SRCAP Complexes Research Articles

7690 Acute hormonal signaling-induced 3D genome organization controls transcriptional dynamics during adipocyte thermogenesis

Abstract Disclosure: Y. Zhang: None. R. Zheng: None. T. Tsuji: None. Y. Xing: None. C. Wang: None. J. Darcy: None. K. Chen: None. Y. Tseng: None. Brown adipose tissue (BAT) maintains body temperature by dissipating energy as heat, presenting a promising target against obesity and its associated metabolic disorders. When exposed to cold, the β3-adrenergic receptor (β3-AR) in brown adipocytes is stimulated, initiating a sequential signaling cascade and activating a thermogenic gene program essential for heat generation. Despite remarkable progress has been made towards understanding the engagement of transcriptional and epigenetic regulators during thermogenesis in response to β3-AR stimulation, the precise impact of three-dimensional (3D) genome organization, an increasingly important modulator of gene expression, on the activation of thermogenic gene program remains elusive. In this study, we employed high-resolution Micro-C in murine brown adipocytes to interrogate the rapidity of 3D genome reorganization in response to β3-AR hormonal signaling and its impact on transcriptional dynamics during thermogenesis. Our findings unveiled substantial rewiring of chromatin loops within 4 hours of β3-AR stimulation. These dynamic changes in chromatin loops, particularly enhancer-promoter (E-P) interactions, were coupled with gene activation during thermogenesis. Furthermore, we uncovered the mechanisms by which β3-AR hormonal signaling mediates 3D chromatin reorganization to regulate the thermogenic gene program. We found that β3-AR hormonal signaling induced the phosphorylation of p18Hamlet, a subunit of the SRCAP complex, facilitating the deposition of the histone variant H2A.Z into regulatory DNA regions. This nucleosome incorporation of H2A.Z further mediated nucleosome rearrangement, favoring the formation of nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) and enhancing the accessibility of regulatory DNA regions. As a result, H2A.Z chromatin incorporation facilitated interactions between cis-regulatory regions and gene promoters, such as E-P interactions, thereby activating thermogenic gene expression in response to β3-AR stimulation. Loss of H2A.Z disrupted loop dynamics, impeding gene activation and BAT thermogenic capacity. The conserved role of H2A.Z in human thermogenesis was validated, and we identified adiposity-related SNPs in human homologous loop anchors that could potentially be targeted for treating obesity. Taken together, our results unveil a previously underappreciated aspect of acute hormonal signaling-induced chromatin dynamics in orchestrating the thermogenic program in brown adipocytes. These findings not only enhance our understanding of molecular regulation of thermogenesis but also shed light on the role of rapid and dynamic chromatin reconfiguration in regulating the cellular response to external stimuli. Our study bridges a critical gap between 3D genome organization and gene activation in the thermogenic program mediated by acute β3-AR hormonal signaling. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Structures of H2A.Z-associated human chromatin remodelers SRCAP and TIP60 reveal divergent mechanisms of chromatin engagement.

H2A.Z is a conserved histone variant that is localized to specific genomic regions where it plays important roles in transcription, DNA repair, and replication. Central to the biochemistry of human H2A.Z are the SRCAP and TIP60 chromatin remodelers, homologs of yeast SWR1 which catalyzes ATP-dependent H2A.Z exchange. Here, we use cryo-electron microscopy to resolve six structural states of the native SRCAP complex, uncovering conformational intermediates interpreted as a stepwise path to full nucleosome engagement. We also resolve the structure of the native TIP60 complex which consists of a structured core from which flexibly tethered chromatin binding domains emerge. Despite the shared subunit composition, the core of TIP60 displays divergent architectures from SRCAP that structurally disfavor nucleosome engagement, suggesting a distinct biochemical function.

