Stent Patency In Patients Research Articles

Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography for coronary in-stent re-stenosis

Abstract Background Through the development of CT equipment and proper preparation before CT scanning, the accuracy of Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD) is improving, and the role of CCTA in treatment decision is gradually expanding. The latest guidelines recommend CCTA as Class IIa to evaluate stent patency and native vessels in patients with chronic coronary disease. However, diagnostic performance of CCTA to evaluate stent patency in patients who underwent coronary stent was not clarified, respectively the role of CCTA in the evaluation of IHD in native coronary artery was established.. Purpose In the present study, we evaluate the agreement between CCTA and CAG in assessing stent patency in patients with de novo ischemic chest pain who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and evaluated which factors contribute to the differences. Methods From January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020, we analyzed 845 patients who underwent new CCTA and CAG sequentially for the evaluation of chest pain previously underwent PCI. In CAG and CCTA, ISR is equally defined as a stenosis greater than 50% of the vessel diameter of within the stented segment or its edge (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent). The degree of In-stent restenosis was analyzed by an independently by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Results A total of 208 stents were analyzed, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for CCTA on the diagnosis of ISR were 0.78 (0.65-0.89) and 0.93 (0.88-0.96), respectively. LR+ and LR- were 11.19 (6.22-20.15) and 0.23 (0.14-0.39). As a result of analyzing the ISR diagnostic agreement of CCTA by dividing into ACS and CCD group, the agreement of CCTA for ISR diagnosis was relatively low in the ACS group (Sensitivity 0.69 (0.48-0.86) vs. 0.88 (0.69-0.97), specificity 0.92 (0.84-0.97) vs. 0.94 (0.86-0.98), LR+ 9 (4-20.24) vs. 13.9 (5.88-32.88), LR- 0.33 (0.19-0.6) vs. 0.13 (0.04-0.37)) (Table 1). As a result of analyzing related factors in cases of discrepancy in ISR diagnosis, the degree of stenosis in both ACS and CCD groups was mostly intermediate stenosis, which often required additional clinical evaluation (Figure 1). Conclusion When new ischemic chest pain occurred in a patient who previously underwent PCI, the diagnostic accuracy of ISR by CCTA differed depending on the patient’s IHD category. In the CCD group, the diagnostic usefulness of CCTA was comparable both native vessels and ISR, but not in the ACS group. As majority of ISR diagnostic discrepancies were in intermediate lesions, even in the ACS group, CCTA may be considered as a diagnostic tool.

Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP.

Distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) can result in obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been an alternative for DMBO after failed ERCP. To compare the efficacy and safety between antegrade and transluminal approaches in patients with unresectable DMBO when ERCP failed. Patients with DMBO leading to obstructive jaundice after failed ERCP were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy between EUS-guided transluminal stenting (TLS group) and antegrade stenting (AGS group). 82 patients were enrolled, of which 45 patients were in TLS group and 37 in AGS group. There were no statistical differences in the malignancy type, baseline common bile duct diameter, total bilirubin level, reason for EUS-BD, and history of biliary drainage between TLS and AGS groups. The technical success rate was statistically higher in TLS group than in AGS group (97.8 vs. 81.1%, P = 0.031). There were no statistical differences in clinical success rate, procedure-related adverse events, stent migration rate, stent dysfunction rate, reintervention rate, and overall patient survival time between TLS and AGS groups. The median time to stent dysfunction or patient death in TLS and AGS groups was 53 and 81 days, respectively (P = 0.017). Although AGS had a lower technical success rate than TLS, it was superior to TLS in stent patency in patients with DMBO.

