Standard Error Of Measurement Research Articles

Reliability of Rehabilitative Musculoskeletal Sonography for Measuring the Visible Cross-Sectional Area of Suboccipital Muscles.

Aims The primary aim of this study is to assess the reliability of rehabilitative sonography as a non-invasive imaging technique for measuring the visible cross-sectional area (CSA) of the deep suboccipital muscles. Objectives Objectives involve determining both the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of sonographic measurements to ensure consistent and reproducible results across different sessions and examiners. The ultimate goal is to validate rehabilitative sonography as a reliable tool for clinical and research applications in the assessment and management of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions involving the deep suboccipital muscles. Design and setting Seventeen participants, including nine women and eight men without neck or vertebral pain, were evaluated using MSK sonography. The visible CSA of suboccipital muscles was assessed using real-time B-mode sonography in a sitting position with a linear probe (5 cm, 7.5 MHz) aligned perpendicularly to the muscle fibers of the rectus capitis posterior minor (RCPM) in one sonogram and the obliquus capitis inferior (OCI) and rectus capitis posterior major (RCPMJ) in another. Two experienced examiners performed sonography measurements, and the procedure was repeated one hour and again one day later. Results Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values for Examiner 1 were 0.84 and 0.79 for RCPM, 0.84 and 0.71 for RCPMJ, and 0.86 and 0.77 for OCI at the one-hour and one-day repetitions, respectively. ICC values for Examiner 2 were 0.86 and 0.77 for RCPM, 0.77 and 0.86 for RCPMJ, and 0.61 and 0.64 for OCI at the one-hour and one-day repetitions, respectively. Inter-rater ICC values were 0.77 for RCPM, 0.82 for RCPMJ, and 0.68 for OCI. Standard error of measurement (SEM) values for Examiner 1 were 11.63 and 13.92 mm² for RCPM, 10.30 and 7.91 mm² for RCPMJ, and 22.84 and 34.61 mm² for OCI. SEM values for Examiner 2 were 11.82 and 13.40 mm² for RCPM, 11.91 and 7.04 mm² for RCPMJ, and 39.20 and 37.73 mm² for OCI. SEM values between examiners were 13.74 mm² for RCPM, 10.36 mm² for RCPMJ, and 36.03 mm² for OCI. Conclusions These findings suggest that sonography is a reliable method for measuring the CSA of the RCPM, RCPMJ, and OCI muscles, provided that the examiners are well-trained and consistent in their techniques and that the average of three measurements is used.

Validation of Breast Idea Volume Estimator Application in Transfeminine People.

Accurate estimation of breast volume is important as researchers aim to achieve optimal feminization for transfeminine people. The Breast Idea Volume Estimator (BIVE) application allows estimation of breast volume using two-dimensional (2D) photographs but has not been validated in the chests of people who have undergone testosterone-mediated puberty. To estimate breast volume, clinical photographs and 3D scans were collected at baseline and 6 months, as a prespecified secondary outcome of a randomized clinical trial of antiandrogen therapy in transfeminine people commencing hormone therapy. BIVE was used to estimate breast volume by two independent researchers and compared with the gold standard of 3D scan calculated volume at different timepoints. Statistical analysis was performed, including the mean absolute difference, standard error of measurement, and intraclass correlation, to determine accuracy, precision, and interrater agreement. Clinical photography and 3D scans were collected from 82 breasts of 41 participants. The median (interquartile range) age of participants was 25 (22-28) years, and the median (interquartile range) body mass index was 24.6 (21.2-28.9) kg/m2. The BIVE sagittal and transverse algorithms demonstrated robust performance, with mean absolute difference less than 20 mL and intraclass correlation greater than 0.87 indicating clinical reliability with high interrater agreement. BIVE provided an accurate, precise, and reliable measure of breast volume in the chests of people who have undergone testosterone-mediated puberty, compared with the gold standard of 3D scan.

