Specialty Teams Research Articles

Service evaluation of the research outputs for 23/24 at a large London teaching hospital

Abstract Introduction The recent report of a UK survey of pharmacy professionals’ involvement in research1 found only small numbers of the pharmacy workforce are currently undertaking research. A number of reasons for this are identified and the report contains a list of recommendations to support the embedding of research into pharmacy careers.1 Within the pharmacy department at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (KCH) all research proposals are presented at the pharmacy research and audit group and a log is kept of department research outputs by the clinical academic research lead. The analysis of this data will provide a benchmark. For the purposes of this study, research encompasses audit, service evaluation and research studies as defined by the Health Research Authority defining research table.2 Aim To identify, over the financial year 23/24, the frequency of different types of research outputs from the pharmacy department at KCH broken down by output type, specialty and role. Methods Regular emails were sent April 23 – March 24 to remind staff to identify and share research outputs with the clinical academic research lead. Outputs received were circulated by newsletter to encourage and motivate others. The clinical academic research lead engaged with individual pharmacy teams throughout the year to encourage and support research outputs. Research output data was collected, April 23 – March 24, on an Excel spreadsheet including staff name, role, specialty, type of research output and date the output was completed. Research outputs were categorised into published articles, published abstracts, attendance at conference, abstracts presented at conference and presentations at conference or national webinar. Ethics was not required as the study is defined as a service evaluation. Results There were a total of 89 research outputs by the pharmacy department across the year. These were broken down into published articles (20), published abstracts (16), attendance at conference (24), abstracts presented at conference (26) and presentations at conference or national webinar (3). The two specialty teams who produced or took part in the most research outputs over the year were critical care (15) and liver (11). Consultants pharmacists were involved in the most research activity (32) followed closely by principal pharmacists (26), specialist pharmacists (25) and the deputy chief pharmacists (19). Pharmacy technicians, pharmacists taking part in the STEP programme and non-registered pharmacy staff scored the least in terms of research activity relative to size of staff group. Consultant pharmacists and principle pharmacists were the groups that published the most articles (8 each). Discussion and conclusion The trust implemented a new electronic patient record system during the year which may have impacted the number of research outputs. A limitation to this study is that there are likely to be unrecorded research outputs. The data broken down by specialty and role will allow the pharmacy management group and clinical academic research lead to support, engage and motivate in those areas to allow staff to have the time, skills and guidance to carry out research activities. The results can be used by other healthcare organisations to benchmark against.

Ambulance offload performance, patient characteristics and disposition for patients offloaded to different areas of the emergency department.

Ambulance transfer of care (TOC) is a key performance indicator for New South Wales EDs, with 90% of ambulances to be offloaded within 30 min of arrival. Nepean Hospital ED has a number of strategies to improve TOC, including ambulatory areas where patients can be offloaded immediately. Offload data are supplied by ambulance and there is no study into its accuracy. The aim is to audit the accuracy of ambulance data of TOC compared to times recorded in the Nepean ED information system, and to examine TOC and patient demographics for different offload destinations. A retrospective observational study was performed for patients presenting by ambulance between 1 July and 31 December 2022. TOC was calculated from FirstNet and compared to ambulance data using a paired-sample t test. Patients were categorised by offload destination within the ED and examined for age, TOC, disposition and specialty team if admitted. TOC for ambulance and ED data was 60.8% versus 64.1%, respectively (difference 3.33%, P < 0.001). Patients offloaded to acute care were older, with 61.9% being >65 years; had a TOC of 37.3% compared to the resuscitation and ambulatory areas with TOC close to 90%; and were likely to be admitted with a 63.8% admission rate and 24.1% of admissions being under the geriatric service. Patients arriving by ambulance requiring an acute care bed were likely to be elderly and frail, and suffered substantial ambulance offload delays. Delays to ambulance offload for these patients is likely driven by acute care bed availability and access block.

