ABSTRACT In this study, the spatial relationship between critical pipes identified using edge-based centrality measures and pipes with higher failure probability-based vulnerability indicators were analysed in sanitary sewer networks. By analysing two sub-networks, one residential and the other a central network, significant spatial associations between pipes with high centrality values and those exhibiting adverse conditions (poor CCTV grades, previous blockages, and low self-cleaning capabilities) were identified. Path-based centrality measures, particularly edge betweenness and K-path edge centrality were less influenced by weights when identifying critical pipes. In contrast, non-path-based measures like nearest neighbour edge centrality could identify localised spatial patterns between critical pipes and pipes in adverse conditions within the sewer networks investigated. The results showed that the spatial patterns between critical pipes and pipes in adverse conditions were not random and could support proactive maintenance planning and the development of more resilient networks. Additionally, the impact of network structure, connectivity, and differences in the composition of pipe attributes could contribute to variations in the strength of observable spatial associations.