Reviewed by: Sounding Modernism: Rhythm and Sonic Mediation in Modern Literature and Film ed. by Julian Murphet, Helen Groth, and Penelope Hone Eleni Loukopoulou (bio) Sounding Modernism: Rhythm and Sonic Mediation in Modern Literature and Film, edited by Julian Murphet, Helen Groth, and Penelope Hone. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017. viii + 254 pp. £75.00 cloth, £24.99 paper, £75.00 ebook. This groundbreaking collection of essays explores how rhythm and sound were mediated in modern literature and film during the period 1890–1950. The contributors deploy theoretical approaches from sound and media studies to foreground their sonic aesthetics through multiple perspectives. A key point of reference for the editors and the contributors to this volume is Roland Barthes's essay "Listening" and his distinction that "[h]earing is a physiological phenomenon; listening is a psychological act."1 As the editors explain, "[l]istening in this sense is a selfconsciously critical process, requiring far more of the reader than the automatic internalisation of an aesthetic ideal" (8). Barthes's analysis influenced Garrett Stewart's methods in his Reading Voices: Literature and the Phonotext; by privileging "listening over hearing" (8), he persuasively stresses the complex processes of literary reading and the "receptivity of the body to phonic and graphic mediations—from the brain's cognitive rhythms to the reverberating surfaces of the diaphragm, throat, tongue, and palate" (8).2 Taking this research into consideration, the editors highlight the significance of Sounding Modernism and explain that "[t]he rich nexus of new sound-recording technologies, new vocabularies of and for sonic phenomena, new standardisations of rhythm and speed, and the weird displacements of 'voice' peculiar to modernity offer unparalleled resonators for the period in literary history known as modernism" (4). Specifically, they draw attention to the impact of the gramophone record and how it interrelates to the way writers used the technique of onomatopoeia in innovative ways. They highlight the fact that [w]hen Joyce came to inscribe the sounds made by the Blooms' domes-tic cat in Ulysses (1922), what mattered (for the first time in literary history) was not the settled national conventions of a "meow," "miaow" or "miau," but the infinitesimal intra-textual distinctions between a "Mkgnao!" a "Mrkgnao!" and a "Mrkrgnao!," not to mention an irregular "Gurrhr!" (7) The editors elucidate such distinctive word formations by convincingly asserting that "it is far from an exegetical stretch to insist that all of this fanatical attention to the letter-by-letter specificity of onomatopoeia's exquisite new pedantries in Joyce's hands can be traced to the impact of a machine that was automatically recording sounds [End Page 192] as sounds and not as alphabetical glyphs" (7). Apart from onomatopoeia, one of the editors, Julian Murphet, is interested in the theoretical analysis of sounds that are soundless, "transposed synaesthetically into image" in modernist texts (20). This becomes the focal point in Murphet's essay. Among others, Murphet explores silence in Samuel Beckett's Texts for Nothing.3 Examining the final Text 13, Murphet highlights Beckett's preoccupation with silence and repetition and the way he breaks "down the units of sense into a perforated surface of sheer language as such" attaining silence "by way of a murmur," producing thus a "prose murmur" (32). Similarly, the examination of silence or ellipsis, but this time in relation to the representation of race, is central in Julie Beth Napolin's contribution. As she observes, in Ernest Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises,4 a black jazz musician's speech moves further and further away from representation, being first a dialect rendering of a racialised timbre. … [T]he matter of his voice is left unnarrated, calling upon the reader's inner sense of sound and that reader's archive of racial associations of voice. It is then a singing, a chanting, until finally it is an ellipsis, a spacing out within written discourse itself. (122) She concludes that, "[w]hile the racialised sound object has been marginalised, it remains 'in' the narrative in elided and distorted (but also compressed) form. The racialised drummer is 'there,' at the audiovisual margins of narratability: the ellipsis is a visualised fracture in articulation" (123). The perception of speech...
Read full abstract