Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatment Research Articles

Technical note: Cryostat transmission characterization for MR linac - temporal stability, clinical impact and change implementation.

In the Unity MR linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), the radiation beam traverses the cryostat and the coil support structure. The resulting beam attenuation must be considered for output calibration and its variation with gantry angle must be characterized in the treatment planning system (TPS). The aim of this work was to investigate the impact of a change of the cryostat transmission characterization (CTC) curve, due to the helium level modification, on clinical treatment plan dosimetry and to report on the experience with the CTC curve update. Twenty stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans: 10 prostate and 10 oligo-metastatic cancer plans, prepared with a beam model incorporating the CTC curve acquired at installation time, were re-calculated using the model implementing CTC curve post helium top-up. To account for the CTC change as well as to align our system to the recent reference conditions recommendations, the new model was commissioned with the emphasis on the specifics associated with the treatment plan adaptation and the existence of the offline and online TPS components. Average CTV mean dose reduction by 0.45% in prostate cases and average GTV mean dose reduction by 0.22% in oligo-metastatic cases was observed. Updated model validation showcased good agreement between measurements and TPS calculations. The agreement between CTC measurements demonstrates its temporal constancy and robustness of the measurement method employed. A helium fill level change was shown to affect the CTC and led to a small but systematic dose calculation inaccuracy. Finally, model validation and end-to-end testing results presented, underscore the minimal impact of transitioning to the new beam model and new reference conditions.

Outcomes of extracranial stereotactic body radiation therapy for induced oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer on novel systemic therapy.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is often delivered in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD). However, the specific subset of patients with polymetastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on novel systemic therapies who develop induced oligopersistant disease (OpersisD) or oligoprogressive disease (OprogD), as defined by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OMD classification, has not been well described. This study explores the outcomes of patients treated with this strategy. Patients with stage IV NSCLC being treated with osimertinib or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) who received extracranial SBRT for OpersisD or OprogD were identified in our retrospective analysis. Outcomes reported include progression-free survival (PFS), time to change of systemic treatment (TTCST), overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and treatment-related toxicity. Forty-nine patients received SBRT for OpersisD (34.7%) or OprogD (65.3%) at a median of 5.8 and 15.3 months after start of systemic therapy, respectively. 55.1% received concurrent osimertinib and 44.9% received ICI. Seventy-seven extracranial lesions were treated with various fractionation schemas. At a median of 18.8 months follow-up from first SBRT, LC was achieved in 92.2% of total lesions treated (71). The 1-year OS was 91.7% for OpersisD and 83.3% for OprogD. OpersisD compared to OprogD had a longer median PFS (18.3 vs. 6.1 months) and longer median TTCST (23.6 vs. 13.5 months), median OS was not reached for either cohort. On multivariate analysis, patients treated with osimertinib had shorter PFS (HR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.01-4.82; P=0.048) and shorter TTCST (HR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.09-7.33; P=0.032). One patient (2%) experienced grade 3 pneumonitis after SBRT, and no grade 4-5 toxicities were reported with SBRT treatment. This study indicates that SBRT for OpersisD or OprogD in Stage IV NSCLC patients on osimertinib or ICIs is safe, very well tolerated, and may prolong the time before needing a shift in systemic therapy. Further prospective research is needed to validate and expand upon these findings.

The Status and Challenges for Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatments in United States Proton Therapy Centers: An NRG Oncology Practice Survey

PurposeTo report the current practice pattern of the proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate treatments. Materials and MethodsA survey was designed to inquire about the practice of proton SBRT treatment for prostate cancer. The survey was distributed to all 30 proton therapy centers in the United States that participate in the National Clinical Trial Network in February, 2023. The survey focused on usage, patient selection criteria, prescriptions, target contours, dose constraints, treatment plan optimization and evaluation methods, patient-specific QA, and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) methods. ResultsWe received responses from 25 centers (83% participation). Only 8 respondent proton centers (32%) reported performing SBRT of the prostate. The remaining 17 centers cited 3 primary reasons for not offering this treatment: no clinical need, lack of volumetric imaging, and/or lack of clinical evidence. Only 1 center cited the reduction in overall reimbursement as a concern for not offering prostate SBRT. Several common practices among the 8 centers offering SBRT for the prostate were noted, such as using Hydrogel spacers, fiducial markers, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for target delineation. Most proton centers (87.5%) utilized pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery and completed Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) phantom credentialing. Treatment planning typically used parallel opposed lateral beams, and consistent parameters for setup and range uncertainties were used for plan optimization and robustness evaluation. Measurements-based patient-specific QA, beam delivery every other day, fiducial contours for IGRT, and total doses of 35 to 40 GyRBE were consistent across all centers. However, there was no consensus on the risk levels for patient selection. ConclusionProstate SBRT is used in about 1/3 of proton centers in the US. There was a significant consistency in practices among proton centers treating with proton SBRT. It is possible that the adoption of proton SBRT may become more common if proton SBRT is more commonly offered in clinical trials.

