Composite patches are widely accepted as a useful practice for the repair of cracked aircraft components and the repair method is of vital importance to the final performance of the repaired structures. The present research experimentally studied the repair efficiency and processing stability of pre-cured, prepreg (including unidirectional and plain weave prepregs) and wet-layup methods for use on cracked Ti-alloy panels through the configuration of a butt joint bonded with a one-sided composite patch. The efficiency and stability of these repair methods were elaborately evaluated and compared via the load bearing behavior, the microstructure of the bonding interface, and the structural failure morphology through two batches of testing specimens. Typical patterns were found in load-displacement curves where the initial damage and ultimate bearing load points divided them into elastic-linear, damage propagation and complete fracture phases. Although the co-cure process of both unidirectional prepreg and wet-layup methods can form a jigsaw-like demarcation interface between the adhesive layer and the composite patch to achieve a good bonding force and a high recovery of loading performance, the latter presents porous patches with a high coefficient of variation in load-carrying capacity. Conversely, the pre-cured laminate and the plain weave prepreg patches failed to restore the mechanical properties owing to the weak bonding interface and the low axial patch strength, respectively. The unidirectional prepreg patch was proven to be the optimal repair method for the cracked metallic structures when balancing repair efficiency and processing stability.
Read full abstract