'Who ever lived in more remarkable times? When were there ever days with as much change as ours?' wrote a Dutch pamphleteer in September 1672.1 His question was right on the mark during the fall of the so-called 'Year of Disaster' of the Dutch Republic. Ever since the winter of 1671, when diplomatic language between France and the Dutch Republic had become increasingly belligerent and Louis XIV had gathered his armies in the Southern Netherlands, it had been clear to most Dutchmen that war was inevitable.2 The inadequate defence of the Republic became the subject of a heated debate. In an attempt to appoint the prince of Orange (who had been excluded from politics during the 1650s and 1660s) to the office of leader of the army and fleet, oppositional propagandists appealed to an anonymous audience by publishing scores of pamphlets. These Orangist publicists were successful in their primary goal. Under severe popular pressure, the prince of Orange was inaugurated as captain-general and admiral-general in February 1672. After the enemy armies of France, Munster and Cologne had entered the Dutch Republic in June and occupied three of the seven provinces within weeks, members of this anonymous public, most notably Dutch citizens from the remaining provinces of Holland and Zeeland, started to riot against certain magistrates that had been considered responsible for the terrible predicament that the Dutch Republic was in. As a consequence, government collapsed. Citizens attacked regents3 on the streets and pillaged their houses. On 12 June the first regent's house was plundered in Haarlem because this particular governor was believed to have supported negotiations with France. The regents Sijms and Langewagen were molested in Hoorn one week later, because they were suspected of financial corruption. On 25 June plundering had begun in Rotterdam and subsequently spread throughout the entire province of Holland and Zeeland. Eventually all large cities saw revolts against regents.4 During the summer months, from June until August, pamphleteers from different political persuasions shared several goals. The prince of Orange was to be appointed to another important political office and several suspected governors were to be removed from office. At the beginning of July, the first goal was achieved when William III was appointed to the office of Stadholder. The removal of suspected governors, however, led to a schism between two important oppositional groups. Orangist pamphleteers were out to discredit certain particular regents, most notably Johan and Cornelis de Witt who were subsequently brutally murdered by a large group of citizens in The Hague on 20 August. Their bodies were mutilated. Their toes, fingers, nose and ears were cut off; their hearts were cut out of their bodies.5 After the gruesome murder of these two men, however, Orangist publicists propagated the installation of a 'renewed obedience' between governors and governed. Six days after the murders, William III had been given the authority to change the governments in the riotous cities in order to 'restore the peace'. Citizens, on the other hand, started to file petitions and published radical pamphlets, demanding a purification of government based on issues of capability and good government. In some cities, peace and calm did not return until 1673.6So far, these dramatic events have not been explained satisfactory on all accounts because historians have overlooked, or even willingly neglected, the role that citizens have played in urban riots and the murders of the De Witt brothers. These citizens were called 'burghers' by Dutch contemporaries. 7 A burgher was not a patrician or a nobleman, nor was he a peasant or an outlaw, but it would be wrong to equate burghers with all citizens. Although all burghers were inhabitants of cities, not all inhabitants of cities were burghers. A burgher had privileges on which he swore an oath to the mayor and was as a consequence elevated above citizens without these special rights. …
Read full abstract