Efficacious patient-specific QA for Vertebra SBRT using a high-resolution detector array SRS MapCHECK: AAPM TG-218 analysis.

Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for vertebra stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) presents challenges due to highly modulated small fields with high-dose gradients between the target and spinal cord. This study aims to explore the use of the SRS MapCHECK® (SRSMC) for vertebra SBRT PSQA. Twenty vertebra SBRT treatment plans including prescriptions 20Gy/1 fraction and 24Gy/2 fractions were selected for each of Millennium (M)-Multileaf Collimator (MLC), and high-definition (HD)-MLC. All 40 plans were measured using Gafchromic EBT3 film (film) and SRSMC, using the StereoPHAN phantom. Plan complexity was assessed using modulation complexity score (MCS), edge metric (EM) (mm-1), modulation factor (MU/cGy), and average leaf pair opening (ALPO) (mm) and its correlation with gamma-pass rate was investigated. The high dose gradient between the target and the spinal cord was analyzed for film and SRSMC and compared against the treatment planning system (TPS). Applying the methodology proposed by AAPM TG-218, action and tolerance values specific to the SRSMC for vertebra SBRT were determined for β values ranging from 5 to 8. Film and SRSMC gamma-pass rates showed no correlation (p>0.05). A moderate negative correlation (R=-0.57, p=0.01) is present between EM and SRSMC 3%/1mm gamma-pass rate for HD-MLC plans. Both film and SRSMC accurately measured high dose gradients between the target and the spinal cord (R2>0.86, p ≤ 0.05). Notably, dose-gradient of HD-MLC plans is 22% steeper and has a smaller standard deviation to M-MLC plans (p ≤ 0.05). Applying TG-218, the film tolerance limit was 96% with action limit 95% for 5%/1mm (β=6) and for the SRSMC tolerance limit was 97% with an action limit of 96% for 4%/1mm (β=6). Our findings suggest that universal TG-218 limits may not be suitable for vertebra SBRT PSQA. This study demonstrates that SRSMC is a viable tool for vertebra SBRT PSQA, supported by TG-218 implementation of process-based tolerance and action limits.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy of central lung tumours using a 1.5 T MR-linac: First clinical experiences

BackgroundMRI-guidance may aid better discrimination between Organs at Risk (OARs) and target volumes in proximity of the mediastinum. We report the first clinical experiences with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) of (ultra)central lung tumours on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Materials and MethodsPatients with an (ultra)central lung tumour were selected for MR-linac based SBRT treatment. A T2-weighted 3D sequence MRI acquired during free breathing was used for daily plan adaption. Prior to each fraction, contours of Internal Target Volume (ITV) and OARs were deformably propagated and amended by a radiation oncologist. Inter-fractional changes in volumes and coverage of target volumes as well as doses in OARs were evaluated in offline and online treatment plans. ResultsTen patients were treated and completed 60 Gy in 8 or 12 fractions. In total 104 fractions were delivered. The median time in the treatment room was 41 min with a median beam-on time of 8.9 min. No grade ≥3 acute toxicity was observed. In two patients, the ITV significantly decreased during treatment (58 % and 37 %, respectively) due to tumour shrinkage. In the other patients, 81 % of online ITVs were within ±15 % of the volume of fraction 1. Comparison with the pre-treatment plan showed that ITV coverage of the online plan was similar in 52 % and improved in 34 % of cases. Adaptation to meet OAR constraints, led to decreased ITV coverage in 14 %. ConclusionsWe describe the workflow for MR-guided Radiotherapy and the feasibility of using 1.5 T MR-linac for SBRT of (ultra) central lung tumours.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastasis: A systematic review of the literature.

