Statin-associated Muscle Symptoms Research Articles

Effect of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Statin Myopathy Risk vs Usual Care on Blood Cholesterol

Nonadherence to statin guidelines is common. The solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) genotype is associated with simvastatin myopathy risk and is proposed for clinical implementation. The unintended harms of using pharmacogenetic information to guide pharmacotherapy remain a concern for some stakeholders. To determine the impact of delivering SLCO1B1 pharmacogenetic results to physicians on the effectiveness of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention (measured by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] levels) and concordance with prescribing guidelines for statin safety and effectiveness. This randomized clinical trial was performed from December 2015 to July 2019 at 8 primary care practices in the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System. Participants included statin-naive patients with elevated ASCVD risk. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to September 2020. SLCO1B1 genotyping and results reporting to primary care physicians at baseline (intervention group) vs after 1 year (control group). The primary outcome was the 1-year change in LDL-C level. The secondary outcomes were 1-year concordance with American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association and Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for statin therapy and statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Among 408 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.1 [7.8] years; 25 women [6.1%]), 193 were randomized to the intervention group and 215 were randomized to the control group. Overall, 120 participants (29%) had a SLCO1B1 genotype indicating increased simvastatin myopathy risk. Physicians offered statin therapy to 65 participants (33.7%) in the intervention group and 69 participants (32.1%) in the control group. Compared with patients whose physicians did not know their SLCO1B1 results at baseline, patients whose physicians received the results had noninferior reductions in LDL-C at 12 months (mean [SE] change in LDL-C, -1.1 [1.2] mg/dL in the intervention group and -2.2 [1.3] mg/dL in the control group; difference, -1.1 mg/dL; 90% CI, -4.1 to 1.8 mg/dL; P < .001 for noninferiority margin of 10 mg/dL). The proportion of patients with American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association guideline-concordant statin prescriptions in the intervention group was noninferior to that in the control group (12 patients [6.2%] vs 14 patients [6.5%]; difference, -0.003; 90% CI, -0.038 to 0.032; P < .001 for noninferiority margin of 15%). All patients in both groups were concordant with CPIC guidelines for safe statin prescribing. Physicians documented 2 and 3 cases of SAMS in the intervention and control groups, respectively, none of which was associated with a CPIC guideline-discordant prescription. Among patients with a decreased or poor SLCO1B1 transporter function genotype, simvastatin was prescribed to 1 patient in the control group but none in the intervention group. Clinical testing and reporting of SLCO1B1 results for statin myopathy risk did not result in poorer ASCVD prevention in a routine primary care setting and may have been associated with physicians avoiding simvastatin prescriptions for patients at genetic risk for SAMS. Such an absence of harm should reassure stakeholders contemplating the clinical use of available pharmacogenetic results. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02871934.

Advances in the management of statin myopathy.

Statins are highly effective therapies for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and preventing cardiovascular events. However, many patients taking statins experience statin-associated muscle symptoms. In the current manuscript, we review algorithms to define statin intolerance and approaches to optimize cardiovascular risk reduction and reduce the nocebo effect among individuals reporting statin-associated muscle pain. Patients with statin intolerance have a higher cardiovascular event risk. These data underscore the need to apply clinical strategies that improve treatment utilization and adherence of patients experiencing statin-related side effects. Recent data have shown that the nocebo effect is frequent with statin therapy. This may be explained by the high frequency of muscle symptoms in the general population and media misinformation. When statins even at a low dosage are not tolerated other therapies can be used such as fibrate, ezetimibe nutraceuticals and antiPCSK9 antibodies. Recent data have identified other alternative therapeutic strategies such as bempedoic acid. There are multiple strategies for the management of statin-intolerance, both pharmacological and nonpharmacological. Patient involvement in the justification of statin treatment indication and therapeutic choice is the first step to overcome misbelief and reduce nocebo effect.

