Standard Gamble Research Articles

How adjusting elicited health utilities after the fact can adversely affect shared decision making

Background: The elicitation of inconsistent health-state utility values (HSUVs) is a prevalent problem. There are two approaches to address this problem: (1) intervention during the elicitation process to ensure that patients estimate consistent HSUVs; (2) no intervention during the elicitation process and inconsistent HSUVs are adjusted after the fact. This paper studies three models recently proposed for adjusting inconsistent HSUVs and consistent HSUVs that some may consider unrealistic. Analysis: The three models are analyzed using a sound theoretical framework: the mathematical equivalence of HSUVs elicited using the standard gamble and probabilities, the Fréchet bounds, and preference theory. It is proven that none of these models accounts for the Fréchet lower bound and health conditions that are preference substitutes. Results: A clinical vignette proves these models may recommend treatments that result in premature death over treatments that cause acceptable adverse effects. Conclusions: The three models are incorrect and may mislead patients and physicians to poor medical decisions. In the spirit of shared decision making, patients should be given the opportunity to reassess inconsistent HSUVs and confirm that the revised HSUVs reflect their preferences.

OP95 Examining The Feasibility And Acceptability Of Valuing The Lebanese Version Of The SF-6D Using Standard Gamble

IntroductionThe SF-6D is a preference-based measure of health, derived from the SF-36 for economic evaluation. No value set exists for the SF-6D in Lebanon and other Arabic speaking countries in the Middle East. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using the standard gamble (SG) technique to generate preference-based values for the Arabic version of SF-6D in a Lebanese population.MethodsThe SF-6D was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translations. Forty-nine states defined by the SF-6D were selected using an orthogonal design and grouped into seven sets. A gender-occupation stratified sample of 126 Lebanese adults from the American University of Beirut were recruited to value seven states and the pits (worst) SF-6D health states using SG. Mean and individual level multivariate regression models were fitted to estimate preference weights for all SF-6D states. The quality of data and the predictive power of the models were compared with results from the United Kingdom (UK).ResultsAll respondents completed the interviews with 25 percent reporting that the SG task was difficult and 21 percent felt some degree of irritation or boredom. A total of 992 (98% out of 1,008 observations) SG valuations were useable for econometric modeling. There was no significant change in the test–retest values of 21 subjects. The mean absolute errors in the mean and individual level models were 0.036 and 0.050, respectively, both of which were lower than the UK results. The random effects model adequately predicts the SG values, with the worst state having a value of 0.322 compared to 0.271 in the UK.ConclusionsThis study confirmed that it was feasible and acceptable to generate preference values with the SG method for the Arabic SF-6D in a Lebanese population. This would be the first step towards developing SF-6D value set for Lebanon to be used in economic evaluation studies and to support resources allocation decisions.

Patient Willingness to Dispose of Leftover Opioids After Surgery

In the United States, up to 70% of surgical patients are prescribed opioids and up to 92% will have leftover tablets. Most do not dispose of leftover opioids, increasing the risk for opioid-related harm. Current interventions promoting opioid disposal have shown mixed success. We conducted a mixed methods study using a standard gamble survey and semi-structured interviews. Participants estimated willingness to dispose in 16 scenarios with varying convenience (time requirements of <5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes) and financial incentives ($0, $5, $25, $50). We estimated the likelihood of disposal using a multivariable mixed effects modified Poisson regression model. Semi-structured interviews explored how convenience, financial incentives, and other barriers and facilitators influenced decisions to dispose. Fifty-five participants were surveyed and 42 were interviewed. Most were willing to dispose when the time required was <15 minutes. Few were willing to dispose if the process required 60 minutes, although a $50 financial incentive increased rates from 9% to 36%. Anxiety about future pain, opioid scarcity, recreational use, family safety, moral beliefs, addiction, theft, and environmental harm also influenced decision-making. Interventions promoting opioid disposal should focus on convenience, but the selective use of financial incentives can be effective. Tailoring interventions to individual barriers and facilitators could also increase disposal rates.

