Spinal Arthrodesis Research Articles

Bone morphogenetic protein and cancer in spinal fusion: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) has been increasingly used in spinal surgery to promote arthrodesis. Because BMP stimulates cellular proliferation, its association with tumorigenesis is a concern. Previous research has generated conflicting conclusions on the risk of cancer in patients receiving BMP. The authors aimed to compare the incidence of solid organ and hematopoietic malignancies in patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis with or without BMP. The PearlDiver Mariner Patient Claims Database was queried for patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion between 2015 and 2021. Patients with preexisting malignancy were excluded. Data were analyzed for incidence of solid organ malignancy and hematopoietic malignancy diagnosed after spinal surgery. Propensity score matching using age, sex, tobacco usage, and year of surgery was performed between patients who did and those who did not receive BMP. Among patients without prior solid organ malignancy, BMP was used in 22,139 patients and not used in 306,249. In the propensity score-matched group, 3.1% of the BMP group developed solid organ malignancy following surgery compared with 3.5% in the non-BMP group. The relative risk (RR) of developing solid organ malignancy after BMP exposure was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.98, p = 0.02). Among patients without prior hematopoietic malignancy, BMP was used in 23,505 patients and not used in 328,796 patients. In the propensity score-matched group, 0.4% of the BMP group developed hematopoietic malignancy compared with 0.6% of the non-BMP group. The RR of developing hematopoietic malignancy after BMP exposure was 0.71 (95% CI 0.55-0.93, p = 0.015). BMP use in thoracolumbar fusion was not associated with an increased risk of new malignancy, which further supports emerging data on the lack of an association between BMP use and increased malignancy.

Sclerostin small-molecule inhibitors promote osteogenesis by activating canonical Wnt and BMP pathways.

The clinical healing environment after a posterior spinal arthrodesis surgery is one of the most clinically challenging bone-healing environments across all orthopedic interventions due to the absence of a contained space and the need to form de novo bone. Our group has previously reported that sclerostin in expressed locally at high levels throughout a developing spinal fusion. However, the role of sclerostin in controlling bone fusion remains to be established. We computationally identified two FDA-approved drugs, as well as a single novel small-molecule drug, for their ability to disrupt the interaction between sclerostin and its receptor, LRP5/6. The drugs were tested in several in vitro biochemical assays using murine MC3T3 and MSCs, assessing their ability to (1) enhance canonical Wnt signaling, (2) promote the accumulation of the active (non-phosphorylated) form of β-catenin, and (3) enhance the intensity and signaling duration of BMP signaling. These drugs were then tested subcutaneously in rats as standalone osteoinductive agents on plain collagen sponges. Finally, the top drug candidates (called VA1 and C07) were tested in a rabbit posterolateral spine fusion model for their ability to achieve a successful fusion at 6 wk. We show that by controlling GSK3b phosphorylation our three small-molecule inhibitors (SMIs) simultaneously enhance canonical Wnt signaling and potentiate canonical BMP signaling intensity and duration. We also demonstrate that the SMIs produce dose-dependent ectopic mineralization in vivo in rats as well as significantly increase posterolateral spine fusion rates in rabbits in vivo, both as standalone osteogenic drugs and in combination with autologous iliac crest bone graft. Few if any osteogenic small molecules possess the osteoinductive potency of BMP itself - that is, the ability to form de novo ectopic bone as a standalone agent. Herein, we describe two such SMIs that have this unique ability and were shown to induce de novo bone in a stringent in vivo environment. These SMIs may have the potential to be used in novel, cost-effective bone graft substitutes for either achieving spinal fusion or in the healing of critical-sized fracture defects. This work was supported by a Veteran Affairs Career Development Award (IK2-BX003845).

Instrumented Posterior Arthrodesis of the Lumbar Spine: Prospective Study Evaluating Fusion Outcomes in Patients Receiving an Interspinous Fixation Device for the Treatment of Degenerative Spine Diseases.