Abstract 5055: Genetic background of recurrent uterine leiomyomas

Abstract Uterine leiomyomas, also known as fibroids, are common benign smooth muscle tumors in women of reproductive age. Leiomyomas can cause symptoms that can significantly reduce the quality of life. Treatment mainly involves hysterectomy or myomectomy, the latter for women who wish to preserve their uterus. Most leiomyomas harbor one of the three driver mutations affecting either MED12, HMGA2, or FH. Recently identified rare subtypes include tumors with mutations in genes linked to the neddylation of the Cullin 3-RING E3 ligase or SRCAP complex. Recurrence of leiomyomas is poorly understood in relation to their clonal origins and molecular factors. The aim of this study was to characterize the mutational profiles of leiomyomas from recurrent operations and to identify the frequency of clonally related tumors. We utilized a retrospective cohort of 234 women who underwent laparoscopic or open abdominal myomectomy, with 46 (20%) of them experiencing multiple procedures related to leiomyomas. We examined the mutation profiles of 133 leiomyomas (62 index and 71 recurrent tumors) from 33 patients who required multiple tumor removal surgeries. We screened the tumors for the three primary leiomyoma drivers—MED12 mutations, HMGA2 overexpression, and FH-deficiency—to identify potentially clonal tumors. We found that 21 out of 33 (64%) patients had tumors from multiple operations with identical leiomyoma driver alterations. To further assess the clonal relationship, we executed whole exome sequencing on these 52 tumors. We identified three patients with two clonally related tumors each through shared somatic copy number alterations and point mutations. The clonally related tumors included HMGA2, FH, and wild-type tumors. Notably, leiomyomas with MED12 mutations—the most common molecular leiomyoma subtype—were not found among the clonally related tumors. Three patients harbored numerous FH-deficient tumors from recurrent operations. In all those patients, we found FH germline mutations, characteristic of Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer syndrome (HLRCC). Moreover, we identified somatic mutations in YEATS4, a member of the SRCAP complex, in four recurrent tumors from three patients. Interestingly, all YEATS4 mutations were different, and the tumors were not clonally related. Further research is required to elucidate the role of YEATS4 in leiomyoma recurrence. In conclusion, our systematic study confirms that reinterventions are common after myomectomy, and while uterine leiomyomas typically develop independently, some share a clonal origin. Additionally, we show that recurrence may be due to genetic predispositions, such as germline FH mutations. Citation Format: Sara Khamaiseh, Anna Äyräväinen, Maare Arffman, Siiri Reinikka, Annukka Pasanen, Ralf Bützow, Päivi Härkki, Pia Vahteristo. Genetic background of recurrent uterine leiomyomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5055.

Structural insights into histone exchange by human SRCAP complex

Histone variant H2A.Z is found at promoters and regulates transcription. The ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler SRCAP complex (SRCAP-C) promotes the replacement of canonical histone H2A–H2B dimer with H2A.Z–H2B dimer. Here, we determined structures of human SRCAP-C bound to H2A-containing nucleosome at near-atomic resolution. The SRCAP subunit integrates a 6-subunit actin-related protein (ARP) module and an ATPase-containing motor module. The ATPase-associated ARP module encircles half of the nucleosome along the DNA and may restrain net DNA translocation, a unique feature of SRCAP-C. The motor module adopts distinct nucleosome binding modes in the apo (nucleotide-free), ADP-bound, and ADP-BeFx-bound states, suggesting that ATPase-driven movement destabilizes H2A–H2B by unwrapping the entry DNA and pulls H2A–H2B out of nucleosome through the ZNHIT1 subunit. Structure-guided chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis confirmed the requirement of H2A-contacting ZNHIT1 in maintaining H2A.Z occupancy on the genome. Our study provides structural insights into the mechanism of H2A-H2A.Z exchange mediated by SRCAP-C.

SRCAP complex promotes lung cancer progression by reprograming the oncogenic transcription of Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling pathway

The activation of YAP/TAZ, a pair of paralogs of transcriptional coactivators, initiates a dysregulated transcription program, which is a key feature of human cancer cells. However, it is not fully understood how YAP/TAZ promote dysregulated transcription for tumor progression. In this study, we employed the BioID method to identify the interactome of YAP/TAZ and discovered that YAP/TAZ interact with multiple components of SRCAP complex, a finding that was further validated through endogenous and exogenous co-immunoprecipitation, as well as immunofluorescence experiments. CUT&Tag analysis revealed that SRCAP complex facilitates the deposition of histone variant H2A.Z at target promoters. The depletion of SRCAP complex resulted in a decrease in H2A.Z occupancy and the oncogenic transcription of YAP/TAZ target genes. Additionally, the blockade of SRCAP complex suppressed YAP-driven tumor growth. In a genetically engineered lung adenocarcinoma mouse model and non-small cell lung cancer patients, SRCAP complex and H2A.Z deposition were found to be upregulated. This upregulation was statistically correlated with YAP expression, pathological stages, and poor survival in lung cancer patients. Together, our study uncovers that SRCAP complex plays a critical role in YAP/TAZ oncogenic transcription by coordinating H2A.Z deposition during cancer progression, providing potential targets for cancer diagnosis and prevention.

