Outcomes Of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Research Articles

Treatment Outcomes and Toxicity Profile of MRI-Guided Gated-Real Time Online Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Patients with Pancreatic Tumors

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to patients with inoperable pancreas cancer has shown promising outcomes. Dose escalation is challenging given the associated risks to nearby organs at risk and requires treatment plan adaptation and motion management. This study reports the treatment related adverse events and treatment outcomes of MRI-guided SBRT utilizing gated-real time online adaptive radiotherapy to patients with pancreatic tumors. This is a single institution retrospective IRB approved study and included patients with pancreatic tumors who were treated with MRI-guided SBRT utilizing gated-real time online adaptive radiotherapy, consecutively between 2019 and 2022. All patients were treated with 0.35T MRI linear accelerator. All patients' charts and radiation plans were reviewed for this study. The study included 25 patients treated consecutively to 125 radiation fractions with MRI-guided SBRT. The study included 15 females and 10 males, 19 white, 2 Asians, 1 Latin American and 2 African Americans. The median age was 74, and all patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma (92%) except two patients who had biopsy proven renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the pancreas without evidence of disease elsewhere. Most patients (68%) received chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine / Protein-bound paclitaxel) prior to SBRT. The median dose to gross target volume (GTV) was 50 Gy, and to planning target volume (PTV) was 35 Gy. All patients were treated in 5 radiation fractions. Thirteen patients (52%) received elective nodal irradiation (ENI). All patients had at least a single real-time online adaptive replanning (median 3 fractions, range 1-5 fractions). All treatment fractions were gated (100%) with MRI guidance. The 1-, 2-, & 3- year local-regional control (LRC) were 81%, 57%, & 57% respectively (Median 16 months). The 1-, 2-, & 3- year Distant Control (DC) were 81%, 74%, & 56% respectively (Median 14 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-year overall survival (OS) were 77%, 35%, & 24% (Median 21 months). Planning Target Volume (PTV) dose ≥40Gy was significantly associated with improved local-regional control (p = 0.02). Gross Target Volume (GTV) dose <50Gy was significantly associated with lower DC (p = 0.03). ENI showed a trend towards improved local-regional control but was not statistically significant (p = 0.1). None of the patients experienced ≥ grade 3 toxicities. Most common adverse event were grades 1 or 2 fatigue (24%), nausea (16%), and abdominal discomfort (12%). In this cohort, MRI-guided SBRT utilizing gated-real time online adaptive radiotherapy was a safe and effective approach for patients with pancreatic tumors who are not surgical candidates. In this study, dose escalation was significantly associated with improved local-regional (PTV ≥40 Gy) and distant control (GTV ≥50Gy). None of the patients experienced grade ≥3 radiation induced adverse events.

Functional Outcomes and Toxicities Associated with SBRT to Bone Metastases Involving the Joint Space

Metastatic spread to bone is a common occurrence in advanced malignancies. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for management of bone metastases in both the palliative and oligometastatic settings, especially for radioresistant histologies. Historically, therapeutic radiation to joints has been avoided whenever possible to minimize toxicities such as joint fibrosis and stiffness. Very little data exists to guide the treatment of bone metastases involving or adjacent to the joint space using SBRT. The purpose of this study is to report functional outcomes and toxicities associated with SBRT to metastatic bone lesions involving the joint space. Patients with solid tumor bone metastases involving the joints of long bones who were treated with SBRT (≥500 cGy/fraction; BED10 ≥37.5) who had ≥30 days follow up were identified from our institutional electronic health record using an IRB approved protocol. Pre-treatment and post-treatment pain assessments and toxicities were collected and scored retrospectively. Toxicities were categorized as acute (≤30 days post treatment) or late (>30 days post-treatment). Weidentified 40 evaluable patients with 54 lesions treated with SBRT. Lesions treated included those involving the hip (29/54, 54%), shoulder (11/54, 20%), elbow (8/54, 14%), and knee (6/54, 11%). The most common patient histology treated was renal cell carcinoma (13/40, 33%), followed by prostate adenocarcinoma (7/40, 18%), non-small cell lung cancer (4/40, 10%), and breast cancer (4/40, 10%). The remainder (12/40) had other histologies. Median follow up time was 7.7 months (range = 1.3-55.0). Median prescribed dose was 650 cGy/fraction (range = 500-1300 cGy) and most lesions received 4000 cGy in 5 fractions (18/54, 33%). At >30 days, of the 42 sites where pain was reported pre-treatment, 30/42 (71%) had complete or partial pain relief, while 10/42 (24%) experienced no pain relief during available follow up. Patients reported worsening pain after SBRT in 2/54 (3.7%) of treated lesions. Seven of 54 (14.0%) treated lesions led to complaints of joint stiffness requiring physical therapy. A minority of patients developed insufficiency fractures or treatment failures after SBRT requiring surgery (4/54, 7.4%). Three of 54 patients (5.6%) developed symptomatic radiation myositis confirmed on imaging. Toour knowledge, this is the first study to report functional and toxicity outcomes of SBRT to lesions involving the joints of long bones. While SBRT appears to have acceptable toxicities at the doses reported in this analysis, further study is warranted to identify pre-treatment factors predictive of toxicity. Limitations of the study include its small sample size, retrospective nature, and single institution design. Future studies will focus on dosimetric and clinical factors associated with toxicities which may allow for more personalized treatments and assist with informed consent.