Combination of atorvastatin and gemfibrozil plus physical activity: an animal model of statin/fibrate-induced myopathy

Introduction Drug-induced myopathy is among the most common causes of muscle disease. Lipid-lowering drugs, primarily the statins as inhibitors of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, are a common cause of myopathy. Statin-fibrate combination potentially increases risk for myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Blood levels of the enzymes creatine kinase (CK), aldolase and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase during myopathy. Exercise may be a trigger for statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Methods In this study a model of myopathy induction was designed via combination of oral atorvastatin, gemfibrozil and exercise for ten days in rats. To maximise exercise, the rats were placed in a pool of water and allowed to swim before sinking in the last three days. Finally, the mean of swimming tolerance times and blood levels of creatine kinase, aldolase and lactate dehydrogenase were measured. Results The results showed a significantly (p < 0.05) decreased swimming tolerance time and elevated enzyme levels in rats receiving atorvastatin (ATV) and gemfibrozil (GMF) plus exercise compared with those rats in other groups. This animal model can be used to evaluate the effects of medication on reduction of statin/fibrate-induced myopathy.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms and vitamin D

Background and Aims: Statin associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are the most common adverse reports among patients treated with statins, but not necessarily caused by the statin. Other several drugs, genetic, infectious, immune disorders can present with muscle signs and symptoms. It should also be noted that low vitamin D levels have been reported in individuals with statin myalgia and vitamin D supplementation may alleviate symptoms.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms in the prosisa study: Prevalence and risk factors

Statin-associated muscle symptoms in the prosisa study: Prevalence and risk factors

Abstract 14248: Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Patients Who Cannot Tolerate Statins: Pooled Analysis of 4 Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Introduction: Some patients cannot tolerate statins mainly because of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Bempedoic acid (BA) is a prodrug activated in the liver and not in skeletal muscle. BA has been shown to significantly lower LDL-C by a mean of ~18% in patients receiving background maximally tolerated statins and a mean of ~25% in patients with statin intolerance. Objective: Determine efficacy and safety of BA in statin-intolerant patients receiving no background statin therapy across 4 phase 3 clinical trials. Methods: Data were pooled from 4 randomized (2:1), placebo-controlled studies evaluating oral BA 180 mg once daily vs placebo for 12 to 52 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint was LDL-C % change from baseline to week 12. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESI), and laboratory values. For patients who reported SAMs, additional information around etiology and location were collected. Results: Of 3621 patients, 586 (394 BA; 192 placebo) reported intolerance to multiple statins because of SAMS or other AEs and received no statins during the studies. Mean baseline LDL-C was 148.7 mg/dL. After 12 weeks, BA significantly lowered LDL-C vs placebo (placebo-corrected, -26.5%; P &lt; 0.001). Myalgia was the top reason for drug discontinuation, but was less common in the BA arm (17.7%) vs placebo (43.5%). CK &gt; 5 х ULN was uncommon in both groups. Among AESIs (Table) , muscle disorders were reported by 12.7% (BA) vs 14.1% (placebo). Myalgia was less common with BA (4.6%) vs placebo (7.3%). Muscle spasms (4.1% vs 3.6%) and pain in extremity (3.3% vs 2.1%) were comparable between treatment groups. Muscular weakness was rare (0.5% BA, 1% placebo). Conclusion: Among the population of patients unable to use statins, BA significantly lowered LDL-C vs placebo without increasing muscle-related TEAEs. BA may be an appropriate lipid-lowering therapy for patients with hyperlipidemia who are statin intolerant.

Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms

Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms

Rationale and design of the CLEAR-outcomes trial: Evaluating the effect of bempedoic acid on cardiovascular events in patients with statin intolerance

Although statins play a pivotal role in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, many patients fail to achieve recommended lipid levels due to statin-associated muscle symptoms. Bempedoic acid is an oral pro-drug that is activated in the liver and inhibits cholesterol synthesis in hepatocytes, but is not activated in skeletal muscle which has the potential to avoid muscle-related adverse events. Accordingly, this agent effectively lowers atherogenic lipoproteins in patients who experience statin-associated muscle symptoms. However, the effects of bempedoic acid on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have not been studied. STUDY DESIGN: Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic acid, an ACL-Inhibiting Regimen (CLEAR) Outcomes is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Included patients must have all of the following: (i) established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or have a high risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, (ii) documented statin intolerance, and (iii) an LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL on maximally-tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. The study randomized 14,014 patients to treatment with bempedoic acid 180 mg daily or matching placebo on a background of guideline-directed medical therapy. The primary outcome is a composite of the time to first cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization. The trial will continue until 1620 patients experience a primary endpoint, with a minimum of 810 hard ischemic events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke) and minimum treatment duration of 36 months and a projected median treatment exposure of 42 months. CONCLUSIONS: CLEAR Outcomes will determine whether bempedoic acid 180 mg daily reduces the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in high vascular risk patients with documented statin intolerance and elevated LDL-C levels.