The Impact of Radiofrequency Ablation on Survival Outcomes and Stent Patency in Patients with Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Endoluminal biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proposed as a palliative treatment for patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in order to improve stent patency and survival. However, the existing data on patients with inoperable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) are conflicting. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing RFA plus stenting versus stenting alone in patients with inoperable eCCA. We searched for trials published in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases up to November 2023. Data extraction was conducted from published studies, and a quality assessment was carried out in accordance with the guidelines recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI were estimated from the trials. The primary endpoints of interest were overall survival and stent patency. Out of 275 results, 5 randomized trials and 370 patients were included. While overall survival was not different between the groups (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.36-1.07; p = 0.09; I2 = 80%;), the subgroup analysis of studies employing plastic stents showed a trend toward better survival in the RFA-treated group (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22-0.80; p = 0.009; I2 = 72%). Stent patency was improved in patients receiving RFA (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.90; p = 0.01; I2 = 23%). Adverse events were not different between the groups (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.69-2.12; p = 0.50; I2 = 0%). Despite the promising results, high heterogeneity and potential biases in the included studies suggest the need for further high-quality randomized trials to explore the potential cumulative effects of RFA on CCA treatment outcomes.

Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a randomised trial

BackgroundEndoluminal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been promoted as palliative treatment for patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in order to improve biliary drainage and eventually prolong survival....

Effect of radiofrequency ablation in addition to biliary stent on overall survival and stent patency in malignant biliary obstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used in addition to stent placement to manage extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction. We aimed to study the effect of RFA on overall survival (OS) and stent patency in malignant biliary obstruction. A comprehensive literature search was performed from inception to May 2022 for all studies measuring the effect of RFA plus stents compared to stents placement only on OS and stent patency in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. We measured differences in OS, stent patency, and odds of adverse events. A random effect model was used to pool data for stent patency, OS, and adverse event. A total of 17 studies (14 observational and 3 RCT) containing 1766 patients were included in the analysis. The weighted pooled mean survival difference was 58.5 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6-84.4, I2 = 71%] in favor of the RFA treatment group. The weighted mean difference in stent patency was better in the RFA plus stent group by 45.3 days (95% CI: 30.1-60.5, I2 = 16.4%) compared to stent only group. The pooled odds of adverse events were the same in both groups [odds ratio (OR) 1.52, 95% CI: 0.96-2.43, I2 = 59%], and no serious adverse event was seen in either group, or no death reported secondary to RFA procedure. No difference in stent patency based on procedure type, including percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (P = 0.06), and an underline cause of bile duct obstruction was found (P = 0.261). RFA treatment, in addition to stent placement in malignant biliary obstruction, potentially improves OS and stent patency duration.

Association between progression-free survival and metal stent patency in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

BackgroundChemotherapy reportedly affects the patency of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) in patients with cancer. However, knowledge regarding the association between SEMS patency and progression-free survival (PFS) remains limited. This study aimed to assess PFS and SEMS patency in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.MethodsBetween January 2012 and June 2021, 74 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) were enrolled in the study. Patients received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) as initial chemotherapy and SEMS within 1 month before or after the initial chemotherapy. Longer PFS was defined as PFS ≥7 months.ResultsThis study enrolled 38 male patients (51.4%); the mean age was 66.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 63.7–68.6] years. Of the patients, 46 (62.2%) had MPC and 58 (78.4%) received FOLFIRINOX as the initial chemotherapy. Of the patients, 61 (82.4%) underwent endoscopic SEMS insertion. The median stent patency and PFS were 6.9 [interquartile range (IQR), 4.5–12.9] and 6.4 (IQR, 4.2–12.5) months, respectively; the median overall survival (OS) was 10.5 (IQR, 6.7–16.5) months. Of the clinical parameters assessed using multivariate analysis, shorter PFS [PFS <7 months; hazard ratio (HR), 2.117; 95% CI, 1.020–4.393; P=0.044] and metastatic cancer (HR, 2.414; 95% CI, 1.159–5.018; P=0.019) were found to be associated with shorter SEMS patency. The median SEMS patency in patients with longer PFS and those with shorter PFS was 14.3 and 7.0 months (P=0.012), respectively, and that in patients with locally advanced cancer and those with metastatic cancer was 16.7 and 7.0 months (P=0.006), respectively. The coefficient of determination between stent patency and PFS was 0.624.ConclusionsSEMS patency may be associated with PFS in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who receive GnP or FOLFIRINOX.