Repeatability of gait of children with spastic cerebral palsy in different walking conditions

Three-dimensional gait analysis is the ‘gold standard’ for measurement and description of gait. Gait variability can arise from intrinsic and extrinsic factors and may vary between walking conditions. This study aimed to define the inter-trial and inter-session repeatability in gait analysis data of children with cerebral palsy (CP) who were walking in four conditions, namely barefoot or with ankle–foot orthosis (AFO), and overground or treadmill. Ten children with spastic CP (7♀; 9.9y ± 3.5y; GMFCS-level I-III) were included in this study. Overall, we found good to excellent intra-class correlation (ICC)-values and favourable standard error of measurement (SEM)-values for the inter-session Gait Profile Score (ICC = 0.85–0.98, SEM = 0.45–0.91°) and Gait Variable Scores (ICC = 0.85–0.99, SEM = 0.22–1.11°) for the lower-limb joints. Taking the total joint-range-of-motion into account, the knee joint showed the most repeatable motion (%SEM = 0.5–1.8 %), while ankle motions showed the lowest repeatability (%SEM = 0.8 %–3.0 %). For the continuous waveform data, only the ankle joint showed repeatability differences between walking conditions, namely, smaller SEM-values for the AFO-condition (mean inter-trial = 0.14°; mean inter-session = 1.121°) in comparison to the barefoot-condition (mean inter-trial = 0.55°; mean inter-session = 2.22°). For all the kinetic parameters, the treadmill conditions showed smaller SEM-values in comparison to the overground condition. In conclusion three-dimensional gait analysis was found to be reliable in all four walking conditions for children with CP. The resulting measurement errors can be used as a reference during clinical interpretations of gait analyses.Clinical trial registration number: Trial ID from an internationally recognized trial registry (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT06355869

Reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in Participants with and without Chronic Shoulder Pain.

The objectives of this study were to estimate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in healthy participants and patients with chronic shoulder pain. Additionally, the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) were calculated. Thirty-one healthy volunteers and twenty patients with chronic shoulder pain were assessed using the PPT and CPM by two raters, with a 24 h interval between sessions. Excellent intra-rater reliability was demonstrated for PPT, with similar SEM and SDC when assessed by the same rater. The inter-rater reliability for PPTs in patients was moderate to good (ICC = 0.59-0.89) with higher SEM (73.83-121.98 kPa) and SDC (61.58-97.59) values than the asymptomatic group (ICC = 0.92-0.96, SEM = 49.61-103.12 kPa, SDC = 42.01-56.30) respectively. CPM's intra-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.82) in the patients and moderate (ICC = 0.67) in the asymptomatic group, while inter-rater reliability was low for the asymptomatic group (ICC = 0.37) and extremely low (ICC = 0.074) for the patients, with comparable SEM and SDC outcomes in both groups. PPT and CPM measurements are highly reliable when conducted by the same rater on the same day. Patients had lower inter-rater PPT reliability but better intra-rater CPM reliability. Clinicians need to be mindful of potential variability when interpreting these test results.

Adaptation and development of the instruction manual for a videoconference-based Motor Assessment Scale: validity, reliability and measurement error of Tele-MAS

Purpose To develop an instruction manual to administer the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) via videoconferencing (Tele-MAS), investigate its validity, reliability and measurement error. Materials and methods In-person assessment, conducted at the participant’s home, was compared to remote assessment conducted by rater A. Then, within two days, the rater B, repeat the remote assessment (n = 41). Part of the sample (n = 10) was assessed again within seven days by rater A to determine test-retest reliability. Concurrent validity, agreement of alternate forms (in-person x remote) for total score and reliability of individual items were analyzed using respectively the Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plots and weighted Kappa (Kw). Interrater and test-retest reliability were analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimal detectable changes (MDC) were computed. Results The Tele-MAS instruction manual was developed. In-person MAS and Tele-MAS present a high positive correlation (r = 0.97). Bland-Altman plots showed adequate agreement (MD=-0.0 point). Most Individual items showed excellent reliability (Kw > 0.70). Tele-MAS showed excellent interrater (ICC(2,1)=0.92) and test-retest (ICC(3,1)=0.98) reliability. Tele-MAS presents a SEM = 3% and MDC = 8%. Conclusion The Tele-MAS is a valid and reliable global motor assessment scale to be applied in individuals after stroke.

