Steroidal Inhibitors Research Articles

Abstract ES8-1: Adjuvant endocrine therapy in 2020: It's complicated

Abstract Adjuvant endocrine therapy in 2020: It’s complicated Data regarding the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer has grown over the past decades, and yet still uncertainty remains in management recommendations. In pre-menopausal women, treatment decisions are often driven by estimation of risk of recurrence, measured in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, algorithm-based prognostic modelling derived from breast cancer registries, molecular profiling and gene signature assays. Despite these significant advances, risk of distant disease recurrence is still over-estimated in a significant proportion of women. The addition of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen in pre-menopausal women has been shown to increase rates of both disease-free survival and overall survival than tamoxifen alone, with the use of the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane producing further higher rates of freedom from recurrence. However, the addition of ovarian suppression in this generally low-risk population comes at the cost of increased adverse events and potential to interpose child-bearing years. Further to this, the SOFT/TEXT studies mandated five years of active treatment; little is known as to whether extended treatment beyond those five years would be comparatively equal, better or worse in terms of outcome endpoints. In the post-menopausal population, the updated ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline suggests that all women with node-positive disease should be offered extended therapy including an aromatase inhibitor for a total of ten years, as well as women with node-negative disease possessing high-risk prognostic factors. The question of how best to identify those women who may fare equally well with de-escalated, shorter therapy remains open. The issue of adverse events and drug-related side effects, particularly in the setting of extended therapy, is relevant and may impact negatively on overall treatment compliance and quality of life. As such, the choice of endocrine therapy remains an important consideration, as is evidence that intermittent administration of aromatase inhibitors may be feasible in selected patients. CDK4/6 inhibitors, administered in tandem with endocrine therapy, have radically changed the approach to managing metastatic endocrine receptor-positive disease. There is now much interest in moving these agents forward into the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, with a number of phase II and III trials ongoing. If positive data is consistently reported in adjuvant studies, this will undoubtedly create another layer of complexity to the clinical management of endocrine-sensitive disease. Citation Format: A McCartney, A Di Leo. Adjuvant endocrine therapy in 2020: It's complicated [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr ES8-1.

Abstract P6-04-07: Time-course DNA and RNA profiling reveals down regulation of all members of the sulfotransferase A1 subfamily during neoadjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors

Abstract Background. The NEO-LET-EXE trial examines the neoadjuvant and sequential administration of the aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole (Femar/Femara) and the aromatase inactivator exemestane (Aromasin). Although both drugs nearly completely inhibit aromatase, resistance to both is developed with time. However, when used sequentially in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), in some patients after switching to the alternative drug after progressing on the first choice, new responses may appear. The mechanism behind this clinical observation is not known. The solution may lead us potentially to a novel strategy to treat hormonal dependent breast cancer.Material. Postmenopausal patients suffering from strongly estrogen receptor (ER) positive (>50%), HER-2 negative locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) may be enrolled. Age: 18+ (no upper limit). Present accrual and target accrual: 55 out of planned 100 patients have been enrolled so far. The last patient is expected to enter the trial in Q4 2020. We report here results from a scientific subprotocol involving 25 patients.Study design. In the neoadjuvant, randomized, open-label, intra-patient cross-over trial NEO-LET-EXE tumor biopsies are obtained at baseline, after two months on the first AI prior to swap to the other aromatase inhibitor, and, finally, at surgery following at least four months on AIs.Methods. Tumor DNA and RNA were extracted from FFPE samples, and normal DNA was extracted from blood samples. Tumor exome was sequenced to an average of 250x depth, normal exomes was sequenced to an average depth of 125x, and tumor RNA was sequenced with at least 200 million reads. Somatic variants and copy number changes were called, and gene expression was quantified from RNA-seq.Results. In order to explain the phenomenon of a lack of cross-resistance between steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors we profiled biopsies at three time points per patient by whole exome and whole transcriptome sequencing from FFPE from 25 patients. A total of 56 DNA whole exomes and 41 RNA-seq transcriptomes were generated from FFPE samples available. Neoadjuvant treatment with sequential use of the two AIs caused a significant downregulation of all four members belonging to the sulfotransferase A1 subfamily (SULT1A1, SULT1A2, SULT1A3 and SULT1A4) following 4 months on AI therapy, irrespectively of the clinically chosen treatment sequence. A significant downregulation of ARSG, ESR1 and PGR was also observed during AI therapy. In addition, a low rate of CYP19A1 copy number changes could be detected in our material. A CYP19A1 deletion occurred in one patient during AI therapy. No DNA or RNA support for hot-spot ESR1 resistance mutations was found at any time point during early neoadjuvant AI therapy.Conclusions. Our findings suggest a significant downregulation of the entire sulfotransferase A1 subfamily during neoadjuvant therapy with AIs in patients with ER-positive LABC. These findings may reflect an early adaptation process caused by the AI-induced estrogen depression. A low rate of CYP19A1 copy number changes could be revealed during the first 4 months of neoadjuvant AI therapy in vivo. Citation Format: Charles Vaske, Rahul Parulkar, Nazli Bahrami, Torill Sauer, Torben Lüders, Annika Lorentzen, Berit Gravdehaug, Vessela Kristensen, Jürgen Geisler. Time-course DNA and RNA profiling reveals down regulation of all members of the sulfotransferase A1 subfamily during neoadjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-04-07.

