SOS Mutagenesis Research Articles

DNA polymerases and SOS mutagenesis: can one reconcile the biochemical and genetic data?

Until recently, it had been concluded from genetic evidence that DNA polymerase III (Pol III, the main replicative polymerase in E. coli) was also responsible for mutagenic translesion synthesis on damaged templates, albeit under the influence of inducible proteins UmuD′ and UmuC. Now it appears that these proteins themselves have polymerase activity (and are now known as Pol V) and can carry out translesion synthesis in vitro in the absence of Pol III. Here I discuss the apparent contradictions between genetics and biochemistry with regard to the role of Pol III in translesion synthesis. Does Pol V interact with Pol III and constitute an alternative component of the replication factory (replisome)? Where do the other three known polymerases fit in? What devices does the cell have to ensure that the “right” polymerase is used in a given situation? The debate about the role of Pol III in translesion synthesis reveals a deeper divide between models that interpret everything in terms of mass action effects and those that embrace a replisome held together by protein–protein interactions and located as a structural entity within the cell. BioEssays 22:933–937, 2000. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

DNA polymerases and SOS mutagenesis: can one reconcile the biochemical and genetic data?

Until recently, it had been concluded from genetic evidence that DNA polymerase III (Pol III, the main replicative polymerase in E. coli) was also responsible for mutagenic translesion synthesis on damaged templates, albeit under the influence of inducible proteins UmuD' and UmuC. Now it appears that these proteins themselves have polymerase activity (and are now known as Pol V) and can carry out translesion synthesis in vitro in the absence of Pol III. Here I discuss the apparent contradictions between genetics and biochemistry with regard to the role of Pol III in translesion synthesis. Does Pol V interact with Pol III and constitute an alternative component of the replication factory (replisome)? Where do the other three known polymerases fit in? What devices does the cell have to ensure that the "right" polymerase is used in a given situation? The debate about the role of Pol III in translesion synthesis reveals a deeper divide between models that interpret everything in terms of mass action effects and those that embrace a replisome held together by protein-protein interactions and located as a structural entity within the cell.

Escherichia coli cells defective for the recN gene display constitutive elevation of mutagenesis at 3,N(4)-ethenocytosine via an SOS-induced mechanism.

The Escherichia coli UVM (UV Modulation of mutagenesis) response is a DNA damage-inducible mutagenic pathway detected as significantly increased mutagenesis at 3,N4-ethenocytosine (epsilon C) lesions borne on transfected single-stranded M13 vector DNA. All major classes of DNA-damaging agents can induce UVM, and the phenomenon is independent of previously characterized mutagenic responses in E. coli. To understand this phenomenon further, we set out to identify and characterize mutants in the UVM response. Screening a mutant bank of cells defective for 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine-inducible genes revealed that defects in the recN gene cause a constitutive elevation of mutagenesis at epsilon C residues. In contrast to normal cells that show approximately 6% mutagenesis at epsilon C lesions, but approximately 60% upon UVM induction, recN-defective strains display approximately 50% mutagenesis at epsilon C lesion sites in untreated cells. However, the recN-mediated mutagenesis response was found to require the recA gene and the umuDC genes, and could be suppressed in the presence of a plasmid harbouring the SOS transcriptional repressor LexA. These results imply that recN cells are constitutively active for SOS mutagenesis functions. The observation that epsilonC mutagenesis is enhanced in recN cells confirms previous findings that mutagenesis at epsilonC can also be independently elevated by the SOS pathway.

Roles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis.

The expression of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerases pol V (UmuD'2C complex) and pol IV (DinB) increases in response to DNA damage. The induction of pol V is accompanied by a substantial increase in mutations targeted at DNA template lesions in a process called SOS-induced error-prone repair. Here we show that the common DNA template lesions, TT (6-4) photoproducts, TT cis-syn photodimers and abasic sites, are efficiently bypassed within 30 seconds by pol V in the presence of activated RecA protein (RecA*), single-stranded binding protein (SSB) and pol III's processivity beta,gamma-complex. There is no detectable bypass by either pol IV or pol III on this time scale. A mutagenic 'signature' for pol V is its incorporation of guanine opposite the 3'-thymine of a TT (6-4) photoproduct, in agreement with mutational spectra. In contrast, pol III and pol IV incorporate adenine almost exclusively. When copying undamaged DNA, pol V exhibits low fidelity with error rates of around 10(-3) to 10(-4), with pol IV being 5- to 10-fold more accurate. The effects of RecA protein on pol V, and beta,gamma-complex on pol IV, cause a 15,000- and 3,000-fold increase in DNA synthesis efficiency, respectively. However, both polymerases exhibit low processivity, adding 6 to 8 nucleotides before dissociating. Lesion bypass by pol V does not require beta,gamma-complex in the presence of non-hydrolysable ATPgammaS, indicating that an intact RecA filament may be required for translesion synthesis.