Minimal important difference of Berg Balance Scale, performance-oriented mobility assessment and dynamic gait index in chronic stroke survivors

ObjectiveThe Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), and Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) are crucial standard tools used to evaluate functional balance. However, their minimal important difference (MID) threshold is yet to be established. The objective of this research was to explore the MID for BBS, POMA, and DGI in people suffering from chronic stroke. MethodsA total of 130 chronic stroke patients were assessed using BBS, POMA and DGI before and after undergoing interventions. The treatment procedures included a series of task-oriented exercises focusing on motor re-learning. In anchor-based approach, the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale served as the anchor. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to identify the best MID cut-off point for BBS, POMA, and DGI. In the distribution-based approach, one-third standard deviation (SD), half SD, one standard error of measurement (SEM), and the total score of BBS, POMA and DGI were used to determine the MID. ResultsThe MID from the ROC curve was greater than 2 points for BBS, greater than 1 point for POMA and DGI. For the distribution-based approach, the MIDs corresponding to one-third of the SD, half of the SD, and one SEM for BBS were 1.92, 3.20, and 0.90; for POMA were 1.47, 2.45, and 1.96; for DGI were 1.48, 2.47, and 1.16 points, respectively. ConclusionBBS, POMA and DGI are suitable instruments for assessing functional balance in individuals with chronic stroke, with demonstrable MID. Additionally, the results indicated that DGI has higher sensitivity and specificity than the other examined scales for distinguishing between groups without change and those with minimal balance improvement after receiving interventions.

Validity and reliability of a finger training tool for assessing metacarpal phalangeal joint ranges of motion in asymptomatic participants

This pilot study aims to evaluate concurrent validity using the goniometer as a reference tool and test–retest reliability of flexion of metacarpal phalangeal joint (MCP) measurements taken from a finger training device (air-guitar system) in healthy participants. There were ten self -reported asymptomatic participants recruited to test the devices. The measurements of all metacarpophangeal joints of the dominant hands were conducted using a finger goniometer and the air-guitar system. Two measuring sessions were conducted on the same day. The concurrent validity of the air-guitar indicated by strong concordance correlation coefficient (0.62–0.90) with the goniometer and mean difference (approximately 1°) between the two instruments are well below the limit of 5°. The test–retest reliability of MCP measurements from the air-guitar glove (0.82–0.99) was acceptable as a clinically meaningful measurement tool as the intraclass correlation coefficients were higher than 0.7. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the air-guitar are similar to those of the goniometer. The air-guitar tracking features, when used as a home-based therapy tool, may assist in monitoring change of MCP flexion over a time course with good reliability and strongly associated with the measurements from the goniometer.

Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire specifically tailored for greater trochanteric pain syndrome for the Dutch population

Abstract Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a highly prevalent condition characterized by lateral hip and thigh pain. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA) questionnaire specifically tailored for GTPS (VISA-G) questionnaire was developed for the purpose of assessing and quantifying the severity of symptoms related to gluteal tendinopathy or GTPS. It is commonly used in research and clinical settings to evaluate the impact of GTPS on patient function and quality of life. The VISA-G questionnaire was developed for English-speaking populations. Before this questionnaire can be used in non-English-speaking populations, it has to be translated and validated for a particular population. The current study aimed to translate and validate the VISA-G questionnaire for a Dutch-speaking context (VISA-G-Dutch). In this study, we conducted a comprehensive process involving forward and back translation, along with a thorough comparison with other established hip-related questionnaires. The COSMIN checklist was used to ensure uniformity in the validation study. A sample of 100 participants, 50 symptomatic and 50 asymptomatic, completed the VISA-G-Dutch, Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Hip Score, and Nonarthritic Hip Score questionnaires. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were measured. Construct validity was assessed through positive correlations between the VISA-G-Dutch and gold standard questionnaires. Strong internal consistency and test–retest reliability correlations were found in both the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. The test–retest reliability also demonstrated strong positive correlations for the symptomatic group. The standard error of measurement was ∼2.3 for the symptomatic group. These results prove that the VISA-G-Dutch is a reliable and valid tool for assessing GTPS and gluteal tendinopathy in Dutch-speaking individuals, providing clinicians with a valuable assessment tool.