P9 Willingness to Trade Off Life Years or Accept Risk of Dying in Time Trade-Off and Standard Gamble Exercises to Restore the Life of a Non-Healthy Family Member: Considerations for Measurement of Non-Patient Utilities

In health economic evaluations, all health effects should be considered, regardless of whether these effects occur in patients or others. The impacts of living with a non-healthy family member can be substantial. However, non-patient utilities are not commonly included in cost-utility analyses (CUA). This study aimed exploring impacts of living with a non-healthy family member for inclusion of non-patient utilities in CUA.

Quantifying Health State Utilities for Permanent Dentition: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Health utility represents individual preference strengths regarding health-related outcomes as a numerical value, with higher utility values of a health state achieved by a service or treatment strategy suggesting that it is more worthwhile to implement and allocate resources to this service. This study aimed to find and compare the utilities of permanent teeth-related health state outcomes. Two groups, one of the dentists (50) and another of dental patients (50), responded to a standard gamble questionnaire to determine the utilities of four hypothetical alternatives of dental health state as follows: (1) carious posterior tooth with pain, (2) carious posterior tooth without pain, (3) filled posterior tooth with a temporary restoration, and (4) filled posterior tooth with a permanent restoration. Values were calculated and compared between the two groups using the unpaired Student's t-test, and another comparison between gender groups was performed using a one-way analysis of variance. There were significant differences between dentists and patients regarding health states 2, 3, and 4 (p = 0.011, 0.026, and 0.008, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between men and women regarding all health statuses. Nonetheless, there were significant differences between male dentists and male patients for health statuses 1 and 3 (p = 0.047 and p = 0.036), respectively. The oral health-related quality of life and its relation to economic dentistry is essential aspects of our modern practice. In the present study, there was a statistically significant difference in the utility value reported by dentists and patients. However, more research is needed in this area.

Health Utility Measures Among Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia After Hair Transplant.

Hair loss causes significant psychosocial distress to patients. Health utility measurements offer an objective, quantitative assessment of health-related quality of life (QOL). We performed a prospective cohort study on patients with hair loss between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. Patient metrics were compared with layperson perception of alopecia, prospectively collected between August 1 and December 31, 2017. Health utility measures were quantified using the visual analog scale (VAS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and relative to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Bonferroni correction to the significance threshold was performed. Thirty-one patients with alopecia were compared with 237 laypeople. Patient metrics for female hair loss were all significantly lower than laypeople measures (VAS QALYs 0.65 ± 0.21 vs. 0.83 ± 0.18, p = 0.0001). Mean SG QALYs were lower for patients in the male alopecia state (0.86 ± 0.23 vs. 0.96 ± 0.12, p = 0.0278). Post-hair transplant improvement in TTO was significantly greater for patients (+ 0.08 ± 0.12 vs. + 0.02 ± 0.09, p = 0.0070) and significantly more often exceeded the MCID (45.2% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.0006). Alopecia negatively impacts QOL, and the true patient experience is more taxing than what is perceived by laypeople. Hair transplantation improves QOL more for male patients than common perception. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Implementing a Health Utility Assessment Platform to Acquire Health Utilities in a Hemodialysis Outpatient Setting: Feasibility Study.