An update on PCSK9 inhibitors- pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and toxicity

ABSTRACT Introduction While atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is affecting growing numbers of patients, lipid-lowering therapies have been continuously improving to achieve prevention of cardiovascular events. Thus, the appearance of a novel therapeutic class, PCSK9 inhibitors, has raised both high expectations as well as concern over possible adverse effects. Areas covered This current review aims to analyze adverse events of special interest linked to PCSK9 inhibitors and give recommendations regarding further conduct when dealing with patients on this therapy. The most stringent adverse effect, neurocognitive impairment has been investigated in several studies, concluding that PCSK9 inhibitors neither improved nor worsened cognitive function. While new onset diabetes mellitus has also been a cause of concern due to its possible association with lipid lowering therapies, studies conducted so far have dispelled this possibility by showing that PCSK9 inhibitors do not increase this risk. Also, statin-associated muscle symptoms have not been proven to arise after the use of PCSK9 inhibitors, even in statin-intolerant patients. Expert opinion In conclusion, it can be safely stated that so far, no compelling evidence links PCSK9 inhibitors to these adverse events; however, long-term trials are always welcome to further assess potential adverse effects.

Role of Bempedoic Acid in Dyslipidemia Management.

Statins remain the preferred agent to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lower atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Additional nonstatin agents are recommended to further lower LDL-C among patients at high-risk of ASCVD or those with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, despite statin therapy. Patients unable to tolerate recommended doses of statin therapy due to adverse effects, including statin-associated muscle symptoms, may also require additional nonstatin agents to lower LDL-C and ASCVD risk. Bempedoic acid is a first-in-class, once-daily oral agent, recently approved as monotherapy and in combination with ezetimibe, as an adjunct to maximally tolerated statin therapy in patients with ASCVD or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia who require additional LDL-C lowering. Its novel mechanism is reported to avoid adverse muscle symptoms associated with statins. The effectiveness and safety of bempedoic acid and bempedoic acid/ezetimibe combination have been reported in multiple phase 2 and 3 trials. In this review, we report the lipid-lowering effects associated with bempedoic acid, and the safety profile from multiple clinical trials. Based on available data, bempedoic acid significantly lowers LDL-C and other atherogenic lipoprotein measures, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein when added to background lipid-lowering therapy in patients with and without statin intolerance. Overall safety of bempedoic acid seems to be comparable to placebo, except for increased serum uric acid and tendon rupture. Ongoing clinical trials assessing the long-term safety and cardiovascular outcomes will provide additional insight into the role of bempedoic acid as an adjunct lipid-lowering medication.

Bempedoic Acid: A New Drug for an Old Problem.

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of bempedoic acid for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction. A PubMed search was conducted from January 2000 to June 15, 2020, using the keyword bempedoic acid for phase III clinical trials published in the English language. Articles related to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of bempedoic acid and other trials relating to the safety and efficacy of this drug were included. The findings from this review show that bempedoic acid is a safe and effective option for lowering LDL-C levels in patients requiring LDL-C lowering for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Statin therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for both primary and secondary prevention. However, many patients cannot tolerate statin therapy because of statin-associated muscle symptoms. Bempedoic acid may be a reasonable adjunct for LDL-C reduction, though further evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes with bempedoic acid in this population is needed. The recent FDA approval of bempedoic acid offers an additional option for lowering LDL-C levels in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or heterozygous familial hyperlipidemia. Additional data regarding effect on long-term cardiovascular outcomes with bempedoic acid are currently being studied.