Advances in local and systemic therapies continue to improve overall survival for patients with cancer, increasing the incidence of spine metastases. Up to 15% of patients with solid tumors develop spinal metastases. Spinal metastases can be particularly devastating for quality of life given the potential pain, neurological deficits from spinal cord compression or cauda equina syndrome, spinal instability, and pathological fractures that may result. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with or without adding less invasive surgical techniques for stabilization or separation has gained favor. SBRT uses smaller, more precise treatment volumes, allowing for higher doses per fracture, thus increasing ablative abilities. We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science to identify all articles investigating the effectiveness of SBRT in providing local disease control, pain control, and relief of spinal cord compression for patients with metastatic disease of the spine. The review yielded 84 articles that met inclusion criteria. The evidence indicates SBRT provides excellent local control and pain control for patients with spine metastesis, and this remains true for patients with spinal cord compression managed with surgical separation followed by postoperative spine SBRT. While not all patients are appropriate candidates for SBRT, carefully considering appropriate frameworks that consider the patient's overall prognosis can guide a multidisciplinary team toward the patients who will benefit the most from this treatment modality.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy suppresses myeloid-derived suppressor cells by regulating miR-21/Sorbin and SH3 Domain-containing Protein 1 axis.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a targeted form of radiotherapy used to treat early-stage cancers. Despite its effectiveness, the impact of SBRT on myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is not well understood. In this study, we examined how SBRT affects the differentiation and survival of MDSCs, as well as delved into the molecular mechanisms involved. SBRT was utilized on bone marrow (BM)-derived MDSCs to investigate its impact on the differentiation and survival of MDSCs using flow cytometry. An animal model of lung cancer was created to assess the anti-cancer properties of SBRT and the role of miR-21 expression in MDSCs. The interplay of miR-21 and Sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 1 (SORBS1) in MDSC differentiation was explored through dual luciferase activity assay, RT-qPCR, and Western blot analysis. The findings suggest that SBRT led to an increase in miR-21 levels, inhibited MDSC differentiation, and triggered cell apoptosis in BM cells. Inhibition of miR-21 reversed the effects of SBRT on MDSC differentiation and apoptosis. Additionally, it was revealed that SORBS1 was a downstream target of miR-21 in BM cells, and the miR-21/SORBS1 axis played a role in regulating MDSC differentiation and apoptosis induced by SBRT. Modulating miR-21 levels in vivo impinged on the response to SBRT treatment and the quantity of MDSCs in a mouse model of lung cancer. Our data indicate that the upregulation of miR-21 induced by SBRT may contribute to the inhibition of MDSC expansion in a lung cancer model.

Using standardized workflows and quantitative data-driven management to reduce time interval from simulation to treatment initiation.

External beam radiotherapy is a complex process, involving timely coordination among multiple teams. The aim of this study is to report our experience of establishing a standardized workflow and using quantitative data and metrics to manage the time-to-treatment initiation (TTI). Starting in 2014, we established a standard process in a radiation oncology-specific electronic medical record system (RO-EMR) for patients receiving external beam radiation therapy in our department, aiming to measure the time interval from simulation to treatment initiation, defined as TTI, for radiation oncology. TTI data were stratified according to the following treatment techniques: three-dimensional (3D) conformal therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney test for the respective metrics of aggregate data for the initial period 2012- 2015 (PI) and the later period 2016-2019 (PII). Over 8 years, the average annual number of treatments for PI and PII were 1760 and 2357 respectively, with 3D, IMRT, and SBRT treatments accounting for 53, 29, 18% and 44, 34, 22%, respectively, of the treatment techniques. The median TTI for 3D, IMRT, and SBRT for PI and PII were 1, 6, 7, and 1, 5, 7 days, respectively, while the 90th percentile TTI for the three techniques in both periods were 5, 9, 11 and 4, 9, 10 days, respectively. From the aggregate data, the TTI was significantly reduced (p=0.0004, p<0.0001, p<0.0001) from PI to PII for the three treatment techniques. Establishing a standardized workflow and frequently measuring TTI resulted in shortening the TTI during the early years (in PI) and maintaining the established TTI in the subsequent years (in PII).