BackgroundPatients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) wait roughly 4 years for a kidney transplant. A potential way to reduce wait times is using hepatitis C virus (HCV)–viremic kidneys.ObjectiveAs preparation for developing a shared decision-making tool to assist patients with ESKD with the decision to accept an HCV-viremic kidney transplant, our initial goal was to assess the feasibility of using The Gambler II, a health utility assessment tool, in an ambulatory dialysis clinic setting. Our secondary goals were to collect health utilities for patients with ESKD and to explore whether the use of race-matched versus race-mismatched exemplars impacted the knowledge gained during the assessment process.MethodsWe used The Gambler II to elicit utilities for the following ESKD-related health states: hemodialysis, kidney transplant with HCV-unexposed kidney, and transplantation with HCV-viremic kidney. We created race exemplar video clips describing these health states and randomly assigned patients into the race-matched or race-mismatched video arms. We obtained utilities for these 3 health states from each patient, and we evaluated knowledge about ESKD and HCV-associated health conditions with pre- and postintervention knowledge assessments.ResultsA total of 63 patients with hemodialysis from 4 outpatient Dialysis Center Inc sites completed the study. Mean adjusted standard gamble utilities for hemodialysis, transplant with HCV-unexposed kidney, and transplantation with HCV-viremic kidney were 82.5, 89, and 75.5, respectively. General group knowledge assessment scores improved by 10 points (P<.05) following utility assessment process. The use of race-matched exemplars had little effect on the results of the knowledge assessment of patients.ConclusionsUsing The Gambler II to collect utilities for patients with ESKD in an ambulatory dialysis clinic setting proved feasible. In addition, educational information about health states provided as part of the utility assessment process tool improved patients’ knowledge and understanding about ESKD-related health states and implications of organ transplantation with HCV-viremic kidneys. A wide variation in patient health state utilities reinforces the importance of incorporating patients’ preferences into decisions regarding use of HCV-viremic kidneys for transplantation.

Patient-Proxy and Societal Perspectives of Quality-of-Life Utilities in Children With Cleft Lip and Palate Managed With Surgical Repair vs No Repair in Ethiopia

In Ethiopia, more than 70% of infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) lack access to surgery. Infants who are untreated can experience severe malnutrition and extreme social stigma resulting in abandonment. Utilities are standardized measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that inform health care resource allocation. However, CL/P utilities are missing from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To elicit utilities for untreated and surgically treated children with CL/P with consideration for social determinants of health from patient-proxy and societal participants. This cross-sectional study used patient proxies and societal participants in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from July 1, 2019, to January 30, 2020. Eligible patient proxies were caregivers of children younger than 18 years with nonsyndromic CL/P who were untreated or received surgery. Proxies were necessary as most patients were 0 to 4 years old and cannot reliably self-report. Eligible societal participants were 18 years and older with no family history of CL/P. Surgical treatment and social determinants of health. Participants measured utilities using the visual analog scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO), and standard gamble (SG). In this study, 312 patient proxies and 135 societal participants were recruited. Mean (SD) utilities for untreated CL/P ranged from 0.57 (0.23) to 0.70 (0.22) from patient proxies and from 0.35 (0.21) to 0.8 (0.23) from societal participants, depending on utility instrument and cleft type. Surgical treatment was associated with a better HRQOL from the patient-proxy perspective (VAS, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.26; TTO, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.25) from the societal perspective (VAS, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.26; TTO, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.22; SG, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.15). Social determinants of health that were associated with patient-proxy utilities were income above the national mean (VAS, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.17; TTO, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.20), and religion (Christian vs other: TTO, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.03). From the societal perspective, the association between treatment and utilities was smaller in females compared with males (TTO, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.01). The findings of this study suggest that CL/P disease severity and surgical impact in Ethiopia were undervalued by previous estimates from high-income countries and were associated with social determinants of health. Utility studies from participants from LMICs are feasible and necessary for representing HRQOL in LMICs and addressing health inequalities.

PCR175 Valuation of SF-6D Health States: Is It Feasible and Acceptable in a Lebanese Population

The SF-6D is a preference-based measure of health derived from the SF-36 for economic evaluation. No value set exists for the SF-6D in Lebanon and other Arabic speaking countries in the Middle East. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using the standard gamble (SG) technique to generate preference-based values for the Arabic version of SF-6D in a Lebanese population.

Estimation of Utility Weights for Prostate-related Health States in Korea.