Neural sex steroids and hippocampal synaptic plasticity.

It was a widely held belief that sex steroids, namely testosterone and 17β-estradiol (E2) of gonadal origin, control synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. A new paradigm emerged when it was shown that these sex steroids are synthesized in the hippocampus. The inhibition of sex steroids in the hippocampus impairs synaptic plasticity sex-dependently in this region of the brain. In gonadectomized animals and in hippocampal cultures, inhibition of estradiol synthesis in female animals and in cultures from female animals, and inhibition of dihydrotestosterone synthesis in male animals and in cultures of male animals, cause synapse loss and impair LTP in the hippocampus, but not vice versa. Since the hippocampal cultures originated from perinatal animals, and due to the similarity of in vivo and in vitro findings, it appears that hippocampal neurons are differentiated in a sex-specific manner during the perinatal period when sexual imprinting takes place.

The alteration of IGF-1 levels and relationship between IGF-1 levels and growth velocity during GnRH analogue therapy

Background Some studies have examined the effect of gonadal suppression on insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels and the growth velocity (GV) with conflicting results. Methods Forty-four girls treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) for central precocious puberty (CPP) were included in the study. IGF-1 levels were examined at the beginning and after 12 months of treatment. Results IGF-1 and IGF-1 standard deviation score (SDS) according to chronological age (CA-IGF-1 SDS) at diagnosis were positively correlated with chronological age (CA), anthropometric measurements, stage of puberty, bone age (BA), BA-CA, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), oestradiol, uterus length, endometrium thickness and ovarian volume (OV) at diagnosis (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in IGF-1 levels after treatment. However, there was a negative correlation between ΔIGF-1 SDS and IGF-1 level, CA-IGF-1 SDS and BA-IGF-1 SDS at diagnosis (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between GV and IGF-1, ΔIGF-1. GV was negatively correlated with basal LH level at diagnosis (p = 0.008, r = -0.397). Peak LH levels of the patients who had GV-SDS < 0 were more suppressive than those of the patients who had GV-SDS > 0 after 12 months of treatment. Conclusions It was determined that the IGF-1 level and CA-IGF-1 SDS at baseline were correlated with more advanced pubertal stage prior to treatment. Initiation of treatment with a relatively high level of IGF-1 increased the risk of a decrease in the IGF-1 level. Likewise, the initiation of treatment with a relatively high LH level may increase the risk of low GV, but low GV was not related to the IGF-1 level. Increased sex steroid suppression may increase the risk of low GV.

