PXR-mediated transcription. Reporter gene assays demonstrated that the mutants showed drastically reduced basal activity and enhanced responses to various ligands, which was further enhanced by coexpression of the coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1α. Mutations of both Leu411 and Ile414 to alanine also suppressed basal activity. Mammalian two-hybrid assays showed that PXR-F420A and PXR-3A bound to corepressors and coactivators in the absence and presence of ligands, respectively. We conclude that the intramolecular interactions of Phe420 with Leu411 and Ile414 stabilize H12 to recruit coactivators even in the absence of ligands, contributing to the basal transcriptional activity of PXR. We propose that the generated mutants might be useful for PXR ligand screening.

Structural Insights into the Specificity of Ligand Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Estrogen-Related Receptor β

Estrogen-related receptor β (ERRβ) is a nuclear receptor critical for many biological processes. Despite the biological and pharmaceutical importance of ERRβ, deciphering the structure of ERRβ has been hampered by the difficulties in obtaining a pure and stable protein for structural studies. In fact, the ERRβ ligand-binding domain remains the last unsolved ERR structure and also one of only a few unknown nuclear receptor structures. Here, we report the identification of a critical single-residue mutation resulted in robust solubility and stability of an active ERRβ ligand-binding domain, thereby providing a protein tool enabling the first probe into the biochemical and structural studies of this important receptor. The crystal structure reveals key structural features that have enabled the integration of the molecular determinants of signals transduced across the ligand binding and coregulator recruitment by all three ERR subtypes, which also provides a framework for the rational design of selective and potent ligands for the treatment of various ERR-mediated diseases.

SUN-LB138 Dynamic Structural Model of Testosterone Entry Into the Unliganded Androgen Receptor

Background: Crystallographic structures of nuclear receptor ligand binding domains provide a static model of a receptor stably wrapped around an internalized ligand. Understanding the dynamics of a receptor at different stages of ligand binding has been hampered by the paucity of crystal structures for unliganded nuclear receptors. Molecular dynamic models have been constructed for some nuclear receptors to fill that void. Methods: The molecular simulation docking program MORDOR (MOlecular Recognition with a Driven dynamics OptimizeR)(1) was used to study the structural dynamics of the androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) modeled from the static structure of the AR LBD bound to testosterone (T) (PDB ID: 2AM9). The goals of the study were to understand a) the dynamic interaction of the T in its binding pocket, b) AR LBD structural flexibilities that permit T entry/exit from the binding pocket and c) a model of the unliganded AR LBD. Results: Modeling AR LBD structure flexibility over time revealed possible alternative dynamic structures, including those without ligand, overlaid against the canonical nuclear receptor structure. The model dynamically tracks the structural changes as a ligand enters into the ligand binding domain and nestles into the ligand binding pocket. The model predicted the appearance of alpha helices within the AR LBD that transiently fold/unfold during the ligand entry phases. Once in the pocket, the ligand itself remains very dynamic in a still flexible pocket. The model predicted also AR LBD amino acids that sequentially interact with the ligand during its dynamic entry into the AR LBD. Intriguingly, those AR amino acids include those mutated in castration-resistant prostate tumors that continue to grow during androgen suppression therapy. Functional studies showed those mutant ARs had a primary consequence of enhancing response to lower level T, and other androgens, consistent with their role in creating a higher affinity AR that can scavenge low-level androgens in an androgen-suppressed patient. Conclusions: The molecular model of T binding to the AR LBD suggests a degree of structural dynamism not evident in the crystallographic structures commonly associated with nuclear receptors. Some AR mutations activating prostate tumor growth may do so by impacting androgen entry/exit, rather than by altering androgen fit into the ligand binding pocket. Reference: (1) Guilbert C, James TL (2008) J Chem Inf Model. 2008 48(6): 1257-1268. doi: 10.1021/ci8000327

Definition of functionally and structurally distinct repressive states in the nuclear receptor PPAR\u03b3