Changes in Acute Care Pharmacist Prescribing and Laboratory Ordering over Time: CAPLET Study.

In Alberta, pharmacists may obtain additional prescribing authorization (APA) and a practice identification number (PRAC-ID) for ordering laboratory tests. Pharmacists working within Alberta Health Services were mandated by the employer to attain APA by 2018, whereas laboratory ordering has been in place since 2009. Five acute care sites within the Calgary Zone had a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system that allowed tracking of these activities. To describe changes in prescribing and laboratory ordering by acute care pharmacists over time and to compare these activities across hospitals, sites, and specialty teams. A retrospective, descriptive review of acute care pharmacist orders for medications and laboratory tests was completed using data from the CPOE system for the period 2018 to 2021. Over the study period, the rates of prescribing and laboratory ordering by pharmacists increased by 67.5% (from 1423 to 2383 per full-time equivalent [FTE]) and by 5.5% (from 235 to 248 per FTE), respectively. Pharmacists at the 5 hospitals increased their prescribing rates during that time (by proportions ranging from 7% to 176%). Cardiology, intensive care, and mental health teams had the largest increases in prescribing rates, whereas mental health, hospitalist, and intensive care teams had the greatest increases in rates of laboratory ordering. In each year of the study, the most frequently ordered medication for adult patients was vancomycin, and the most frequently ordered laboratory test was measurement of vancomycin before dose administration. The proportion of medication orders conveyed verbally decreased from 60.0% to 47.4% over the study period. The application of expanded scope of practice increased among acute care pharmacists, to a greater extent for prescribing than for laboratory ordering; however, the proportion of verbal medication orders remains high, a situation that should be addressed to improve patient safety. This study showed that prescribing and laboratory ordering are complementary, given that the top medications and laboratory tests were frequently related. The results of this study can be used for practice development and as the basis for further research within an expanded CPOE system.

Trauma Compendium: Management of the Entrapped Patient – a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP

ABSTRACT Entrapped patients may be simply entombed or experiencing crush injury or entanglement. Patients with trauma who are entrapped are at higher risk of significant injury than patients not entrapped. Limited access and prolonged scene times further complicate patient management. Although patient entrapment is a significant focus of specialty teams, such as urban search & rescue (US&R) teams that operate as local, regional, and/or national resources in response to complex scenes and disaster scenarios, entrapment is a regular occurrence in routine EMS response. Therefore, all EMS clinicians must have the training and skills to manage entrapped patients and to support medically-directed rescue throughout the extrication process. NAEMSP recommends: EMS clinicians must perform a timely and thorough primary and secondary assessment and reassessments in parallel with dynamic extrication planning; the environment may require adaption of standard assessment techniques and devices. EMS clinicians should establish early, clear, and ongoing communications with rescue personnel to ensure a coordinated patient-centered medically directed approach to extrication. Communication with the patient should be frequent, clear, and reassuring. EMS clinicians should immediately take measures to effectively prevent and manage hypothermia. EMS clinicians should recognize airway management in the entrapped patient is always challenging. When required, advanced airway placement should be performed by the most experienced operator with proficiency in multiple modalities and alternative techniques in limited access situations. In entrapped patients who are experiencing or are at risk for crush syndrome, EMS clinicians should initiate large-volume (i.e., 1-1.5 liters/hour for adults and 20 milliliters/kilogram/hour for pediatric patients for the initial 3-4 hours) fluid resuscitation with crystalloid, preferably normal saline, as early as possible and prior to extrication. In entrapped patients who are experiencing or are at risk for crush syndrome, EMS clinicians should administer medications to mitigate risks of hyperkalemia, infection, and renal failure, early and prior to extrication. Tourniquet application should be considered in the setting of the crushed extremity as a potential adjunct to medical optimization before extrication of some patients. Patients with prolonged entrapment with the potential for severe injuries require complex resuscitation and may benefit from EMS physician management on scene. EMS systems should consider an early EMS physician response to entrapped patients.

