Choosing the right parameterization to describe a transversely isotropic medium with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI) allows us to match the scattering potential of these parameters to the available data in a way that avoids a potential tradeoff and focuses on the parameters to which the data are sensitive. For 2D elastic full-waveform inversion in VTI media of pressure components and for data with a reasonable range of offsets (as with those found in conventional streamer data acquisition systems), assuming that we have a kinematically accurate normal moveout velocity ([Formula: see text]) and anellipticity parameter [Formula: see text] (or horizontal velocity [Formula: see text]) obtained from tomographic methods, a parameterization in terms of horizontal velocity [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] is preferred to the more conventional parameterization in terms of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]. In the [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] parameterization and for reasonable scattering angles (<[Formula: see text]), [Formula: see text] acts as a “garbage collector” and absorbs most of the amplitude discrepancies between the modeled and observed data, more so when density [Formula: see text] and S-wave velocity [Formula: see text] are not inverted for (a standard practice with streamer data). On the contrary, in the [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] parameterization, [Formula: see text] is mostly sensitive to large scattering angles, leaving [Formula: see text] exposed to strong leakages from [Formula: see text] mainly. These assertions will be demonstrated on the synthetic Marmousi II as well as a North Sea ocean bottom cable data set, in which inverting for the horizontal velocity rather than the vertical velocity yields more accurate models and migrated images.
Read full abstract