Inherited mutations affecting the SRCAP complex are central in moderate-penetrance predisposition to uterine leiomyomas

Uterine leiomyomas (ULs) are benign smooth muscle tumors that are common in premenopausal women. Somatic alterations in MED12, HMGA2, FH, genes encoding subunits of the SRCAP complex, and genes involved in Cullin 3-RING E3 ligase neddylation are mutually exclusive UL drivers. Established predisposition genes explain only partially the estimated heritability of leiomyomas. Here, we examined loss-of-function variants across 18,899 genes in a cohort of 233,614 White European women, revealing variants in four genes encoding SRCAP complex subunits (YEATS4, ZNHIT1, DMAP1, and ACTL6A) with a significant association to ULs, and YEATS4 and ZNHIT1 strikingly rank first and second, respectively. Positive mutation status was also associated with younger age at diagnosis and hysterectomy. Moderate-penetrance UL risk was largely attributed to rare non-synonymous mutations affecting the SRCAP complex. To examine this disease phenotype more closely, we set out to identify inherited mutations affecting the SRCAP complex in our in-house sample collection of Finnish individuals with ULs (n= 860). We detected one individual with an ACTL6A splice-site mutation, two individuals with a YEATS4 missense mutation, and four individuals with DMAP1 mutations: one splice-site, one nonsense, and two missense variants. These individuals had large and/or multiple ULs, were often diagnosed at an early age, and many had family history of ULs. When a somatic second hit was found, ACTL6A and DMAP1 were silenced in tumors by somatic mutation and YEATS4 by promoter hypermethylation. Decreased H2A.Z staining was observed in the tumors, providing further evidence for the pathogenic nature of the germline mutations. Our results establish inactivation of genes encoding SRCAP complex subunits as a central contributor to moderate-penetrance UL predisposition.

HIRA complex presets transcriptional potential through coordinating depositions of the histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z on the poised genes in mESCs.

Histone variants have been implicated in regulating chromatin dynamics and genome functions. Previously, we have shown that histone variant H3.3 actively marks enhancers and cooperates with H2A.Z at promoters to prime the genes into a poised state in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). However, how these two important histone variants collaboratively function in this process still remains elusive. In this study, we found that depletion of different components of HIRA complex, a specific chaperone of H3.3, results in significant decreases of H2A.Z enrichment at genome scale. In addition, CUT&Tag data revealed a genomic colocalization between HIRA complex and SRCAP complex. In vivo and in vitro biochemical assays verified that HIRA complex could interact with SRCAP complex through the Hira subunit. Furthermore, our chromatin accessibility and transcription analyses demonstrated that HIRA complex contributed to preset a defined chromatin feature around TSS region for poising gene transcription. In summary, our results unveiled that while regulating the H3.3 incorporation in the regulatory regions, HIRA complex also collaborates with SRCAP to deposit H2A.Z onto the promoters, which cooperatively determines the transcriptional potential of the poised genes in mESCs.

The ATPase SRCAP is associated with the mitotic apparatus, uncovering novel molecular aspects of Floating-Harbor syndrome