National Addiction Workshop: A Virtual Adaptation to Support Competency Development in Opioid Use Disorder Management.

Accessible, manualized, skill-based training ready for wide dissemination is needed to prepare healthcare staff to meet the needs of people impacted by the opioid epidemic. A 2-day workshop and simulation training was designed by an interprofessional substance use disorder (SUD) specialty care team, adapted to a virtual platform, manualized, and offered to healthcare staff and trainees from a large healthcare system. The workshop was offered 6 times over the course of 10 months with a total of 177 participants from across the United States enrolled in the training. Interactive experiential learning strategies including games designed to test knowledge, small-group case discussions, video demonstrations of skills, patient panels, and 3 simulations of a patient with chronic pain who developed opioid use disorder in the context of long-term opioid therapy were utilized in efforts to build skills and confidence managing SUDs in primary care and general mental health settings. Of those who completed the post-workshop survey, most found both content and training structure useful, particularly content related to medication management, stigma, and collaborative care. In addition, overall confidence scores in assessing, diagnosing, and treating SUD increased. Skill building exercises, such as interprofessional team simulations, were highlighted as most beneficial. The workshop received national attention leading to a partnership with the healthcare system's simulation center for wider dissemination. Expanding access to SUD treatment requires training healthcare staff to effectively change attitudes, increase knowledge, and improve key skills. This 2-day interprofessional workshop was well-received by participants who reported high acceptability and satisfaction scores and demonstrated improved confidence in the management of SUDs. This type of manualized, collaborative, skill-based learning experience can foster staff preparedness and willingness to conceptualize SUD as a chronic condition amenable to treatment in different healthcare settings.

Unique model for pharmacist cross‐coverage in the ambulatory care setting

AbstractClinical cross‐coverage in ambulatory care pharmacy practice is currently lacking and can lead to gaps in patient care, lost revenue generation, and pharmacist burnout due to a lack of time and support for indirect patient care and non‐clinical activities. To address this need, a cross‐coverage model for a team of ambulatory care pharmacists practicing in diverse clinical settings was developed and is primarily supported by a single broadly‐trained pharmacist known as an ambulatory care generalist. Cross‐coverage from the ambulatory care generalist includes in‐person and virtual patient care as well as in‐basket management and is available to all clinic‐based pharmacists on the specialty and primary care team with a few select clinics involving a designated collaborative practice agreement. The cross‐covering pharmacist has been shown to positively impact productivity measures and components of pharmacist burnout. Widespread implementation of this cross‐coverage model has the potential to greatly impact pharmacy practice and patient care in the ambulatory care setting and increase sources of revenue.

Operation STICK Improves Vascular Access Outcomes in a Specialty Team: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Education and training may improve outcomes within an experienced vascular access team. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a standardized peripheral intravenous catheter insertion educational program (Operation STICK) on vascular access outcomes. A quasi-experimental study design was used. Adult inpatients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) requiring ultrasound-guided insertion by a vascular access specialty team were eligible. Data were collected before and 7months after the educational training program. A total of 54 subjects were included (24 pre- and 30 post-implementation). Significant improvements were found for mean peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time (3.62 to 14.97days, P <.001), completion of therapy (58.3% to 96.7%, P =.001), and first-stick success rate (79.2% to 100%, P =.013). Catheter-to-vein ratio significantly decreased (P =.007). Standardized education/training in vascular access focusing on best practices yields favorable outcomes for DIVA patients within an established specialty team.

Health care transition models in spina bifida care: evidence-based lessons in support of neurosurgical practice.

