AbstractInfrared spectroscopy is increasingly being adopted as a technology for soil analysis. However, laboratories worldwide are equipped with different infrared spectrometers, leading to variations that hinder the global application of soil spectroscopy. This study evaluates the transferability of soil spectra from a global dataset collected using four mid‐infrared spectrometers. To evaluate the efficacy of five spectral transfer functions (direct standardization, piecewise direct standardization, spectral space transformation [SST], principal components‐canonical correlation analysis [PC‐CCA], and domain‐invariant partial least square [DIPLS] regression), two datasets were used: dataset A (n = 224; standardized samples) was scanned using one primary spectrometer and three secondary spectrometers; dataset B (n = 1904; legacy samples) was scanned only using the primary spectrometer. The first set of chemometrics models was developed using dataset A to compare the performance of different spectrometers. The second set of models was developed using dataset B to evaluate the effectiveness of spectral transfer functions. Both models were developed using partial least squares regression. Spectral transfer functions developed using dataset A indicate that the PC‐CCA method was the best in converging spectra collected from four instruments into a similar space projected using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. Spectral transfer did not result in consistent improvement in the prediction of soil properties compared to the direct use of spectra collected from different spectrometers. These findings carry significant implications for the utilization of legacy models, enabling laboratories to concentrate on acquiring new samples and spectral measurements using established protocols without the need for spectral transfer.
Read full abstract