BackgroundA variety of human genetic diseases is known to be caused by mutations in genes encoding chromatin factors and epigenetic regulators, such as DNA or histone modifying enzymes and members of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes. Floating-Harbor syndrome is a rare genetic disease affecting human development caused by dominant truncating mutations in the SRCAP gene, which encodes the ATPase SRCAP, the core catalytic subunit of the homonymous chromatin-remodeling complex. The main function of the SRCAP complex is to promote the exchange of histone H2A with the H2A.Z variant. According to the canonical role played by the SRCAP protein in epigenetic regulation, the Floating-Harbor syndrome is thought to be a consequence of chromatin perturbations. However, additional potential physiological functions of SRCAP have not been sufficiently explored.ResultsWe combined cell biology, reverse genetics, and biochemical approaches to study the subcellular localization of the SRCAP protein and assess its involvement in cell cycle progression in HeLa cells. Surprisingly, we found that SRCAP associates with components of the mitotic apparatus (centrosomes, spindle, midbody), interacts with a plethora of cytokinesis regulators, and positively regulates their recruitment to the midbody. Remarkably, SRCAP depletion perturbs both mitosis and cytokinesis. Similarly, DOM-A, the functional SRCAP orthologue in Drosophila melanogaster, is found at centrosomes and the midbody in Drosophila cells, and its depletion similarly affects both mitosis and cytokinesis.ConclusionsOur findings provide first evidence suggesting that SRCAP plays previously undetected and evolutionarily conserved roles in cell division, independent of its functions in chromatin regulation. SRCAP may participate in two different steps of cell division: by ensuring proper chromosome segregation during mitosis and midbody function during cytokinesis. Moreover, our findings emphasize a surprising scenario whereby alterations in cell division produced by SRCAP mutations may contribute to the onset of Floating-Harbor syndrome.

Deficient H2A.Z deposition is associated with genesis of uterine leiomyoma.

One in four women suffers from uterine leiomyomas (ULs)-benign tumours of the uterine wall, also known as uterine fibroids-at some point in premenopausal life. ULs can cause excessive bleeding, pain and infertility1, and are a common cause of hysterectomy2. They emerge through at least three distinct genetic drivers: mutations in MED12 or FH, or genomic rearrangement of HMGA23. Here we created genome-wide datasets, using DNA, RNA, assay for transposase-accessible chromatin(ATAC), chromatin immunoprecipitation(ChIP) and HiC chromatin immunoprecipitation (HiChIP) sequencing of primary tissues to profoundly understand the genesis of UL. We identified somatic mutations in genes encoding six members of the SRCAP histone-loading complex4, and found that germline mutations in the SRCAP members YEATS4 and ZNHIT1 predispose women to UL. Tumours bearing these mutations showed defective deposition of the histone variant H2A.Z. In ULs, H2A.Z occupancy correlated positively with chromatin accessibility and gene expression, and negatively with DNA methylation, but these correlations were weak in tumours bearing SRCAP complex mutations. In these tumours, open chromatin emerged at transcription start sites where H2A.Z was lost, which was associated with upregulation of genes. Furthermore, YEATS4 defects were associated with abnormal upregulation of bivalent embryonic stem cell genes, as previously shown in mice5. Our work describes a potential mechanism of tumorigenesis-epigenetic instability caused by deficient H2A.Z deposition-and suggests that ULs arise through an aberrant differentiation program driven by deranged chromatin, emanating from a small number of mutually exclusive driver mutations.

The SRCAP chromatin remodeling complex promotes oxidative metabolism during prenatal heart development.

Mammalian heart development relies on cardiomyocyte mitochondrial maturation and metabolism. Embryonic cardiomyocytes make a metabolic shift from anaerobic glycolysis to oxidative metabolism by mid-gestation. VHL-HIF signaling favors anaerobic glycolysis but this process subsides by E14.5. Meanwhile, oxidative metabolism becomes activated but its regulation is largely elusive. Here, we first pinpointed a crucial temporal window for mitochondrial maturation and metabolic shift, and uncovered the pivotal role of the SRCAP chromatin remodeling complex in these processes in mouse. Disruption of this complex massively suppressed the transcription of key genes required for the tricarboxylic acid cycle, fatty acid β-oxidation and ubiquinone biosynthesis, and destroyed respirasome stability. Furthermore, we found that the SRCAP complex functioned through H2A.Z deposition to activate transcription of metabolic genes. These findings have unveiled the important physiological functions of the SRCAP complex in regulating mitochondrial maturation and promoting oxidative metabolism during heart development, and shed new light on the transcriptional regulation of ubiquinone biosynthesis.