The purpose of this study was to conduct a literature review on transition programs from pediatric to adult care and the role of neurosurgery as individuals with spina bifida (SB) transition, and to provide a framework for neurosurgical providers to assist in the transition to adult-centered care. A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement, with a search in Medline and Embase to identify US clinical programs reporting on their experiences establishing a transition program for adolescents and young adults with SB. Data were collected for authors, year, transition clinic location, model of care for transition clinic, ages served, and specialty clinical team. The literature search yielded 698 articles, 5 of which met the inclusion criteria. These 5 studies included 4 transition programs for which models of care and approach to transition, clinical services involved, establishment of goals, and age of initiation and transition were identified. All programs described setting transition goals, ranging from community services, to self-management, to health care navigation, to patient-driven goals, with 1 program reporting a quality-of-life measurement component to their model. Robust SB transition programs can be established by applying the expanded chronic care model, reviewing lessons learned by other programs, advocating at the institutional level, and seeking support via professional organizations. While the comprehensive role of neurosurgical providers in these programs is still being defined, a shared vision of enhancing the health and quality of life for individuals with SB and their families is needed by all subspecialists involved.

Breaking bad news: Comparing the perception of the role, barriers and experiences of neonatal intensive care and well-baby nursery nurses.

Nurses accompany patients throughout the breaking bad news process. The aim of the research was to compare neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses and well-baby nursery (WBN) nurses on their role, barriers and experiences in breaking bad news to parents/relatives during hospitalization. A cross-sectional comparative study. Two medical centres in Israel were employed. A 39-item questionnaire was distributed with 140 nurses participating in the study. STROBE Checklist was used. A total of 140 nurses participated in this study. There was no significant overall difference (p ≤ .45) between NICU and WBN nurses in their perception of their role in breaking bad news. Differences were found in barriers to the role which included a lack of information, lack of time and communication issues. No differences were found in the nurses' experiences in breaking bad news. NICU and WBN nurses reported that they received no support (n = 40, 58.8%; n = 45, 64.3%, respectively). No breaking bad news specialty team existed in either unit (NICU: n = 64, 91.4%; n = 60, 87.0%). Nurses in the WBN and NICU are involved in breaking bad news. The role of the nurse has not been fully acknowledged making it difficult to perform. Nurses' experiences in breaking bad news were varied. Nurses facing challenges should be provided guidance and support. This needs to be implemented. The role played by nurses in breaking bad news has not been fully acknowledged making it difficult to perform. Nurses need to receive formal training and support in order to improve this practice.

"For the first time…I am seriously fighting burnout": clinician experiences with a challenging electronic health record transition.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is transitioning from its legacy electronic health record (EHR) to a new commercial EHR in a nationwide, rolling-wave transition. We evaluated clinician and staff experiences to identify strategies to improve future EHR rollouts. We completed a convergent mixed-methods formative evaluation collecting survey and interview data to measure and describe clinician and staff experiences. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics; interview transcripts were coded using a combination of a priori and emergent codes followed by qualitative content analysis. Qualitative and quantitative findings were compared to provide a more comprehensive understanding of participant experience. Employees of specialty and primary care teams at the first nationwide EHR transition site agreed to participate in our study. We distributed surveys at 1-month pre-transition, 2 months post-transition, and 10 months post-transition to each of the 68 identified team members and completed longitudinal interviews with 30 of these individuals totaling 122 semi-structured interviews. Interview participants reported profoundly disruptive experiences during the EHR transition that persisted at 1-year post implementation. Survey responses indicated training difficulties throughout the transition, and sharp declines (P ≤ .05) between pre- and post-go-live measures of EHR usability and increase in EHR burden that were perceived to be due in part to system inefficiencies, discordant positive messaging that initially ignored user challenges, and inadequate support for and attention to ongoing EHR issues. Participants described persistent high levels of stress associated with these disruptions. Our findings highlight strategies to improve employee experiences during EHR transitions: (1) working with Oracle Cerner to resolve known issues and improve usability; (2) role-based training with opportunities for self-directed learning; (3) peer-led support systems and timely feedback on issues; (4) messaging that responds to challenges and successes; and (5) continuous efforts to support staff with issues and address clinician and staff stress and burnout. Our findings provide relevant strategies to navigate future EHR transitions while supporting clinical teams.