A Pilot Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and 177Lu-PSMA-617 for Oligometastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for oligorecurrent prostate cancer (OPC). Despite excellent local control, distant metastasis free survival rates are more modest. We hypothesized SBRT outcomes could be optimized with improved staging imaging and integration of a well-tolerated targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RLT) for microscopic disease. We report initial results of a prospective, single-institution pilot (NCT05079698) of a novel, PSMA-based theranostic strategy for OPC. Men with castrate sensitive OPC and 1-3 sites of PSMA PET avid disease ("index lesions") and no PSMA non-avid sites were eligible. No androgen deprivation therapy was permitted. Subjects first received 2 cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT (7.47±0.14 GBq) spaced 6 weeks apart. In vivo dosimetry was performed during cycle 1. Four weeks post-cycle 2, patients were restaged with 68Ga-PSMA PET for an interim (post-RLT) response assessment. Index lesions were then consolidated with SBRT (9 Gy x 3) irrespective of post-RLT PET response. The primary outcome was feasibility defined as successful completion of protocol-mandated therapy without intercurrent distant failure on post-RLT PET. Six men were treated with nine total index lesions (5 nodal, 3 osseous, 1 visceral). The study met its primary endpoint; all completed required interventions and no distant progression was seen on interim PSMA PET. Treatment was well tolerated; no grade 3+ toxicities, 2/6 had grade 2 toxicities (transient anemia and hyperbilirubinemia) and 5/6 had grade 1 toxicities. Median baseline lesion-level PSMA SUVmax was 16.8±8.7. Median interim SUVmax was 6.2±2.5 and declined for all but one lesion post-RLT (median -65%). Median SUVmax at 3-mos post-SBRT was 3.3±2.5 and decreased for all evaluable lesions (median -80%). Median baseline PSA was 2.01 ng/mL (range: 0.72-4.56) which declined in 5/6 post-RLT. The 6th patient experienced biochemical rise with interim PET showing only greater avidity in the known index lesion and SBRT was completed per protocol. All 4 evaluable patients with at least one post-SBRT follow-up have improved PSA at last visit (range 5.5-12 mos from cycle 1), and 2/4 have undetectable PSA. Composite dosimetry, correlatives and quality of life studies are forthcoming. Our pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a novel PSMA anchored theranostic strategy combining SBRT with targeted RLT for OPC. Preliminary data suggests promising outcomes, including the possibility of achieving an undetectable biochemical disease state without hormone therapy.