Visualization of two binding sites for the Escherichia coli UmuD′ 2C complex (DNA pol V) on RecA-ssDNA filaments

The heterotrimeric UmuD′ 2C complex of Escherichia coli has recently been shown to possess intrinsic DNA polymerase activity (DNA pol V) that facilitates error-prone translesion DNA synthesis (SOS mutagenesis). When overexpressed in vivo, UmuD′ 2C also inhibits homologous recombination. In both activities, UmuD′ 2C interacts with RecA nucleoprotein filaments. To examine the biochemical and structural basis of these reactions, we have analyzed the ability of the UmuD′ 2C complex to bind to RecA-ssDNA filaments in vitro. As estimated by a gel retardation assay, binding saturates at a stoichiometry of approximately one complex per two RecA monomers. Visualized by cryo-electron microscopy under these conditions, UmuD′ 2C is seen to bind uniformly along the filaments, such that the complexes are completely submerged in the deep helical groove. This mode of binding would impede access to DNA in a RecA filament, thus explaining the ability of UmuD′ 2C to inhibit homologous recombination. At sub-saturating binding, the distribution of UmuD′ 2C complexes along RecA-ssDNA filaments was characterized by immuno-gold labelling with anti-UmuC antibodies. These data revealed preferential binding at filament ends (most likely, at one end). End-specific binding is consistent with genetic models whereby such binding positions the UmuD′ 2C complex (pol V) appropriately for its role in SOS mutagenesis.

Translesion synthesis, or molecular steeplechase

The review is devoted to the latest achievements in studying SOS mutagenesis and translesion synthesis (DNA synthesis on damaged templates). A group of novel DNA polymerases (proteins of the UmuC family) have been found, capable of bypassing the replication block caused by a lethal lesion in the template. A special role of the steric factor in selection of the complementary nucleotide at the active center of DNA polymerase is shown.

A role for the umuDC gene products of Escherichia coli in increasing resistance to DNA damage in stationary phase by inhibiting the transition to exponential growth.

The umuDC gene products, whose expression is induced by DNA-damaging treatments, have been extensively characterized for their role in SOS mutagenesis. We have recently presented evidence that supports a role for the umuDC gene products in the regulation of growth after DNA damage in exponentially growing cells, analogous to a prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint. Our further characterization of the growth inhibition at 30 degrees C associated with constitutive expression of the umuDC gene products from a multicopy plasmid has shown that the umuDC gene products specifically inhibit the transition from stationary phase to exponential growth at the restrictive temperature of 30 degrees C and that this is correlated with a rapid inhibition of DNA synthesis. These observations led to the finding that physiologically relevant levels of the umuDC gene products, expressed from a single, SOS-regulated chromosomal copy of the operon, modulate the transition to rapid growth in E. coli cells that have experienced DNA damage while in stationary phase. This activity of the umuDC gene products is correlated with an increase in survival after UV irradiation. In a distinction from SOS mutagenesis, uncleaved UmuD together with UmuC is responsible for this activity. The umuDC-dependent increase in resistance in UV-irradiated stationary-phase cells appears to involve, at least in part, counteracting a Fis-dependent activity and thereby regulating the transition to rapid growth in cells that have experienced DNA damage. Thus, the umuDC gene products appear to increase DNA damage tolerance at least partially by regulating growth after DNA damage in both exponentially growing and stationary-phase cells.

RecA protein-dependent R-loop formation in vitro

The RecA protein of Escherichia coli, which has crucial roles in homologous recombination, DNA damage repair, induction of the SOS response, and SOS mutagenesis, was found to catalyze assimilation of complementary RNA into a homologous region of a DNA duplex (R-loop). The reaction strictly requires a region of mismatch in the duplex, which may serve as a nucleation site for RecA protein polymerization. The optimum conditions for the assimilation reaction resemble those for the previously studied RecA protein-catalyzed homologous pairing and strand exchange reaction between two DNA molecules. Our finding lends strong support to the proposal that RecA protein-catalyzed assimilation of a transcript into duplex DNA results in formation of an R-loop at certain regions of the chromosome and that, when stabilized, the R-loop can serve as an origin of chromosome replication.

The bacteriophage P1 HumD protein is a functional homolog of the prokaryotic UmuD'-like proteins and facilitates SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli.