Synthesis and characterisation of steroidal inhibitors of α-amylase, α-glucosidase and oxidative species

Synthesis and characterisation of steroidal inhibitors of α-amylase, α-glucosidase and oxidative species

Glucuronidation of Abiraterone and Its Pharmacologically Active Metabolites by UGT1A4, Influence of Polymorphic Variants and Their Potential as Inhibitors of Steroid Glucuronidation

Abiraterone (Abi) acetate (AA) is a prodrug of Abi, a CYP17A1 inhibitor used to treat patients with advanced prostate cancer. Abi is a selective steroidal inhibitor that blocks the biosynthesis of androgens. It undergoes extensive biotransformation by steroid pathways, leading to the formation of pharmacologically active Δ4-Abi (D4A) and 5α-Abi. This study aimed to characterize the glucuronidation pathway of Abi and its two active metabolites. We show that Abi, its metabolites, and another steroidal inhibitor galeterone (Gal) undergo secondary metabolism to form glucuronides (G) in human liver microsomes with minor formation by intestine and kidney microsomal preparations. The potential clinical relevance of this pathway is supported by the detection by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry of Abi-G, D4A-G, and 5α-Abi-G in patients under AA therapy. A screening of UGT enzymes reveals that UGT1A4 is the main enzyme involved. This is supported by inhibition experiments using a selective UGT1A4 inhibitor hecogenin. A number of common and rare nonsynonymous variants significantly abrogate the UGT1A4-mediated formation of Abi-G, D4A-G, and 5α-Abi-G in vitro. We also identify Gal, Abi, and its metabolites as highly potent inhibitors of steroid inactivation by the UGT pathway with submicromolar inhibitor constant values. They reduce the glucuronidation of both the adrenal precursors and potent androgens in human liver, prostate cancer cells, and by recombinant UGTs involved in their inactivation. In conclusion, tested CYP17A1 inhibitors are metabolized through UGT1A4, and germline variations affecting this metabolic pathway may also influence drug metabolism. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The antiandrogen abiraterone (Abi) is a selective steroidal inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxy/17,20-lyase, an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of androgens. Abi is metabolized to pharmacologically active metabolites by steroidogenic enzymes. We demonstrate that Abi and its metabolites are glucuronidated in the liver and that their glucuronide derivatives are detected at variable levels in circulation of treated prostate cancer patients. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A4 is the primary enzyme involved, and nonsynonymous germline variations affect this metabolic pathway in vitro, suggesting a potential influence of drug metabolism and action in patients. Their inhibitory effect on drug and steroid glucuronidation raises the possibility that these pharmacological compounds might affect the UGT-associated drug-metabolizing system and pre-receptor control of androgen metabolism in patients.

Steady-state activation of the high-affinity isoform of the \u03b14\u03b22\u03b4 GABAA receptor

Activation of GABAA receptors consisting of α4, β2 (or β3), and δ subunits is a major contributor to tonic inhibition in several brain regions. The goal of this study was to analyze the function of the α4β2δ receptor in the presence of GABA and other endogenous and clinical activators and modulators under steady-state conditions. We show that the receptor has a high constitutive open probability (~0.1), but is only weakly activated by GABA that has a maximal peak open probability (POpen,peak) of 0.4, taurine (maximal POpen,peak = 0.4), or the endogenous steroid allopregnanolone (maximal POpen,peak = 0.2). The intravenous anesthetic propofol is a full agonist (maximal POpen,peak = 0.99). Analysis of currents using a cyclic three-state Resting-Active-Desensitized model indicates that the maximal steady-state open probability of the α4β2δ receptor is ~0.45. Steady-state open probability in the presence of combinations of GABA, taurine, propofol, allopregnanolone and/or the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate closely matched predicted open probability calculated assuming energetic additivity. The results suggest that the receptor is active in the presence of physiological concentrations of GABA and taurine, but, surprisingly, that receptor activity is only weakly potentiated by propofol.

Steady-state activation and modulation of the synaptic-type α1β2γ2L GABAA receptor by combinations of physiological and clinical ligands.

The synaptic α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor is activated phasically by presynaptically released GABA. The receptor is considered to be inactive between synaptic events when exposed to ambient GABA because of its low resting affinity to the transmitter. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of physiological and/or clinical positive allosteric modulators of the GABAA receptor with ambient GABA generates measurable steady‐state activity. Recombinant α1β2γ2L GABAA receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and activated by combinations of low concentrations of orthosteric (GABA, taurine) and allosteric (the steroid allopregnanolone, the anesthetic propofol) agonists, in the absence and presence of the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. Steady‐state activity was analyzed using the three‐state cyclic Resting‐Active‐Desensitized model. We estimate that the steady‐state open probability of the synaptic α1β2γ2L GABAA receptor in the presence of ambient GABA (1 μmol/L), taurine (10 μmol/L), and physiological levels of allopregnanolone (0.01 μmol/L) and pregnenolone sulfate (0.1 μmol/L) is 0.008. Coapplication of a clinical concentration of propofol (1 μmol/L) increases the steady‐state open probability to 0.03. Comparison of total charge transfer for phasic and tonic activity indicates that steady‐state activity can contribute strongly (~20 to >99%) to integrated activity from the synaptic GABAA receptor.