Treatment accuracy of standard linear accelerator-based prostate SBRT: the delivered dose assessment of patients treated within two major clinical trials using an in-house position monitoring system.

The purpose of this study was to assess the dosimetric improvements achieved in prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment within the PROMETHEUS and NINJA trials using an in-house real-time position monitoring system, SeedTracker. This study considered a total of 127 prostate SBRT patients treated in the PROMETHEUS (ACTRN12615000223538) and NINJA (ACTRN12618001806257) clinical trials. The SeedTracker position monitoring system was utilized for real-time position monitoring with a 3-mm position tolerance. The doses delivered to the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder were assessed by incorporating the actual target position during treatment. The dose that would have been delivered without monitoring was also assessed by incorporating the observed position deviations. Treatment with position corrections resulted in a mean (range) CTV D99 difference of -0.3 (-1.0 to 0.0) Gy between the planned and delivered dose. Without corrections, this difference would have been -0.6 (-3.7 to 0.0) Gy. Not correcting for position deviations resulted in a statistically significant difference between the planned and delivered CTV D99 (p < 0.05). The mean (range) dose difference between the planned and delivered D2cc of the rectum and bladder for treatment with position corrections was -0.1 (-3.7 to 4.7) Gy and -0.1 (-1.7 to 0.5) Gy, respectively. Without corrections, these differences would have been -0.6 (-6.1 to 4.7) Gy and -0.2 (-2.5 to 0.9) Gy. SeedTracker improved clinical dose volume compliance in prostate SBRT. Without monitoring and corrections, delivered dose would significantly differ from the planned dose.

Multi-omics integrative modelling for stereotactic body radiotherapy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: clinical trial protocol of the MONDRIAN study

BackgroundCurrently, main treatment strategies for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) disease are surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), with successful local control rates for both approaches. However, regional and distant failure remain critical in SBRT, and it is paramount to identify predictive factors of response to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive approaches. The main endpoint of the MONDRIAN trial is to identify multi-omic biomarkers of SBRT response integrating information from the individual fields of radiomics, genomics and proteomics.MethodsMONDRIAN is a prospective observational explorative cohort clinical study, with a data-driven, bottom-up approach. It is expected to enroll 100 ES-NSCLC SBRT candidates treated at an Italian tertiary cancer center with well-recognized expertise in SBRT and thoracic surgery. To identify predictors specific to SBRT, MONDRIAN will include data from 200 patients treated with surgery, in a 1:2 ratio, with comparable clinical characteristics. The project will have an overall expected duration of 60 months, and will be structured into five main tasks: (i) Clinical Study; (ii) Imaging/ Radiomic Study, (iii) Gene Expression Study, (iv) Proteomic Study, (v) Integrative Model Building.DiscussionThanks to its multi-disciplinary nature, MONDRIAN is expected to provide the opportunity to characterize ES-NSCLC from a multi-omic perspective, with a Radiation Oncology-oriented focus. Other than contributing to a mechanistic understanding of the disease, the study will assist the identification of high-risk patients in a largely unexplored clinical setting. Ultimately, this would orient further clinical research efforts on the combination of SBRT and systemic treatments, such as immunotherapy, with the perspective of improving oncological outcomes in this subset of patients.Trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05974475).

Stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy and flattening filter-free beams: dosimetric considerations.

The present study comparatively evaluates the impact of energy-matched flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams with different energy levels on the physical-dosimetric quality of lung and liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans. For this purpose, 54different lung and liver lesions from 44patients who had already received SBRT combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included in this retrospective planning study. Planning computed tomography scans already available were used for the renewed planning with 6MV, 6MV-FFF, 10MV, and 10MV-FFF under constant planning objectives. The treatment delivery data, dosimetric distributions, and dose-volume histograms as well as parameters such as the conformity index and gradient indices were the basis for the evaluation and comparison of treatment plans. Asignificant reduction of beam-on time (BOT) was achieved due to the high dose rates of FFF beams. In addition, we showed that for FFF beams compared to flattened beams of the same energy level, smaller planning target volumes (PTV) require fewer monitor units (MU) than larger PTVs. An equal to slightly superior target volume coverage and sparing of healthy tissue as well as organs at risk in both lung and liver lesions were found. Significant differences were seen mainly in the medium to lower dose range. We found that FFF beams together with VMAT represent an excellent combination for SBRT of lung or liver lesions with shortest BOT for 10MV-FFF but significant dose savings for 6MV-FFF in lung lesions.