Immediate postprocedure anticoagulation with factor Xa inhibitors of venous stents for nonthrombotic venous lesions does not increase stent patency

BackgroundMany clinicians will prescribe anticoagulation therapy for patients after iliac vein stenting to prevent early or late stent thrombosis. At present, it is unknown whether therapeutic anticoagulation has any effect on stent patency. Thus, we assessed the role of short-term anticoagulation on iliac vein stent patency in patients with nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs). MethodsWe performed a retrospective medical record review of all iliac vein stents placed for NIVLs at the Center for Vascular Medicine from January 2018 to December 2019. We compared the stent patency in the two groups. The anticoagulation (AC) group had received rivaroxaban or apixaban postoperatively for a minimum of 90 days and were compared with a group that had received no postoperative anticoagulation (NAC). Stent patency was assessed using transabdominal ultrasound at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months. At the discretion of the treating physician, the patients who demonstrated thrombus layering on surveillance ultrasound scanning continued rivaroxaban or apixaban until thrombus resolution was observed. The demographics and stent location, diameter, and length were assessed. Stent patency was analyzed using life table analyses. Differences in stent patency were analyzed using GraphPad Prism, version 8, statistical software (GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, Calif) and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. ResultsThe number of patients and stents in each group were as follows: AC group, 299 patients and 308 stents; and NAC group, 77 patients and 90 stents. The average age was 52.24 ± 13.44 years and 55.63 ± 14.49 years in the AC and NAC groups, respectively (P ≤ .065). Women constituted 76% of the patients in the AC group and 72% in the NAC group. The average stent diameter and length for the AC group was 20 ± 2 mm and 77 ± 13 mm and for the NAC group was 19 ± 2 mm and 82 ± 9 mm, respectively. The stents had been placed in the right common iliac vein, bilaterally, or left common iliac vein territory in 15%, 3%, and 82% in the AC group and 18%, 2%, and 80% in the NAC group, respectively. The cumulative stent patency at 30 months was 98.7% and 94.6% for the NAC and AC groups, respectively (P ≤ .83). All the stents placed were Wallstents (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass). A total of eight insertion site thromboses occurred that did not affect stent patency: five in the AC group (1.6%) and three in the NAC group (4.5%; P = .15). In addition, 19 patients demonstrated evidence of thrombus layering, with 6 receiving extended anticoagulation. ConclusionsOur data indicate that perioperative stent thrombosis in patients with NIVLs is uncommon. Thus, anticoagulation for perioperative stent thrombosis prophylaxis is not necessary. Anticoagulation should only be used for patients with insertion site thromboses and should be considered if thrombus layering is observed on surveillance scanning.

Duplex Ultrasound Can Successfully Identify Endoleaks and Renovisceral Stent Patency in Patients Undergoing Complex Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Efficacy of duplex ultrasound (DU) surveillance of complex EVAR such as FEVAR and ChEVAR has not been studied. All patients undergoing FEVAR or ChEVAR at a single multihospital institution were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative surveillance included DU at 1 month and CTA at 3 months. 82 patients met inclusion criteria including 39 (47.6%) ChEVAR and 43 (52.4%) FEVAR cases. DU identified endoleak with aneurysm sac enlargement in 3 cases requiring reintervention. CTA at 3 months detected 2 new endoleaks without growth and 1 renal artery stent occlusion. Replacement of initial postoperative imaging with DU did not result in any missed endoleaks, deaths, ruptures, or branch occlusions.

Comparison of endoscopic bilateral metal stent drainage with plastic stents in the palliation of unresectable hilar biliary malignant strictures: Large multicenter study.

