(310) Severe Delayed Skin Reaction to Antiseptic Irrigation Solution Managed with Pinch Skin Grafting After Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery: A Case Report

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is a common procedure for treating erectile dysfunction, and skin preparation with antiseptic solutions is a standard practice to reduce infection risk. However, some antiseptic solutions, such as chlorhexidine-based Irrisept, have been associated with severe skin reactions. Several studies have reported cases of contact dermatitis, blistering, and chemical burns following the use of chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solutions before surgery. Objective This case report aims to highlight the potential risk of severe skin reactions when using Irrisept and other chlorhexidine antiseptic solutions during penile prosthesis surgery. It also explores the novel technique of pinch skin autografting used to salvage the implant and achieve successful wound healing after delayed skin necrosis. Methods 61-year-old male with a history of prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction who underwent insertion of an IPP. Results The patient's penile shaft developed blisters 3 weeks post-implantation, which progressed to full-thickness necrosis despite conservative treatment. The distribution and location of the reaction led to the hypothesis that it was caused by the chlorhexidine-based Irrisept antiseptic. The antiseptic solution used copiously throughout the case and 10CC was injected under pressure into the drain which also may explain the reaction observed. The patient underwent wound debridement and was treated with pinch skin autografts from the bilateral thighs. The autografts resulted in 95% epithelialization with excellent cosmetic outcomes with no other complications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of Irrisept-induced delayed skin necrosis and the use of pinch skin grafting to salvage the implant after penile prosthesis surgery. Conclusions Skin reactions to Irrisept antiseptic solution during penile prosthesis surgery are rare but can be severe. Surgeons should be cautious and consider alternative skin preparation methods in patients with a history of skin allergies or sensitivities. This case also highlights the potential of pinch skin autografting as a salvage technique for post-IPP skin reactions. A multidisciplinary approach involving reconstructive burn surgeons and specialty wound care teams may be beneficial in optimizing outcomes in such cases. Disclosure No.