Methyl-CpG-binding domain 9 (MBD9) is required for H2A.Z incorporation into chromatin at a subset of H2A.Z-enriched regions in the Arabidopsis genome

The SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex, which deposits the histone variant H2A.Z into nucleosomes, has been well characterized in yeast and animals, but its composition in plants has remained uncertain. We used the conserved SWR1 subunit ACTIN RELATED PROTEIN 6 (ARP6) as bait in tandem affinity purification experiments to isolate associated proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana. We identified all 11 subunits found in yeast SWR1 and the homologous mammalian SRCAP complexes, demonstrating that this complex is conserved in plants. We also identified several additional proteins not previously associated with SWR1, including Methyl-CpG-BINDING DOMAIN 9 (MBD9) and three members of the Alfin1-like protein family, all of which have been shown to bind modified histone tails. Since mbd9 mutant plants were phenotypically similar to arp6 mutants, we explored a potential role for MBD9 in H2A.Z deposition. We found that MBD9 is required for proper H2A.Z incorporation at thousands of discrete sites, which represent a subset of the genomic regions normally enriched with H2A.Z. We also discovered that MBD9 preferentially interacts with acetylated histone H4 peptides, as well as those carrying mono- or dimethylated H3 lysine 4, or dimethylated H3 arginine 2 or 8. Considering that MBD9-dependent H2A.Z sites show a distinct histone modification profile, we propose that MBD9 recognizes particular nucleosome modifications via its PHD- and Bromo-domains and thereby guides SWR1 to these sites for H2A.Z deposition. Our data establish the SWR1 complex as being conserved across eukaryotes and suggest that MBD9 may be involved in targeting the complex to specific genomic sites through nucleosomal interactions. The finding that MBD9 does not appear to be a core subunit of the Arabidopsis SWR1 complex, along with the synergistic phenotype of arp6;mbd9 double mutants, suggests that MBD9 also has important roles beyond H2A.Z deposition.

Znhit1 controls intestinal stem cell maintenance by regulating H2A.Z incorporation

Lgr5+ stem cells are crucial to gut epithelium homeostasis; however, how these cells are maintained is not fully understood. Zinc finger HIT-type containing 1 (Znhit1) is an evolutionarily conserved subunit of the SRCAP chromosome remodeling complex. Currently, the function of Znhit1 in vivo and its working mechanism in the SRCAP complex are unknown. Here we show that deletion of Znhit1 in intestinal epithelium depletes Lgr5+ stem cells thus disrupts intestinal homeostasis postnatal establishment and maintenance. Mechanistically, Znhit1 incorporates histone variant H2A.Z into TSS region of genes involved in Lgr5+ stem cell fate determination, including Lgr5, Tgfb1 and Tgfbr2, for subsequent transcriptional regulation. Importantly, Znhit1 promotes the interaction between H2A.Z and YL1 (H2A.Z chaperone) by controlling YL1 phosphorylation. These results demonstrate that Znhit1/H2A.Z is essential for Lgr5+ stem cell maintenance and intestinal homeostasis. Our findings identified a dominant role of Znhit1/H2A.Z in controlling mammalian organ development and tissue homeostasis in vivo.

LncGPR107 drives the self-renewal of liver tumor initiating cells and liver tumorigenesis through GPR107-dependent manner

BackgroundWith self-renewal and differentiation properties, liver tumor initiating cells (TICs) are the reasons for tumor initiation, metastasis and drug resistance. G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are critical modulators in many physiological and pathological processes. While, their roles in liver TICs are unknown.MethodsAn unbiased screening was performed using online-available data dataset. Liver TICs were sorted by FACS with surface marker CD133, or enriched by oncosphere formation. TIC self-renewal was examined by oncosphere formation and tumor initiation assay. Loss of function and gain of function assays were performed to examine the role of lncRNA. RNA pulldown, RNA immunoprecipitation, ChIP, western blot and double FISH were used explore the molecular mechanism of lncRNA.ResultsWe performed an unbiased screening for GPCR expression in liver cancers, and found GPR107 was the most highly expressed GPCR in liver cancer and liver TICs. GPR107 was essential for the self-renewal of liver TICs. The expression of GPR107 was regulated by a long noncoding RNA lncGPR107. LncGPR107 was also highly expressed in liver cancers and liver TICs. LncGPR107 drove the self-renewal of liver TICs through GPR107. Moreover, lncGPR107 recruited SRCAP complex to GPR107 promoter to drive its transcriptional activation. LncGPR107 depletion inhibited the binding of SRCAP complex and GPR107 promoter and subsequent GPR107 expression. Moreover, LncGPR107-SRCAP-GPR107 can be targeted for liver TIC elimination.ConclusionGPR107 was the most highly expressed GPCR in liver cancer and liver TICs. LncGPR107 participated in the transcriptional regulation of GPR107 in cis, through recruiting SRCAP remodeling complex to GPR107 promoter. This work revealed the important role of GPCR signaling in liver TIC self-renewal and added a new layer for liver TIC and GPCR regulation.