ObjectivesVery limited previous research has investigated the utility weights of prostate-related diseases in the general population in Korea. The purpose of this study was to calculate the utility of prostate-related health states in the Korean general public using the standard gamble (SG) method.MethodsSeven health states for hypothetical prostate cancers, 1 for benign prostate hyperplasia, and 1 for erectile dysfunction were developed based on patient education material and previous publications. In total, 460 responses from the Korean general population were used to analyze the utility of prostate-related health states. Computer-assisted personal interviews were conducted, and utility values were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and SG. Mean utility values were calculated for each prostate-related health state.ResultsThe mean utility values of prostate cancer derived from SG ranged from 0.281 (metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer) to 0.779 (localized prostate cancer requiring prostatectomy). The utility value of benign prostate hyperplasia was 0.871, and that of erectile dysfunction was 0.812. The utility values obtained using the SG method in all conditions were higher than the values obtained by VAS. There were no significant demographic variables affecting utility values in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsOur findings might be useful for economic evaluation and utility calculation of screening and interventions for prostate-related conditions in the general population.

Evaluation of Preference and Utility Measures for Transoral Thyroidectomy.

Traditional, trans-cervical thyroidectomy results in the presence of a neck scar, which has been shown to correlate with lower quality of life and lower patient satisfaction. Transoral thyroid surgery (TOTS) has been utilized as an alternative approach to avoid a cutaneous incision and scar by accessing the neck and thyroid through the oral cavity. This study was designed to evaluate patient preference through health-state utility scores for TOTS as compared to conventional trans-cervical thyroidectomy. In this cross-sectional study, patient preferences were elicited for TOTS and trans-cervical thyroidectomy with the use of an online survey. Respondents were asked to consider 4 hypothetical health scenarios involving thyroid surgery with varying approaches. Health-state utility scores were elicited using visual analog scale and standard gamble exercises. Overall, 516 respondents completed the survey, of whom 261 (50.6%) were included for analysis, with a mean age of 41.5 years (SD 14.9 years), including 171 (65.5%) females. Health utility scores were similar for TOTS and conventional transcervical techniques. Statistically significant differences in the standard gamble utility score were noted for gender and ethnicity across all scenarios. Comparisons of visual analog score utilities were not statistically significant based on respondent demographics. Preferences for TOTS and trans-cervical thyroidectomy did not significantly differ in the current study. Females and white ethnicity indicated stronger preference for a TOTs approach compared to males and other ethnicities, respectively. Some literature suggests certain types of patients who might prefer minimally invasive thyroidectomy more so than other patients-in keeping with the current findings of this study.

Patient acceptance of transvaginal sonographic endometrial thickness assessment compared with hysteroscopy and biopsy for exclusion of endometrial cancer in cases of postmenopausal bleeding.

Available examinations for women with postmenopausal bleeding include transvaginal sonography to measure endometrial thickness (TVS-ET), and invasive endometrial assessment using hysteroscopy/endometrial biopsy. However, selection of the examination method seldom involves consideration of patient preferences. The aim of this study was to examine patient preferences for the method used to investigate postmenopausal bleeding. Women were asked to complete an interviewer-administered structured survey before they underwent clinical investigations at a university gynaecology unit from June 2016 to June 2017. Using the standard gamble approach, women were asked to choose between invasive assessment by hysteroscopy/endometrial biopsy (gold standard) or TVS-ET with a risk of missing endometrial cancer. The risk of missing endometrial cancer during TVS-ET was varied until each woman was indifferent to either option. The median detection rate for endometrial cancer required using TVS-ET was 95% (interquartile range=80%-99.9%). In total, 200 women completed the survey, and 77 (38.5%) women required TVS-ET to have a 99.9% detection rate for endometrial cancer. Prior hysteroscopy experience was the only factor that influenced the women's decisions: a significantly higher detection rate was required by this patient group than by patients without previous hysteroscopy experience (P=0.047). A substantial proportion of women would accept TVS-ET alone for the investigation of postmenopausal bleeding. In the era of patientcentred care, clinicians should incorporate patient preferences and enable women to make informed choices concerning the management of postmenopausal bleeding.