Identifying and addressing real-world challenges to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) care: A quality improvement initiative.

e13143 Background: Recent introduction of novel therapies into advanced TNBC management has greatly increased complexity of care. This study aimed to identify real-world challenges and practice gaps in evidence-based treatment for TNBC in the community oncology setting. Methods: In March-August 2023, 48 health care providers (HCPs) at 4 US community oncology clinics completed surveys on practice gaps and challenges related to care delivery, treatment selection, adverse event management, and shared decision making (SDM) in TNBC. HCPs (n=47) then participated in audit/feedback (AF) sessions to review clinical evidence and develop clinic-specific action plans to address identified gaps. Follow-up surveys evaluated the impact of real-world clinical practice changes stemming from the initiative. Results: HCPs reported sequencing of therapies across multiple lines of treatment, coordinating care and care transitions, and providing patient-centered supportive care as their top 3 challenges. They also reported challenges with managing adverse events, particularly neutropenia (46%) and cardiotoxicity (25%). Most HCPs (~70%) reported providing nutritional support services, healthy lifestyle counseling, and financial counseling, while distress screening, quality of life assessment, and end-of-life counseling were less frequently used (~40%). Two-thirds of HCPs said that they often or always engaged in SDM with their patients, with top barriers identified as lack of time, patients’ low health literacy, and lack of support staff. Changes that were considered most likely to improve care were improved collaboration across interprofessional teams (31%) and improved follow-up and monitoring for early signs of recurrence/progression (21%). When asked about support necessary to for changes across their healthcare system, HCPs selected improved workflows/protocols to support collaboration across disciplines (tumor boards, specialty care teams, etc) as their top resource need. After the AF sessions, action plans included use of new communication channels to discuss patient side effects or confirm plans for biomarker testing, improved treatment sequencing protocols, workflow standardization for patients transitioning to specialty care teams, and implementation of checkpoints to ensure continued patient engagement and timely identification of adverse events. On a follow-up survey, clinics reported they had improved follow-up and monitoring for adverse events (83%) and were engaging patients more frequently in SDM (67%). Conclusions: Community oncology clinics face multiple ongoing challenges that may be impeding the ability to integrate newer therapies into TNBC management. Further research on multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and needed workflow changes has the potential to improve care for patients with TNBC.

Redesigning Diabetes Care for Treatment Inertia: A Population Health Model.

In the past 2 decades, health care has witnessed technological and pharmacological advancements leading to innovations in diabetes management. Despite these advances, published guidelines, and treatment algorithms, most people with diabetes remain above glycemic targets. Thus, the authors designed a novel care model aimed at improving several causative factors, including therapeutic inertia, limited access to endocrinology and cardiovascular specialists, time constraints, and complexity in incorporating clinical practice guidelines. The model involves collaboration between the diabetes specialty team and primary care providers (PCPs). The intervention reviewed uncontrolled diabetes data and the patient's electronic medical record (EMR) and sent personalized, evidence-based recommendations to the provider using the task function in the EMR. Other services (eg, diabetes education) were utilized to optimize patient care to achieve optimal glycemic targets and address cardiometabolic risk. The overall mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased pre-post intervention by almost 1%, and 52.1% (347 of 666) of the cohort had ≥-0.5% change in HbA1c post-intervention. All pathways exhibited a decrease in HbA1c. Team-based approaches to managing diabetes patient care were the most effective. The interventions effectively utilized the resources across the health system without placing additional load or burden on primary care or diabetes specialty care teams. In the future, the authors hope to address the limitations of the current gap caused by increasing diabetes numbers, decreasing availability of PCPs and endocrinologists, and fee-for-service models using the innovative specialty consultant-primary care connection and knowledge exchange offered by this novel model, which can only be sustained with payer's support.

Advancing Newborn Screening Long-Term Follow-Up: Integration of Epic-Based Registries, Dashboards, and Efficient Workflows.