Prospective evaluation of radiographic fusion outcomes in patients receiving instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine using a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device. All patients (n = 110) from a single US physician's practice who received instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine with a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device in the calendar year 2020 were invited to return for a follow-up CT scan to radiographically assess fusion. Forty-three patients, representing 69 total treated levels, consented to participate and received a lumbar CT scan at a mean of 459 days post-surgery (177 to 652). The interspinous/interlaminar fusion was assessed by 3 independent radiologists using a novel grading scale. Spinous process fractures were also assessed. 92.8% of the assessed levels were considered fused. There were no intraoperative spinous process fractures. There were 4 spinous process fractures (5.8%) identified on CT imaging, all of which were asymptomatic and healed without subsequent intervention. There were no instances of device mechanical failure or device-related reoperation. Instrumented posterior arthrodesis of the lumbar spine using a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device provides clinically meaningful fusion rates with no reoperations and a low risk of spinous process fracture or other device-related complications.

Hip loading asymmetry in Lenke type 1 idiopathic scoliosis: Effect of spinal fusion and sex

BackgroundThoracic curvatures are most common in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. The literature highlights an imbalance of hip joint moments in the frontal plane quantified with a symmetry index. Spinal arthrodesis can reduce this symmetry index which then tends towards 0. Furthermore, asymptomatic women present lower hip moment in the frontal plane than asymptomatic men. This difference could influence the symmetry index in the case of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to show a significant positive effect of spinal arthrodesis on the symmetry index. The secondary objective was to compare the symmetry index between sexes before spinal fusion. MethodThe retrospective study included 20 patients with Type-1 Lenke curve idiopathic scoliosis, who performed a gait analysis before and one year after spinal fusion. The gait analysis consisted of walking back and forth at spontaneous speed. FindingsWhile significantly lower curvatures were depicted, the symmetry index showed a significantly lower value after spinal fusion (p < 0.03). The symmetry index showed no significant difference between sexes (p > 0.05). InterpretationThe study shows the effect of surgical fusion on the symmetry index, although the latter remains significant compared to the norm. Literature reveals that spinal fusion tends to the symmetrisation of the body's center of mass and increases ranges of motion on the trunk and pelvis. This could favour symmetry of hip moment in the frontal plane. Future research should investigate other Type Lenke curves before and after surgery, and the effect of braces on this symmetry index.

Autonomy with responsibility ¿Is informed consent just a signature on a paper? Evaluation in patients who underwent spine's surgery.

To evaluate the information that patients undergoing spine surgery truly receive and assimilate when they sign their informed consent documents. This was a retrospective study on patients who underwent spine arthrodesis or spine discectomy. Patients were given a full explanation of the surgical technique to be employed and its potential risks before they were included on the surgical waiting list. Before surgery, they were asked to sign an informed consent form. The studied variables included whether patients read the informed consent form, whether they recalled the surgical technique used or the spinal segment operated, whether they were aware of the surgical risks involved, and if they had looked for information about their procedure elsewhere. Answers were analyzed by age and educational level. Of a total of 458 total patients, only 51.9% answered all the questions. Sixty-three percent of patients said they had read the informed consent document before surgery. Although 91.6% of patients were aware of the spine segment operated, only 73.5% remembered the surgical technique employed. A total of 63.9% of patients could recall the vertebral levels operated. 39.1% were not aware of the surgical risks involved, and only 16.0% of patients admitted having looked for additional information. A statistically significant correlation was found between the search for additional information and young age (p < 0.001) on the one hand, and high educational level on the other (p = 0.023). Even though obtaining informed consent is an important procedure before spinal surgery, almost 40% of the patients in this study underwent surgery without reading the informed consent document or being aware of the risks posed by the procedure.

The lumbar adjacent-level syndrome: analysis of clinical, radiological, and surgical parameters in a large single-center series.