Crystallization and structure determination of aldo-keto reductase 1C3 in complex with steroidal inhibitors using in situ proteolysis

Crystallization and structure determination of aldo-keto reductase 1C3 in complex with steroidal inhibitors using <i>in situ</i> proteolysis

Immunosuppressive therapy in children with primary nephrotic syndrome: single center experience, Karachi, Pakistan

BackgroundMajority of children with nephrotic syndrome are steroid sensitive, but treatment of difficult to treat nephrotic (frequent relapsing, steroid dependent and steroid resistant) syndrome is challenging. Low dose steroid, levamisole, cyclophosphamide (CPM), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the common options of treatment.Objective of the study was to determine the response to steroid and alternative immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) in children with difficult nephrotic syndrome (DNS).MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of 176 children with DNS, managed over 12 years at The Kidney Center-Postgraduate Training Institute, Karachi- Pakistan from 2005 to 2017.Initial episode was treated with daily oral prednisolone (OP) for 4–8 weeks followed by alternate day OP for 12–24 weeks. Subsequently low dose OP, levamisole (Leva)and cyclophosphamide was used for frequent relapsing (FR)/ steroid dependent (SD). All with initial steroid resistance and non- responders to leva and or cyclophosphamide were biopsied and treated with CNIs and MMF. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.ResultsThere were 130(73.86%) children with FR/SD and 46(26.13%) with SRNS. All children with SR (46) and 86 with FR/SD were biopsied. Minimal change disease (60.60%) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS 23%) were the two common lesions. Majority (73.86%) received single OP whereas divided doses were administered in 26.13% cases. Daily OP was used for 4, 6 and 8 weeks in 61.36,28.4 and10.22% respectively. Steroids were tapered over 3 (31.81%),4 (52.27%) and 6 months (15.90%). Levamisole, CPM, cyclosporin (CS) and MMF were used sequentially in 45, 54.23, 50 and 20% respectively. Combination of MMF and CS was used in 11.29% of cases.Levamisole was effective in 80%, CPM induced complete remission (CR, 57.77%) or partial remission (PR, 22.22%), CS induced CR 46.59% and PR 39.77%. MMF showed PR and CR 69 and 12.82% respectively. At last follow up, 46% were maintaining remission while off treatment, whereas 35% are maintaining remission on therapy,10.23% lost- to-follow, 5.68% progressed to chronic kidney disease. Mortality was 2.84% and it was due to infection and uremia.ConclusionMajority had steroid sensitive MCD. Levamisole and cyclophosphamide were effective in maintaining remission in FR/ SD. FSGS was responsible for resistance to steroid and alternative ISAs. Cyclosporin was effective in inducing remission in SRNS. Mortality was less than 3%.

Steady-State Activation and Modulation of the Concatemeric α1β2γ2L GABAA Receptor

The two-state coagonist model has been successfully used to analyze and predict peak current responses of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor. The goal of the present study was to provide a model-based description of GABAA receptor activity under steady-state conditions after desensitization has occurred. We describe the derivation and properties of the cyclic three-state resting-active-desensitized (RAD) model. The relationship of the model to receptor behavior was tested using concatemeric α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The receptors were activated by the orthosteric agonists GABA or β-alanine, the allosteric agonist propofol, or combinations of GABA, propofol, pentobarbital, and the steroid allopregnanolone, and the observed steady-state responses were compared with those predicted by the model. A modified RAD model was employed to analyze and describe the actions on steady-state current of the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. The findings indicate that the steady-state activity in the presence of multiple active agents that interact with distinct binding sites follows standard energetic additivity. The derived equations enable prediction of peak and steady-state activity in the presence of orthosteric and allosteric agonists, and the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The study describes derivation and properties of a three-state resting-active-desensitized model. The model and associated equations can be used to analyze and predict peak and steady-state activity in the presence of one or more active agents.

