Spanish-speaking Patients Research Articles

Weathering the storm when the end of the road is near: A qualitative analysis of supportive care needs during CAR T-cell therapy in pediatrics.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy provides promising outcomes in relapsed/refractory B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), yet still carries high toxicity rates and relatively poor long-term survival. Efficacy has yet to be demonstrated in other diagnoses while toxicity and risk profiles remain formidable. To date, treatment-related symptom burden is gleaned from clinical trial toxicity reports; the patient perspective remains understudied. English- or Spanish-speaking patients (ages 8-25years) undergoing CAR T-cell therapy for any malignancy and their primary caregivers were recruited from Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH), and the Pediatric Oncology Branch of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Both patient and caregiver completed semi-structured dyadic interviews 3months post treatment. We used directed content analysis for codebook development and thematic network analysis for inductive qualitative analysis. Twenty families completed interviews (13 patients, 15 parents). Patients were a median age 16.5years, predominantly female (65%), White (75%), and diagnosed with ALL (75%). Global themes included "A clear decision," "Coping with symptoms," and "Unforeseen psychosocial challenges." When families were asked to describe the "most challenging part of treatment," most described "the unknown." Most reported "the symptoms really weren't that bad," even among patients hospitalized for severe toxicity events. Fatigue, pain, and nausea were the most prevalent symptoms. Importantly, only one family would have chosen a different therapy, if given another opportunity. Although physical symptoms were largely tolerable, recognizing supportive care opportunities remains imperative, particularly psychosocial concerns.

Validation of the Spanish Version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in Patients With Cancer.

Assessment of breakthrough pain is essential for adequate management of cancer pain. The Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool (BAT) has been proven to be a brief, multidimensional, and reliable questionnaire for the assessment of breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP). Currently, there are no validated instruments in Spanish that allow assessing BTCP. The objective of this study was to validate the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool - Spanish (BAT-S) version of the BAT in adult patients with cancer. The BAT-S was tested in a prospective observational study conducted in adult patients with cancer-related pain and treated in a comprehensive cancer center in Mexico. We conducted a forward-backward translation and cross-cultural equivalence test in the Spanish language. The psychometric properties in patients with cancer were assessed using factor analysis, reliability, and validity. To assess reliability, the Kappa test and the intra-class correlation coefficient were used. For consistency, Cronbach's alpha test was used. Seventy patients participated in the study; 140 questionnaires were analyzed. The Spanish translation was well accepted by participants. Reliability was comprised between 0.746 for "use of analgesics" and 1.00 for "pain location." Thirteen of the 14 items had values above 0.8, and 12 above 0.9. Cronbach´s alpha coefficient was 0.7. This study confirms that BAT-S is a valid and reliable questionnaire to assess breakthrough pain in Mexican patients with cancer. This newly validated tool may be used to facilitate clinical management of primarily Spanish-speaking patients with breakthrough cancer pain. This study describes a prospective observational study to assess the validity and reliability of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in its Spanish version. The results support the use of this newly validated tool to facilitate clinical management of primarily Spanish-speaking patients with breakthrough cancer pain.

Associations between language, telehealth, and clinical outcomes in patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a surge in telehealth utilization. However, language barriers have emerged as a potential obstacle to effective telemedicine engagement, impacting millions of limited English proficient (LEP) individuals. Understanding the role of language spoken in telehealth outcomes is critical, particularly in cancer care, in which consistent follow-up and communication are vital. The primary objective was to assess the impact of telehealth utilization and primary language spoken on clinical outcomes in cancer patients. This study utilized a retrospective cohort design, encompassing cancer patients seen at the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. The study incorporated both in-person and telehealth visits, examining the association between encounter type and clinical outcomes. The study included 7890 patients with more than one outpatient visit during the study period. There was decreased telehealth utilization in non-English speaking cancer patients throughout the pandemic. Increased telehealth utilization was associated with higher rates of admission, irrespective of cancer type. Additionally, telehealth visits were associated with longer duration of subsequent admissions compared to in-person visits. Spanish-speaking patients utilizing telehealth had higher rates of re-admission compared to English speakers utilizing telehealth. Patients who died had higher rates of telehealth utilization compared to patients who survived. This study demonstrates that primary language spoken is associated with differences in telehealth utilization and associated outcomes in cancer patients. These differences suggest that the interplay of telehealth and language could contribute to widening of disparities in clinical outcomes in these populations. The study underscores the need to optimize telehealth usage and minimize its limitations to enhance the quality of cancer care in a telehealth-driven era.