Effect of atorvastatin on muscle symptoms in coronary heart disease patients with self-perceived statin muscle side effects: a randomized, double-blinded crossover trial.

AimsTo estimate the effect of atorvastatin on muscle symptom intensity in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with self-perceived statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) and to determine the relationship to blood levels of atorvastatin and/or metabolites.Methods and resultsA randomized multi-centre trial consecutively identified 982 patients with previous or ongoing atorvastatin treatment after a CHD event. Of these, 97 (9.9%) reported SAMS and 77 were randomized to 7-week double-blinded treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day and placebo in a crossover design. The primary outcome was the individual mean difference in muscle symptom intensity between the treatment periods, measured by visual-analogue scale (VAS) scores. Atorvastatin did not affect the intensity of muscle symptoms among 71 patients who completed the trial. Mean VAS difference (statin-placebo) was 0.31 (95% CI: −0.24 to 0.86). The proportion with more muscle symptoms during placebo than atorvastatin was 17% (n = 12), 55% (n = 39) had the same muscle symptom intensity during both treatment periods whereas 28% (n = 20) had more symptoms during atorvastatin than placebo (confirmed SAMS). There were no differences in clinical or pharmacogenetic characteristics between these groups. The levels of atorvastatin and/or metabolites did not correlate to muscle symptom intensity among patients with confirmed SAMS (Spearman’s rho ≤0.40, for all variables).ConclusionRe-challenge with high-intensity atorvastatin did not affect the intensity of muscle symptoms in CHD patients with self-perceived SAMS during previous atorvastatin therapy. There was no relationship between muscle symptoms and the systemic exposure to atorvastatin and/or its metabolites. The findings encourage an informed discussion to elucidate other causes of muscle complaints and continued statin use.

Association of SLCO1B1 c.521T&gt;C (rs4149056) with discontinuation of atorvastatin due to statin-associated muscle symptoms

The most common adverse drug reaction from statins are statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), characterized by myopathy (weakness), myalgia (muscle pain), and commonly elevation in serum creatine kinase. All statins are substrates of the organic anion transporter 1B1 (OATP1B1; gene: SLCO1B1), albeit to different degrees. A genetic polymorphism in SLCO1B1, c.521T>C (rs4149056), markedly decreases OATP1B1 function. The literature is currently unclear as to whether SLCO1B1 c.521T>C is significantly associated with discontinuation of atorvastatin specifically due to SAMS. Our hypothesis was that individuals carrying the SLCO1B1 decreased function 521C allele are more likely to discontinue atorvastatin due to SAMS. This was a retrospective analysis of survey data from 379 Caucasians genotyped for rs4149056 and treated with atorvastatin for at least 12 months. Crude and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for established risk factors for SAMS, determined the association of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with discontinuation of atorvastatin due to SAMS (SLCO1B1 521T-homozygotes vs. 521C-carriers). The sample was 51% male, with a mean age of 57 years (SD = 11). Sixty-one percent of participants reported discontinuing atorvastatin due to SAMS, and 32% overall carried the 521C allele. SLCO1B1 521C-carrier status was not a significant predictor of atorvastatin discontinuation in any model: crude OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.68-1.66; P = 0.78 and adjusted OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.68-1.69; P = 0.76. The results were similar in a sub-group of participants treated with higher doses of atorvastatin (>20 mg). In summary, SLCO1B1 c.521T>C was not significantly associated with discontinuation of atorvastatin therapy due to SAMS.

The impact of statins on physical activity and exercise capacity: an overview of the evidence, mechanisms, and recommendations.