Atypical IgM on T cells predict relapse and steroid dependence in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

The clinical heterogeneity of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in childhood may reflect different mechanisms of disease that are as yet unclear. Here, we evaluated the association between an atypical presence of IgM on the surface of T cells (T-cell IgM) and the response to steroid therapy in a total of 153 pediatric patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in different phases of disease. At disease onset, T-cell IgM median levels were significantly elevated and predictive of risk of relapse in 47 patients. They were also significantly increased comparing 58 steroid-dependent to 8 infrequently relapsing and 14 frequently relapsing patients, especially during relapse, whereas they were within the normal range in 7 genetic steroid-resistant patients. T-cell IgM invivo was not affected by the amount of total circulating IgM, nor by concomitant acute infections or oral immunosuppression. However, it was affected by rituximab treatment in 21 steroid-dependent patients. By invitro experiments, elevated T-cell IgM was not influenced by total circulating IgM levels or by the presence of other circulating factors, and there was no distinctive antigen-specificity or atypical IgM polymerization. Rather, we found that increased T-cell IgM correlates with reduced IgM sialylation, which influences T-cell response to steroid inhibition and T-cell production of podocyte-damaging factors. Thus, the atypical presence of IgM on the surface of T cells may predispose a subset of steroid-sensitive pediatric patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome to a poor response to steroid therapy since disease onset.

Sex hormones modulate pathogenic processes in experimental traumatic brain injury.

Clinical and animal studies have revealed sex-specific differences in histopathological and neurological outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The impact of perioperative administration of sex steroid inhibitors on TBI is still elusive. Here, we subjected male and female C57Bl/6N mice to the controlled cortical impact (CCI) model of TBI and applied pharmacological inhibitors of steroid hormone synthesis, that is, letrozole (LET, inhibiting estradiol synthesis by aromatase) and finasteride (FIN, inhibiting dihydrotestosterone synthesis by 5α-reductase), respectively, starting 72h prior CCI, and continuing for a further 48h after CCI. Initial gene expression analyses showed that androgen (Ar) and estrogen receptors (Esr1) were sex-specifically altered 72h after CCI. When examining brain lesion size, we found larger lesions in male than in female mice, but did not observe effects of FIN or LET treatment. However, LET treatment exacerbated neurological deficits 24 and 72h after CCI. On the molecular level, FIN administration reduced calpain-dependent spectrin breakdown products, a proxy of excitotoxicity and disturbed Ca2+ homeostasis, specifically in males, whereas LET increased the reactive astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acid protein specifically in females. Examination of neurotrophins (brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neuronal growth factor, NT-3) and their receptors (p75NTR , TrkA, TrkB, TrkC) revealed CCI-induced down-regulation of TrkB and TrkC protein expression, which was reduced by LET in both sexes. Interestingly, FIN decreased neuronal growth factor mRNA expression and protein levels of its receptor TrkA only in males. Taken together, our data suggest a sex-specific impact on pathogenic processes in the injured brain after TBI. Sex hormones may thus modulate pathogenic processes in experimental TBI.

Abstract OT1-01-01: The NEO-LET-EXE-trial: An intra-patient cross-over trial to explore the "lack of cross-resistance" between steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors

Abstract Background. The aromatase inhibitor letrozole and the aromatase inactivator exemestane currently belong to the most widely used antihormonal drugs for breast cancer worldwide. Both compounds are strongly suppressing estradiol levels in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. However, in the metastatic setting, these drugs may be used after another, causing new responses in selected patients following switching to the alternative drug after progressing on the first choice. This well-known “lack of cross resistance” has been recognized for some time and is documented by several trials. However, the precise explanation for this clinical observation is still unknown. The solution may potentially lead us to a novel strategy to treat hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Trial design. NEO-LET-EXE is a neoadjuvant, randomized, open-label, intra-patient cross-over trial . Eligibility criteria. Postmenopausal patients suffering from estrogen receptor (ER) positive (&amp;gt;50%), HER-2 negative, locally advanced breast cancer, suitable for neoadjuvant/presurgical antihormonal therapy, may be enrolled. Age: 18+ (no upper limit). Specific aims. To explain the phenomenon of a lack of cross-resistance between steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors in vivo. Sequential tumor biopsies and blood samples, obtained at baseline and following 2 months of therapy with each drug given in sequence, will be used to perform a comprehensive exploration of the consequences of each drug therapy. The influence on plasma and tissue steroids (estrogens, androgens, etc.) will be compared. In addition, whole genome sequencing, whole exome sequencing, epigenetics, proteomics and plasma analysis (cytokines, tumor DNA fragments, etc.) will be performed. Statistical methods. Data will be analyzed using mixed effects models. Present accrural and target accrural. 49 out of planned 100 patients have been enrolled so far. The last patient is expected to enter the trial in Q4 2019. Citation Format: Bahrami N, Sauer T, Loeng M, Gravdehaug B, Engebretsen SS, Aljabri B, Bemanian V, Lindstrøm JC, Lüders T, Kristensen VN, Geisler J. The NEO-LET-EXE-trial: An intra-patient cross-over trial to explore the "lack of cross-resistance" between steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-01.

Abstract OT1-04-01: A phase IIB pre-surgical trial of oral tamoxifen (TAM) versus transdermal 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) in women with DCIS of the breast

Abstract Background Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is diagnosed in 60,000 women annually in the US. TAM is proven to reduce risk of local recurrence and new primary breast cancer in women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive DCIS. However, acceptance of TAM has been low, primarily because of toxicity related to systemic exposure. Local delivery to the breast is an attractive alternative since low systemic levels could minimize toxicity. 4-OHT is an active metabolite of TAM. When formulated as a gel and applied to the breast skin, it is well tolerated, and results in 4-OHT breast tissue drug levels comparable oral TAM. In small pilot studies, its anti-proliferative effects on invasive breast tumors and DCIS are also similar to oral TAM [Lee O, et al. PMID 25028506]. The goal of our study is to validate these results in preparation for a Phase III trial of 4-OHT gel in comparison to oral TAM. Methods We are conducting a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase IIB pre-surgical trial to demonstrate that daily application of 4-OHT gel will result in a reduction in the Ki-67 labeling index of DCIS lesions that is not inferior to that seen in women receiving daily oral TAM 20 mg daily. Ki-67 of the base-line diagnostic core needle biopsy will be compared to that of the therapeutic surgical excision sample after oral TAM or 4-OHT gel for 8 ± 2 weeks. Secondary endpoints include changes in Oncotype DCIS-Score, IHC markers (CD68, COX2, p16), hormone levels, coagulation markers, drug concentration in the plasma and breast tissue, the fraction of women with no residual DCIS in the surgical sample, and experienced symptoms. 100 women (assuming 20% non-evaluable samples or compliance issues) with DCIS (10% ER-positive) will be enrolled across six institutions into two intervention arms: oral TAM 20 mg daily, placebo gel and 4-OHT gel 4mg daily (2mg/breast), placebo capsule. All participants will be evaluable for toxicity from their first dose. All samples from all participants who receive drug will be evaluated and included in the primary analysis, which will be based on intent to treat principle. To date 15 of 100 participants have been enrolled across six institutions including: Northwestern University in Chicago, IL, St. Elizabeth Healthcare in Edgewood, KY, Duke University Medical Center in Durham, NC, Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, OH, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, NY, and Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Since study open, 69 potential participants have been contacted, 52 did not consent for screening, 17consented for screening, 2 are pending consent, and 15 have started study intervention. The most common reasons potential participants chose not to consent are wanting to schedule surgery as soon as possible, attitudes toward medical research, and current use of a prohibited concomitant medication such as a potent inhibitor of tamoxifen metabolism or exogenous sex steroid. Funding Source: NCI Contract # HHSN2612201200035I. Citation Format: Benante KA, Xu Y, Tull MB, Segura AJ, Alber KM, Kalinichenko K, Hou L, Jovanovic B, Perloff M, Heckman-Stoddard B, Dimond E, Khan SA. A phase IIB pre-surgical trial of oral tamoxifen (TAM) versus transdermal 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) in women with DCIS of the breast [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-01.