Real-World Results of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for 399 Medically Operable Patients with Stage I Histology-Proven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Surgery is the standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, no clear randomized trial demonstrates its superiority to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regarding survival. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the treatment outcomes of SBRT in operable patients with stage I NSCLC using a large Japanese multi-institutional database to show real-world outcome. Exactly 399 patients (median age 75 years; 262 males and 137 females) with stage I (IA 292, IB 107) histologically proven NSCLC (adenocarcinoma 267, squamous cell carcinoma 96, others 36) treated at 20 institutions were reviewed. SBRT was prescribed at a total dose of 48-70 Gy in 4-10 fractions. The median follow-up period was 38 months. Local progression-free survival rates were 84.2% in all patients and 86.1% in the T1, 78.6% in T2, 89.2% in adenocarcinoma, and 70.5% in squamous cell subgroups. Overall 3-year survival rates were 77.0% in all patients: 90.7% in females, 69.6% in males, and 41.2% in patients with pulmonary interstitial changes. Fatal radiation pneumonitis was observed in two patients, all of whom had pulmonary interstitial changes. This real-world evidence will be useful in shared decision-making for optimal treatment, including SBRT for operable stage I NSCLC, particularly in older patients.

Ten-Year Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Does Synchronous Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Benefit?

AimsThe benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metachronous oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) has previously been described and its use in current clinical practice is established. The role of SBRT in the management of synchronous OMBC remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of SBRT-treated synchronous OMBC with those of SBRT-treated metachronous OMBC. Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of consecutive extracranial OMBC patients treated with SBRT at a single institution between 2011 and 2022. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, local control and distant control. Log-rank tests were used to test any differences. Cox regression was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictive factors. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. ResultsIn total, 74 OMBC patients with 113 lesions were analysed. The median follow-up was 20 months (range 0–98). Seventy per cent of patients presented metachronously and 30% synchronously. 30 Gy in three fractions was most commonly prescribed, resulting in a median biologically effective dose (BED at α/β = 10) of 60 Gy (range 35.7–112.5 Gy). Forty-nine per cent of patients switched systemic therapy post-SBRT (median time to switch: 14 months, range 0–79). Two patients (2%) experienced grade 3 acute toxicities with no grade ≥4 toxicities. At 2 years overall survival was 92.4% and PFS 39.0%, local control 85.9% and distant control 37.0%. For metachronous and synchronous disease, respectively, 2-year local control rates were 86.5% and 85.8% and PFS rates were 35.3% and 48.3%. The median PFS of metachronous and synchronous disease were 18 months and 17 months, respectively (P = 0.86). Predictive factors on multivariate analysis were treated site for overall survival, change in systemic therapy post-SBRT for PFS and BED for local control. ConclusionOur data confirm SBRT as a well-tolerated treatment for OMBC with excellent local control rates regardless of metachronous or synchronous presentation. There is no suggestion that survival outcomes are inferior for synchronous disease. Further prospective studies are required to validate this finding.

Therapeutic Outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Lesions – A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Surgical resection, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have seldom been compared for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We explored the treatment outcomes of SBRT for small HCC by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). We compared the efficacy and safety of surgical resection, RFA and SBRT for liver-confined small HCC (three or fewer lesions with a diameter ≤5 cm). The study endpoint included the odds ratios of the 1-, 3- and 5-year progression/recurrence/disease-free survival (disease progression-free survival; DPFS) and overall survival rates, as well as severe complications. Forty-five studies included 21 468 patients. In the NMA with comparable data, SBRT had comparable 1-, 3- and 5-year DPFS but significantly worse pooled long-term overall survival (3- and 5-year overall survival) than surgical resection (odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidential interval 1.3–1.89; odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.06–1.69, respectively). SBRT was associated with significantly better pooled 1-year DPFS compared with RFA (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.97), with the remaining outcomes being comparable. SBRT had significantly less incidence of severe complications compared with surgical resection (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.42–0.88) and RFA (odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.94). In conclusion, for small HCCs (≤5 cm) with one to three nodules, SBRT may be favourable to reduce the risks of severe complications. In terms of DPFS, SBRT may be recommended as an alternative first-line therapy for RFA and surgical resection. The results regarding overall survival should be interpreted with caution, considering the potentially uneliminated bias. There is a clear need for well-designed randomised trials to conclusively identify real differences in efficacy between these treatments, especially SBRT and surgical resection.