The development of specific clinical and neurological symptoms and radiological degeneration affecting the segment adjacent to a spinal arthrodesis comprise the framework of adjacent-level syndrome. Through the analysis of a large surgical series, this study aimed to identify possible demographic, clinical, radiological, and surgical risk factors involved in the development of adjacent-level syndrome. A single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures between January 2014 and December 2018 was performed. Clinical, demographic, radiological, and surgical data were collected. Patients who underwent surgery for adjacent-segment disease (ASD) were classified as the ASD group. All patients were evaluated 1 month after the surgical procedure clinically and radiologically (with lumbar radiographs) and 3 months afterward with CT scans. The last follow-up was performed by telephone interview. The median follow-up for patients included in the analysis was 67.2 months (range 39-98 months). A total of 902 patients were included in this study. Forty-nine (5.4%) patients required reoperation for ASD. A significantly higher BMI value was observed in the ASD group (p < 0.001). Microdiscectomy and microdecompression procedures performed at the upper or lower level of an arthrodesis without fusion extension have a statistically significant impact on the development of ASD (p = 0.001). Postoperative pelvic tilt in the ASD group was higher than in the non-ASD group. Numeric rating scale, Core Outcome Measures Index, and Oswestry Disability Index scores at the last follow-up were significantly higher in patients in the ASD group and in patients younger than 65 years. Identifying risk factors for the development of adjacent-level syndrome allows the implementation of a prevention strategy in patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis surgery. Age older than 65 years, high BMI, preexisting disc degeneration at the adjacent level, and high postoperative pelvic tilt are the most relevant factors. In addition, patients older than 65 years achieve higher levels of clinical improvement and postsurgical satisfaction than do younger patients.

Clinical and radiological results of final fusion in patients who underwent lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods. About 66 patients with a mean follow-up of 5years.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included. A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4mm and 14mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications. Level 4.

Risk Factors of Infectious Complications in Pediatric Patients With Cerebral Palsy After Spinal Arthrodesis.

This was a retrospective study. The main objective of this study was to investigate (1) whether pediatric patients with cerebral palsy (CP) have higher rates of postoperative infectious complications after spinal fusion and (2) risk factors for postoperative infections. Prior studies have shown that patients with CP undergo corrective spine surgery more often than the general population, yet typically have worse postoperative outcomes. Further investigation is needed to improve our understanding of the perioperative factors that place children with CP at greater risk of postoperative infectious complications. The 2019 "American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program" Pediatric database was used for patient data. The univariable analysis compared the prevalence of preoperative comorbidities and perioperative factors between children with and without CP. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to ascertain independent risk factors for postoperative infectious complications. A total of 4445 patients were included in the study; 606 (13.63%) patients had CP and 3839 (86.37%) did not. Patients with CP were more likely to have several notable preoperative comorbidities, and the rate of developing any infectious complication was more than 7 times greater in the CP cohort than in the control cohort (14.36% vs 1.88%; P <0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed CP [odds ratio (OR): 3.55, CI: 2.25-5.60; P <0.001], American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or higher (OR: 2.10, CI: 1.29-3.42; P = 0.003), and hematologic disorders (OR: 2.01, CI: 1.06-3.83; P = 0.033) to be independent risk factors for increased postoperative infectious complications. CP is an independent risk factor for the development of 30-day postoperative infectious complications in pediatric patients. In addition, the American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or higher and hematologic disorders were risk factors for postoperative infections after spinal fusion surgery.

Delayed successful interbody fusion after initially failed midline lumbar interbody fusion spinal arthrodesis in a patient with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and severe osteoporosis.

Introduction. Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan has been the gold standard for assessing bone mineral density prior to spinal instrumentation surgery. DEXA scans, on the other hand, can produce falsely elevated measurements in patients with severe degenerative changes, compression fractures, and aortic calcification, which can lead to incorrect patient selection and failed interbody fusion. Materials and methods. Detailed anamnesis of disease development, thorough clinical examination, patient-reported outcome measures (pain VAS, ODI, SF-12), preoperative and postoperative bone-window CT of the spine (interbody fusion status assessment), vertebral bone mineral density assessment by DEXA scan, vertebral bone density measurement in Hounsfield units by computer tomography, and the review of published literature were analysed. Results. A 67-year-old woman was diagnosed with L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. DEXA scan revealed normal bone mineral density in the lumbar vertebrae. The patient underwent midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF). The postoperative course was complicated by the occurrence of clinical and radiographic signs of pseudarthrosis. She refused revision surgery and was lost to follow-up. Three years postoperatively, she presented in good physical condition, with significant improvement in pain and functional disability. A CT scan showed delayed successful interbody fusion with complete resolution of radiolucency around implants. Conclusions. This case report summarizes some of the possible errors in diagnosis and surgical treatment in patients with degenerative pathology associated with severe vertebral osteoporosis.