Endoscopic stenting to manage malignant hilar biliary obstruction has no consensus regarding the optimal stenting strategy. In this multicenter study, we compared transpapillary parallel-style bilateral metal stenting with bilateral plastic stenting, and evaluated short- and long-term outcomes. We recruited 262 consecutive patients (Bismuth classification types II-IV) who underwent either bilateral metal or plastic stenting as primary therapy at four tertiary centers. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching. Our primary outcome was overall survival. After propensity score matching, each group comprised 96 patients, with no significant differences in any baseline characteristics. The median survival was significantly longer in the metal stenting group than in the plastic stenting group (7.2months [95%CI 6.0-8.5] vs. 4.1months [95%CI 2.9-5.3]; P=0.015). The clinical success rates were significantly higher in the metal stenting group than in the plastic stenting group (99.0% vs. 71.9%, respectively; P<0.001), and lower post-procedure cholangitis incidence (7.3% vs. 26.0%; P<0.001), longer median symptom-free stent patency (9.2months [95%CI 7.6-10.6] vs. 4.8months [95%CI 4.2-5.3]; P<0.001), and fewer total interventions (1.3±0.6 vs. 2.0±1.4; P<0.001). In multivariate Cox analysis of the overall survival, metal stenting (HR 0.589, P=0.002), hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HR 0.419, P=0.009), and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.596, P=0.006) were independent predictors of death. Endoscopic therapy using bilateral metal stenting is superior to bilateral plastic stenting, with prolonged overall survival, higher clinical success, and longer stent patency in patients with advanced hilar biliary malignancies.

Folfirinox chemotherapy prolongs stent patency in patients with malignant biliary obstruction due to unresectable pancreatic cancer

Background: Stent insertion for biliary decompression to relieve jaundice and subsequent biliary infection is necessary for patients with biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer, and it is important to keep the stent patent as long as possible. However, few studies have compared stent patency in terms of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in stent patency in terms of recently evolving chemotherapy.Methods: Between January 2015 and May 2017, 161 patients with pancreatic cancer who had undergone biliary stent insertion with a metal stent were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between chemotherapy and stent patency was assessed. Additionally, overall survival according to the treatment, risk factors for stent patency, and long-term adverse events were evaluated.Results: Median stent patency was 42 days for patients with the best supportive care and 217 days for patients with chemotherapy (conventional gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and folfirinox) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the folfirinox group showed the longest median stent patency and overall survival, with 283 days and 466 days, respectively (P < 0.001) despite higher adverse events rate. Patients who underwent folfirinox chemotherapy after stent insertion had better stent patency in multivariate analysis (HR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.12–0.60; P = 0.001).Conclusions: Compared with patients who received best supportive care only, patients who underwent chemotherapy after stent insertion had better stent patency. More prolonged stent patency can be expected for patients with folfirinox than conventional gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

A newly designed biliary brachytherapy drainage catheter for patients with malignant biliary obstruction: A pilot study.

Self.expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement has been considered as the preferred treatment to relieve jaundice in nonsurgical patients. However, 50% of stents become stenosed within 3.6 months due to tumor ingrowth and epithelial hyperplasia. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a newly designed brachytherapy biliary drainage catheter (BBDC) loaded with 125I seeds for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). In this prospective study, patients with unresectable MBO underwent BBDC placement after SEMS placement at our center from September 2017 to April 2019. A total of 21 patients with MBO were enrolled. The technical and clinical success rates were 100%. Total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, cancer antigen 19.9, and carcinoembryonic antigen levels significantly decreased during the 1.month follow.up (P < 0.05). Four patients (19%) had minor complications. During the median follow.up of 299 days, 13 patients (61.9%) developed stent occlusion. The 6.month stent patency and survival rates were 73.5% and 79.2%, respectively. The median stent patency and survival were 279 and 454 days, respectively. The use of BBDC loaded with 125I seeds is a feasible and effective method to prolong biliary stent patency in patients with MBO.