Abstract P3-06-11: Time-course DNA and RNA profiling of tumors from intra-patient cross-over trial of sequential use of aromatase inhibitors

Abstract Background. The NEO-LET-EXE trial examines the neoadjuvant use of sequential administration of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole (Femar / Femara) and the aromatase inactivator exemestane (Aromasin). Although both drugs nearly completely inhibit aromatase, resistance to both is developed with time. However, when used sequentially, in some patients after switching to the alternative drug and progressing on the first choice, new responses may appear. The mechanism behind this clinical observation is currently not known. The solution may lead to a novel strategy to re-sensitize tumors to hormonal treatment. Prior studies have examined genomics at the four month time point, but not at both two months and four months. Material. Postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive (&amp;gt;50%), HER-2 negative locally advanced breast cancer may be enrolled. Age: 18+ (no upper limit). Present accrural and target accrural: 49 out of planned 100 patients have been enrolled so far. The last patient is expected to enter the trial in Q4 2019. Study design. In the neoadjuvant, randomized, open-label, intra-patient cross-over trial NEO-LET-EXE biopsies are taken before treatment, after two months on one aromatase inhibitor and swap to the other aromatase inhibitor, and at surgery at four months. Results. In order to explain the phenomenon of a lack of cross-resistance between steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors we profiled biopsies at three time points per patient by whole exome and whole transcriptome sequencing from FFPE from 25 patients. A total of 56 DNA whole exomes and 41 RNA seq transcriptomes were generated from FFPE samples available. When grouping both arms together, mutational burden decreased at two months, while clonality of mutations increased, providing evidence of selection. At four months, mutational burden increased from the two month timepoint. In particular, PIK3CA somatic variants present at the first time point were not detected at two months. However, these were detected again at significant variant allele fractions at four months after switch of treatment. The majority of gene expression changes happen in the initial two months, with fewer changes between two and four months. Instead, significant changes in alternative splicing at two months and four months were observed, for example for FGFR1, which does not experience a large fold change in expression between these two points. Our preliminary results show significant DNA and RNA changes in the first two months of aromatase inhibition leading to fewer, more clonal variants. Comparison of the four month to two month time point shows fewer RNA changes than the prior two months and an increase in the number of somatic variants compared to the two month timepoint. Citation Format: Vaske CJ, Parulkar R, Bahrami N, Sauer T, Loeng M, Gravdehaug B, Aljabri B, Bemanian V, Lindstrøm J, Lüders T, Kristensen V, Geisler J. Time-course DNA and RNA profiling of tumors from intra-patient cross-over trial of sequential use of aromatase inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-11.

Strong Inhibitory Effect, Low Cytotoxicity and High Plasma Stability of Steroidal Inhibitors of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors With C-3 Amide Structural Motif.

Herein, we report the synthesis, structure-activity relationship study, and biological evaluation of neurosteroid inhibitors of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) receptors that employ an amide structural motif, relative to pregnanolone glutamate (PAG) – a compound with neuroprotective properties. All compounds were found to be more potent NMDAR inhibitors (IC50 values varying from 1.4 to 21.7 μM) than PAG (IC50 = 51.7 μM). Selected compound 6 was evaluated for its NMDAR subtype selectivity and its ability to inhibit AMPAR/GABAR responses. Compound 6 inhibits the NMDARs (8.3 receptors (8.3 ± 2.1 μM) more strongly than it does at the GABAR and AMPARs (17.0 receptors (17.0 ± 0.2 μM and 276.4 ± 178.7 μM, respectively). In addition, compound 6 (10 μM) decreases the frequency of action potentials recorded in cultured hippocampal neurons. Next, compounds 3, 5–7, 9, and 10 were not associated with mitotoxicity, hepatotoxicity nor ROS induction. Lastly, we were able to show that all compounds have improved rat and human plasma stability over PAG.