A novel lung SBRT treatment planning: Inverse VMAT plan with leaf motion limitation to ensure the irradiation reproducibility of a moving target

This study exposed the implementation of a novel technique (VMATLSL) for the planning of moving targets in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This new technique has been compared to static conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and dynamic conformal arc (DCA). The rationale of this study was to lower geometric complexity (54.9% lower than full VMAT) and hence ensure the reproducibility of the treatment delivery by reducing the risk for interplay errors induced by respiratory motion. Dosimetry metrics were studied with a cohort of 30 patients. Our results showed that leaf speed limitation provided conformal number (CN) close to the VMAT (median CN of VMATLSL is 0.78 vs 0.82 for full VMAT) and was a significant improvement on 3D-CRT and DCA with segment-weight optimized (respectively 0.55 and 0.57). This novel technique is an alternative to VMAT or DCA for lung SBRT treatments, combining independence from the patient's breathing pattern, from the size and amplitude of the lesion, free from interplay effect, and with dosimetry metrics close to the best that could be achieved with full VMAT.

Feasibility and tolerability of breath-hold in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy with surface guided radiotherapy

PurposeIntrafractional motion constitutes a significant challenge in SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy).The breath-hold (BH) technique is employed to mitigate tumor motion; however, ensuring reproducibility and consistency remains critically important. Surface tracking systems, integrated into the treatment process, facilitate motion tracking through three-dimensional camera technology. Surface guidance has been incorporated with Varian EDGE (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and has been utilized at multiple treatment sites within our department since 2018. Drawing on four years of experience, this study aims to publish patient experience, assess the feasibility, and evaluate the tolerability of breath-hold during SBRT with surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT), particularly focusing on a specific subgroup: patients with liver metastases. MethodsProspective evaluation was conducted on patients with liver metastases undergoing breath-hold SBRT with SGRT. A two-step survey consisting of seven questions was administered after CT simulation and treatment. Treatment duration and the number of breath-holds were recorded. Additionally, factors potentially influencing SGRT and treatment time were assessed. ResultsBetween April 2021 and May 2022, a total of 41 patients underwent 171 fractions of treatment. According to the questionnaire, prior training was found to be beneficial, and breath-holding during the procedure was tolerable. Patients reported experiencing slight stress due to their active participation in the treatment. Factors such as Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), age, lung volume, conditions affecting lung capacity, previous breath-hold history, and being a native speaker showed no correlation with treatment time. Moreover, these factors did not correlate with the tolerability of breath-hold during SGRT. However, female patients showed better breath-holding performance in SGRT treatments compared to male patients (p: 0.02). ConclusionsThe application of breath-hold with SGRT procedures is tolerable and feasible in liver SBRT treatments. There exists no specific subgroup that cannot tolerate this method.

Online Adaptive MRI-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pancreatic and Other Intra-Abdominal Cancers.

A 1.5T MRI combined with a linear accelerator (Unity®, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) is a device that shows promise in MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Previous studies utilized the manufacturer's pre-set MRI sequences (i.e., T2 Weighted (T2W)), which limited the visualization of pancreatic and intra-abdominal tumors and organs at risk (OAR). Here, a T1 Weighted (T1W) sequence was utilized to improve the visualization of tumors and OAR for online adapted-to-position (ATP) and adapted-to-shape (ATS) during MRI-guided SBRT. Twenty-six patients, 19 with pancreatic and 7 with intra-abdominal cancers, underwent CT and MRI simulations for SBRT planning before being treated with multi-fractionated MRI-guided SBRT. The boundary of tumors and OAR was more clearly seen on T1W image sets, resulting in fast and accurate contouring during online ATP/ATS planning. Plan quality in 26 patients was dependent on OAR proximity to the target tumor and achieved 96 ± 5% and 92 ± 9% in gross tumor volume D90% and planning target volume D90%. We utilized T1W imaging (about 120 s) to shorten imaging time by 67% compared to T2W imaging (about 360 s) and improve tumor visualization, minimizing target/OAR delineation uncertainty and the treatment margin for sparing OAR. The average time-consumption of MRI-guided SBRT for the first 21 patients was 55 ± 15 min for ATP and 79 ± 20 min for ATS.