776 SRCAP complex subunit YL1 as a novel epigenetic target in melanoma

776 SRCAP complex subunit YL1 as a novel epigenetic target in melanoma

ΔNp63α modulates histone methyl transferase SETDB1 to transcriptionally repress target genes in cancers.

ΔNp63α is primarily expressed in the epithelial tissue, including the mammary gland and epidermis, where it is indispensable to maintain the high proliferative potential of somatic stem cells.1 Although mutations of p63 are extremely rare in human cancers, several tumors, including primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), squamous cell epithelial lung malignancies, non-small-cell lung cancers and basal-like subtypes of breast cancer,2–6 often display elevated levels of ΔNp63, which is associated with poor prognosis. However, the mechanism of action of ΔNp63α in tumors remains mostly unknown. ΔNp63 isoforms, the amino-deleted isoforms encoded by TP63, lack the N-terminal transactivation (TA) domain, but are still able to transcriptionally regulate a distinct subset of genes due to the presence of a second TA domain (TA2). Thus, ΔNp63α has been shown to function both as a transcriptional activator and as a transcriptional repressor. Although the ΔNp63 transcriptional profile has been extensively characterized in normal epithelial cells and in cancer cell lines, little is known about how ΔNp63α directly transactivates genes, and which co-activators are required at enhancer and promoter sites. Furthermore, detailed information precisely mapping the TA2 domain is still missing. In contrast, much more information is available on the mechanisms of ΔNp63α-mediated transcriptional repression. ΔNp63α represses transcription by directly antagonizing p53 family members or by modulating the chromatin landscape near target genes (Figure 1). In the past several years, one prevalent hypothesis in the literature has been that ΔNp63α represses TAp73/p53 target genes simply by acting as dominant-negative to prevent TAp73/p53 occupancy at the shared DNA responsive elements (Figure 1a). For example, p63 knockdown in HNSCC cell lines results in TAp73-dependent apoptosis via PUMA and NOXA upregulation. In this system, ΔNp63α forms hetero-tetramers with TAp73, preventing the binding of TAp73 to PUMA enhancers.7 Although this notion is still valid, it did not explain several results obtained in HNSCC2 and in other cancer types suggesting that alternative TAp73/p53-independent mechanisms, employed by ΔNp63α, are engaged. Indeed, in keratinocytes and in HNSCC cell lines, ΔNp63α physically interacts with the histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2, and recruits these enzymes to p63 and p53 enhancer sites, thus mediating histone H3 and H4 deacetylation and consequent transcriptional inhibition (Figure 1b).8 Another ΔNp63α-dependent mechanism of repression is the recruitment of the SRCAP chromatin remodelling complex, via a physical interaction with the SAMD9L subunit.2 SRCAP complex is involved in H2A/H2A.Z exchange, mediating H2A.Z deposition near p63 response elements, thus creating a chromatin environment that is in a repressed conformation; this has been demonstrated in keratinocytes, lung SCC and HNSCC cell lines (Figure 1c). Figure 1 Schematic view of different mechanisms of ΔNp63α-mediated inhibition in different cancer types. (a) ΔNp63α, by direct interaction with p53-like responsive elements and/or by forming mixed inactive tetramers, inhibits the ... Recently, using a yeast two-hybrid assay, Regina et al. 9 showed that ΔNp63α interacts with SETDB1, a histone lysine methyl transferase (HMT) that is important in epigenetic regulation (Figure 1d). SETDB1 belongs to the SET (Suppression of variegation, Enhancer of zeste, Trithorax)-domain containing enzymes. HMTs catalyze the transfer of one to three methyl groups from S-adenosyl-methionine to specific lysine residues on histone proteins.10 Depending on the site and degree of methylation, this modification can have various effects, including regulation of chromatin organization and gene transcription. Among the different HMTs, SETDB1 has been of increasing interest due to its involvement in melanoma, where it is located in a recurrently amplified chromosome fragment.11 SETDB1 amplification has been also described in lung tumors.12 Regina et al.9 demonstrated that SETB1 is also overexpressed in different breast cancer cell lines and in primary tumors. Knockdown of SETDB1 resulted in growth-inhibitory effects. The authors also identified a list of 30 genes possibly repressed by ΔNp63 in a SETDB1-dependent manner, some of which correlated with the survival of breast cancer patients, suggesting that the ΔNp63α−SETDB1 interaction has a relevant and functional role in breast tumorigenesis. These findings indicate a third mechanism through which ΔNp63α represses transcription, demonstrating that ΔNp63α uses different partners in a combinatorial fashion and in a cell-type-specific manner. Understanding mechanistically how ΔNp63α recruits chromatin remodelers, and identifying repressed target genes in different cells and cancer types, could be important in the future to modulate senescence/proliferation in epithelial cells and to block rapid cancer expansion.