The Connecticut Newborn Screening (NBS) Network, in partnership with the Connecticut Department of Public Health, strategically utilized the Epic electronic health record (EHR) system to establish registries for tracking long-term follow-up (LTFU) of NBS patients. After launching the LTFU registry in 2019, the Network obtained funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration to address the slow adoption by specialty care teams. An LTFU model was implemented in the three highest-volume specialty care teams at Connecticut Children's, involving an early childhood cohort diagnosed with an NBS-identified disorder since the formation of the Network in March 2019. This cohort grew from 87 to 115 over the two-year project. Methods included optimizing registries, capturing external data from Health Information Exchanges, incorporating evidence-based guidelines, and conducting qualitative and quantitative evaluations. The early childhood cohort demonstrated significant and sustainable improvements in the percentage of visits up-to-date (%UTD) compared to the non-intervention legacy cohort of patients diagnosed with an NBS disorder before the formation of the Network. Positive trends in the early childhood cohort, including %UTD for visits and condition-specific performance metrics, were observed. The qualitative evaluation highlighted the achievability of practice behavior changes for specialty care teams through responsive support from the nurse analyst. The Network's model serves as a use case for applying and achieving the adoption of population health tools within an EHR system to track care delivery and quickly fill identified care gaps, with the aim of improving long-term health for NBS patients.

(310) Severe Delayed Skin Reaction to Antiseptic Irrigation Solution Managed with Pinch Skin Grafting After Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery: A Case Report

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is a common procedure for treating erectile dysfunction, and skin preparation with antiseptic solutions is a standard practice to reduce infection risk. However, some antiseptic solutions, such as chlorhexidine-based Irrisept, have been associated with severe skin reactions. Several studies have reported cases of contact dermatitis, blistering, and chemical burns following the use of chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solutions before surgery. Objective This case report aims to highlight the potential risk of severe skin reactions when using Irrisept and other chlorhexidine antiseptic solutions during penile prosthesis surgery. It also explores the novel technique of pinch skin autografting used to salvage the implant and achieve successful wound healing after delayed skin necrosis. Methods 61-year-old male with a history of prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction who underwent insertion of an IPP. Results The patient's penile shaft developed blisters 3 weeks post-implantation, which progressed to full-thickness necrosis despite conservative treatment. The distribution and location of the reaction led to the hypothesis that it was caused by the chlorhexidine-based Irrisept antiseptic. The antiseptic solution used copiously throughout the case and 10CC was injected under pressure into the drain which also may explain the reaction observed. The patient underwent wound debridement and was treated with pinch skin autografts from the bilateral thighs. The autografts resulted in 95% epithelialization with excellent cosmetic outcomes with no other complications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of Irrisept-induced delayed skin necrosis and the use of pinch skin grafting to salvage the implant after penile prosthesis surgery. Conclusions Skin reactions to Irrisept antiseptic solution during penile prosthesis surgery are rare but can be severe. Surgeons should be cautious and consider alternative skin preparation methods in patients with a history of skin allergies or sensitivities. This case also highlights the potential of pinch skin autografting as a salvage technique for post-IPP skin reactions. A multidisciplinary approach involving reconstructive burn surgeons and specialty wound care teams may be beneficial in optimizing outcomes in such cases. Disclosure No.

Evaluation of the preclinical hospital visit programme with students' feedback at the University of Nottingham, UK.