53983 Pediatric Dermatology Made Simple: Physician Assessment of Informative Guides on Common Dermatologic Conditions for Spanish-Speaking Patients

53983 Pediatric Dermatology Made Simple: Physician Assessment of Informative Guides on Common Dermatologic Conditions for Spanish-Speaking Patients

Insurance Status, Language, and Access to Care for Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Patients with public insurance (PUBs) face more difficulty obtaining orthopaedic appointments and have longer wait times than privately insured patients (PVTs). These delays are associated with greater injury severity at the time of surgery, which affects sports injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament tears where early surgical stabilization leads to better outcomes. Additionally, previous evidence showed that patients with limited English proficiency often must rely on informal translation services, such as family members or friends, to communicate with their orthopaedic surgeons, which may represent a disparity in the care provided. It was hypothesized that PUBs would be less likely to obtain an appointment compared with PVTs and that most providers would not offer professional translation services to Spanish-speaking patients. Cross-sectional study. The authors called 50 randomly selected orthopaedic surgeons' offices in California specializing in sports medicine to request an appointment. Each office was called 4 times in random order for the hypothetical patient having either private or public insurance and speaking either Spanish or English. The hypothetical PUB had significantly decreased access to an appointment (19% of offices offered an appointment) when compared to the PVT (73.8% offered an appointment). Independent private practice (IPP) offices were less likely to accept public insurance (13.3%) compared with offices at academic medical centers (57.1%). There was no difference in access to an appointment for the Spanish- versus English-speaking patient. Translation services were offered at 73.8% of the orthopaedic offices. Overall, the data illustrated disparities in access to pediatric orthopaedic care for PUBs compared to those with private insurance. Disparities were most prominent in IPP settings, which were less likely than academic offices to accept public insurance. Additionally, it was found that 73.8% of the offices the authors contacted offered Spanish translation services. Interventions should focus on increasing acceptance of public insurance and translation services in IPP settings. Future studies should expand this analysis to other languages and investigate the potential impacts of language on the quality of care provided.

Through the eyes of Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and community leaders: a qualitative study on the in-patient hospital experience

BackgroundSpanish-speakers with non-English language preference and complex medical needs suffer disparities in quality of care, safety, and health outcomes. Communication challenges during prolonged hospitalizations for complex illnesses negatively influence how this group engages in their care and decision-making while hospitalized. Limited literature capturing the perspectives of Spanish-speaking patients in this context exists. Given the impact of language barriers on care and medical decision-making, this study documents the experiences of Spanish-speaking patients with NELP and hospitalized with complex care needs as well as caregivers and community leaders.MethodsUsing community-engaged recruitment strategies and semi-structured interviews and a focus group, we gathered insights from Spanish-speaking patients hospitalized for prolonged periods, caregivers, and community leaders from three geographic regions. Data were deidentified, transcribed, translated, coded in duplicate, and analyzed guided by grounded theory using NVivo.ResultsWe interviewed 40 participants: 27 patients, 10 caregivers and 3 community leaders. We identified four major themes: (1) Disconnected experiences impeding interactions, communication, and decision-making (2) Inadequate interpreter services (3) Benefits and consequences of family at the bedside (4) Community -informed recommendations.ConclusionThe study showed that in-person interpreters were preferred to virtual interpreters; yet interpreter access was suboptimal. This resulted in ad hoc family interpretation. Participants noted language negatively impacted patient’s hospital experience, including decreasing confidence in medical decision-making. Recommendations from patients, caregivers, and community leaders included expanding interpreter access, bolstering interpreter quality and accuracy, and increasing resources for patient education.

Comparing suicide risk screening strategies in Spanish-speaking pediatric patients

BackgroundSuicide and suicidal behaviors pose significant global public health challenges, especially among young individuals. Effective screening strategies are crucial for addressing this crisis, with depression screening and suicide-specific tools being common approaches. This study compares their effectiveness by evaluating the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) against item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire-A (PHQ-A). MethodsThis study is a secondary analysis of the Argentinean-Spanish version of the ASQ validation study, an observational, cross-sectional, and multicenter study conducted in medical settings in Buenos Aires, Argentina. A convenience sample of pediatric outpatients/inpatients aged 10 to 18 years completed the ASQ, PHQ-A, and Suicide Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ) along with clinical and sociodemographic questions. ResultsA sample of 267 children and adolescents were included in this secondary analysis. Results show that the ASQ exhibited higher sensitivity (95.1%; 95% CI: 83% - 99%) compared to PHQ-A item 9 (73.1%; 95% CI: 57% - 85%), and superior performance in identifying suicide risk in youth. LimitationsThe study included a convenience sampling and was geographically restricted to Buenos Aires, Argentina. The study also lacked longitudinal follow-up to assess the predictive validity of these screening tools for suicide risk. ConclusionThe study highlights the ASQ's effectiveness in identifying suicide risk among youth, emphasizing the importance of specialized screening tools over depression screening tools alone for accurate risk assessment in this population.