Goniometry and fleximetry measurements to assess cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain: a validity and reliability study

PurposeTo assess the test–retest and inter-rater reliability of goniometry and fleximetry in measuring cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain.MethodsA reliability study. Thirty individuals with chronic neck pain were selected. Cervical range of motion was measured by goniometry and fleximetry at two time points 7 days apart. To characterize the sample, we used the numerical pain rating scale, Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale, and Neck Disability Index. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Correlations between goniometry and fleximetry measurements were performed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho).ResultsFor goniometry, we found excellent test–retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.986, SEM ≤ 1.89%, MDC ≤ 5.23%) and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.947, SEM ≤ 3.91%, MDC ≤ 10.84%). Similarly, we found excellent test–retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.969, SEM ≤ 2.71%, MDC ≤ 7.52%) and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.981, SEM ≤ 1.88%, MDC ≤ 5.20%) for fleximetry. Finally, we observed a strong correlation between the goniometry and the fleximetry for all cervical movements (rho ≥ 0.993).ConclusionGoniometry and fleximetry measurements are reliable for assessing cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Markerless three-dimensional gait analysis in healthy older adults: test–retest reliability and measurement error

In older adults, gait analysis may detect changes that signal early disease states, yet challenges in biomechanical screening limit widespread use in clinical or community settings. Recently, a markerless method from multi-camera video data has become accessible, making screenings less challenging. This study evaluated the test–retest reliability and measurement error of markerless gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy older adults. Twenty-nine healthy older adults performed gait analysis on two occasions, at preferred walking speed, using their everyday clothes. Lower limb angles and moments were averaged from 8 gait cycles. Integrated pointwise indices [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICCA,K) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM)] were calculated for curve data, as well as ICCA,K, and SEM [95 % confidence intervals] for selected peaks. Generally, kinematic ICCs were good (>0.75) and reasonably stable throughout the gait cycle, except for the hip kinematics during the swing phase in the sagittal plane and pelvis tilt and rotation. The integrated and peaks SEM were <2.4°. The reliability of kinetics was similar (ICC>0.75), except for the transverse hip moment and abduction peak, fluctuating more during the swing than through the stance phase. SEM were < 0.07Nm/Kg. In conclusion, these results showed good overall test–retest reliability for markerless gait kinematics and kinetics for the hip, knee, and ankle joints, moderate for the pelvis angles, and error levels of ≤5°, and SEM%≤5% for the sagittal plane. This supports this method’s use in assessing gait in healthy older adults, including kinetics, for which reliability data from markerless systems is difficult to find reported.

Repeatability and minimal detectable change including clothing effects for smartphone-based 3D markerless motion capture

OpenCap, a smartphone- and web-based markerless system, has shown acceptable accuracy compared to marker-based systems, but lacks information on repeatability. This study fills this gap by evaluating the intersession repeatability of OpenCap and investigating the effects of clothing on gait kinematics. Twenty healthy volunteers participated in a test–retest study, performing walking and sit-to-stand tasks with minimal clothing and regular street wear. Segment lengths and lower-limb kinematics were compared between both sessions and for both clothing conditions using the root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) for entire waveforms and the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) for discrete kinematic parameters. In general, the RMSD test–retest values were 2.8 degrees (SD: 1.0) for walking and 3.3 degrees (SD: 1.2) for sit-to-stand. The highest intersession variability was observed in the trunk, pelvis, and hip kinematics of the sagittal plane. SEM and MDC values were on average 2.2 and 6.0 degrees, respectively, for walking, and 2.4 and 6.5 degrees for sit-to-stand. Clothing had minimal effects on kinematics by adding on average less than one degree to the RMSD values for most variables. The segment lengths showed moderate to excellent agreement between both sessions and poor to moderate agreement between clothing conditions. The study highlights the reliability of OpenCap for markerless motion capture, emphasizing its potential for large-scale field studies. However, some variables showed high MDC values above 5 degrees and thus warrant further enhancement of the technology. Although clothing had minimal effects, it is still recommended to maintain consistent clothing to minimize overall variability.

Absolute and Relative Reliability of Spatiotemporal Gait Characteristics Extracted from an Inertial Measurement Unit among Senior Adults Using a Passive Hip Exoskeleton: A Test-Retest Study.

Seniors wearing a passive hip exoskeleton (Exo) show increased walking speed and step length but reduced cadence. We assessed the test-retest reliability of seniors' gait characteristics with Exo. Twenty seniors walked with and without Exo (noExo) on a 10 m indoor track over two sessions separated by one week. Speed, step length, cadence and step time variability were extracted from one inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed over the L5 vertebra. Relative and absolute reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). The relative reliability of speed, step length, cadence and step time variability ranged from "almost perfect to substantial" for Exo and noExo with ICC values between 0.75 and 0.87 and 0.60 and 0.92, respectively. The SEM and MDC values for speed, step length cadence and step time variability during Exo and noExo were <0.002 and <0.006 m/s, <0.002 and <0.005 m, <0.30 and <0.83 steps/min and <0.38 s and <1.06 s, respectively. The high test-retest reliability of speed, step length and cadence estimated from IMU suggest a robust extraction of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during exoskeleton use. These findings indicate that IMUs can be used to assess the effects of wearing an exoskeleton on seniors, thus offering the possibility of conducting longitudinal studies.