Correlation Between Oligometastatic Tumor in Two Other Visceral Organs and Prognosis in Patients With Brain Metastases.

Background and Objective: A recent report indicated that metastases to other body organs commonly develop after stereotactic body radiation treatment for cure in patients with oligometastases (OGM) confined to one organ. This study was undertaken to determine if the presence of metastatic disease in two other visceral organs (TVO) in patients with conventionally treated brain metastases (BRM) was associated with poorer prognosis. Methods: This retrospective clinical investigation included 26 patients treated for palliation of OGM-BRM between May 1996 and February 2020. These individuals were classified according to the presence (13 patients) or absence (13 patients) of metastases in TVO. Results: With an overall mean follow-up of 16 months, 20 patients were deceased, and 6 patients were alive. The median survivals for the OGM-BRM-TVO and non-OGM-BRM-TVO subsets were 4 and 12 months, respectively; the corresponding crude survival rates at 12 months were 0% and 46% (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis correlating prognosis to the number of BRM (single vs. multiple) and OGM-BRM categories (synchronous vs. metachronous) failed to reveal a survival advantage favoring a certain subgroup. Conclusion: Although the evidence is speculative, we believe that an aggressive disease condition is more likely present in patients with OGM-BRM-TVO. With the notion of an overall poor survival, we suggest a more tailored, less or nonharmful management approach (i.e., palliative therapy or hospice) for this particular patient cohort.

OTHER-10 EARLY CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF SRS AND SBRT STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) CASE SERIES AT HCG CANCER CENTRE, NAIROBI.

Abstract BACKGROUND Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), Stereotactic Radiotherapy(SRT) and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) delivers fewer high-dose fractions of radiation which may be radiobiologically favorable to conventional low-dose fractions commonly used for central nervous system. We report our early experience using SBRT in central nervous tumours (CNS). METHODS / INTRODUCTION Sequential patients treated with SBRT from December 2022 to May 2023 at HCG Cancer Care Kenya for CNS tumours will be included in this retrospective review of early clinical data collected in the institutional database. SBRT treatments were delivered using VersaHD Linac with doses ranging from 36.25Gy to 30Gy delivered in 3 to 5 fractions. Local guidelines have been developed to guide stereotactic radiotherapy treatments in Kenya. The national health insurer is currently reimbursing for stereotactic treatments would further increases the uptake. Discussion The CNS cases that has been treated locally with SRS/SRT/SBRT with CNS case series shall be evaluated under clinical presentation, treatment planning process in recurrent Meningioma, Glomus tymphanicum and brain metastasis. The radiobiological advantage of SRS/SRT/SBRT over conventional radiotherapy is the short course treatment with minimal toxicity. SRS/SBRT is not oxygen dependent tumor DNA damage but related to endothelial cell damage from apoptosis. The treatment volume margins in CNS cancers are tight to a millimeter hence rigid immobilization with head fraxion frame is required. The turnaround time from diagnosis, planning to treatment delivery for the patients is 72 hours. RESULTS 30 patients underwent SBRT treatment techniques varying from CNS and other sites. The case presentations in case series met the criteria and indications for SBRT treatment. The initial patient reported the treatment to be tolerable however currently we do have data on acute and long term in terms of both outcomes and toxicity. Follow up is needed to review and report on the outcomes.