Action plans increase advance care planning documentation and engagement among English and Spanish-speaking older adults.

Advance care planning (ACP) has been reconceptualized as a health behavior. Action plans (APs), or patient-directed mini contracts, improve behavior change. However, no prior studies have assessed whether APs can increase ACP documentation and engagement. We included English and Spanish-speaking primary care patients from San Francisco, ≥55 years of age, with ≥2 serious or chronic illnesses. Participants were in the intervention arm of the PREPAREforYOURcare.org trial and asked at baseline to choose 1 of 5 actions (e.g., choose a surrogate). At 6 months, we assessed whether participants completed their AP and if completion was associated with demographics, electronic health record (EHR) ACP documentation, and five-point ACP Engagement Survey scores. We used t-tests, chi-squared, multivariate analysis adjusted for baseline ACP and clustering by physician, and qualitative thematic analysis to explore reasons for non-completion. The mean age of 586 participants was 65 ± 10 years; 44.0% women, 45.9% Spanish-speaking, 31.4% had limited health literacy, and 43% completed an AP at 6 months; surrogate-related (47.4%), tell others about medical wishes (33.7%), ask clinicians questions (13.7%), and decide what matters most in life (5.2%). Participants with limited versus adequate health literacy were less likely to complete an AP (25.4% vs 35.9%, p = 0.01). Completing an AP was associated with greater ACP EMR documentation 49.8% vs 35.6%, p < 0.001 (adjusted odds ratio: 2.06; 95% CI [1.43-2.97]) and engagement (adjusted five-point scores [3.69; 95% CI 3.57-3.81 vs 3.10; 95% CI: 2.98-3.21], p < 0.001). Themes for non-completion included not being ready and logistical issues (e.g., surrogate deceased). Among English and Spanish-speaking older adults, creating an ACP AP resulted in greater documentation and engagement. APs may help facilitate ACP behavior change as part of effective ACP interventions. Additional support may be needed for patients with limited health literacy and those facing logistical barriers.

Are Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Validated for Spanish Language and Culture?

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been adopted as a way to measure patient self-rated physical function and health status for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although multiple PROMs exist and have been translated into various languages, the cross-cultural adaptation and validity of these PROMs for Spanish-speaking patients is unknown. To evaluate the adaptation quality and psychometric properties of Spanish-language adaptations of PROMs for patients with ACL injuries. Scoping review; Level of evidence, 3. Under PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we reviewed published studies related to adaptation quality and psychometric properties of Spanish PROMs in patients with ACL injuries. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Reported Measures, the Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaires, and the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The level of evidence for each PROM was determined based on the number of studies, methodological quality, consistency of results, and sample size. The initial search strategy identified 5687 articles. After removal of duplicates, 1882 titles were screened, and 114 articles were assessed for eligibility. Six articles were selected for final review, comprising 4 PROMs: the Lysholm knee score, the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI), the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and the Lower Limb Functional Index. Three studies followed all 6 processes for cross-cultural adaptation. None of the studies demonstrated all 14 domains required for cross-cultural validity (eg, description of translator expertise). The ACL-RSI achieved the highest level of evidence, with 3 of 9 domains demonstrating moderate evidence. This review identified 4 instruments that have been translated for Spanish-speaking patients with ACL injuries, none of which demonstrated appropriate adaptation or robust psychometric properties. The study highlights the need for improvement in PROMs for Spanish-speaking patients and the potential for mismeasurement and inappropriate application of PROM results in patients with ACL injuries.