The Influence of Vision Impairment on the Measurement of Cognition in Older Adults in India: Findings From LASI-DAD.

Prior investigations have not considered whether poor vision biases cognitive testing. However, such research is vital given increasing evidence that vision impairment (VI) may be an important modifiable risk factor for dementia, particularly in low- and middle-income settings where the prevalence of VI is high. This study employed data from 3784 participants in Wave 1 of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia (LASI-DAD) who underwent both visual acuity and cognitive function testing. We used multiple indicators and multiple causes models to assess differential item functioning (DIF; eg, bias) in cognitive testing by objectively measured distance and near VI. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the association between VI and cognitive factor scores before and after DIF adjustment. Analyses were performed for general cognition and separate cognitive domains, corresponding to memory, language/fluency, executive functioning, and visuospatial performance. Models were adjusted for demographic, health, and socioeconomic covariates. Participants in our sample were 60 and older. Most participants with VI were 60-69 years old (59.6%) and 50.8% were female. Individuals experiencing both distance and near VI tended to be older, have lower educational attainment, be married, reside in rural settings, and belong to lower consumption and BMI categories. Both distance and near VI were associated with poorer cognition before and after DIF-adjustment. Differences between DIF-unadjusted and -adjusted scores were small compared to the standard error of measurement, indicating no evidence of meaningful measurement differences by VI. In well-conducted large-scale surveys, bias in cognitive testing due to VI is likely minimal. Findings strengthen previous evidence on the association between VI and dementia by showing that such associations are unlikely to be attributable to vision-related measurement error in the assessment of cognitive functioning.

Reconstruction of infrared absorption and scattering coefficient distributions of semitransparent medium using Adam algorithm combined with adjoint model

Precise reconstruction of infrared optical coefficient distributions within semitransparent medium holds great significance in engineering field. This study introduces the Adam algorithm to reconstruct the infrared absorption and scattering coefficient distributions of a 2D semitransparent slab. The discrete ordinate method (DOM) is utilized to solve the time-domain radiative transfer equation (TD-RTE), and the radiative intensity at boundary is employed as input signal. The gradient calculation of the objective function employs the adjoint equation method (AEM). Results demonstrate that the adaptive moment estimation (Adam) algorithm can simultaneously estimate the infrared absorption and scattering coefficient distributions with high accuracy. Compared to traditional optimization methods, the Adam algorithm demonstrates significant superiority in terms of reconstruction accuracy, computational efficiency, and tolerance to measurement errors. Furthermore, it is also appropriate for determining the infrared optical parameters of different internal structures. Balancing both calculation accuracy and computation time, a recommended learning rate of η = 50 is suggested for the reconstruction task. The Adam algorithm presents limitations for reconstructing the distributions in scattering-dominant medium. The normalized root-mean-square errors of the absorption and scattering coefficients respectively increase to 0.2311 and 0.0655 when the standard measurement error is increased to 20 %.

Remote self-testing for adult cochlear implant users: the effect of wireless streaming on speech recognition in noise

Objectives Wireless sound transfer methods for cochlear implant sound processors have become popular for remote self-assessed hearing tests. The aim of this study was to determine (1) spectral differences in stimuli between different wireless sound transfer options and (2) the effect on outcomes of speech recognition tests in noise. Design In study 1, the frequency response of different streaming options (Phonak Roger Select, Cochlear Mini Mic 2+, telecoil and Bluetooth connection) was measured by connecting headphones to CI sound processors. Study 2 followed a repeated measures design in which digits-in-noise (DIN) tests were performed using wireless streaming to sound processors from Cochlear, Advanced Bionics, and MED-EL. Study Sample 20 normal hearing participants. Results Differences in frequency response between loudspeaker and wireless streaming conditions were minimal. We did not find significant difference in DIN outcome (F4,194 = 1.062, p = 0.376) between the wireless transfer options with the Cochlear Nucleus 7 processor. No significant difference in DIN outcomes was found between Bluetooth streaming and the loudspeaker condition for all of the three tested brands. The mean standard error of measurement was 0.72 dB. Conclusions No significant differences in DIN test outcomes between wireless sound transfer and the reference method were found.