Identification of steroidal derivatives inhibiting the transformations of allopregnanolone and estradiol by 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 10

17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 10 (17β-HSD10) is a mitochondrial enzyme known for its potential role in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). 17β-HSD10, by its oxidative activity, could decrease the concentration of two important neurosteroids, allopregnanolone (ALLOP) and 17β-estradiol (E2), respectively preventing their neurogenesis and neuroprotective effects. Since the inhibition of 17β-HSD10 could lead to a new treatment for AD, we developed two biological assays using labeled ALLOP or E2 as substrates to measure the inhibitory activity of compounds against pure 17β-HSD10 protein. After the optimization of different parameters (time, concentration of enzyme, substrate and cofactor), analogs of the first reported steroidal inhibitor of 17β-HSD10 in intact cells were screened to determine their inhibitory potency for the ALLOP or the E2 oxidation. One compound, androstane derivative 5, possesses the best dual inhibition against both transformations (ALLOP, IC50 = 235 μM and E2, IC50 = 610 μM). Some compounds are dual inhibitors to a lesser extent, and others seem selective for one of the transformations in particular. By developing two reliable assays and by identifying a first generation of steroidal inhibitors of pure 17β-HSD10, this preliminary study opens the door to new and more potent inhibitors.

Abstract B069: Drug response variability between luminal and basal prostate cancer tumors

Abstract Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a genomically heterogeneous disease that has been subtyped into molecularly distinct subtypes. Over the past several years, multiple drugs have demonstrated improvements in overall survival in men with advanced prostate cancer, prompting further investigations of these drugs. However, characterizing drug response in the localized disease setting and in the context of PCa molecular subtypes needs further investigation. Here in a large prospective cohort of men with adverse pathology we explore the heterogeneity of patient drug response between basal, luminal, and neuroendocrine prostate cancer subtypes. Methods: Whole-transcriptome RNA expression profiles of 9,640 radical prostatectomy (RP) samples from prospective use of the Decipher test were obtained from the GRID registry database. Patients were subtyped into basal, luminal A, luminal B, and neuroendocrine subtypes using the PAM50 and small cell gene expression signatures. Drug response scores (DRS) predicting patient sensitivity for 89 oncology drugs were determined using in vitro drug sensitivity and microarray data from the NCI-60 panel. Pearson’s chi squared test was used to determine significant differences in drug sensitivity among PCa subtypes. Results: Applying the subtype signatures to the cohort, we classified 43% of samples as basal, 26% as luminal A, 30% as luminal B, and 2% as neuroendocrine. DRS was highly variable across the subtypes. Basal tumors showed a distinct drug response profile where basal tumors were more sensitive to kinase inhibitors (e.g., cabozantanib, dasatnib, erlotinib), mTOR inhibitors (e.g., everolimus, temsirolumus), DNA repair inhibitors (e.g., olaparib, mitoxantrone), and alkylating (e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin) chemotherapy. Luminal A and B were more sensitive to steroid inhibition (e.g., abiraterone, tamoxifen) and anti-microtuble (e.g., docetaxel, paclitaxel, vinorelbine) chemotherapy, whereas neuroendocrine had highest DRS for antiproliferative agents (e.g., mitomycin, cytabarine, carmustine, topotecan), Significant differences in average DRS scores in subtypes were observed for all 89 drugs (p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion: Prostate cancer subtypes in the localized disease setting have distinct drug response profiles, suggesting that subtyping and DRS scores may be useful for selecting candidates for systemic therapy trials. Citation Format: Robert Den, Jonathan Lehrer, Mandeep Takhar, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Nicholas Erho, Elai Davicioni, Felix Feng. Drug response variability between luminal and basal prostate cancer tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Prostate Cancer: Advances in Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research; 2017 Dec 2-5; Orlando, Florida. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(16 Suppl):Abstract nr B069.

Structure Confirmation and Evaluation of a Nonsteroidal Inhibitor of 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 10

17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 10 (17β-HSD10) is a steroidogenesis enzyme known for its potential role in Alzheimer’s disease. For comparison purposes between steroidal and nonsteroidal 17β-HSD10 inhibitors 1 and 2, respectively, we attempted the chemical synthesis of benzothiazole phosphonate derivative 2. Instead of a one-pot synthesis, we report a two-step synthesis with characterization of both imine intermediate 5 and final compound 2. Furthermore, complete assignation of 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signals of 2 is provided, as we observed a divergence of NMR data with those published previously. Finally, biological assays showed that 1 and 2 inhibited the oxidation of estradiol (E2) into estrone (E1) by the 17β-HSD10 recombinant protein. However, in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 intact cells transfected with 17β-HSD10, only the steroidal inhibitor 1 induced a dose-dependent inhibition of E2 to E1 transformation.