The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is an urgent and internationally shared target. One of the existing measures to do so is carbon offsetting through afforestation. However, when designing afforestation projects meant to act as carbon sinks, the remaining environmental issues are usually overlooked, with the potential risk of shifting environmental burdens. This study uses the water scarcity footprint as an indicator to choose the most adequate location for afforestation.To do so, a particular case study aimed at offsetting the carbon emissions of a canning company has been chosen. This multinational company has two main locations: Galicia (NW Spain), and La Unión (El Salvador). First, the annual carbon and water footprints of the production of the company’s flagship product (a pack of 3 tuna cans) have been calculated. The carbon footprint has been calculated following the corresponding ISO 14067 and PAS 2050 recommendations. Then, an afforestation project aimed at offsetting those carbon emissions has been designed following the corresponding Spanish regulations, and its prospective water scarcity impacts have been calculated. Two potential locations for the afforestation measure (next to the two company facilities in Galicia and La Unión) were assessed regarding green water scarcity impacts, in order to choose the more sustainable location. If the afforestation project were located in El Salvador, its water scarcity footprint would be 30% higher than in Galicia, and thus Galicia has been chosen as the location for this offsetting action.A sensitivity analysis has been carried out to evaluate how the use of different evapotranspiration values would affect the results, and the choice of the methodological approach used has been justified. Still, the approach used in this study has some limitations which have also been discussed, and ideas for its further improvement in subsequent studies have been presented.The relevance of following a holistic approach when designing carbon offsetting projects has been stated. If an afforestation project was planned focusing only on its carbon absorption rate, it may result in a burden shift to other impact areas (such as the water scarcity considered here). Thus, by linking indicators, we make sure that the carbon footprint reduction achieved does not imply an unsustainable contribution to water scarcity.