ID: 209037 Retrograde Paddle Implant for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Complex Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Cases

Complex spine arthrodesis can challenge the approach for spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Percutaneous SCS placement is limited by epidural fibrosis and bone grafts over the puncture sites (1) making traditional techniques prone to higher complication rates and suboptimal lead placement (2). Placing retrograde SCS paddle can overcome these technical issues and promote effective SCS therapy in select patients.

Surgical Site Infection After Polymethyl Methacrylate Pedicle Screw Augmentation in Osteoporotic Spinal Vertebrae: A Series of 537 Cases.

Retrospective observational study of prospectively collected outcomes. The use of transpedicular screws augmented with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is an alternative for patients with osteoporotic vertebrae. To investigate whether using PMMA-augmented screws in patients undergoing elective instrumented spinal fusion (ISF) is correlated with an increased risk of infection and the long-term survival of these spinal implants after surgical site infection (SSI). We studied 537 consecutive patients who underwent ISF at some point within a 9-year period, involving a total of 2930 PMMA-augmented screws. Patients were classified into groups: (1) those whose infection was cured with irrigation, surgical debridement, and antibiotic treatment; (2) those whose infection was cured by hardware removal or replacement; and (3) those in whom treatment failed. Twenty eight of the 537 patients (5.2%) developed SSI after ISF. An SSI developed after primary surgery in 19 patients (4.6%) and after revision surgery in 9 (7.25%). Eleven patients (39.3%) were infected with gram-positive bacteria, 7 (25%) with gram-negative bacteria, and 10 (35.7%) with multiple pathogens. By 2 years after surgery, infection had been cured in 23 patients (82.15%). Although there were no statistically significant differences in infection incidence between preoperative diagnoses (P = 0.178), the need to remove hardware for infection control was almost 80% lower in patients with degenerative disease. All screws were safely explanted while vertebral integrity was maintained. PMMA was not removed, and no recementing was done for new screws. The success rate for treatment of deep infection after cemented spinal arthrodesis is high. Infection rate findings and the most commonly found pathogens do not differ between cemented and noncemented fusion. It does not appear that the use of PMMA in cementing vertebrae plays a pivotal role in the development of SSIs.

Application of rhBMP in spinal fusion surgery: any correlation of cancer incidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Safety concerns regarding the application of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been highlighted in recent years. It is noted that both BMP and their receptors being identified as a trigger for cancer growth. Here, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of BMP for spinal fusion surgery. We conducted this systematic review on topics of spinal fusion surgery with rhBMP application from three database (PubMed, EuropePMC, and Clinicaltrials.gov) with MeSH phrases such as "rh-BMP," "rhBMP," "spine surgery," "spinal arthrodesis," and "spinal fusion" were searched (using the Boolean operators "and" and "or"). Our research includes all articles, as long as published in English language. In the face of disagreement between the two reviewers, we discussed it together until all authors reached a consensus. The primary key outcome of our study is the incidence of cancer following rhBMP implantation. Our study included a total of 8 unique studies (n = 37,682). The mean follow-up varies among all studies, with the longest follow-up is 66months. Our meta-analysis showed that exposure to rhBMP in spinal surgery did increase the risk of cancers (RR 1.85, 95%CI [1.05, 3.24], p = 0.03). Our study found that rhBMP was not associated with the increased risk of cancer incidence within the rhBMP cohort. Still, we did face several limitations, in which further studies are needed to confirm the result of our meta-analysis.

Posterior spinal implant failure and its clinical significance: analysis of two cases and literature review

Background: The goal of spine arthrodesis is vertebral fusion and stabilization, however there are multiple factors which don’t allow it; among the most known are implant failure and pseudarthrosis. The question is, should a revision surgery must be performed in all implant failures? Case description: We present 2 cases of screw fatigue or failure which were treated differently based on the symptoms of the patients, even when they had clear radiologic images of implant failure. Conclusion: The set of signs and symptoms are the pillar for the decision in the definitive treatment, even though the literature mentions bone-implant fusions in less than a year, instrumentation does not always fulfill its objective due to surgical and non-surgical factors; however, we must individualize each case with the aim of maintaining spinal stabilization, preserving neurological function and relieve pain.

Dislocation and survival rate of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with high risk of instability.

