SEER, 98, 2, APRIL 2020 368 Elphick, Daniel. Music behind the Iron Curtain: Weinberg and his Polish Contemporaries. Music in Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 2020. 298 pp. Music examples. Tables. Figures. Notes. Appendices. Bibliography. Index. £75.00. A restless, plaintive melody underscored BBC coverage of Holocaust Memorial Day on 27 January 2020: the opening of the first movement of Mieczysław Weinberg’s String Quartet No. 5 (1945). The quartet was played as survivors and dignitaries assembled at Auschwitz for the 75th anniversary of the death camp’s liberation. To those familiar with Weinberg’s music, not least through the recent widening of interest in his work, the juxtaposition reinforced a number of associations: Weinberg (1919–96), composer, Jewish, close family murdered in the camps. As musicologist Daniel Elphick demonstrates in Music behind the Iron Curtain: Weinberg and his Polish Contemporaries, however, Weinberg’sJewishnessandtraumaticlossesarepartofamorecomplexidentity; so, for that matter, is another common Weinberg story (friend of Shostakovich, residentintheUSSRafterflightfromNazis,prolificbutmusicallyconservative). Elphick’s contribution to Weinberg studies distinguishes itself by exploring the composer’s continuing relationship to Poland and its musicians after his escape to Russia; it is a counterbalance, as such, to Verena Mogl’s 2017 examination of Weinberg’s Soviet contexts. Yet Elphick has no interest in reclaiming the composer for Poland. Instead, he draws attention to the ‘dialogue of loss and influence’ interconnecting ‘all three spheres of [Weinberg’s] identity’ (pp. 13, 14). Blending lucid music analysis with careful contextualization, the study is a quietly ambitious first monograph from a significant new voice in Polish and Russian music scholarship. The ambition resides in Elphick’s interweaving of three strands of argument and methodology across the book’s chronological survey of Weinberg’s life and work: twentieth-century Polish and Russian musical/political history, plus theoretically-engaged analyses of Weinberg’s seventeen string quartets (for Elphick, the composer’s laboratory). There are obvious drawbacks to this strategy in a relatively concise book: of necessity, some major works (most notably The Passenger, Weinberg’s Auschwitz opera) receive little attention; music analysts may sometimes find themselves wishing for longer or more detailed readings. Nevertheless, the juxtapositions are often sharply illuminating, and Elphick presents neat analyses, the best of which (on quartets no. 5, 6, 8 and 12) persuade the reader of his assertion that some of Weinberg’s finest music for the medium surpasses the quality of contemporary quartets by Shostakovich (p. 97). These and other aspects of the book make it a self-recommending addition to any serious collection on Polish or Russian music. I appreciated, for instance, REVIEWS 369 the way Elphick places Jewish experience more centrally in his telling of Polish music history, supplementing existing studies; his paralleling of Weinberg’s transplanted fate with other Polish exiles, such as Andrzej Panufnik, who fled the height of Stalinism for the UK; the contrast of captive Russian and liberated Polish musical minds after Stalin; his analytical focus on music by less celebrated Poles (most notably Grażyna Bacewicz, her String Quartets Nos 3 and 7 receiving strong attention here); the details added to our knowledge of musical relations between the USSR and Poland after Stalin; and the ironies of offerings like a post-1968 Soviet rewriting of Polish music history ‘absolving Soviet figures of any wrongdoing by omission’ while celebrating ‘“a colossal wave of joyful art, bursting with energy and merriment”’ (Polish socrealizm, apparently). Occasionally, the diversity of methods in play threatens to overwhelm the music or composer, as in the critical collective (Lacan, Eliot, Dante, Adorno, Hepokoski) brought to bear on Weinberg’s eleventh quartet in chapter four (an ultimately productive approach that would have benefited from more space in which to unpack ideas). But Elphick marshals his forces well, for the most part, and works hard to avoid excluding readers (not least students) with less expertise. The book makes a particularly substantial contribution to the study of Weinberg’s musical language, presenting lexicons of terminology that detail different sides of a coin: the revelation of Weinberg’s subjectivity through his style and its symbolic effects. As a ‘reactive’ (J. P. E. Harper-Scott) or ‘mainstream’ (Arnold Whittall) modernist, Weinberg’s music ‘incorporates [unresolving] dissonance’ but also...