The Escherichia coli umuD and umuC genes comprise an operon and encode proteins that are involved in the mutagenic bypass of normally replication-inhibiting DNA lesions. UmuD is, however, unable to function in this process until it undergoes a RecA-mediated cleavage reaction to generate UmuD'. Many homologs of umuDC have now been identified. Most are located on bacterial chromosomes or on broad-host-range R plasmids. One such putative homolog, humD (homolog of umuD) is, however, found on the bacteriophage P1 genome. Interestingly, humD differs from other umuD homologs in that it encodes a protein similar in size to the posttranslationally generated UmuD' protein and not UmuD, nor is it in an operon with a cognate umuC partner. To determine if HumD is, in fact, a bona fide homolog of the prokaryotic UmuD'-like mutagenesis proteins, we have analyzed the ability of HumD to complement UmuD' functions in vivo as well as examined HumD's physical properties in vitro. When expressed from a high-copy-number plasmid, HumD restored cellular mutagenesis and increased UV survival to normally nonmutable recA430 lexA(Def) and UV-sensitive DeltaumuDC recA718 lexA(Def) strains, respectively. Complementing activity was reduced when HumD was expressed from a low-copy-number plasmid, but this observation is explained by immunoanalysis which indicates that HumD is normally poorly expressed in vivo. In vitro analysis revealed that like UmuD', HumD forms a stable dimer in solution and is able to interact with E. coli UmuC and RecA nucleoprotein filaments. We conclude, therefore, that bacteriophage P1 HumD is a functional homolog of the UmuD'-like proteins, and we speculate as to the reasons why P1 might require the activity of such a protein in vivo.

SOS mutagenesis results from up-regulation of translesion synthesis

Irradiation of DNA with ultraviolet light generates a variety of photolesions. Among them, are cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and (6-4) photoproducts blocking lesions that interfere with DNA replication if left unrepaired. In addition to efficient pre-replicative excision repair mechanisms, cells have evolved damage tolerance pathways enabling them to replicate lesion-containing DNA molecules either by directly replicating through the damaged base (translesion synthesis, TLS) or by employing the locally undamaged complementary strand thus avoiding the lesion (damage avoidance pathways, DA). Using double-stranded vectors with a single T(6-4)T UV lesion and a strand segregation analysis (SSA), we have measured the relative utilization of the two tolerance pathways (TLS and DA) in Escherichia coli. During the SOS response the error-prone TLS pathway is strongly stimulated (≈20-fold) at the expense of the error-free DA pathways. Thus, up-regulation of TLS may turn out to be a general property of the SOS response; a similar conclusion was previously reached with the frameshift-inducing N-2-acetylaminofluorene adduct. Therefore, as far as its contribution to damaged DNA replication is concerned, the SOS response appears to be an induced mutator state rather than a survival strategy. Depending on the base inserted opposite the lesion, TLS can be error-free or mutagenic. In a wild-type strain, both forms of TLS are increased to a similar extent during the SOS response. In contrast, in a Δ umuDC strain induction of TLS is totally abolished, demonstrating that the UmuDC proteins usually thought to be specifically involved in mutagenesis facilitate the recovery of both error-free and mutagenic replication intermediates in vivo.

The Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins UmuD and UmuD' interact physically with the replicative DNA polymerase.

The Escherichia coli umuDC operon is induced in response to replication-blocking DNA lesions as part of the SOS response. UmuD protein then undergoes an RecA-facilitated self-cleavage reaction that removes its N-terminal 24 residues to yield UmuD'. UmuD', UmuC, RecA, and some form of the E. coli replicative DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, function in translesion synthesis, the potentially mutagenic process of replication over otherwise blocking lesions. Furthermore, it has been proposed that, before cleavage, UmuD together with UmuC acts as a DNA damage checkpoint system that regulates the rate of DNA synthesis in response to DNA damage, thereby allowing time for accurate repair to take place. Here we provide direct evidence that both uncleaved UmuD and UmuD' interact physically with the catalytic, proofreading, and processivity subunits of the E. coli replicative polymerase. Consistent with our model proposing that uncleaved UmuD and UmuD' promote different events, UmuD and UmuD' interact differently with DNA polymerase III: whereas uncleaved UmuD interacts more strongly with beta than it does with alpha, UmuD' interacts more strongly with alpha than it does with beta. We propose that the protein-protein interactions we have characterized are part of a higher-order regulatory system of replication fork management that controls when the umuDC gene products can gain access to the replication fork.

UmuD'(2)C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V.