Background . The General Medical Council's publication Tomorrow's Doctors recommends that medical students should attain professional awareness at an early stage of their education. Accordingly, in the University of Nottingham, basic science teaching is integrated with clinical practice, by attaching medical students to hospital specialty teams and general practices in the community, as regular timetabled 'hospital visits' from the beginning of their medical education. We evaluated the feedback forms of the preclinical (1st and 2nd years) medical students retrospectively based on their experience of the hospital-based clinical teaching programme over 2 years. The hospital visit programme was modified based on the student feedback following which the effectiveness of the modified programme was revaluated post-test. Methods . This study was based on a quasi-experimental design in which comparisons of pre-test and post-test feedbacks with 337 feedback forms in each group were analysed in the study period. Quantitative response questions in the feedback were statistically analysed using independent t-test, and free text questions were qualitatively analysed and grouped into themes. Results . Data analyses showed significant difference (p<0.001) between the pre- and post-test groups. The main feedback themes identified were number of the patients examined, organization of the visit, patient selection, introductory talk, and briefing and debriefing before and after the visit. Conclusion . The structure of the hospital visit programme was influenced by the available infrastructure, flexibility of access and delivery of clinical teaching. The programme helped build professional attitudes in both staff and students and encouraged independent learning.

A descriptive analysis of children seeking medical attention for problematic sexualized behavior.

Problematic Sexualized Behavior (PSB) in children is an increasingly prevalent and often misunderstood issue that impacts the well-being of children. Quantifying the numbers of affected children is challenging due to inconsistencies in how these children are identified, as well as misperceptions surrounding the issue and lack of a coordinated community response. In this single-center retrospective case review, we attempt to report data on child demographics and case characteristics for children presenting to one Child Protection Program (CPP) medical specialty team for concern of PSB. A total of 224 children were identified as having engaged in PSB during the study period. 110 (49%) of these children were referred to the CPP for medical evaluation and medically triaged by the team. The remaining 114 children (51%) were identified through the medical triage of the presenting cases as having engaged in PSB with the index children, but were not referred to CPP for medical care themselves. The majority of children who were referred (69%) were the recipient of the PSB, compared to being the displayer of the behavior (20%). Of the recipient cases, the child displaying PSB was also referred to the CPP only 14.5% of the time. These results highlight that the number of children presenting for medical evaluation with concern of PSB is a significant underestimation of the prevalence of PSB in the community. This notable gap in identification of children engaging in PSB prevents service delivery for these children, including medical evaluation. The results also demonstrate that children displaying PSB were disproportionately missing from care and represent a specific area of missed opportunity for intervention and support by medical professionals.

Abstract 18110: Assessing the Impact of a Multidisciplinary Cardio-Kidney Care Team on the Overall Care Satisfaction in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction And Chronic Kidney Disease

Background: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) experience fragmented care in the usual referral-based model given poor care coordination between subspecialists and primary care clinicians (PCCs). Multidisciplinary specialty care teams can improve care coordination, increase use of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT), and potentially increase patient satisfaction. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in a single-center tertiary care institution, enrolling patients with both HFrEF (ejection fraction &lt;50%) and CKD (stages 2-5, not on hemodialysis) over 6 months. The patients’ PCCs were randomized to either the control arm in which usual care was continued, or to the treatment arm where PCCs were supported by a virtually organized cardio-kidney team with a heart failure specialist and nephrologist. Treatment arm PCCs received recommendations from the cardio-kidney team via electronic medical record secure messaging sharing guidance on GDMT use, necessary lab tests, etc. Patients’ quality of life and symptoms were assessed at both baseline and 3 months via the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQoL) survey and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), respectively. Results: 95 patients had 3 month follow-up data (treatment n=47, control=48). The mean patient age was 67.4±10.8, and 61% were male. The majority (76%) were African American with mean EF of 35.5 ±11.0. The treatment group had higher reported and clinically significant (&gt;at least a 5-point change) improvement of KCCQ scores from baseline to 3 months (52%) compared to the control group (38%), however, this was not statistically significantly different (p=0.15). Meanwhile, the proportion of deterioration was 39% and 40% in the treatment and control groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in KDQOL scores between or within both groups when comparing the baseline to 3 month data. Conclusion: Implementing a multidisciplinary care team to support PCCs is a feasible intervention and at 3 months, there was an increase (although statistically insignificant) in KCCQ scores. A longer duration of follow-up may be better able to assess the effects of multidisciplinary care team models.