The repressive states of nuclear receptors (i.e., apo or bound to antagonists or inverse agonists) are poorly defined, despite the fact that nuclear receptors are a major drug target. Most ligand bound structures of nuclear receptors, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), are similar to the apo structure. Here we use NMR, accelerated molecular dynamics and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to define the PPARγ structural ensemble. We find that the helix 3 charge clamp positioning varies widely in apo and is stabilized by efficacious ligand binding. We also reveal a previously undescribed mechanism for inverse agonism involving an omega loop to helix switch which induces disruption of a tripartite salt-bridge network. We demonstrate that ligand binding can induce multiple structurally distinct repressive states. One state recruits peptides from two different corepressors, while another recruits just one, providing structural evidence of ligand bias in a nuclear receptor.

Revealing a Mutant-Induced Receptor Allosteric Mechanism for the Thyroid Hormone Resistance.

SummaryResistance to thyroid hormone (RTH) is a clinical disorder without specific and effective therapeutic strategy, partly due to the lack of structural mechanisms for the defective ligand binding by mutated thyroid hormone receptors (THRs). We herein uncovered the prescription drug roxadustat as a novel THRβ-selective ligand with therapeutic potentials in treating RTH, thereby providing a small molecule tool enabling the first probe into the structural mechanisms of RTH. Despite a wide distribution of the receptor mutation sites, different THRβ mutants induce allosteric conformational modulation on the same His435 residue, which disrupts a critical hydrogen bond required for the binding of thyroid hormones. Interestingly, roxadustat retains hydrophobic interactions with THRβ via its unique phenyl extension, enabling the rescue of the activity of the THRβ mutants. Our study thus reveals a critical receptor allosterism mechanism for RTH by mutant THRβ, providing a new and viable therapeutic strategy for the treatment of RTH.

Structural studies unravel the active conformation of apo RORγt nuclear receptor and a common inverse agonism of two diverse classes of RORγt inhibitors

The nuclear receptor retinoid acid receptor-related orphan receptor γt (RORγt) is a master regulator of the Th17/IL-17 pathway that plays crucial roles in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity. RORγt has recently emerged as a highly promising target for treatment of a number of autoimmune diseases. Through high-throughput screening, we previously identified several classes of inverse agonists for RORγt. Here, we report the crystal structures for the ligand-binding domain of RORγt in both apo and ligand-bound states. We show that apo RORγt adopts an active conformation capable of recruiting coactivator peptides and present a detailed analysis of the structural determinants that stabilize helix 12 (H12) of RORγt in the active state in the absence of a ligand. The structures of ligand-bound RORγt reveal that binding of the inverse agonists disrupts critical interactions that stabilize H12. This destabilizing effect is supported by ab initio calculations and experimentally by a normalized crystallographic B-factor analysis. Of note, the H12 destabilization in the active state shifts the conformational equilibrium of RORγt toward an inactive state, which underlies the molecular mechanism of action for the inverse agonists reported here. Our findings highlight that nuclear receptor structure and function are dictated by a dynamic conformational equilibrium and that subtle changes in ligand structures can shift this equilibrium in opposite directions, leading to a functional switch from agonists to inverse agonists.

Structures and regulation of non-X orphan nuclear receptors: A retinoid hypothesis

Nuclear receptors are defined as a family of ligand regulated transcription factors [1–6]. While this definition reflects that ligand binding is a key property of nuclear receptors, it is still a heated subject of debate if all the nuclear receptors (48 human members) can bind ligands (ligands referred here to both physiological and synthetic ligands). Recent studies in nuclear receptor structure biology and pharmacology have undoubtedly increased our knowledge of nuclear receptor functions and their regulation. As a result, they point to new avenues for the discovery and development of nuclear receptor regulators, including nuclear receptor ligands. Here we review the recent literature on orphan nuclear receptor structural analysis and ligand identification, particularly on the orphan nuclear receptors that do not heterodimerize with retinoid X receptors, which we term as non-X orphan receptors. We also propose a speculative “retinoid hypothesis” for a subset of non-X orphan nuclear receptors, which we hope to help shed light on orphan nuclear receptor biology and drug discovery.This article is part of a Special Issue entitled ‘Orphan Nuclear Receptors’.