A feasibility trial of skin surface motion-gated stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of upper abdominal or lower thoracic targets using a novel O-ring gantry

Background and purposeA novel O-ring gantry can deliver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with artificial intelligence-facilitated, CT-guided online plan adaptation. It gates mobile targets by optically monitoring skin surface motion. However, this gating solution has not been clinically validated. We conducted a trial to evaluate the feasibility of optical skin surface-guided gating for patients with mobile upper abdominal or lower thoracic malignancies treated with SBRT on this platform (NCT05030454). Materials and methodsTen patients who were prescribed SBRT to a thoracic or abdominal target and were capable of breath-hold for at least 17 s enrolled. They received SBRT in five fractions with breath-hold technique and optical skin surface motion monitored-gating with a ± 2 mm tolerance. Online plan adaptation was left to the discretion of the daily treating physician. The primary endpoint was defined as successful completion of > 75 % of attempted fractions. Exploratory endpoints included local control and acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity rates after three months. For adapted fractions the contouring, planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery times were recorded. ResultsForty-seven of 51 SBRT fractions (92 %) were successfully gated at breath-hold by optical skin surface motion monitoring. The tumor centroid position during breath-hold varied by a mean of approximately 2 mm. Sixty-three percent of fractions were adapted online with a median total treatment time of 78.5 min. After three months no local recurrences or acute grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed. ConclusionsSBRT treatment to mobile targets with surface-monitored gating on a novel O-ring gantry was prospectively validated.

Evaluation of kV Triggered Fiducial Tracking for Prostate SBRT Intrafraction Motion Management.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective treatment for localized prostate cancer. Given the high dose per fraction, a high degree of precision is needed during SBRT treatment delivery. Fiducial marker tracking is a means of monitoring intrafraction motion, ensuring precise treatment delivery and potentially allowing for decreased planning target volume (PTV) margins. We present a 5-year single institution experience to characterize the performance of fiducial tracking. We analyzed 132 consecutive patients treated at our institution with prostate SBRT between July 2017 and November 2022 using fiducial tracking with the TrueBeam Auto Beam Hold feature. Patients were treated using a 5-fraction dose escalation protocol, with many receiving a simultaneous integrated boost to the GTV up to 45 Gy. All patients underwent pre-treatment cone-beam CT and planar kV imaging with rigid registration to the fiducial markers. Cine kV images were acquired every 3-5 seconds during treatment delivery and the beam was paused when a fiducial deviated from a given 4 mm diameter tolerance region. Additional intrafraction 2D or 3D imaging techniques were then used to realign the fiducials. Data was retrieved from the record and verify system including: number and type of intrafraction images, number of treatment interruptions, number of and magnitude of shifts, and total treatment time. The average number of cine kV images acquired per fraction and for the total 5 fraction SBRT course were 86.6 ± 26.8 and 425.6 ± 136.8 respectively. Assuming 1.3 mGy/kV image, the fiducial tracking process delivered an average additional 55.3 cGy over the full treatment course. On average, the beam was paused 5.0 ± 2.5 times per fraction (range 1-21 interruptions) and shifts were applied 4.1 ± 2.1 times (range 0-10.2 times) per fraction. Over the 2560 total shifts applied for all the patients, the average(max) translations were 0.6 (12) mm vrt, 0.7 (22) mm lng, and 0.9 (5) mm lat and the average(max) rotations were 0.19 (5.9)° pitch, 0.01 (2.4)° roll, and 0.16 (6.4)° rtn. Overall, 2.4% of shifts were greater than the 4 mm PTV margin and 4.2% of vertical shifts were greater than the 2.5 mm posterior margin. Average fraction treatment time was 27 ± 9.7 minutes. Fiducial tracking affords the potential to increase daily treatment precision when delivering prostate SBRT. Our data indicate that the beam is typically paused several times during a prostate SBRT fraction, with occasional large shifts required, suggesting the importance of intrafraction motion management. Downsides of kV triggered fiducial tracking include extension of treatment times and delivery of additional radiation dose to the patient. We are investigating if this method of motion management might allow for a reduction in PTV margins to reduce normal tissue dosing.