P3565Clopidorel-based antiplatelet therapy is not enough for stent patency in patients undergoing femoropopliteal arterial endovascular interventions

P3565Clopidorel-based antiplatelet therapy is not enough for stent patency in patients undergoing femoropopliteal arterial endovascular interventions

Duplex Ultrasound Can Successfully Identify Endoleaks and Renovisceral Stent Patency in Patients Undergoing Complex Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Duplex Ultrasound Can Successfully Identify Endoleaks and Renovisceral Stent Patency in Patients Undergoing Complex Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Stent patency in patients with advanced chronic venous disease and nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions

ObjectiveMidterm patency results of iliac vein stents placed for nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs) are not widely known. Previously published studies involving large series of patients with iliac vein stent placement have failed to clearly demonstrate the outcomes for patients with NIVLs and advanced disease. To further study this issue, we reviewed our series of 268 iliac vein stents placed for NIVLs. MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed of 210 patients who underwent common or external iliac vein angioplasty and stent placement procedures between January 2013 and December 2014. Only patients with Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classification scores of C3, C4, or C5 were included. Patients were excluded if they had either active ulcer disease or signs of post-thrombotic lesions at initial venography or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Ultrasound-guided puncture was performed of the femoral or common femoral vein at the discretion of the surgeon. This was followed by ascending venography. IVUS was used in cases in which a definite stenosis was not appreciated on initial ascending venography. Balloon angioplasty and stents were applied across lesions. After the procedure, patients were instructed to use clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Patency of the stents was assessed during a follow-up visit with abdominal venous duplex ultrasound scans. The length of the patients' follow-up and stent patency rates were based on the last previous duplex ultrasound scan available. ResultsA total of 268 procedures were performed in 210 patients. Bilateral lower extremity stent placements were required in 58 patients; 173 (64.6%) procedures were performed in women. The average age of our patients was 72 ± 15 (standard deviation) years. Of the 268 procedures, 144 (53.7%) were performed in the left lower extremity. The Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classification of lower extremity venous disease was 58%, 30%, and 12% for C3, C4, and C5, respectively. Our average follow-up period was 437 days (median, 499 days; range, 1-1060 days). Patients were observed for >6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in 71.3%, 57.1%, and 28.7% of cases, respectively. During this period, 4 of the 268 (1.5%) limbs experienced in-stent thrombosis. Primary stent patency of 98.7%, 98.3%, and 97.9% was noted at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of follow-up, respectively. ConclusionsOur midterm patency rates for iliac vein stents placed in patients with advanced chronic venous disease demonstrated excellent (98.5%) results. Furthermore, with IVUS assistance, we have clearly documented the average area of iliac venous segments as well as the most common locations of the stenoses.

Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy with Antegrade Stenting for Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (BD) is a well-recognized alternative BD method after unsuccessful endoscopic transpapillary drainage. EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) with antegrade stenting (AGS) was recently applied to the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of HGS combined with AGS for treatment of malignant biliary stricture-induced obstructive jaundice. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single academic tertiary care center. Patients: From January 2006 to December 2014, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was attempted in patients with obstructive jaundice; it was successful in 641 patients and impossible in 154 patients (postsurgically altered anatomy or duodenal stenosis, n = 101; difficult cannulation, n = 53). In total, 145 patients underwent EUS-guided BD; HGS and HGS with AGS were attempted in 42 patients (Group A, January 2006-August 2011) and 37 patients (Group B, September 2011-December 2014), respectively. Interventions: Under EUS and fluoroscopy guidance, HGS and HGS with AGS were performed via needle puncture, guidewire insertion, puncture-hole dilation, and stent placement. Main Outcome Measurements: Groups A and B were compared in terms of technical success, functional success, adverse event rates, re-intervention rates, patient survival time, and time to stent dysfunction or patient death. The two groups were also compared in a subgroup analysis of only 28 patients who underwent chemotherapy. Results: The technical success rate was significantly higher in Group A than B (97.6 vs. 83.8%, p = 0.03). The functional success rate was comparable between the two groups (90.2 vs. 90.3%), although the rate of adverse events was significantly higher in Group A than B (26.1 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.03). The re-intervention rate tended to be higher in Group A than B (16.7 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.25). Groups A and B did not differ significantly in terms of median overall patient survival (75 vs. 61 days, p = 0.70) or median time to stent dysfunction or patient death (68 vs. 63 days, p = 0.08). Among patients who underwent chemotherapy, there was no difference in overall patient survival time between the two groups (121 vs. 157 days, p = 0.08), although time to stent dysfunction or patient death was significantly shorter in Group A than B (71 vs. 95 days, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Although the technical success rate of HGS with AGS was lower than that of HGS, HGS with AGS was superior to HGS in terms of adverse event rate and stent patency in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Stent patency in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction receiving chemo(radio)therapy.