Escaping the Silos: Utilization of a Pediatric Trauma Escape Room to Promote Interprofessional Education and Collaboration.

Millions of children are treated annually for trauma-related injuries but comprise a smaller proportion of emergency department visits than adults. As a result, emergency department teams may not have the knowledge, skills, and confidence to care for pediatric patients, and specialty teams may not interact enough as an interprofessional team to provide high-quality patient care. The purpose of this project is to describe a novel interprofessional simulation-based education initiative to assist pediatric trauma team readiness. An escape room was designed to provide an interactive educational environment focused on pediatric trauma education. Using an interprofessional dyad of a trauma nursing specialist and a pediatric nursing expert, the escape room was designed as a series of clues to improve pediatric skills and interprofessional collaboration between specialty teams. The escape room training was conducted (from February to March, 2023) in a large Southeastern U.S. Level II adult trauma center. Twenty-one registered nurses from different specialty teams participated in the simulation exercises with overwhelmingly positive feedback. Colleagues reported this was a unique way to deliver education that resulted in innovative team building and enriched collegiality between the specialty teams. The escape room educational format was positively received, and future events are planned across disciplines and various topics. Trauma centers with lower pediatric volumes seeking to provide engaging team-based education may use this format as a unique and innovative way to develop teams for clinical success.

Pediatric growth faltering: Evaluation and management in primary care.

Pediatric growth faltering (GF), previously known as failure to thrive and now also called pediatric malnutrition and weight faltering, is a common clinical finding in primary care. Most pediatric GF cases are caused by inadequate caloric intake, not organic disease states. Evaluation requires clinicians to obtain detailed nutritional, medical, psychosocial, and family histories; take accurate anthropometric measurements; and perform a careful physical examination. Evaluation findings should be analyzed to determine whether targeted diagnostic workup, specialty referral, or a trial of nutritional counseling is indicated. Management includes caregiver education about childhood nutrition and frequent monitoring of growth parameters. A multidisciplinary approach that includes nutritionist, developmental therapist, and other specialty team member involvement is desirable.

A30Safe Interdepartmental Learning from clinical incidents using a Quality Improvement Framework

Mistakes are an inherent learning opportunity within healthcare that can be used to prevent future loss of lives and reduce suffering. We aim to create a safe learning space within our organization that can be embedded within our quality improvement (QI) process. We have designed a bespoke framework ( Safe Interdepartmental Learning with a Quality Improvement Framework Our tertiary hospital clinical governance team in collaboration with the multi-professional education, simulation, and patient safety departments has identified 5 topics based on the root cause analysis of serious clinical incidents. This description from our recent cohort involves the recruitment of 5 different specialty teams, each consisting of 1 experienced consultant faculty and 3 other facilitating clinicians with different levels of experience in healthcare simulation. The teams prepared and designed the most suitable clinical scenario progression to address the learning objectives based on their allocated topics. Learner and peer feedback along with reflections on the session, highlighted possible change ideas to modify the subsequent scenario running. Over a period of 6 months, different learner sets were involved in the same simulation exercise with 2 further iterative modifications. The 5 teams have generated a total of 15 hours of simulation sessions using standard pre-briefing, debriefing, and evidence-based simulation techniques. The level of independent facilitation and mentoring by more advanced debriefers has been adjusted to fit the individual pace of experiential learning. To further enhance the embedded faculty development a total of 270 minutes of online discussion, reflections, and 15 topics were presented by the facilitators to create a multi-professional learning experience. The content was structured to reflect the national outcome’s framework for faculty development and the ASPIH standards guidance for simulation-based education. The recorded simulation sessions, debriefing, and topic discussions have generated a useful asynchronous online reference for the current and future cohorts. The feasibility of implementing this simulation programme integrated with a QI framework is a major step for our future prospective evaluation of the impact of translational simulation as theorized in the current literature [2] on patient outcomes and healthcare performance indicators. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.