Reviewed by: Baseball Meets the Law: A Chronology of Decisions, Statutes, and Other Legal Events by Ed Edmonds and Frank G. Houdek Robert Bellamy Ed Edmonds and Frank G. Houdek. Baseball Meets the Law: A Chronology of Decisions, Statutes, and Other Legal Events. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2017. 319 pp. Paper, $39.95. I am a baseball nerd. My personal and research interests are mainly in the institutions of baseball, such as stadiums, or in the intersection of the game with media. While reading the Introduction of Edmonds and Houdek’s new book, I was struck that these two gentlemen may also be baseball nerds. Their description of how they think about legal issues at the ballpark, from product liability to free agency to intellectual property is similar to my own interests in stadium design and location, placement of cameras, media coverage, etc. I trust the reader and the authors understand that I use the term “nerd” as one of respect and admiration. This is an excellent book that everyone can learn much from reading. Messrs. Edmonds and Houdek are lawyers and legal scholars with impeccable credentials to write this volume. Obviously, a book entitled Baseball Meets the Law is unlikely to attract all baseball fans. The intricacies of the law are of limited interest to the casual fan, despite the authors’ effort in showing how Robinson, Ruth, Postema, Hunter, Messersmith and many others participated in legal issues that were seminal in creating today’s baseball industry including the game on the field. Edmonds and Houdek offer one of the most useful introductions I have read in some time. It carefully explains the process of compiling so much information in a relatively short book, the rationale of using historical chronology as a means of presentation, and admits that compromises had to be made to bring this project to fruition. They clearly state that this is a “selective chronology” and ask readers to bring to their attention what may have been left out. Part of my job is to accept that challenge. The organization and scope of the book is appropriate and useful with chapters ranging from “Baseball Origins and Club Teams, 1791– 1865” to “Selig, Steroids and Baseball Prosperity,” with each chapter broken down into specific years. Of course, several issues (e.g., free agency, steroids, Flood) took place over a series of years. While noted by the authors, this does lead to some repetition with names being given in full over and over. This is distracting in several places including the various versions of names given Jackie Robinson, and the use of full names (e.g., Robert Francis Murphy, George Wharton Pepper, Kennesaw Mountain Landis, and Tillinghast L’Hommedieau Huston). On the other hand, whom among us could resist using the last name in the list in full whenever we have the chance? [End Page 231] There all also several entries that do not seem explicitly linked to baseball and the law. Examples include President Obama’s visit to the Hall of Fame, Kevin Brown’s Dodger contract, the deaths of Curt Flood and Yogi Berra, and Bowie Kuhn’s birth. While many of these are informative and add a bit of spice to the book, there are some cases that would better fill the space. I am also skeptical of the value of Appendices B and C. The “Black Sox” scandal is no doubt one of the most important cases in baseball history. However, the presence of a “Selected Bibliography” on the topic indicates that the topic has been covered thoroughly in any number of books and articles. I question whether this material, as complete as it is, deserves an inordinate amount of attention. As for additions that could and, in my estimation, should be included in future editions of the book are these: • Some information on the Walker brothers and other early African American players that led to the “unwritten rule” of racial segregation in the game for decades. Since the first women in baseball are covered, as they certainly deserve to be, what about these other baseball pioneers? • The Sports Broadcasting Act (1961) and the promulgation of FCC antisports siphoning rules (1975), and the subsequent overturning of...
Read full abstract