Background and study aims Recent literature suggests that chemo(radio)therapy might reduce the patency of plastic stents in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Whether this might also be valid for other types of stents is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of chemo(radio)therapy on the patency of fully-covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) and plastic stents. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction who underwent biliary stent placement between April 2001 and July 2015. Primary outcome was duration of stent patency. Secondary outcome was stent patency at 3 and 6 months. We used Kaplan–Meier survival analyses to compare stent patency rates between patients who received chemo(radio)therapy and patients who did not. Results A total of 291 biliary stents (151 metal and 140 plastic) were identified. The median cumulative stent patency of FCSEMSs did not differ between patients receiving chemo(radio)therapy (n = 51) and those (n = 100) who did not ( P = 0.70, log-rank test). The estimated cumulative stent patency of plastic stents was also comparable in 99 patients without and 41 patients with chemo(radio)therapy ( P = 0.73, log-rank test). At 3 and 6 months, FCSEMS patency rates were 87 % and 83 % in patients without chemo(radio)therapy and 96 % and 83 % in patients with therapy, respectively. Plastic patency rates were 69 % and 55 % in patients without and 85 % and 39 % in patients with therapy, respectively. After 1 year, 78 % of the FCSEMSs were still patent in patients without chemo(radio)therapy and 69 % of the FCSEMSs were still patent in patients with therapy. Conclusion Our data indicate that chemo(radio)therapy does not reduce the patency of biliary fully-covered metal and plastic stents.

Bilateral versus unilateral placement of metal stents for inoperable high-grade malignant hilar biliary strictures: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study (with video)

The efficacy of palliative biliary drainage by using bilateral or unilateral self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for a malignant hilar biliary stricture (MHS) remains controversial. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study investigated whether bilateral drainage by using SEMSs is superior to unilateral drainage in patients with inoperable MHSs. Patients with inoperable high-grade MHSs who underwent palliative endoscopic insertion of bilateral or unilateral SEMSs were enrolled. The main outcome measurements were the rate of primary reintervention for malfunction after successful placement of SEMSs, stent patency, technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, and survival duration. A total of 133 pathology-diagnosed patients were randomized to the bilateral group (n= 67) or the unilateral group (n= 66). The primary technical success rates were 95.5% (64/67) and 100% (66/66) in the bilateral and unilateral groups, respectively (P= .244). The clinical success rates were 95.3% (61/64) and 84.9% (56/66), respectively (P= .047). The primary reintervention rates based on the per-protocol analysis were 42.6% (26/61) in the bilateral group and 60.3% (38/63) in the unilateral group (P= .049). The median cumulative stent patency duration was 252 days in the bilateral group and 139 days in the unilateral group. The risk of stent patency failure was significantly higher in the unilateral group (log-rank test; P< .01). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model to assess stent patency, bilateral SEMS placement was a favorable factor (adjusted hazard ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.172-0.521; P< .001). Survival probability and late adverse events were not different between the 2 groups. Unilateral and bilateral drainage strategies by using SEMSs had similar technical success rates, but bilateral drainage resulted in fewer reinterventions and more durable stent patency in patients with inoperable high-grade MHSs. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02166970.).