Instability remains as an unsolved complication after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Dual mobility (DM) cups have decreased dislocation rate in rTHA; however, there are few clinical studies that evaluate the risk of dislocation after rTHA in patients with high risk of instability. Between 2007 and 2019, 95 consecutive rTHA using a DM cup, in 93 patients with instability risk factors were retrospectively reviewed. Instability risk factors were defined as follows: deficient abductor mechanism (22.1%), previous dislocation (68.4%), Paprosky 3 acetabular bone defect (21.1%), neuromuscular disease (4.2%), lumbar spine arthrodesis (6.3%), and more than one previous surgery (33.6%). Mean follow-up was 4.3 ± 2.4years. Clinical and radiographic parameters were reported. DM cup survival was determined using a Kaplan-Meier analysis with re-revision for any cause as the end-point. Surgical complications and re-dislocation rate was recorded. Seven DM cups were re-revised; three due to aseptic loosening, three due to peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and one due to instability. At sevenyears follow-up, the survival rate of the DM cup using re-revision for any reason as the end-point was 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 66.4-98.4%). There were 12 (12.6%) complications: two (2.1%) dislocations, six (6.3%) PJI, four (4.2%) peri-prosthetic fractures. Our findings suggest DM cups are effective reducing dislocation rate in rTHA in patients with a high risk of instability, without increasing early aseptic loosening and with a low rate of dislocation. Nevertheless, longer follow-up is needed to confirm implant stability and dislocation rates in the long term.

Increased Dislocation Rates After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Isolated Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis

BackgroundWhile stiffness of the lumbosacral spine is a known predictor of instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA), little is known about the medical- and surgical-related outcomes following THA in patients who have prior isolated sacroiliac (SI) joint arthrodesis. Methods197 patients who had a history of isolated SI joint arthrodesis who subsequently underwent elective primary THA for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (THA-SI) from 2015 to 2021 were identified in a national administrative database. Using propensity score matching and logistic regression analyses, this cohort was compared to two groups of patients: patients who did not have any history of lumbar or SI arthrodesis and patients undergoing primary THA who had a history of lumbar arthrodesis without extension into the SI joint (THA-LF). ResultsThe THA-SI group had a significantly higher incidence of dislocation (odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.04-4.04, P = .037) with no increased incidence of medical complications or other surgical complications when compared to patients without a history of SI or lumbar arthrodesis. There were no significant differences in any complications in THA-SI patients when compared to THA-LF patients. ConclusionPatients who had prior isolated SI joint arthrodesis undergoing primary THA demonstrated a two-fold increased incidence of dislocation when compared to those who did not have prior SI arthrodesis, although the risk of complications in this population was similar to that observed in patients who had prior isolated lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Impact of cervical spine pathology on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Cervical spine pathology can affect the supporting muscles and function of the shoulder and contribute to shoulder and arm pain and hence may impact postoperative outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a history of cervical spine arthrodesis and its timing, before or after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), on the outcomes of TSA. Our hypothesis is that a history of cervical arthrodesis (CA) will negatively impact patient outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively collected cohort at a single institution. Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) patients with CA were identified and compared to a cohort of patients without CA (NCA) enrolled in an institutional registry from 2011 to 2020. Demographic characteristics, diagnoses, implant type, range of motion, adverse events, and clinical outcome metric scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], Constant, Shoulder Function score, patient satisfaction) were recorded. Outcomes between cohorts were analyzed using conventional statistics as well as stratification by minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) thresholds where applicable. Of the 573 TSAs evaluated, 48 (20a CA-aTSA and 28 CA-rTSA) had a history of CA and 525 (280 NCA-aTSA and 245 NCA-rTSA) had no history of CA. The CA-TSA (aTSA and rTSA) had lower Constant, ASES, and Shoulder Function scores postoperatively as well as less improvement in active external rotation and an overall lower satisfaction rating (P<.05 for all) compared with NCA-TSA. The adverse event rate in the CA-TSA cohort was higher compared with the NCA-TSA cohort (25% vs. 6.5% [rTSA; P=.004] and 24.5% vs. 11% [aTSA; P=.068]). Optimal cutoff analysis showed that a time from CA to TSA of greater than 1.33 years had a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 75.0% in predicting achievement of SCB for ASES score. The current study demonstrates that patients with a history of CA undergoing shoulder arthroplasty results in lower postoperative functional outcomes, lower satisfaction, and higher rates of postoperative adverse events requiring surgical revision when compared to a cohort without a history of CA. Additionally, the current study demonstrates that a time interval of at least 16 months between CA and shoulder arthroplasty optimizes the chances of achieving SCB for ASES score.