Importance of the pharmacological profile of the bound ligand in enrichment on nuclear receptors: toward the use of experimentally validated decoy ligands.

The evaluation of virtual ligand screening methods is of major importance to ensure their reliability. Taking into account the agonist/antagonist pharmacological profile should improve the quality of the benchmarking data sets since ligand binding can induce conformational changes in the nuclear receptor structure and such changes may vary according to the agonist/antagonist ligand profile. We indeed found that splitting the agonist and antagonist ligands into two separate data sets for a given nuclear receptor target significantly enhances the quality of the evaluation. The pharmacological profile of the ligand bound in the binding site of the target structure was also found to be an additional critical parameter. We also illustrate that active compound data sets for a given pharmacological activity can be used as a set of experimentally validated decoy ligands for another pharmacological activity to ensure a reliable and challenging evaluation of virtual screening methods.

Minireview: Dynamic Structures of Nuclear Hormone Receptors: New Promises and Challenges

Therapeutic targeting of nuclear receptors (NRs) is presently restricted due to 2 constraints: 1) a limited knowledge of the structural dynamics of intact receptor when complexed to DNA and coregulatory proteins; and 2) the inability to more selectively modulate NR actions at specific organ/gene targets. A major obstacle has been the current lack of understanding about the function and structure of the intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain that contains a major regulatory transcriptional activation function (AF1). Current studies of both mechanism of action and small molecule-selective receptor modulators for clinical uses target the structured pocket of the ligand-binding domain to modulate coregulatory protein interactions with the other activation function AF2. However, these approaches overlook AF1 activity. Recent studies have shown that highly flexible intrinsically disordered regions of transcription factors, including that of the N-terminal domain AF1 of NRs, not only are critical for several aspects of NR action but also can be exploited as drug targets, thereby opening unique opportunities for endocrine-based therapies. In this review article, we discuss the role of structural flexibilities in the allosteric modulation of NR activity and future perspectives for therapeutic interventions.

Chemoisosterism in the Proteome

The concept of chemoisosterism of protein environments is introduced as the complementary property to bioisosterism of chemical fragments. In the same way that two chemical fragments are considered bioisosteric if they can bind to the same protein environment, two protein environments will be considered chemoisosteric if they can interact with the same chemical fragment. The basis for the identification of chemoisosteric relationships among protein environments was the increasing amount of crystal structures available currently for protein-ligand complexes. It is shown that one can recover the right location and orientation of chemical fragments constituting the native ligand in a nuclear receptor structure by using only chemoisosteric environments present in enzyme structures. Examples of the potential applicability of chemoisosterism in fragment-based drug discovery are provided.

Induced Fit Simulations on Nuclear Receptors

The large superfamily of nuclear receptors is a family of ligand-activated transcription factors involved in numerous fundamental processes and shows many common characteristics and behaviors. The comprehension of these roles is of fundamental importance to select the right target for receptor structure-based screening. Recently, during the last ten years, several crystallographic structures of nuclear receptors complexed with ligands have been registered in the Protein Data Bank, supplying a structural basis for computational simulations. The macroscopic flexibility of helix12 and local flexibility of some amino acids sidechains within cavities of the Ligand Binding Domain suggest a reason for the behavior of these receptors toward different ligands. Several approaches have been applied in trying to explain this flexibility and to predict how ligand binding can influence complex conformations. In this short review, we present an introduction to the structure and function of nuclear receptors, specifically the estrogen, androgen, glucorticoid, peroxisome proliferator, steroid, thyroid and vitamin D receptors, and a discussion of the state-of-the-art of induced fit approaches for the nuclear receptor family.

Inhibition of prostate cancer cell growth by second-site androgen receptor antagonists.