PO-04-233 MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES TO TREAT VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS WITH RADIOABLATION AND CARDIAC SYMPATHECTOMY (MAVERICS)

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are the most lethal arrhythmias. Established therapies to prevent occurrence of VAs include anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) and catheter ablation (CA). For patients with recurrent VAs despite AADs and CA, there exist novel treatment modalities such as cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) via percutaneous and surgical approach and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The current study reports the outcomes of CSD and SBRT from a tertiary care academic center. To report outcomes of CSD and SBRT for treatment of VAs refractory to conventional treatment with AADs and CA. Study comprises all patients undergoing CSD or SBRT at our center from 10/2018 to 10/2021. Patients with less than 2 months of available follow-up data were excluded. Retrospective chart review was performed to collate data for demographics, clinical characteristics, arrhythmia burden before and after novel therapies (maximum 12 months), and complications during study period. Burden of VAs in the form of episodes of anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and defibrillator shocks per month were assessed as primary efficacy outcome. Complications during CSD and SBRT were assessed as primary safety outcome. Overall, 25 patients underwent novel therapies for VAs. Thirteen were excluded due to insufficient follow up data. Of 12 included patients, a total of 4, 5, and 3 patients underwent SBRT, CSD, and both CSD/SBRT, respectively. Median age of the study population was 66 years (55-72). The majority of the patients (10/12) were male. Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 30% (25%-34%). Eight patients had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Median number of AADs and CA prior to novel therapies was 3 (2-5) and 1 (0-2), respectively. Follow up was available for a median of 12 (12-12) months before and 12 (9-12) months after intervention. Overall, 11 of 12 patients demonstrated a reduction in VA burden. Mean number of ATP and shock episodes was significantly lower after novel therapies (39±43 vs 3±6; p= 0.008). No procedure-related complications were observed during the study period. Incorporation of novel VA treatment modalities is associated with a reduced arrhythmia burden in this single center study. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Efficacy, toxicities, and prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiotherapy for unresectable liver metastases

This study aims to determine the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver metastases in patients not eligible for surgery. This study included 31 consecutive patients with unresectable liver metastases who received SBRT between January 2012 and December 2017; 22 patients had primary colorectal cancer and nine patients had primary non-colorectal cancer. Treatments ranged from 24 Gy to 48 Gy in 3 to 6 fractions over 1 to 2 weeks. Survival, response rates, toxicities, clinical characteristics, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify significant prognostic factors for survival. Among these 31 patients, 65% had received at least one prior regimen of systemic therapy for metastatic disease, whereas 29% had received chemotherapy for disease progression or immediately after SBRT. The median follow-up interval was 18.9 months; actuarial in-field local control rates at 1, 2, and 3 years after SBRT were 94%, 55%, and 42%, respectively. The median survival duration was 32.9 months; 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 89.6%, 57.1%, and 46.2%, respectively. The median time to progression was 10.9 months. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was well-tolerated, with grade 1 toxicities of fatigue (19%) and nausea (10%). Patients who received post-SBRT chemotherapy had significant longer overall survival (P=0.039 for all patients and P=0.001 for patients with primary colorectal cancer). Stereotactic body radiotherapy can be safely administered to patients with unresectable liver metastases, and it may delay the need for chemotherapy. This treatment should be considered for selected patients with unresectable liver metastases.

Clinical Outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Lung Cancer with Ground-Glass Opacity Predominant Lesions: A Single Institution Experience.

The detection rate of early-stage lung cancer with ground-glass opacity (GGO) has increased, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been suggested as an alternative to surgery in inoperable patients. However, reports on treatment results are limited. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to investigate the clinical outcome after SBRT in patients with early-stage lung cancer with GGO-predominant tumor lesions at a single institution. This study included 89 patients with 99 lesions who were treated with SBRT for lung cancer with GGO-predominant lesions that had a consolidation-to-tumor ratio of ≤0.5 at Asan Medical Center between July 2016 and July 2021. A median total dose of 56.0 Gy (range, 48.0-60.0) was delivered using 10.0-15.0 Gy per fraction. The overall follow-up period for the study was median 33.0 months (range, 9.9 to 65.9 months). There was 100% local control with no recurrences in any of the 99 treated lesions. Three patients had regional recurrences outside of the radiation field, and three had distant metastasis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 91.6%, and 82.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that advanced age and a low level of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide were significantly associated with overall survival. There were no patients with grade ≥3 toxicity. SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with GGO-predominant lung cancer lesions and is likely to be considered as an alternative to surgery.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Sarcoma Pulmonary Metastases.