Utility outcomes score assessment of living with below-knee amputation

Objectives: Lower limb trauma that involves severe soft-tissue injuries continues to pose treatment challenges when considering whether to perform an amputation or salvage the injured extremity. This study aimed to measure the perceived health burden of living with unilateral below-knee amputation (BKA). A secondary aim was to compare the health burden of living with BKA and single-eye blindness and/or double-eye blindness (SEB and DEB). Methods: A web-based survey was utilized to establish the effectiveness of outcome scores for three health states (unilateral BKA, SEB, and DEB) in a sample of 116 participants recruited from the general population. The outcome measures included the time trade-off (TTO), standard gamble (SG), and visual analog scale (VAS) tests. Results: The TTO, SG, and VAS scores for BKA were 0.75 ± 0.2, 0.78 ± 0.18, and 0.57 ± 0.16, respectively. These measures indicate that participants were willing to undergo a theoretical surgery that carries a 22% chance of mortality and trade 9 years of life to avoid a BKA. These were lower than the values of SEB VAS (P = 0.02) and TTO (P = 0.002) tests and the SG measure (0.8 ± 0.17, P = 0.09). Age, gender, race, income, and education were not statistically significant independent predictors of the utility scores for BKA. Conclusion: When faced with a BKA, individuals in our sample population would choose to undergo reconstructive surgery with a hypothetical 22% chance of mortality. They would be willing to sacrifice 9 years of their life for such a surgery to avoid a BKA. These data can be beneficial to understand better how patients perceive their disability and help in patients’ counseling.

Willingness to accept risk with medication in return for cure of symptoms among patients with Rome IV irritable bowel syndrome.

SummaryBackgroundSome drugs for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have serious side effects.AimsTo examine the willingness of individuals with IBS to accept risks with medication in return for symptom cure.MethodsWe collected demographic, gastrointestinal symptoms, psychological health, quality of life and impact on work and daily activities data from 752 adults with Rome IV‐defined IBS. We examined median willingness to accept death in return for cure with a hypothetical medication using a standard gamble, according to these variables.ResultsParticipants would accept a median 2.0% (IQR 0.0%‐9.0%) risk of death in return for a 98.0% (IQR 91.0%‐100.0%) chance of permanent symptom cure. The median accepted risk of death was higher in men (5.0% vs 2.0%, P < 0.001), those with continuous abdominal pain (4.0% vs 1.0%, P < 0.001), more severe symptoms (P = 0.005 for trend), abnormal depression scores (P < 0.001 for trend), higher gastrointestinal symptom‐specific anxiety (P < 0.001 for trend), and lower IBS‐related quality of life (P < 0.001 for trend). Those willing to accept above median risk of death were more likely to be male (17.1% vs 9.1%, P < 0.001), take higher levels of risks in their daily life (P = 0.008 for trend), and report continuous abdominal pain (53.1% vs 39.4%, P < 0.001), and had higher depression (P = 0.004 for trend) and lower quality of life (P < 0.001 for trend) scores.ConclusionPatients are willing to accept significant risks in return for cure of their IBS symptoms.

A Discrete Choice Experiment to Derive Health Utilities for Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC) Deficiency in France.