The impact of ligand binding on nuclear receptor (NR) structure and the ability of target cells to distinguish between different receptor-ligand complexes are key determinants of the pharmacological activity of NR ligands. However, until relatively recently, these mechanistic insights have not been used in a prospective manner to develop screens for NR modulators with specific therapeutic activities. Driven by the need for unique androgen receptor (AR) antagonists that retain activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer, we developed and applied a conformation-based screen to identify AR antagonists that were mechanistically distinct from existing drugs of this class. Two molecules were identified by using this approach, D36 and D80, which interact with AR in a unique manner and allosterically inhibit AR agonist activity. Unlike the clinically important antiandrogens, casodex and hydroxyflutamide, both D36 and D80 block androgen action in cellular models of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Mechanistically, these compounds further distinguish themselves from classical AR antagonists in that they do not promote AR nuclear translocation and quantitatively inhibit the association of AR with DNA even under conditions of overexpression. Although the therapeutic potential of these antiandrogens is apparent, it is the demonstration that it is possible, to modulate the interaction of cofactors with agonist-activated AR, using second-site modulators, that has the greatest potential with respect to the therapeutic exploitation of AR and other NRs.

Nonsteroidal Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs): Dissociating the Anabolic and Androgenic Activities of the Androgen Receptor for Therapeutic Benefit

Interest in the development and therapeutic potential of nonsteroidal tissue-selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) has increased dramatically within the past decade. Rapidly expanding knowledge of nuclear hormone receptor structure and function and successful proof-of-principle clinical trials with SARMs have revived an almost dormant search for improved androgens. This Award Address attempts to chronicle the landmark discoveries (with emphasis on our work), organize the SARM landscape into clinically relevant bins, and provide insight into the clinical prospects for SARMs. 1.1. Origins of Androgen Use. An early (1889) and unusual experiment in androgen therapy was performed by Charles Edouard Brown-Sequard, age 72. He administered a testicular extract to himself and reported that he felt “increased vigor and capacity for work”. Despite retrospective suggestions that any effect was purely placebo, this report resulted in widespread use of testicular extracts throughout Europe and North America for several decades. Attempts to isolate the active components of testicular extract failed until 1935 when testosterone (17 hydroxy-4-andosten-3-one) was isolated from bull testes. Shortly thereafter, its synthesis was reported. In the same year, extracts of urine from males were shown to cause nitrogen retention, an indicator of anabolic metabolism. Testosterone was the first anabolic androgen to be used clinically, but its use is limited by its androgenicity and pharmacokinetic (PK) issues. 1 In the latter half of the 20th century, the chemical scaffold of testosterone was modified extensively, producing many

Computational Modeling of the Structural Mechanism Linking Ligand and Corepressor Binding to Thyroid Hormone Receptors

Thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are nuclear receptors with two functional states. Upon binding to the thyroid hormone, TRs recruit coactivator proteins and activate gene transcription. Without the hormone ligands, TRs interact with corepressor proteins and repress transcription. Due to the importance of the thyroid hormone action in embryo development, metabolism, heart rhythm and cholesterol level, the molecular mechanism behind the functional switch has been studied extensively. However, the current available crystal structures of thyroid hormone receptor ligand binding domains (LBDs) are all in the ligand-bound (holo) form, with no revelation on ligand-free (apo) form or transcription corepressor bound form. In order to elucidate the complete apo to holo switch process, we constructed homology models of apo TR from the available apo structures of interrelated nuclear receptors: retinoid acid receptor (RXR) and peroxisome proliferators activated receptor (PPAR). Both models were subjected to energy minimization followed by molecular dynamic (MD) simulation. Analysis of the MD simulations proved that the model based on PPAR was more stable than the model based on RXR. As a result, unlike the prevailing idea that TRs would exert a major structural change in the C-terminal activation helix (AF2) domain upon ligand binding, TRs exhibit only subtle changes at the AF2 domain. Our model predicts that the recruitment of corepressor proteins, which require the relocation of the AF2 domain, is more appropriately portrayed as an induced fit process. Additionally, we constructed homology models of TR LBD in complex with the nuclear receptor interacting domains of corepressor proteins. Molecular dynamic simulation of this receptor-correpressor complex system in the absence or presence of the ligand thyroid hormone has identified correlated conformational changes that may be important for the functional switch.

