An online search for ‘cereal growth stages’ in Web of Science (http://wok.mimas.ac.uk/) shows that ‘The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations’ (Tottman, 1987) has been cited over 440 times. The aim of the paper was to bring precision to the description and interpretation of cereal growth stages. It was not the first paper published on decimal growth stages nor even the most highly cited and is a follow up to an earlier publication ‘An explanation of the decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations’ (Tottman & Makepeace, 1979), which has been cited 280 times. The most highly cited (over 3900 citations) paper using the search term ‘cereal growth stages’ is an earlier paper proposing the decimalisation of cereal growth stages (Zadoks et al., 1974) which was a development of the Feekes scale (Feekes, 1941), as described and illustrated by Large (1954). While the Feekes scale was widely used and Large's 1954 paper has been cited over 1000 times, it was felt that there was a need to better describe the earlier stages of cereal growth in order to cover all small grain species growing in diverse environments (Tottman & Makepeace, 1979). The Feekes scale was also considered to be not so suitable for computerisation of data records (Zadoks et al., 1974). As Tottman's 1987 paper was not the first, why should it be considered influential? The answer is in its title and that of the preceding 1979 paper. Tottman & Makepeace (1979) took the scale proposed by Zadoks et al. (1974) and made it applicable beyond the academic world. The fuller descriptions of specific growth stages and the addition of illustrations in the 1979 and 1987 papers meant that non-specialists could identify the specific growth stages in key crops such as wheat and barley. Hilary Broad's excellent illustrations occupy 11 pages of the 1979 paper and 9 pages of the 1987 paper and the then Editors of the Annals of Applied Biology should be congratulated for their foresight in publishing so many pages of illustrations. The critical improvement in the 1987 paper was a fuller description of the assessment of growth stages, especially the critical stages around the onset of stem elongation [Decimal Growth Stages (DGS) 30–32]. These were accompanied by Hilary Broad's illustrations of sections through developing stems that enabled advisors and growers to determine when the majority of a crop had reached DGS 31–33, which has been adopted in the UK as the ‘T1’ stage, one of the key timing points for applying inputs such as fertilisers, fungicides and herbicides. The illustrations of key stages from the 1987 paper were reproduced on a double-sided guide published by the British Crop Protection Council in 1987 to ensure that they were available to crop scientists and growers throughout the UK. The Home Grown Cereals Authority (HGCA) subsequently made another double-sided guide available as paper and electronic copies in which they credit Tottman & Makepeace's (1979) paper but use the illustrations from Tottman's (1987) paper to describe the stages around stem elongation. I therefore argue that it is the 1987 paper that influenced the HGCA guide ‘Cereal growth stages – a guide for crop treatments’ (http://archive.hgca.com/document.aspx?fn=load&media_id=6831&publicationId=7240), which links the key application timings of T1, T2 and T3 to the appropriate DGS. HGCA also reproduces the key growth stages in ‘The wheat growth guide’ (http://archive.hgca.com/document.aspx?fn=load&media_id=4321&publicationId=4444) and ‘The barley growth guide’ (http://archive.hgca.com/publications/documents/cropresearch/barley_growth_guide.pdf). All these guides have been made widely available to advisors and growers and demonstrate how the decimal growth stages are used as a reference to a crop's behaviour throughout its life cycle. Such uses are not reflected in academic publication statistics but demonstrate that ‘The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations’ (Tottman, 1987) has been highly influential in cereal agriculture over at least 25 years and will continue to be so. The impact of the paper upon practical agriculture is difficult to quantify but it has been a key factor in improving applications of inputs like fertiliser, fungicides and herbicides for optimum effect and minimal wastage. I thank the Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS) for funding.
Read full abstract