Foreign body in the hypopharynx: late prosthesis extrusion after cervical arthrodesis

This is a case report of a rare airway Foreign Body (FB), the first reported case of an extruded prosthesis of previous cervical spine arthrodesis still attached to the wall of the hypopharynx, obstructing the airway, and requiring immediate removal. A 56-year-old man with a history of previous cervical arthrodesis (C3-C7). He presented anterior displacement of the Cage Device and erosion of the posterior wall of the hypopharynx, with the prosthesis causing partial obstruction of the larynx. After the Neurosurgery and Radiology team determined that there were no risks of cervical spine instability, we were able to remove the device in the operating room using Laryngoscope and McGill forceps with success. After proper evaluation of the case, we were able to remove the foreign body uneventfully. Given the rarity of this complication, we hope this case report can assist in the treatment and management of future cases.

Use of biphasic calcium phosphate versus demineralized bone matrix: retrospective clinical and CT analysis of posterolateral fusion results.

Bone graft extenders have been developed to prevent donor site morbidity associated with iliac crest bone graft, but few studies compared the efficacy of various substitutes. Our purpose was to determine fusion rate and clinical outcome in patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis using demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing one-level or two-level arthrodesis of lumbar spine were retrospectively reviewed. Two treatment groups placed either BCP or DBM, in addition to local autograft in lumbar posterolateral space. Three-dimensional CT exam and dynamic flexion-extension radiographs at postoperative 2-year were assessed for posterolateral fusion status and pain scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for clinical outcome. Of the 148 patients reviewed (including 23 in one- and 58 patients in two-level in BCP group, and 47 in one- and 20 patients in two-level in DBM group), no significant differences were found in terms of age, sex, BMI, smoking, diabetes, steroids, number of level fused, non-union rate or revision surgery between BCP and DBM groups. Significantly improved pain scale of back and leg and ODI were found in both groups postoperatively without group difference. We found a comparable fusion rate in one-level surgery (100% versus 93.6%) and a superior fusion rate of BCP group in two-level surgery (98.3% versus 80.0%, p = 0.01). Being a bone graft extender without osteoinductive property, with local autograft, BCP is comparable to DBM for one- and superior for two-level fusion. No significant difference was found in clinical outcomes.

Iliolumbar vein: a challenge for the exposure of the L4-5 disc in the anterior approach to the lumbar spine.

Anterior lumbar spine arthrodesis has been increasingly prescribed. In order to obtain better exposure of the intervertebral discs, it is necessary to identify vascular structures depending on the level to be approached. Systematic ligation of the iliolumbar vein has been suggested for access to the L4-L5 level, which may be technically challenging. The goal of the present study was to determine a safe limit for separating the iliolumbar vein safely without the need for its ligation. In total, 2284 patients involving the topography of the iliolumbar vein were included. If this vein was up to 5mm distant from the inferior border of the L4-L5 intervertebral disc, its ligature was performed. In cases that the distance was greater than 5mm, only the retraction was performed without ligature. A total of 115 ligatures were necessary (5% of cases). Among the 2169 cases with no ligature, bleeding due to ruptures occurred during traction in only 55 patients (3% of cases). The time taken for ligation ranged from five minutes to thirty-two minutes, with an average of 18.3min per ligature. In cases in which ligatures were needed (distance less than 5mm), there was loosening of the ligatures leading to bleeding in 23 cases (20% of ligatures). Systematic ligature is not necessary for accessing the anterior route to the L4-L5 level, leading to a reduction in the time of surgery and avoiding serious vascular injuries that can occur.

Innovation and care: the RAAC program in the context of spinal surgery

Spinal arthrodesis remains a major and decisive surgery. Faced with a constantly increasing number of operated patients, professional practices are evolving at the Robert-Debré pediatric hospital (Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris). In favor of the well-being of children and their parents, the implementation of improved rehabilitation after surgery has revolutionized the accompaniment of scoliosis patients: considerable reduction in length of stay, improvement in postoperative management and parent/child satisfaction.