The damage-inducible UmuD' and UmuC proteins are required for most SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Our recent assay to reconstitute this process in vitro, using a native UmuD'(2)C complex, revealed that the highly purified preparation contained DNA polymerase activity. Here we eliminate the possibility that this activity is caused by a contaminating DNA polymerase and show that it is intrinsic to UmuD'(2)C. E. coli dinB has recently been shown to have DNA polymerase activity (pol IV). We suggest that UmuD'(2)C, the fifth DNA polymerase discovered in E. coli, be designated as E. coli pol V. In the presence of RecA, beta sliding clamp, gamma clamp loading complex, and E. coli single-stranded binding protein (SSB), pol V's polymerase activity is highly "error prone" at both damaged and undamaged DNA template sites, catalyzing efficient bypass of abasic lesions that would otherwise severely inhibit replication by pol III holoenzyme complex (HE). Pol V bypasses a site-directed abasic lesion with an efficiency about 100- to 150-fold higher than pol III HE. In accordance with the "A-rule," dAMP is preferentially incorporated opposite the lesion. A pol V mutant, UmuD'(2)C104 (D101N), has no measurable lesion bypass activity. A kinetic analysis shows that addition of increasing amounts of pol III to a fixed level of pol V inhibits lesion bypass, demonstrating that both enzymes compete for free 3'-OH template-primer ends. We show, however, that despite competition for primer-3'-ends, pol V and pol III HE can nevertheless interact synergistically to stimulate synthesis downstream from a template lesion.

Lon and Clp family proteases and chaperones share homologous substrate-recognition domains.

Lon protease and members of the Clp family of molecular chaperones and protease regulatory subunits contain homologous regions with properties expected for substrate-binding domains. Fragments corresponding to these sequences are stably and independently folded for Lon, ClpA, and ClpY. The corresponding regions from ClpB and ClpX are unstable. All five fragments exhibit distinct patterns of binding to three proteins that are protease substrates in vivo: the heat shock transcription factor sigma32, the SOS mutagenesis protein UmuD, and Arc repressor bearing the SsrA degradation tag. Recognition of UmuD is mediated through peptide sequences within a 24-residue N-terminal region whereas recognition of both sigma32 and SsrA-tagged Arc requires sequences at the C terminus. These results indicate that the Lon and Clp proteases use the same mechanism of substrate discrimination and suggest that these related ATP-dependent bacterial proteases scrutinize accessible or disordered regions of potential substrates for the presence of specific targeting sequences.

The mutA mistranslator tRNA-induced mutator phenotype requires recA and recB genes, but not the derepression of lexA-regulated functions.

The mapping of mutA and mutC mutator alleles to the glyV and glyW glycine tRNA genes, respectively, and the subsequent discovery that the mutA phenotype is abolished in a DeltarecA strain raise the possibility that asp --> gly misinsertion may induce a novel mutagenic pathway. The recA requirement suggests three possibilities: (i) the SOS mutagenesis pathway is activated in mutA cells; (ii) loss of recA function interferes with mutA-promoted asp --> gly misinsertion; or (iii) a hitherto unrecognized recA-dependent mutagenic pathway is activated by translational stress. By assaying the expression levels of a reporter plasmid bearing a umuC :lacZ fusion, we show that the SOS regulon is not in a derepressed state in mutA cells. Neither overexpression of the lexA gene through a multicopy plasmid nor replacement of the wild-type lexA allele with the lexA1[Ind-] allele interferes with the expression of the mutA phenotype. The mutA phenotype is unaffected in cells defective for dinB, as shown here, and is unaffected in cells defective for umuD and umuC genes, as shown previously. We show that mutA-promoted asp --> gly misinsertion occurs in recA- cells and, therefore, the requirement for recA is 'downstream' of mistranslation. Finally, we show that the mutA phenotype is abolished in cells deficient for recB, suggesting that cellular recombination functions may be required for the expression of the mutator phenotype. We propose that translational stress induces a previously unrecognized mutagenic pathway in Escherichia coli.

The isfA mutation specifically inhibits the SOS-dependent mutagenic pathway and does not selectively affect any particular base substitution.

We have previously described a new mutation in Escherichia coli, isfA, which causes inhibition of SOS mutagenesis (UV-induced in rec+ and spontaneous in recA730 strains) and several SOS-dependent phenomena. Antimutagenic activity of the isfA mutation in the recA730 strain was shown to be related to inhibition of processing of UmuD to UmuD' by RecA* coprotease. In the present study we have analysed the specificity of the antimutagenic activity of the isfA mutation by employing F' plasmids carrying a set of mutant lacZ genes that can individually detect two types of transitions and four types of transversions. Analysis revealed that isfA inhibits UV-induced G:C-->A:T and A:T-->G:C transitions, but does not affect the same G:C-->A:T transitions induced by EMS, an SOS-independent mutagen. Analysis of the antimutagenic activity of the isfA mutation in two mutator strains, recA730 and mutL, showed that isfA inhibits SOS-dependent transversions in recA730, but not transitions generated as replication errors in the mutL strain. In the double mutant recA730 mutL, both transitions and transversions were enhanced and isfA inhibits most transversions and only those transitions generated by the recA730 mutation. The results indicate that the antimutagenic activity of the isfA mutation is specific for the SOS, UmuD'C-dependent mutagenic pathway but does not selectively affect any particular base substitution. Moreover, studies on the effect of the isfA mutation on transitions and transversions in different genetic backgrounds enable us to recognize different mutagenic pathways active in recA730 cells.