Lung metastases are the most common form of distant failure for patients diagnosed with sarcoma with metastasectomy considered for some patients with limited metastatic disease and good performance status. Alternatives to surgery such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be considered, though data are limited. We present outcomes after SBRT for sarcoma lung metastases. Fifty sarcoma patients with 109 lung metastases were treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2021. Outcomes evaluated included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity including lung pneumonitis/fibrosis, chest wall toxicity, dermatitis, brachial plexus, and esophageal toxicity. Systemic therapy receipt before and after SBRT was recorded. SBRT schedules were divided into 3 cohorts: 30 to 34Gy/1fx (n=10 [20%]), 48 to 50Gy/4 to 5fx (n=24[48%]), and 60Gy/5fx (n=16[32%]). With a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 1/3-year LC rates were 96%/88% and 1/3-year OS 77%/50%, respectively. There was no differences between the 3 regimens in terms of LC, OS, or toxicity. Size >4cm was a predictor of worse LC ( P =0.031) and worse OS ( P = 0.039) on univariate analysis. The primary pattern of failure was new metastases (64%) of which the majority were in the contralateral lung (52%). One-year chemotherapy-free survival was 85%. Overall, 76% of patients did not require chemotherapy initiation or change of chemotherapy regimen after lung SBRT. Toxicity was reported in 16% of patients overall, including 25%, 20%, and 14% in the 30 to 34Gy/1fx, 48 to 50Gy/4 to 5fx, and 60Gy/5fx cohorts, respectively. SBRT outcomes for lung metastases from sarcoma demonstrate high rates of LC and are similar with different dose/fractionation regimens. Lung SBRT is associated with prolonged chemotherapy-free survival. Prospective validation of these results is warranted.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) via Helical tomotherapy for early-stage lung cancer with or without pathological proof

BackgroundStereotactic body radio therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment option for nonsurgical candidates with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pathological proof is sometimes difficult to obtain in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy via helical tomotherapy (HT-SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer patients with or without a pathological diagnosis.MethodsBetween June 2011 and December 2016, we treated 119 lung cancer patients with HT-SBRT, including 55 with a clinical diagnosis and 64 with a pathological diagnosis. Survival outcomes, including local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between two cohorts with and without a pathological diagnosis.ResultsThe median follow-up for the whole group was 69 months. Patients with a clinical diagnosis were significantly older (p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed between the clinical and pathological diagnosis cohorts in terms of the long-term outcome, with 5-year LC, PFS, CSS, and OS of 87% versus 83% (p = 0.58), 48% versus 45% (p = 0.82), 87% versus 84% (p = 0.65), and 60% versus 63% (p = 0.79), respectively. Recurrence patterns and toxicity were also similar.ConclusionsEmpiric SBRT appears to be a safe and effective treatment option in a multidisciplinary setting when patients with SPNs highly suggestive of malignancy are unable/refuse to obtain a definitive pathological diagnosis.

Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

To investigate the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among consecutive patients with early-stage NSCLC who received SBRT between November 2009 and September 2019, those with cT1-2N0M0 staged by the UICC TNM classification and staging system for lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-three patients with early-stage NSCLC received SBRT. The median follow-up period was 29 months (range=2-105 months). Twenty-one lung tumors were clinically diagnosed as early-stage primary lung cancers without histological confirmation. Histological examinations revealed adenocarcinoma in 24 patients and squamous cell carcinoma in 8. Two- and 5-year local control, cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 94.4 and 94.4%; 94.6 and 90.8%; 69.0 and 43.3%; and 80.0 and 59.3%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the T stage, histology, and type of pulmonary nodule correlated with PFS and OS. Good clinical outcomes were achieved by patients with early-stage NSCLC who received SBRT.

Biochemical disease control outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or moderate hypo-fractionation (HFRT) for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PrCa): Retrospective analysis of 12 years of experience at two Canadian cancer centers.