Induced-fit docking of mometasone furoate and further evidence for glucocorticoid receptor 17α pocket flexibility

An induced-fit docking method was used to characterize the interactions of the glucocorticoid receptor binding-site with mometasone furoate, a glucocorticoid with a lipophilic ester at the C17α position. Two validation studies demonstrated that the protocol can reproduce crystal structures of nuclear receptors, and is appropriate for modeling ligand binding to the glucocorticoid receptor. Key hydrogen bonding interactions between mometasone furoate and the glucocorticoid receptor, as well as favorable hydrophobic interactions between the furoate group and the 17α pocket, contribute to high affinity and specificity of this ligand for the receptor. Using the glucocorticoid des-ciclesonide, which has an even larger moiety at the 16,17α position, induced-fit docking demonstrates the ability of the 17α pocket of the receptor to expand even further to accommodate the ligand.

Coactivators PGC-1β and SRC-1 Interact Functionally to Promote the Agonist Activity of the Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator Tamoxifen

PGC-1beta is a transcriptional coactivator that enhances strongly and in a hormone-dependent manner the activity of the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) while having only weak effects on similar steroid hormone receptors, such as ERbeta or the glucocorticoid receptor. Notably, PGC-1beta enhances ERalpha transcriptional activity not only in response to agonist ligands, such as estradiol, but also to selective ER modulators, such as tamoxifen. Here, we dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying the ability of PGC-1beta to act selectively on ERalpha and to promote the agonist activity of tamoxifen. We show that receptor selectivity is achieved by PGC-1beta interactions with not just the ligand binding domain (LBD), which is highly conserved among nuclear receptors, but also the N-terminal domain and the hinge/AF-2a region of ERalpha, which are less well conserved. PGC-1beta interacts directly with the hinge/AF-2a and LBD regions but indirectly and via the coactivator SRC-1 with the N-terminal domain. The three ERalpha surfaces and SRC-1 collectively enable efficient coactivation by PGC-1beta. Similar ERalpha surfaces and interactions enable PGC-1beta to coactivate transcription by tamoxifen-bound ERalpha. Surprisingly, PGC-1beta coactivation of tamoxifen-bound ERalpha depends partially on one of the LXXLL motifs of PGC-1beta and on Lys(362) of the ERalpha LBD (i.e. surfaces implicated in agonist-dependent interactions). Our findings suggest that tamoxifen-induced changes in the ERalpha LBD promote interactions with the coactivator PGC-1beta, which then cooperates with SRC-1 to enable tamoxifen agonism.

Nuclear localization and DNA binding of ecdysone receptor and ultraspiracle

The Ecdysone receptor (EcR) is distributed between cytoplasm and nucleus in CHO cells. Nuclear localization is increased by the ligand Muristerone A. The most important heterodimerization partner Ultraspiracle (Usp) is localized predominantly in the nucleus. We used the diethylentriamine nitric oxide adduct DETA/NO, which releases NO and destroys the zinc-finger structure of nuclear receptors, to investigate whether nuclear EcR and Usp interact with DNA. If expressed separately, Usp and EcR in the absence of hormone do not interact with DNA. The hormone-induced increase in nuclear EcR is due to enhanced DNA binding. In the presence of Usp, EcR is shifted nearly quantitatively into the nucleus. Only a fraction (approximately 30%) of the heterodimer is sensitive to DETA/NO. Interaction of the heterodimer with DNA is mediated mainly by the C-domain of EcR. Deletion of the DNA-binding domain of Usp only slightly reduces nuclear localization of EcR/Usp, although the nuclear localization signal of Usp is not present anymore. The results indicate that EcR and Usp can enter the nucleus independently, but cotransport of both receptors mediated by dimerization via the ligand binding domains is possible even in the absence of hormone.