Statins are among the most widely prescribed medications worldwide. Considered the 'gold-standard' treatment for cardiovascular disease (CVD), statins inhibit HMG-CoA reductase to ultimately reduce serum LDL-cholesterol levels. Unfortunately, the main adverse event of statin use is the development of muscle-associated problems, referred to as SAMS (statin-associated muscle symptoms). While regular moderate physical activity also decreases CVD risk, there is apprehension that physical activity may induce and/or exacerbate SAMS. While much work has gone into identifying the epidemiology of SAMS, only recent research has focused on the extent to which these muscle symptoms are accompanied by functional declines. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of possible mechanisms underlying SAMS and summarize current evidence regarding the relationship between statin treatment, physical activity, exercise capacity, and SAMS development. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were used to search the most relevant and up-to-date peer-reviewed research on the topic. The mechanism(s) behind SAMS, including altered mitochondrial metabolism, reduced coenzyme Q10 levels, reduced vitamin D levels, impaired calcium homeostasis, elevated extracellular glutamate, and genetic polymorphisms, still lack consensus and remain up for debate. Our summation of the evidence leads us to suggest that the etiology of SAMS development is likely multifactorial. Our review also demonstrates that there is limited evidence for statins impairing exercise adaptations or reducing exercise capacity for the majority of the investigated populations. The available evidence indicates that the benefits of engaging in physical activity while on statin medication largely outweigh the risks.

Lipid and cardiometabolic features of T2DM patients achieving stricter LDL-C and non-HDL-C targets in accordance with ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines

Background New recommendations call for lowering LDL-C < 55 mg/dL and non-HDL-C < 85 mg/dL in very-high cardiovascular risk (VH-CVR) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). This study assessed the proportion of VH-CVR diabetics currently meeting these primary and secondary lipid targets, and which therapies/phenotypes predict combined goals achievement. Methods We analysed the cardiometabolic phenotype, use of lipid-modulatind drugs (LMD), pre- and post-LMD lipids levels, and CV complications among 1196 T2DM with high (n = 221; 18%) or VH-CVR (n = 975; 82%). Among the latter, the characteristics of combined lipid goal-achievers (n = 158) were compared to those of non-achievers (n = 817), with subgroup analyses of on-statin patients (n = 732) and those with established CVD taking statins (n = 362). Presence of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) was also recorded. Results 75% of VH-CVR patients were on statins. Both LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals were achieved by 16.2% of all VH-CVR, 19.3% of on-statin VH-CVR, and 24.3% of patients with established CVD taking statins. Achieving both targets was associated with high-intensity statins, specifically rosuvastatin, [statin + ezetimibe] combination, lower baseline LDL-C, smaller LDLs, lower TG and lipoprotein(a), and reduced metabolic syndrome frequency. SAMS reporting did not differ between achievers and non-achievers. Conclusions More than 80% of patients are above targets. To bridge this gap, apart from treating more LMD-naive/refractory diabetics, one should consider for LDL-C to put most patients on high-intensity statins, more often with ezetimibe and, within statins, to switch preferably to rosuvastatin. As regards non-HDL-C, the off-target patients’ phenotype suggests that intensifying lifestyle measures against metabolic syndrome should supplement current therapies.

FOCAL CHRONIC CHEST PAIN RELATED TO STATIN

Statins are widely available cholesterol-lowering agents with a cardinal role in the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), such as pain or stiffness, is among the most reported side effects. SAMS usually affects large

Relationship Between Statin-associated Muscle Symptoms, Serum Vitamin D and Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol - A Cross-sectional Study.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) can lead to medication non-adherence among statin users. There is a complex relationship between SAMS, vitamin D and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D, LDL-C and occurrence of SAMS. This was a cross-sectional study in patients using statins. Thorough patient histories were taken, a clinical examination was conducted and SAMS were recorded. Levels of vitamin D, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and LDL-C were measured. These parameters were compared amongst statin users with SAMS and those without SAMS. Levels of vitamin D and LDL-C were converted into percentiles and their relationship with SAMS was evaluated in terms of odds ratio. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were drawn, taking vitamin D and LDL-C as predictors of SAMS. A total of 121 statin users were enrolled in this study. Thirty-eight patients (31.4%) presented with SAMS. Significantly lower levels of serum vitamin D were observed amongst statin users with SAMS compared with those without SAMS (19.8 ± 9.67 ng/mL versus 25.0 ± 14.6 ng/mL; 95% confidence interval -10.4 to -0.07; p=0.04). With vitamin D levels less than or equal to 5th, 10th and 25th percentile, the chances of occurrence of SAMS were significantly higher, but not at the 50th percentile (corresponding vitamin D level of 20.21 ng/mL). LDL-C did not show any conclusive relationship with SAMS. ROC curves showed a significant discrimination for vitamin D levels, but not for LDL-C. Statin users with low levels of vitamin D are at increased risk of developing SAMS. However, LDL-C status of statin users failed to predict any meaningful association with SAMS. Given the small sample size of this study, these results should be regarded as preliminary.