PurposeCost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions require health utility data. However, in medical conditions, such as aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency, this presents problems due to the rarity of the disease. The study aim therefore was to employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to generate health utilities for AADC deficiency.MethodsA previous literature review, clinician and parent interviews had identified six key AADC deficiency attributes: mobility, muscle weakness, oculogyric crises (OCG), feeding ability, cognitive impairment and screaming. A representative sample of the French general population was recruited. Participants rated 5 health state vignettes describing AADC deficiency using time-trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG). Additionally, participants rated the worst health state using the Health Utility Index version 3 (HUI3). Subsequently, participants completed DCE 11 choice sets. Indirect DCE part-worth utilities were converted to health utilities using the anchors from the TTO, SG and HUI3.ResultsThe DCE was completed online by 1001 participants (50.9% female; mean age 45.7 years). Most participants (596, 59.5%) provided consistent responses to the repeated choice task. Five models were evaluated, and one preference reversal (“head control”/“sitting unaided”) was identified in all models. The rescaled utilities ranged from 0.3891 to 0.5577 (difference of 0.17 utilities) for TTO anchors corresponding to the worst (633233) and best (111111) health states. Health utilities ranged from 0.5534 to 0.7093 for the SG anchors. The disutility associated with a transition from “no problems walking” to “bedridden” was −0.0533, whereas disutility of moving from “constant screaming” relative to “no screaming” was −0.0248. The disutility associated with daily OCG was −0.0167. Disutilities for the other attributes were small although there were exceptions.ConclusionA DCE was used to derive health utilities for AADC deficiency. These health utilities will subsequently be used in an economic model evaluating an AADC deficiency intervention.

Eliciting health state utilities for Aromatic L-amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency: a UK vignette study

PurposeThe aim of this study was to generate health state utilities for aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency, a rare genetic, lifelong neurogenerative condition predominantly manifesting in young infants.MethodsParticipants were presented with health state vignettes. These had been previously developed based on published literature, clinician input, interviews with parents of AADC deficiency patients and expert opinion. A total of 5 health state vignettes were presented: bedridden, head control, sitting unsupported, standing with assistance and walking with assistance. Health state utilities (HSU) were elicited using time-trade off (TTO; 10-year time horizon) and the standard gamble (SG). The vignettes were completed online by panel participants drawn from a representative sample of the United Kingdom residential population.ResultsA total of 1598 participants completed the vignettes. Around 21% had incongruent responses (higher utilities for the bedridden compared to walking health states). Incongruent responses were associated with shorter task completion times, gender and parental status. These responses were removed from the analysis. Health state utilities (HSU) increased correspondingly as health states improved for both the TTO and SG. The mean HSU (standard deviation) for the TTO task were: bedridden state 0.49 (0.34); head control 0.54 (0.33), sitting unsupported 0.63 (0.31); standing with assistance 0.68 (0.31); and walking with assistance 0.73 (0.31). For the SG, mean health state utilities were: 0.56 (0.28), 0.57 (0.27), 0.67 (0.24), 0.70 (0.24), and 0.75 (0.25), respectively.ConclusionHealth state utilities were derived for AADC deficiency through a vignette study. These will be used for a cost-effectiveness model of an AADC deficiency treatment.

A Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values in the Plastic Surgery Literature.

Background:Cost-utility analyses assess health gains acquired by interventions by incorporating weighted health state utility values (HSUVs). HSUVs are important in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) because they include qualitative metrics when comparing operative techniques or interventions. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the extent and quality of existing original utilities research within PRS.Methods:A systematic review of articles with original PRS utility data was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Subspecialty, survey sample size, and respondent characteristics were extracted. For each HSUV, the utility measure [direct (standard gamble, time trade off, visual analog scale) and/or indirect], mean utility score, and measure of variance were recorded. Similar HSUVs were pooled into weighted averages based on sample size if they were derived from the same utility measure.Results:In total, 348 HSUVs for 194 disease states were derived from 56 studies within seven PRS subspecialties. Utility studies were most common in breast (n = 17, 30.4%) and hand/upper extremity (n = 15, 26.8%), and direct measurements were most frequent [visual analog scale (55.4%), standard gamble (46.4%), time trade off (57.1%)]. Studies surveying the general public had more respondents (n = 165, IQR 103–299) than those that surveyed patients (n = 61, IQR 48–79) or healthcare professionals (n = 42, IQR 10–109). HSUVs for 18 health states were aggregated.Conclusions:The HSUV literature within PRS is scant and heterogeneous. Researchers should become familiar with these outcomes, as integrating utility and cost data will help illustrate that the impact of certain interventions are cost-effective when we consider patient quality of life.