Planning Target Volume Margin Quantification of Retroperitoneal Tumors Using Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy with Spine Tracking

Stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment (SBRT) is an effective modality for treating primary and oligometastatic malignant lesions. Appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins are essential when delivering SBRT to maximize target prescription coverage while minimizing dose to surrounding organs-at-risk. Spine tracking uses boney spinal anatomy as a surrogate for tumor localization during treatment delivery on robotic linear accelerator platforms that employ intrafraction kV x-ray imaging. The aim of this study was to quantify the PTV margin needed when spine tracking was used for tumor localization when treating retroperitoneal metastatic lesions with robotic SBRT. A single institution chart review was performed and identified 16 patients with retroperitoneal tumors treated stereotactically over 19 courses in 103 fractions. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images that were registered based on tumor position at the time of treatment were analyzed. Rigid registrations were re-performed aligning the position of the spine on the CBCT relative to its position on the planning CT. Shifts from the treatment position were recorded and per-patient mean shifts and standard deviations were calculated. Van Herk's margin recipe was used to determine the additional PTV margin required if spine tracking was used instead of soft tissue alignment. Patient tumors were stratified and compared based on proximity to the vertebral column (≤1 cm vs >1 cm) and location within the retroperitoneum (superior vs inferior to the renal artery). Student's t-test was used to compare statistical differences of shifts based on location. The additional margins calculated by van Herk's margin recipe to adequately cover the target volumes within the 95% isodose surface for 90% of the entire patient cohort in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions were 2.7, 2.8, and 2.8 mm, respectively. When tumors were stratified by proximity to the vertebral column, average longitudinal (p<0.001) and total shifts (p<0.001) were statistically significant. Isometric PTV expansions of 3, 4, and 5 mm would have encompassed 55%, 76%, and 86% of the maximum total shifts for lesions >1 cm from the vertebral column versus 94%, 100%, and 100% for lesions ≤1 cm. When stratified by location within the retroperitoneum, isometric PTV expansions of 3, 4, and 5 mm would have encompassed 82%, 94%, and 100% of the maximum total shifts for lesions superior to the renal artery versus 78%, 94%, and 98% for lesions inferior to the renal artery. When treating retroperitoneal tumors with robotic SBRT, a minimum isometric margin expansion between 3 to 5 mm when creating the PTV is recommended if spine tracking is used for intrafraction tumor localization. Target volumes adjacent to the vertebral column may have PTV margins decreased to ≤4 mm without compromising target coverage.

First-Year Experience of IMRT/SBRT Treatments Using a Novel Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy System

This study presents the first-year experience of treating patients using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with the X1 system, the first biology-guided radiation therapy (BgRT) machine installed in a clinical setting. A total of 78 patients underwent IMRT and SBRT treatments on the X1 system from May 2021 to May 2022. Clinical and technical data, such as treatment sites, number of pre-treatments kVCT scans, beam on time, patient setup time, imaging time per kVCT, and couch shifts after kVCT match, were collected and analyzed. Additionally, daily machine output stability, patient-specific quality assurance (QA) results, machine uptime, and user survey were also documented and reported. The most commonly treated site was the head and neck (63%), followed by the pelvis (23%), thorax (6%), and abdomen (8%). All treatments, except for 5 pelvis patients (6%) who received SBRT treatments for bony metastases, were conventionally fractionated IMRT (CF IMRT). The average number of kVCT scans per fraction is 1.2 ± 0.5 for all treatments. The average beam on time in minutes was 9.2 ± 3.5 for all treatments, 8.4 ± 2.4 for head and neck, 6.7 ± 1.3 for thorax, 10.3 ± 1.6 for abdomen, 11.6 ± 5.1 for CF IMRT pelvis, and 10.8 ± 5.3 for SBRT pelvis. The average patient setup time and imaging time per kVCT was 4.8 ± 2.6 minutes and 4.6 ± 1.5 minutes, respectively. The average couch corrections based on kVCT images were 0.4 ± 4.4 mm, 1.0 ± 4.5 mm, and 1.3 ± 4.3 mm along the x, y, and z direction, respectively; the average couch rotation corrections were 0.1 ± 0.9° for pitch, 0.0 ± 0.9° for roll, and 0.2 ± 1.2° for yaw. The daily machine output was 0.4 ± 1.2% from the baseline. The patient QA had a gamma passing rate of 97.4 ± 2.8%. The machine uptime was 92% of the total treatment time. The kVCT image quality and daily QA process received the highest level of satisfaction, while the treatment workflow for therapists received the lowest level of satisfaction (table 1). At one year after the installation of the X1 system, this study reports successful treatment of 78 patients using IMRT/ SBRT. With the recent FDA clearance of BgRT, our institution is preparing to treat patients using PET-guidance via a new product release, which should address deficiencies in the current IGRT workflow.