Association between Statin Use and Physical Function among Older Chinese Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Multiple statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) risk factors usually coexist in a given older diabetic patient, but the association between statin use and physical function in older Asian persons with T2MD remains uncertain. The present study therefore sought to provide insight into this uncertainty through a focused assessment of statin-associated outcomes in Chinese diabetic adults. Cross-sectional study. The study included 146 participants with T2MD in the Center of Gerontology and Geriatric, West China Hospital. The participants received the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Statin use and other medical data for each patient were determined via assessment of the inpatient hospital information system. Assessments of physical functions included ADLs, IADLs and the Timed "Up and Go" (TUG) test. Multiple regression analyses were then performed in order to determine the relationship between statin utilization and physical function. The average age of these 146 participants (32 women, 21.9%) was 80.00±5.60 years. At enrollment, 78 (53.4%) of the 146 patients were treated with statins. Among the statin users, 48.7% presented with a lack of TUG ability, which was significantly greater than in non-statin users (27.9%). However, the rates of IADL and ADL disabilities did not differ significantly between groups. In a multiple regression analyses, statin use was associated with a three-fold (95% CI 1.06, 9.51) increase in the risk of TUG inability, after adjusted all covariates. There was a significant association between statin use and TUG inability in older Chinese inpatients with diabetes.

Survey of Personal Use of Statins by Prescribers

A total of 829 physicians and advanced practice providers within a large, mostly primary care network were surveyed about their personal use of statins and their attitudes toward patient use of these medications. The 239 respondents included 60 clinicians who were current users, most for extended periods, and 15 who had stopped statin use. Nearly one-third of the clinicians over age 40 who took statins used them for primary prevention, compared with just 7.6% of the general adult US population. Half of the current statin users felt that their personal use had a positive effect on their likelihood of prescribing them to patients. More than 10% of users had discontinued statin use due to muscle effects, with virtually no other adverse effects mentioned among the survey respondents. The incidence of statin-associated muscle symptoms was high enough to suggest that as yet unmeasurable statin muscle pathology may be a real phenomenon that has been overlooked.

Safety of High-Intensity Statins in the Veteran Population: Atorvastatin 40 to 80 mg Compared With Rosuvastatin 20 to 40 mg.

Background: High-intensity statin therapy is recommended in patients with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at high risk of ASCVD. Current evidence demonstrates efficacy of high-intensity statin therapy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events; yet the comparative safety profile between high-intensity statin agents remains unknown. In 2011, when atorvastatin became generic, the Veteran's Health Administration made the formulary switch from rosuvastatin to atorvastatin. Currently, rosuvastatin is generic; however, at the time of this study, it was still under patent. Objective: The primary objective was to determine if high-intensity atorvastatin compared with rosuvastatin is associated with an increased incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the veteran population. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital compared patients receiving rosuvastatin 20 to 40mg from January 2009 to November 2011 (n = 4,165) and atorvastatin 40 to 80mg from May 2012 to June 2016 (n = 5,852). Patients were excluded if they were nonadherent to statin therapy or had a documented ADR to atorvastatin prior to formulary switch. Results: A difference in overall ADR rates was found between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups (4.59% vs 2.91%; odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.00; P < 0.05). Statistically significant differences in abnormal liver transaminases (3.99% vs 1.39%; OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 2.21 to 3.94; P < 0.05) and statin-associated muscle symptoms (1.14% vs 0.5%; OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.39 to 3.74; P < 0.05) were identified between groups. Patients receiving rosuvastatin were on therapy 2.5 times longer before developing an ADR. Conclusion and Relevance: High-intensity atorvastatin compared with rosuvastatin is associated with an increased incidence of ADRs.