A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach for Modeling SF-6D Health State Utility Scores

ObjectivesTypically, models that were used for health state valuation data have been parametric. Recently, many researchers have explored the use of nonparametric Bayesian methods in this field. In this article, we report on the results from using a nonparametric model to predict a Bayesian short-form 6-dimension (SF-6D) health state valuation algorithm along with estimating the effect of the individual characteristics on health state valuations. MethodsA sample of 126 Lebanese members from the American University of Beirut valued 49 SF-6D health states using the standard gamble technique. Results from applying the nonparametric model were reported and compared with those obtained using a standard parametric model. The covariates’ effect on health state valuations was also reported. ResultsThe nonparametric Bayesian model was found to perform better than the parametric model at (1) predicting health state values within the full estimation data and in an out-of-sample validation in terms of mean predictions, root mean squared error, and the patterns of standardized residuals and (2) allowing for the covariates’ effect to vary by health state. The findings also suggest a potential age effect with some gender effect. ConclusionsThe nonparametric model is theoretically more flexible and produces better utility predictions from the SF-6D than previously used classical parametric model. In addition, the Bayesian model is more appropriate to account the covariates’ effect. Further research is encouraged.

Quality of life and health-related utility after trans-oral surgery for head and neck cancers

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess utility coefficients of health states following two minimally invasive surgical approaches for head and neck cancer, namely trans-oral robotic surgery and trans-oral laser microsurgery. Those utility coefficients will be later exploited in an economic evaluation study comparing the two approaches.MethodsThe above cited economic evaluation will be done from the Swiss healthcare system perspective and, as such, Swiss healthcare professionals were interviewed to elicit utility coefficients. Health states, ranging from remission to palliative care, were described using clinical vignettes. A computerized tool (UceWeb) implementing standard gamble and rating scale methods was used.ResultsUtility coefficients for 18 different health states were elicited with the two methods from 47 individuals, for a total of 1692 values. Elicited values varied from 0.980 to 0.213. Comparison with values elicited in previous studies show the need for population-specific elicitation, mainly for the worst health states.ConclusionHerein we report health utility coefficients for the Swiss population for health states following minimally invasive trans-oral surgery. This study provides utility values that can be used not only for a specific cost-utility analysis, but also for future studies involving the same health states.

Estimation of Utility Values for Computing Quality-adjusted Life Years Associated With Homelessness.

There is a lack of data-driven evidence about the burden of homelessness, and lack of a holistic measure of effectiveness for evaluating interventions targeting homelessness. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) can help holistically capture the burden of homelessness, and facilitate the valuation and comparison of interventions designed to address homelessness. This study estimated utility values required to compute the QALYs associated with homelessness, and also examined individual-level characteristics that affect these values. The study is cross-sectional and derived from a large national survey conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. A sample of 6607 middle- and low-income adults in the United States. A self-completion standard gamble survey was used to estimate utility values associated with homelessness. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between individual-level characteristics and these utility values. The study estimated the average utility value associated with homelessness as 43.4% among the study participants. This implies that 1 year of life as a homeless individual is perceived to be equivalent to less than half a year of life as a stably housed individual in good health. The study also found that individuals who have experienced homelessness and financial distress value life as a homeless person considerably less than those who have not had these experiences. The method developed in this study can be used to estimate QALYs in studies evaluating homelessness interventions, thereby establishing the societal value of these interventions and informing policy and budgetary decision-making. Future studies estimating the utility values associated with homelessness in the general population, as well as specific homeless groups, are required to provide more generalizable evidence.