The BigMove Intervention for People With Physical and Mental Health Conditions: A First Evaluation of Self-Perceived Health, Quality of Life, Coping and Mental and Social Functioning.

The BigMove intervention aims to improve the functioning and quality of life of people with physical and mental health conditions via an integrated care approach. This pilot study evaluates the impact of the intervention on self-perceived health (SPH), quality of life (QoL), active coping behaviour, and mental and social functioning. Data were analysed from N = 457 participants who had been referred to the intervention by their general practitioner (mean age 48.98 years; 76% female). Three patient-reported and one clinician-rated measures were used: SPH, QoL (MANSA), active coping behaviour (UPCC-ACT), mental and social functioning (HoNOS). Pre- and post-intervention measurements (from 2011 to 2018) were compared using paired-samples t-tests. Due to missing data, analyses were conducted with 205-257 participants per completed outcome. Associations with age and sex were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Clinically relevant change was evaluated with the Edwards-Nunnally index and standard error of measurement (SEM) scores. Post-intervention, there were statistically significant improvements for all outcomes (p < 0.0001) with moderate to large effect sizes (d = 0.41 to 1.02). The observed changes in outcomes can be considered as clinically relevant improvements. This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that the intervention has positive effects on SPH, QoL, active coping behaviour, and mental and social functioning.

Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change in pelvis and lower limb coordination during running assessed with modified vector coding

The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of Modified Vector Coding in assessing the coordination and coordination variability of the lower limbs and pelvis during running and to determine the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC). Twenty-five healthy runners participated in a biomechanical analysis of treadmill running using a motion capture system. Modified vector coding was applied to assess the three-dimensional coordination among various pelvis and lower limb segmental couplings. Reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), MDC, and Bland-Altman analysis to ascertain measurement consistency, agreement, and the smallest clinically meaningful change that exceeds measurement error. The test–retest reliability for 33 of 42 segmental couplings analyzed was good to excellent, with ICC values ranging from 0.613 to 0.928 (p <0.05), which substantiates the robustness of modified vector coding in running biomechanics. However, nine couplings, particularly femur-tibia in the sagittal plane during midstance and foot in the frontal plane-tibia in the transverse plane during late stance, exhibited poor to moderate reliability. These findings underscore the need for cautious interpretation due to significant proportional bias (p <0.05). SEM and MDC provided insights into the precision and minimal clinically significant changes for each coupling. The findings confirm the reliability of modified vector coding for biomechanical analysis in running, with most couplings demonstrating consistent high reliability. Nevertheless, specific couplings should be interpreted with caution due to potential measurement errors. The application of MDC highlights the precision of modified vector coding in biomechanical analyses and emphasizes the importance of careful interpretation to improve clinical and research outcomes in running-related injuries.

Test-Retest Reliability and Visual Perturbation Performance Costs During 2 Reactive Agility Tasks.

High secondary injury rates after orthopedic surgeries have motivated concern toward the construct validity of return-to-sport test batteries, as it is evident that common strength and functional assessments fail to elicit pertinent behaviors like visual search and reactive decision making. This study aimed to establish the test-retest reliability of 2 reactive agility tasks and evaluate the impact of visual perturbation on physical performance. Fourteen physically active individuals completed 2 agility tasks with reaction time (ie,4 corner agility), working memory, and pathfinding (ie,color recall) components. Participants completed both tasks 4 times in 2 sessions scheduled 7days apart. Outcomes included performance metrics of reaction time, time to target, number of targets, and total time assessed with reactive training timing gates. To assess test-retest reliability, we used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Stroboscopic goggles induced visual perturbation during the fourth trial of each task. To assess the effect of visual perturbation, we used paired t tests and calculated performance costs. The 4-corner agility task demonstrated excellent reliability with respect to reaction time (ICC3,1 = .907, SEM = 0.13, MDC = 0.35s); time to light (ICC3,1 = .935, SEM = 0.07, MDC = 0.18s); and number of lights (ICC3,1 = .800, SEM = 0.24, MDC = 0.66 lights). The color recall task demonstrated good-to-excellent test-retest reliability for time to lights (ICC3,1 = .818-.953, SEM = 0.07-0.27, MDC = 0.19-0.74s); test time (ICC3,1 = .969, SEM = 5.43, MDC = 15.04s); and errors (ICC3,1 = .882, SEM = 0.19, MDC = 0.53 errors). Visual perturbation resulted in increased time to target (P = .022-.011), number of targets (P = .039), and total test time (P = .013) representing moderate magnitude degradation of performance (d = 0.55-0.87, performance costs = 5%-12%). Both tasks demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability. Performance degraded on both tasks with the presence of visual perturbation. These results suggest standardized reactive agility tasks are reliable and could be developed as components of dynamic RTS testing.