Exploring Pediatric Code Status, Advance Care Planning, and Mode of Death Disparities at End of Life

ContextChildren from marginalized groups are at risk for worse medical outcomes, yet little is known about their end of life experiences. ObjectiveWe examine the characteristics of deceased children with a focus on race, ethnicity, and preferred language. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of patients who died at Texas Children's Hospital from 2018 to 2019. Demographics, date of death, and final code status were extracted. Medical complexity prior to admission and mode of death were obtained from chart review. ResultsWe included 433 patients. Over one-third were Hispanic (39.3%) with 42.3% preferring Spanish. The majority were White (61.4%) or Black (21.0%). Most patients had significant medical complexity (52.0%) or were infants in their birth admission (29.4%). Half (52.4%) received palliative care; patients with increased medical complexity were more likely to have palliative care involved (P<0.001). There were no differences in palliative care, code status, or mode of death by race. Hispanic patients were less likely to have a full code status (OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.25–0.73). Spanish-speaking patients were more likely to have palliative care involvement (OR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.21–3.46) and less likely full code orders (OR 0.24, 95% CI: 0.1–0.63). ConclusionPalliative care services are engaged with most children at end of life and is accessible to marginalized patient groups. Spanish-speaking patients have different code status orders and modes of death at end of life. Further studies are needed to elucidate explanatory factors for differences revealed and multicenter studies are needed to characterize more widespread experiences.

Challenges in the Transition from Acute Hospital Care to Home for Spanish-Speaking Latino Patients with TBI and Families: Perspectives of Healthcare Providers and Interpreters.

Language-based disparities negatively impact patient outcomes. Spanish-speaking Latino patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) transitioning home from acute hospital care and their families have poor TBI-related outcomes; further, they have significant difficulties navigating the healthcare system due to care fragmentation and limited provider support. These challenges are exacerbated by language barriers. There are disproportionately fewer bilingual providers and interpreters in the U.S. healthcare system for patients with TBI for whom English is not their primary language. Although Spanish-speaking Latino patients with TBI and their families communicate with healthcare providers using interpreters on a regular basis, limited research has explored the healthcare delivery perspective. The purpose of this study was to understand the perspectives of healthcare providers and interpreters regarding their experience caring for or supporting Spanish-speaking Latino patients with TBI and their families during the transition home from acute hospital care. This qualitative descriptive study included 10 bilingual (English and Spanish-speaking) participants: 7 interdisciplinary providers and 3 interpreters; findings were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis to inform intervention adaptation. Four themes were identified: 1) language misalignment decreases health literacy and increases length of stay; 2) TBI-related cognitive impairments, coupled with language differences, make communication challenging; 3) unique social contributors to health directly decrease health equity; and 4) recommendations to improve access and justice in transitional care. There are multiple opportunities to improve transitional care support provided to Spanish-speaking Latino patients with TBI and their families in a manner that is not currently being addressed in research or in practice.

S150 - Barriers to Enrolling Monolingual Spanish-Speaking Primary Care Patients in a Screening and Brief Intervention (SBI) RCT to Reduce Risky Drug Use: Lessons Learned From the Quit-Mobile Study

S150 - Barriers to Enrolling Monolingual Spanish-Speaking Primary Care Patients in a Screening and Brief Intervention (SBI) RCT to Reduce Risky Drug Use: Lessons Learned From the Quit-Mobile Study

Patient and caregiver perspectives on causes and prevention of ambulatory adverse events: multilingual qualitative study

ContextAmbulatory adverse events (AEs) affect up to 25% of the global population and cause over 7 million preventable hospital admissions around the world. Though patients and caregivers are key actors...

Exploring the Telephone Call Experience of Patients with Non-English Language Preference in Primary Care vs. Specialty.

Latine people, comprising 18.5% of the US population, constitute the largest ethnic minority group, with nearly one-third self-identifying as having non-English language preference (NELP). Despite the importance of the telephone in health care access, there is limited understanding of how NELP patients navigate telephone calls with primary and specialty care clinics. This qualitative study aims to capture how Spanish speakers with NELP characterize their telephone call experiences with primary and specialty care clinics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 Spanish-speaking participants from primary care clinics with a sizeable proportion of patients who prefer to communicate in a language other than English at an urban academic medical center in Boston, MA. Participants were selected from primary care clinics that were well-equipped to serve Spanish-speaking patients. A total of 24 Spanish-speaking patients with NELP, mainly women (83%), with a mean age of 55.8years, participated. They represented diverse countries of origin, with an average length of time in the USA of 21.7years. Interview questions prompted participants to describe their telephone call experiences with front desk staff, with attention to interpreter availability, ancillary assistance, health outcomes stemming from a lack of language services, and emotional consequences of language discordance on calls. Patients perceived primary care clinics as providing familiarity and language concordance during telephone interactions, contrasting with specialty care clinics, seen as sources of monolingual English communication. Participants utilized various strategies, such as requesting interpreters, using concise English phrases, or seeking assistance from acquaintances, relatives, or primary care clinic staff, to mitigate language barriers. The findings underscore significant challenges faced by Spanish-speaking patients with NELP in ambulatory specialty care telephone calls. The study emphasizes the importance of creating inclusive multilingual telephone environments, standardizing interpreter access, and reflecting the diversity of the communities served.