Physical and Functional Interactions between Drosophila Homologue of Swc6/p18Hamlet Subunit of the SWR1/SRCAP Chromatin-remodeling Complex with the DNA Repair/Transcription Factor TFIIH

The multisubunit DNA repair and transcription factor TFIIH maintains an intricate cross-talk with different factors to achieve its functions. The p8 subunit of TFIIH maintains the basal levels of the complex by interacting with the p52 subunit. Here, we report that in Drosophila, the homolog of the p8 subunit (Dmp8) is encoded in a bicistronic transcript with the homolog of the Swc6/p18(Hamlet) subunit (Dmp18) of the SWR1/SRCAP chromatin remodeling complex. The SWR1 and SRCAP complexes catalyze the exchange of the canonical histone H2A with the H2AZ histone variant. In eukaryotic cells, bicistronic transcripts are not common, and in some cases, the two encoded proteins are functionally related. We found that Dmp18 physically interacts with the Dmp52 subunit of TFIIH and co-localizes with TFIIH in the chromatin. We also demonstrated that Dmp18 genetically interacts with Dmp8, suggesting that a cross-talk might exist between TFIIH and a component of a chromatin remodeler complex involved in histone exchange. Interestingly, our results also show that when the level of one of the two proteins is decreased and the other maintained, a specific defect in the fly is observed, suggesting that the organization of these two genes in a bicistronic locus has been selected during evolution to allow co-regulation of both genes.

Purification and assay of the human INO80 and SRCAP chromatin remodeling complexes

Chromatin modifying and remodeling enzymes play critical roles in many aspects of chromosome biology including transcription, replication, recombination, and repair. Our laboratory recently identified and characterized two multisubunit human chromatin remodeling enzymes designated the INO80 and SRCAP complexes. Mechanistic studies revealed that the human INO80 complex catalyzes nucleosome sliding and the SRCAP complex catalyzes ATP-dependent exchange of histone H2A/H2B dimers containing the histone variant H2A.Z into nucleosomes. Here we describe methods for purification and assay of the INO80 and SRCAP chromatin remodeling complexes.

GAS41 Is Required for Repression of the p53 Tumor Suppressor Pathway during Normal Cellular Proliferation

GAS41 is a common subunit of the TIP60 and SRCAP complexes and is essential for cell growth and viability. Here, we report that GAS41 is required for repression of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway during normal cellular proliferation. Either GAS41 small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of GAS41 expression or specific interruptions of the carboxy-terminal coiled-coil motif of the GAS41 protein activate the p53 tumor suppressor pathway, as evidenced by p53 up-regulation, p53 serine-15 phosphorylation, and p21 transcriptional activation. Activation of the p53 pathway does not result from changes in TIP60 complex assembly or TIP60 coactivator functions for p53, since a TIP60 complex containing a coiled-coil mutant of GAS41 retains the same composition and histone acetyltransferase activity as its wild-type counterpart and since mutant GAS41 does not compromise ectopic p53-dependent transcriptional activation in a reporter gene assay. Finally, we demonstrate that GAS41 is prebound to the promoters of two p53 tumor suppressor pathway genes (p21 and p14ARF) in normal unstressed cells but is dissociated from both promoters in response to stress signals that activate p53. Our data suggest that GAS41 plays a role in repressing the p53 tumor suppressor pathway during the normal cell cycle by a TIP60-independent mechanism.