Sa1382 Can Anti-Reflux Metal Stent Make the Stent Patency Longer in Patients With Inoperable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction?

The anti-reflux metal stents (ARMSs) were designed to reduce the duodenobilary reflux and ascending infection, and prolong the stent patency in patients with inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction. In this study, we aimed to compare the stent patency between the covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) with an anti-reflux design, and those without an anti-reflux design.

Metallic Stent Expansion Rate at Day One Predicts Stent Patency in Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction.

Self-expandable metallic stent insertion has been a mainstream treatment for relieving the obstructive symptoms of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO), a late-stage complication of gastrointestinal malignancies. This study aims to investigate the predictive value of stent expansion rates in clinical outcomes in patients with MGOO. Eighty-seven patients with inoperable MGOO receiving metallic stents were reviewed retrospectively from April 2010 to December 2014. Clinical outcomes, predictors of stent patency, and survival were analyzed. The technical and clinical success rates were 100 and 94.3%, respectively. The median stent patency time was 114days (range 13-570days). The median survival time was 133days (range 13-1145days). Stent dysfunctions occurred in 28 patients (32.2%), with restenosis accounting for the majority (82%). The stent expansion rate ≥75% at Day 1 predicted the stent patency [hazard ratio (HR) 0.12, P=0.04]. However, it did not correlate with survival. Non-gastric cancer origins (HR 2.41, P=0.002) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (HR 2.54, P=0.001) correlated with poor survival. However, post-stent chemotherapy (HR 0.55, P=0.03) was related to better outcome. The comparison of clinical outcomes of first and second stent insertions showed no significant difference in the stent expansion rate either at Day 0 and Day 1 (P=0.97 and P=0.57). Self-expandable metallic stent insertion is a safe and effective treatment for relieving the obstructive symptoms. The stent expansion rate ≥75% at Day 1 is a novel stent-related predictor of stent patency.

SHP-1 activation inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and intimal hyperplasia in a rodent model of insulin resistance and diabetes

Aims/hypothesisAccelerated migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) enhances arterial restenosis after angioplasty in insulin resistance and diabetes. Elevation of Src homology 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) induces apoptosis in the microvasculature. However, the role of SHP-1 in intimal hyperplasia and restenosis has not been clarified in insulin resistance and diabetes.MethodsWe used a femoral artery wire injury mouse model, rodent models with insulin resistance and diabetes, and patients with type 2 diabetes. Further, we modulated SHP-1 expression using a transgenic mouse that overexpresses SHP-1 in VSMCs (Shp-1-Tg). SHP-1 agonists were also employed to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of SHP-1 by oxidised lipids.ResultsMice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) exhibited increased femoral artery intimal hyperplasia and decreased arterial SHP-1 expression compared with mice fed a regular diet. Arterial SHP-1 expression was also decreased in Zucker fatty rats, Zucker diabetic fatty rats and in patients with type 2 diabetes. In primary cultured VSMCs, oxidised LDL suppressed SHP-1 expression by activating Mek-1 (also known as Map2k1) and increased DNA methylation of the Shp-1 promoter. VSMCs from Shp-1-Tg mice exhibited impaired platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation with a concomitant decrease in PDGF-stimulated VSMC proliferation and migration. Similarly, HFD-fed Shp-1-Tg mice and mice treated with the SHP-1 inducer, Icariside II, were protected from the development of intimal hyperplasia following wire injury.Conclusions/interpretationSuppression of SHP-1 by oxidised lipids may contribute to the excessive VSMC proliferation, inflammatory cytokine production and intimal hyperplasia observed in arteries from diabetes and insulin resistance. Augmenting SHP-1 levels is a potential therapeutic strategy to maintain stent patency in patients with insulin resistance and diabetes.