The effect of primary language on access to specialized orthopedic care

BackgroundLanguage barriers can negatively impact the quality of care for non-English speaking patients. Lack of access to health-care providers who speak multiple languages or interpreters in medical offices can result in delayed appointment times, delayed treatment, and increased complications. Access to shoulder surgeons with subspecialty training is limited and this has been established which may further exacerbate the problem with access for these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of primary language spoken on access to specialty shoulder care in South Florida. MethodsThree populous, diverse counties in South Florida were selected for data collection. Sixty-nine orthopedic offices were identified by Google search and selected via random number generator. Investigators used the Secret Shopper methodology to contact each office to schedule an appointment for a shoulder arthroplasty for a family member who spoke exclusively English or Spanish using a blocked phone number. The ability to schedule a new patient appointment with a fellowship-trained shoulder specialist, the waiting period for the scheduled appointment, and interpretation services for Spanish-speaking patients were collected. ResultsOf the 69 offices called, 35 met inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in wait times for shoulder arthroplasty based on primary language spoken. There was no difference in wait time to see a shoulder specialist between Spanish (13.7 days) and English-speaking patients (12.9 days) (P = .835)). Wait times with a nonfellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon between Spanish and English-speaking patients was also not different (9.5 days and 11.96 days, respectively (P = .522). Similarly, no difference existed in phone call duration (P = .56), median income and wait times for a general orthopedic surgeon, with r = −0.26 (P = .105), or a shoulder specialist, with r = −0.19 (P = .22). Of the clinics accepting patients, 74.3% (n = 26/35) offered Spanish interpretation with 42.3% (n = 11/26) providing a multilingual physician, 26.9% (n = 7/26) a translating service, 23.1% (n = 6/26) had a staff member capable of translation, and 7.7% (n = 2/26) had an available professional interpreter. ConclusionWhile access to orthopedic specialty care may be similar for Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients in South Florida, over 25% of clinics lack multilingual physicians or qualified interpreter access. This can negatively impact surgical decision-making, postoperative care and outcomes after shoulder surgery. It is essential the orthopedic community advocates for the proper resources to optimally assist surgeons and provide quality care for Spanish-speaking orthopedic patients.

Spanish translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the ADTC scale (Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool)

Obtain a version to validate it in a population of adults with AD. 1) Translation into Spanish and cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire from the original version in English, through a seven-step process. 2) Evaluation of the unidimensionality of the resulting scale by means of an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), of its reliability by means of Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and of its validity by evaluating the correlation of its score with those of the POEM and DLQI questionnaires. (external reference criteria). The version resulting from the translation and cross-cultural adaptation process was well understood by the target population. The AFE of the 66 questionnaires documented the unidimensionality of the scale based on compliance with all the criteria used for its verification. Its reliability was excellent (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.917) and its score had a very high correlation with the external reference criteria (POEM: Spearman's Rho 0.85; p < 0.0001; DLQI Spearman's Rho = 0.81; p < 0 .0001). The version translated into Spanish and adapted for transculturation of the ADCT questionnaire has appropriate psychometric characteristics, which will contribute to optimizing the care processes of Spanish-speaking patients.

A proposal to teach medical students how to use interpreters

IntroductionMedical interpreters are crucial to ensure fair and high-quality healthcare for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). Despite the need to use high-quality medical interpreters to communicate with LEP patients, medical schools often do not adequately educate their students on how to work with interpreters.AimsThis study seeks to investigate the efficacy of using peer-assisted learning to teach medical students how to properly use medical interpreters. Moreover, the study strives to elucidate if an interactive peer-led model can be an effective teaching modality to train medical students about the basics of using medical interpreters.MethodsA pre- and post-training design was utilized to investigate the efficacy of peer-assisted learning in teaching medical students how to use interpreters. Second year medical students led a two-part workshop consisting of the following: (1) a didactic training session and (2) a practical session where learners interacted with Spanish-speaking standardized patients through an interpreter. Pre-training and post-training responses to survey questions were analyzed to determine changes in student comfort, confidence, and knowledge of best practices when using a medical interpreter.ResultsThere was a statistically significant increase in comfort and confidence with using interpreters after receiving peer-assisted training.ConclusionsA peer-led didactic training followed by an interactive training session can increase student comfort and confidence with using medical interpreters in clinical settings. Peer-assisted-learning may be an effective way to teach some of the best practices of using medical interpreters.

