Background Scientific meetings have integral role for physicians and researchers to exchange ideas and shedding light on most crucial aspects in medicine among which is the healthcare disparities (HCD) which have recently gained much attention from policy makers and researchers. Up to our knowledge, no prior data addressed the proportions of scientific contributions that focused on healthcare disparities and presented in cardiology conferences. So, we sought to determine the reporting of HCD in HFSA abstracts that were presented in 2018-2020. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of the HFSA meeting abstracts that were published in special supplement issues in the Journal of Cardiac Failure of three years 2018-2020, all abstracts were screened from both title and abstract text to assess if the abstract main focus was to highlight HCD (age, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic, geographic, circadian or linguistic). If an abstract highlighted more than one HCD then we counted each disparity separately without merging of data. Results Total number of abstracts analysed was 1282, among which 97 (7.6%) were addressing one or more disparities. The first author of the abstracts highlighting HCD were almost universally from US affiliation (Except five abstracts whose first authors were from non-US affiliation). The abstracts focusing on HCD were 4.8%, 7.4% and 9.8% in 2018, 2019 and 2020 HFSA meetings respectively. Among the abstracts focusing on HCD; sex/gender disparity was the most reported HCD (32.5%) followed by age and race/ethnicity disparities (25.2% and 24.4%) respectively, see Fig A. Race/Ethnicity was the most reported HCD in HFSA2018 (36.8%), age was most common HCD in HFSA2019 (36.4 %) while sex/gender was the most common HCD in HFSA2020 (40%), see Fig B. Despite the increase in total number of abstracts addressing HCD in 2019 and 2020, there is no significant difference between the types of HCD among the three analysed years (p=0.33). Conclusions The scientific contributions to HFSA that focus on different HCD were doubled from 2018 to 2020 with sex/ gender disparity being the most common reported one, however, there is no significant difference among the three included meetings according to the type of healthcare disparity. As the population diversity increases, there is crucial need to address healthcare disparities to overcome them. When cardiovascular meetings tend to specify sessions and poster categories focusing on healthcare disparities, this can promote the awareness and propose solutions to this concerning healthcare issue particularly in cardiovascular care. Scientific meetings have integral role for physicians and researchers to exchange ideas and shedding light on most crucial aspects in medicine among which is the healthcare disparities (HCD) which have recently gained much attention from policy makers and researchers. Up to our knowledge, no prior data addressed the proportions of scientific contributions that focused on healthcare disparities and presented in cardiology conferences. So, we sought to determine the reporting of HCD in HFSA abstracts that were presented in 2018-2020. Cross-sectional analysis of the HFSA meeting abstracts that were published in special supplement issues in the Journal of Cardiac Failure of three years 2018-2020, all abstracts were screened from both title and abstract text to assess if the abstract main focus was to highlight HCD (age, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic, geographic, circadian or linguistic). If an abstract highlighted more than one HCD then we counted each disparity separately without merging of data. Total number of abstracts analysed was 1282, among which 97 (7.6%) were addressing one or more disparities. The first author of the abstracts highlighting HCD were almost universally from US affiliation (Except five abstracts whose first authors were from non-US affiliation). The abstracts focusing on HCD were 4.8%, 7.4% and 9.8% in 2018, 2019 and 2020 HFSA meetings respectively. Among the abstracts focusing on HCD; sex/gender disparity was the most reported HCD (32.5%) followed by age and race/ethnicity disparities (25.2% and 24.4%) respectively, see Fig A. Race/Ethnicity was the most reported HCD in HFSA2018 (36.8%), age was most common HCD in HFSA2019 (36.4 %) while sex/gender was the most common HCD in HFSA2020 (40%), see Fig B. Despite the increase in total number of abstracts addressing HCD in 2019 and 2020, there is no significant difference between the types of HCD among the three analysed years (p=0.33). The scientific contributions to HFSA that focus on different HCD were doubled from 2018 to 2020 with sex/ gender disparity being the most common reported one, however, there is no significant difference among the three included meetings according to the type of healthcare disparity. As the population diversity increases, there is crucial need to address healthcare disparities to overcome them. When cardiovascular meetings tend to specify sessions and poster categories focusing on healthcare disparities, this can promote the awareness and propose solutions to this concerning healthcare issue particularly in cardiovascular care.
Read full abstract