We report a comprehensive specific-heat study of the mixed antiferromagnetic system ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{1\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{x}}$${\mathrm{Co}}_{\mathrm{x}}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$ with x=0.286, 0.366, and 0.604. Four different issues related to competing anisotropies and random fields are discussed. (i) In zero field, a single sharp peak at the N\'eel transition ${T}_{N}$ is seen in each sample. There is no evidence for additional transitions at lower temperatures. We suggest that there are differences between systems with competing Ising-XY anisotropies and those with Ising-Ising anisotropies. Some new neutron scattering data are presented.The behavior of other competing anisotropy systems is discussed. (ii) When a small magnetic field H is applied along the easy axis (c axis) in ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{0.714}$${\mathrm{Co}}_{0.286}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$, it exhibits a random-field Ising model (RFIM) behavior similar to the diluted system ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{0.682}$${\mathrm{Mg}}_{0.318}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$.The reduction of ${T}_{N}$ obeys the scaling prediction ${T}_{N}$(H)=${T}_{N}$(0)-${\mathrm{AH}}^{2}$-${\mathrm{BH}}^{2/\ensuremath{\varphi}}$, where the crossover exponent \ensuremath{\varphi} is found to be 1.24\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.09. The shape of the specific-heat peak also changes continuously with increasing field. This is attributed to crossover effects in constant applied fields. Small thermal hystereses between the field-cooled and field-warmed data were detected in ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{0.682}$${\mathrm{Mg}}_{0.318}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$, but not in ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{0.714}$${\mathrm{Co}}_{0.286}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$.Some previously unpublished results on ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{0.682}$${\mathrm{Mg}}_{0.318}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$ are presented. The measurement of the specific-heat critical exponent \ensuremath{\alpha} is also discussed. We point out that the standard indirect methods, such as susceptibility and birefringence, may be invalid in finite fields. Our direct specific-heat data suggest that \ensuremath{\alpha} is large and negative (\ensuremath{\approxeq}-1). This can be interpreted as a Fisher renormalization effect. (iii) In higher fields, ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{0.714}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{0.286}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$ has a spin-flop (SF) phase.Sharp cusps are observed at the transitions to the paramagnetic (PM) phase, but no anomalies are observed at the transitions to the low-field uniaxial antiferromagnetic (AF) phase. The AF-PM boundary is found to join smoothly to the SF-PM boundary at an inflection point and the peak near this point shows substantial rounding. Possible experimental and theoretical causes for these observations are discussed. (iv) In ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{0.396}$${\mathrm{Co}}_{0.604}$${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$, the spins order perpendicular to the c axis in zero field. For applied fields parallel to the c axis, the system should correspond to the three-state Potts model in random fields. We find that the shape of the specific-heat peak changes with increasing field in a manner similar to the RFIM systems, becoming quite symmetric at 19.2 kOe. The phase boundary can be described either by the singular equation given in (ii) with an unusually small crossover exponent \ensuremath{\varphi}=0.42\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.03, or by an analytic equation involving unusually large ${H}^{4}$ and ${H}^{6}$ terms. These results are not well understood.