A system-wide approach to digital equity: the Digital Access Coordinator program in primary care.

The transition to digital tools prompted by the pandemic made evident digital disparities. To address digital literacy gaps, we implemented a system-wide digital navigation program. The Digital Access Coordinator (DAC) program consists of 12 multilingual navigators who support patients in enrolling and using the patient portal and digital tools. We implemented the program in our primary care network which consists of 1.25 million patients across 1211 clinicians. From May 2021 to November 2022, the DACs completed outreach to 16045 patients. Of the 13413 patients they reached, they successfully enrolled 8193 (61%) patients in the patient portal. Of those patients they enrolled, most patients were of Other race, Hispanic ethnicity, and were English-speaking (44%) and Spanish-speaking patients (44%). Using our embedded model, we increased enrollment across 7 clinics (mean increase: 21.3%, standard deviation: 9.2%). Additionally, we identified key approaches for implementing a digital navigation program. Organizations can support patient portal enrollment, a key part of digital health equity, by creating and prioritizing digital navigation programs.

Comparing Hospital Length of Stay Between Persons With LEP and English-Speaking Patients in a Large Rural Academic Medical Center.

Patients with limited English proficiency that are hospitalized without regular access to professional medical interpreters have a longer length of stay (LOS).1 The authors studied the difference in LOS between English-speaking patients and patients with limited English proficiency in New Hampshire's only academic trauma medical center. The authors also examined race, ethnicity, and distance of residence from hospital. Retrospective data were queried from EPIC, the electronic medical record system used by the authors. Queried data focused on inpatient hospitalizations between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. Patient primary language was grouped into English, Spanish, and other non-English language. Spanish-speaking patients live on average 39.6 miles farther from a hospital than English-speaking patients and have a 0.34 lower case mix index. After English, Spanish is the second-most frequently spoken language. Regression analyses found language to be a significant factor in LOS, LOS variance, and case mix index. A 2.34-day longer LOS for Spanish-speaking patients demonstrates an important health care disparity warranting further attention.

User-Centered Design of a Preference-Driven Patient Activation Tool for Optimizing Depression Treatment in Integrated Primary Care Settings (The Transform DepCare Study).

Few patient engagement tools incorporate thecomplex patient experiences, contexts, and workflows that limit depression treatment implementation. Describe a user-centered design (UCD) process for operationalizing a preference-driven patient activation tool. Informed by UCD and behavior change/implementation science principles, we designed a preference-driven patient activation prototype for engaging patients in depression treatment. We conducted three usability cycles using different recruitment/implementation approaches: near live/live testing in primary care waiting rooms (V1-2) and lab-based think aloud testing (V3) oversampling older, low-literacy, and Spanish-speaking patients in the community and via EHR algorithms. We elicited clinician and "heuristic" expert input. We administered the system usability scale (SUS) all three cycles and pre-post V3, the patient activation measure, decisional conflict scale, and depression treatment barriers. We employed descriptive statistics and thematically analyzed observer notes and transcripts for usability constructs. Overall, 43 patients, 3 clinicians, and 5 heuristic (a usability engineering method for identifying usability problems) experts participated. Among patients, 41.9% were ≥ 65years old, 79.1% female, 23.3% Black, 62.8% Hispanic, and 55.8% Spanish-speaking and 46.5% had ≤ high school education. We described V1-3 usability (67.2, 77.3, 81.8), treatment seeking (92.3%, 87.5%, 92.9%), likelihood/comfort discussing with clinician (76.9%, 87.5%, 100.0%), and pre vs. post decisional conflict (23.7 vs. 15.2), treatment awareness (71.4% vs. 92.9%), interest in antidepressants (7.1% vs. 14.3%), and patient activation (66.8 vs. 70.9), with fewer barriers pertaining to cost/insurance, access/coordination, and self-efficacy/stigma/treatment efficacy. Key themes included digital literacy, understandability, high acceptability for aesthetics, high usefulness of patient/clinician videos, and workflow limitations. We adapted manual entry/visibility/content; added patient activation and a personalized algorithm; and proposed flexible, care manager delivery leveraging clinic screening protocols. We provide an example of leveraging UCD to design/adapt a real-world, patient experience and workflow-aligned patient activation tool in diverse populations.