363 Background: SBRT uses highly conformal radiotherapy to deliver high dose per fraction treatment. Advantages of SBRT include short treatment times, decreased costs and limited toxicity. Randomized trial outcomes of 7-fraction SBRT for low or intermediate PrCa were reported but results of studies that compared 5-fraction SBRT with conventional and HFRT are pending. Here, we reviewed the 12-year experience with SBRT and HFRT at the Juravinski and Walker Family Cancer Centers in Ontario. Methods: We reviewed patients with low or intermittent-risk PrCa treated with SBRT alone or HFRT alone in the period of July 2010 and February 2022. Database search criteria included treatments with SBRT 35-40Gy in 5 fractions and HFRT 60-62Gy in 20 fractions. Overall survival (OS), time to biochemical failure (per Phoenix criteria: i.e., 2ng/mL above PSA nadir) and biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess OS and bFFS. Results: We identified 314 patients with low or intermediate-risk PrCa who were treated with SBRT and 258 patients who were treated with HFRT. Intermediate-risk category composed 86.0% and 95.7% of the SBRT and HFRT cohorts. ISUP Grade Group (GG) distributions for the SBRT and HFRT patients were: GG1: 19.4% and 9.3%, GG2: 72.9% and 74.0%, and GG3: 7.6% and 16.7%, respectively. OS rates at 5 years were 96.6% for SBRT vs. 95.8% for HFRT-treated patients. The 5-year bFFS rates for SBRT and HFRT were 92.3% and 90.1%, respectively. The 7-year bFFS rate for the SBRT cohort was 90.2%. Mean time to biochemical failure was 40.4 months after SBRT vs. 35.8 months after HFRT. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective treatment option for low to intermediate-risk PrCa with encouraging OS and bFFS rates comparable with HFRT. Pending randomized trial results will determine whether SBRT is the new standard of care for this population.

Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Intraprostatic Relapse after Definitive Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Patterns of Failure and Association between Volume of Irradiation and Late Toxicity.

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the adverse effects and outcomes of salvage re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (sSBRT) for local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive radiotherapy (RT). The study was focused on the adverse effects and prognostic factors for treatment toxicity, followed by an analysis of patterns of failure and survival. Patients treated with sSBRT between 2012 and 2020 at a tertiary institution were included. The exclusion criteria were a primary or salvage radical prostatectomy or a palliative sSBRT dose. Patients with oligorecurrence were eligible if all metastatic lesions were treated locally with curative intent. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to grade ≥ 3 toxicity, local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (FFDM), progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical control (BC) and overall survival (OS). The differences between groups (focal vs. whole-gland sSBRT) were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess prognostic factors for the listed endpoints. A total of 56 patients with a median age of 70.9 years and a median follow-up of 38.6 months were included in the analysis. The majority of them received local sSBRT only (45; 80.4%), while the rest were simultaneously treated for oligometastases (11; 19.6%). Overall, 18 (32.1%) patients experienced any grade ≥ 3 toxicity, including 1 (6.7%) patient who received focal sSBRT, and 17 (41.5%) patients treated with whole-gland sSBRT. The Planning Target Volume (per cc; HR 1.01; 95% CI 1-1.02; p = 0.025) and use of ADT (yes vs. no; HR 0.35; 95%CI 0.13-0.93; p = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors for the risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicity. The estimated rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was significantly higher (43.8% vs. 7.1% at 2 years; p = 0.006), and there was no improvement in the LC (92.9% vs. 85.3% at 2 years; p = 0.759) in patients treated with whole-gland sSBRT compared to focal sSBRT. The 2- and 5-year LC were 87.6% and 47.9%, respectively; the 2- and 5-year FFDM were 72.7% and 42.8%, respectively; and the 2- and 5-year PFS were 67.9% and 28.7%, respectively. The primary pattern of failure was distant metastasis. The sSBRT for local recurrence of PCa after definitive RT was associated with a high risk of severe grade ≥ 3 toxicity, which significantly increased with the volume and extent of re-irradiation.

Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Oligometastatic Patients with Lymph Node Metastases from Gynecological Cancers

To evaluate clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a local treatment for lymph node metastases from gynecological cancers. Between November 2007 and October 2021, we retrospectively analyzed 29 lymph node metastases in 22 oligometastatic/oligoprogressive patients treated with SBRT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the rates survival. Univariate analysis for prognostic factors were performed with the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR). Median age was 62 years (IQR, 50-80 years). Median follow-up was 17 months (IQR 10.5-31 months). The median survival was 22 months (CI 95%: 4.2-39.7, IQR: 12.5-34.5 months). Six months, one year and two year overall survival (OS) were 96.6%, 85.2%, and 48.7%, respectively. Median local control (LC) was not reached. Six months, 1one year and 2 year were 93.1%, 87.9%, and 79.9%, respectively. Distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) at one year, and two year was 53% and 37.1%, respectively Four patients (18%) experienced acute G1-G2 toxicities. No G3-4 acute toxicity was reported, and no late toxicity was observed. SBRT for lymph node recurrence offers excellent in-field tumor control with safe profile and low toxicities. Size, number of oligometastases, and time primary tumor to RT seem to be significant prognostic factors.

The efficacy and outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in adrenal gland metastases.

This retrospective study presents our single-institutional experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy for adrenal gland metastases. We evaluated patients with adrenal metastases treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) from 2014 to 2020. We performed an analysis of 35 patients. The median age of the patients was 62.2. Dosimetric parameters and treatment outcomes were evaluated. The primary diagnosis of the majority of patients was non-small cell lung cancer (94.3%). Treatment was performed in a median of 3 fractions, and the median prescribed dose was 24 Gy (range 22,5-27). The median follow-up was 17 months. Treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours was categorized as complete response in 11 patients, partial response in nine patients, stable disease in 7, and progressive disease in eight patients. Twenty seven patients had oligometastatic disease and treatment response. Patients with oligometastatic disease had a significantly higher rate of complete response and partial response to treatment than patients with common disease (P = 0,011). The 6-month and 1-year local control rates were 68.4% and 43%, respectively. In general, SBRT was well tolerated and no acute toxicities were observed. Our retrospective study shows that SBRT can be applied safely in adrenal metastases with good results especially in patients with oligometastatic disease.

Predicted Inferior Outcomes for Lung SBRT With Treatment Planning Systems That Fail Independent Phantom-Based Audits

More than 15% of radiotherapy clinics fail external audits with anthropomorphic phantoms conducted by Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Houston (IROC-H) while passing other industry-standard quality assurance (QA) tests. We seek to evaluate the predicted impact of such failed plans on outcomes for patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors. We conducted a retrospective study of 55 patients treated with SBRT for lung tumors with prescription BED10 ≥100Gy using a treatment planning system (TPS) that passed IROC-H phantom audits. Sample linac beam models with introduced errors were commissioned by varying the multi-leaf collimator leaf tip offset parameter (i.e., 'dosimetric leaf gap') over the range +/-1.0 mm relative to the validated model. These models mimic TPS that pass internal QA measures but fail IROC-H tests. Patient plans were recalculated on sample beam models. Predicted tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated based on published dose-response models. A leaf tip offset value of -1.0 mm decreased the fraction of plans receiving a PTV BED10 ≥100 Gy from 95% to 27%. This translated to a significant decrease in 2-yr TCP of 4.8% (95% CI: 2.0-5.5%) with a decrease in TCP up to 21%. Conversely, leaf tip offset of +1.0 mm resulted in 36% of patients exceeding previously met OAR constraints, including two instances of spinal cord and brachial plexus overdoses and a small increase in chest wall NTCP by 0.7%, (95% CI 0.5%-0.8%). Simulated treatment plans with modest MLC leaf offsets result in lung SBRT plans that significantly under-dose tumor or exceed OAR constraints. These dosimetric endpoints translate to significant detriments in TCP. These simulated plans mimic planning systems that pass internal QA measures but fail independent phantom-based tests, underscoring the need for enhanced quality assurance including external audits of TPS.