The Chinese Mandarin COMHON Index and Braden Scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: An inter-rater reliability and convergent validity study

BackgroundThe COMHON Index is an intensive-care-specific pressure injury risk assessment tool, which has demonstrated promising psychometric properties. It has been translated into Chinese Mandarin but requires inter-rater reliability testing and comparison to the standard care instrument (Braden Scale) before clinical use. ObjectivesThis study aimed to test and compare the inter-rater reliability and convergent validity of the Chinese Mandarin versions of the COMHON Index and Braden Scale. MethodsThe study was conducted in a Chinese comprehensive intensive care unit. Based on a sample size calculation, five registered nurse raters with at least 6-months experience independently conducted risk assessments for 20 adult patients using both the COMHON Index and Braden Scale. Intraclass correlations (ICC) for inter-rater reliability, standard errors of measurement (SEM), and minimally detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson Product Moment Correlation for sum scores and Spearman's rho for subscales. ResultsInter-rater reliability of COMHON Index and Braden Scale sum scores was very high (ICC [1,1] = 0.973; [95% confidence interval 0.949–0.988]; SEM 0.54; MDC 1.50) and high (ICC [1,1] = 0.891; [95% confidence interval 0.793-0.951]; SEM 0.93; MDC 2.57), respectively. All COMHON-Index subscales demonstrated ICC values >0.6, whereas two Braden Scale subscales (Mobility, Activity) were below this threshold. Instrument sum scores were strongly correlated (Pearson's r = −0.76 [r2 = 0.58]; p < 0.001), as were three subscale item pairs (mobility rs= −0.56 [r2 = 0.32]; nutrition rs= −0.63 [r2 = 0.39]; level of consciousness/sensory perception rs= −0.67 [r2 = 0.45] p < 0.001). ConclusionBoth the COMHON Index and Braden Scale demonstrated high levels of inter-rater reliability and measured similar constructs. However, the COMHON Index demonstrated superior inter-rater reliability and the results suggest that it better detects changes in patient condition and subsequently pressure injury risk. Further testing is recommended.

Assessing Lower-Extremity Visuo-Motor Reaction Time in Young Male Soccer Players: Test-Retest Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of the Brain Pro System.

A reliable, versatile means of assessing visuo-motor reaction time (V-MRT) is important to football (soccer) players for many reasons, including the fact that faster V-MRT is a critical sport skill that may even play a role in reducing common sports injuries to the lower muscle extremities that can be associated with lost time on the field. We aimed to determine the test-retest reliability and minimum detectable change (MDC) of the Brain Pro System for assessing lower-extremity V-MRT in young male football players. We had 68 participants (M age = 16.35, SD = 1.71years) perform two assessment sessions one-week apart. For test-retest reliability, we calculated a one-way intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) at the 95% confidence interval and provided the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) (MDC = SEM × 1.96 × √2) for V-MRTs. We obtained excellent V-MRT test-retest reliability for dominant lower-extremity, non-dominant lower-extremity, and dominant and non-dominant lower-extremities (ICC2,1 = .93, 95%CI = .89-.96; ICC2,1 = .94, 95%CI = .91-.96; ICC2,1 = .96, 95%CI = .94-.97; respectively). The calculated MDC for the dominant lower-extremity V-MRT, the non-dominant lower-extremity V-MRT, and dominant and non-dominant lower-extremities (random) V-MRT were 1.21seconds, 1.13seconds, and 1.21seconds, respectively. Brain Pro System had excellent reliability for assessing lower-extremity V-MRT in young male football players. The MDC values at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) we obtained were reliable for assessing clinically meaningful V-MRT changes.