Treatment Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Synchronous and Metachronous Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with synchronous or metachronous oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: The clinical data of 87 patients with 138 lesions who received MDT between February 2008 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had ≤5 metastasis at diagnosis (synchronous) or during progression (metachronous) and were treated with SBRT for their metastasis. The primary endpoints were local control (LC) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Median follow-up was 20.4 months for entire cohort and 27.2 months for survivors. Synchronous oligometastatic disease was observed in 35 patients (40.2%), and 52 patients (59.8%) had metachronous disease. Seventy-two patients (82.8%) received systemic treatment synchronously or after MDT, while 15 patients (17.2%) did not receive any systemic treatment. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 79.4% and 58.1%, respectively, and the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 58.6% and 15.1%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year LC rates per lesion were 96.6% and 91.4%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival between patients with synchronous oligometastasis and those with metachronous oligometastasis. All disease progressions were observed at a median time of 31.6 months (range: 1.9–196.9 months) after the completion of SBRT. Patients with solitary oligometastasis had significantly better OS compared to patients with >1 metastasis (p = 0.04). No patients experienced grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities. Conclusion: SBRT is a successful treatment for oligometastatic RCC patients due to its excellent LC and minimal toxicity profile. There were no statistically significant survival differences between patients with synchronous and metachronous oligometastasis. Patients with solitary oligometastasis outlived their counterparts.

Abstract 13956: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Treat Ventricular Arrhythmias With Radioablation and Cardiac Sympathectomy (MAVERICS)

Background: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are the most lethal arrhythmias. Established therapies to prevent VAs include anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) and catheter ablation (CA). For patients with recurrent VAs despite AADs and CA, novel therapies such as cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) exist. This study reports outcomes of CSD and SBRT at a tertiary care academic center. Methods: Study comprises all patients undergoing CSD or SBRT at one center from 10/2018 - 10/2021. Patients with less than 2 months of follow-up were excluded. Retrospective chart review was performed to collate data for demographics, clinical characteristics, arrhythmia burden before and after novel therapies (maximum 12 months), and treatment complications. VA burden in the form of anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) episodes and defibrillator shocks was assessed as primary efficacy outcome. Treatment complications were assessed as primary safety outcome. Results: Overall, 25 patients underwent novel therapies for VAs, and 13 were excluded for insufficient follow up. Five, 4, and 3 patients underwent CSD, SBRT, and both, respectively. Median age was 66 years (55-72), and 10 (83%) were male. Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 30% (25%-34%). Four patients (33%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Median number of AADs and CA prior to novel therapies was 3 (2-5) and 1 (0-2), respectively. Follow up was available for a median of 12 (12-12) months before and 12 (9-12) months after treatment. Overall, VA burden was reduced in 11 of 12 patients (Figure 1). Mean number of ATP and shock episodes was significantly lower after novel therapies (39±43 vs 3±6; p= 0.008). No procedure-related complications were observed. Conclusion: Novel VA treatment modalities are associated with a significantly reduced arrhythmia burden in this single center study. There is a promising role of these therapies as an adjunct to the existing treatment modalities of CA and AADs.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact.

Helical tomotherapy (HT), a unique rotational dose delivery machine, has been updated from Hi-ART to Radixact. We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using HT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compared the dosimetric details of Hi-ART and Radixact. Between April 2014 and November 2020, 28 patients with HCC were treated with SBRT using HT for a cure at Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, 9 patients had stage 0 disease, 12 had stage A, 4 had stage B, and 3 had stage C. The tumor size ranged from 1 cm to 8 cm (median, 2 cm). The SBRT dose ranged from 40 to 60 Gy (median, 48 Gy) with 4 fractions. Twenty-three patients were treated with Hi-ART and 5 patients were treated with Radixact. To compare the dosimetric parameters between Hi-ART and Radixact, we created treatment plans with the same constraints, pitch, modulation factor, and field width for the same patient in pairs. The median follow-up time from the date of SBRT administration was 24 months (range, 3-67 months). The local failure-free survival and intrahepatic failure-free survival rates were 96% and 58% at 1 year, 84% and 36% at 2 years, and 76% and 18% at 3 years, respectively. The overall survival rate was 93% at 1 year, 93% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years, respectively. When the paired treatment plans were reviewed, the beam-on time and intermediate dose-spillage were found to be significantly reduced in Radixact than Hi-ART (P<0.001). With regard to normal organ sparing, the irradiated dose to the total liver, normal liver, heart, and kidney was significantly lower with Radixact (P<0.001). SBRT using HT for HCC showed favorable treatment outcomes. Radixact, the latest version, physically improved treatment efficiency by reducing treatment time and provided better organ sparing than Hi-ART.