SOS and UVM pathways have lesion-specific additive and competing effects on mutation fixation at replication-blocking DNA lesions.

Escherichia coli cells have multiple mutagenic pathways that are induced in response to environmental and physiological stimuli. Unlike the well-investigated classical SOS response, little is known about newly recognized pathways such as the UVM (UV modulation of mutagenesis) response. In this study, we compared the contributions of the SOS and UVM pathways on mutation fixation at two representative noninstructive DNA lesions: 3,N4-ethenocytosine (epsilonC) and abasic (AP) sites. Because both SOS and UVM responses are induced by DNA damage, and defined UVM-defective E. coli strains are not yet available, we first constructed strains in which expression of the SOS mutagenesis proteins UmuD' and UmuC (and also RecA in some cases) is uncoupled from DNA damage by being placed under the control of a heterologous lac-derived promoter. M13 single-stranded viral DNA bearing site-specific lesions was transfected into cells induced for the SOS or UVM pathway. Survival effects were determined from transfection efficiency, and mutation fixation at the lesion was analyzed by a quantitative multiplex sequence analysis procedure. Our results suggest that induction of the SOS pathway can independently elevate mutagenesis at both lesions, whereas the UVM pathway significantly elevates mutagenesis at epsilonC in an SOS-independent fashion and at AP sites in an SOS-dependent fashion. Although mutagenesis at epsilonC appears to be elevated by the induction of either the SOS or the UVM pathway, the mutational specificity profiles for epsilonC under SOS and UVM pathways are distinct. Interestingly, when both pathways are active, the UVM effect appears to predominate over the SOS effect on mutagenesis at epsilonC, but the total mutation frequency is significantly increased over that observed when each pathway is individually induced. These observations suggest that the UVM response affects mutagenesis not only at class 2 noninstructive lesions (epsilonC) but also at classical SOS-dependent (class 1) lesions such as AP sites. Our results add new layers of complexity to inducible mutagenic phenomena: DNA damage activates multiple pathways that have lesion-specific additive as well as suppressive effects on mutation fixation, and some of these pathways are not directly regulated by the SOS genetic network.

Urocanic Acid Photochemistry and Photobiology

Urocanic acid (2-propenoic acid, 3-[ lH-imidazol-4(5)-yl], UA)? is one of the smallest molecules to have stimulated global interest among biologists, environmentalists, photochemists, photobiologists, medicinal chemists and immunologists. Its history can be traced back more than a century to when it was first found in the urine of dogs (1). Interest in the molecule remained dormant until the middle of the century but rekindled in the late 1940s when it was detected in animal skin and sweat. This led to the proposal that UA acts as a natural sunscreen, possibly as a specific photoprotecting agent for DNA because of the overlap of the UA and DNA absorption spectra (2). Since 1983 there has been an explosive growth in UA research, primarily as a consequence of the proposal by De Fabo and Noonan (3) that the cis photoisomer (cUA) of trans-UA (tUA) could be responsible for the phenomenon of photoimmunosuppression. In a recent literature survey we found that about 25 research papers have appeared every year over the last decade involving UA. Several comprehensive reviews of the molecule's photobiology, photochemistry and photophysics have appeared (4-

Intermolecular cleavage by UmuD-like enzymes: identification of residues required for cleavage and substrate specificity

The UmuD-like proteins are best characterized for their role in damage-induced SOS mutagenesis. An essential step in this process is the enzymatic self-processing of the UmuD-like proteins. This reaction is thought to occur either via an intramolecular or intermolecular self-cleavage mechanism. Here, we demonstrate that it can also occur via an heterologous intermolecular cleavage reaction. The Escherichia coli UmuD enzyme demonstrated the broadest substrate specificity, cleaving both E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium UmuD substrates in vivo. In comparison, the wild-type S. typhimurium UmuD (UmuDSt) and MucA enzymes catalyzed intermolecular self-cleavage, but did not facilitate heterologous cleavage. Heterologous cleavage by the UmuDSt enzyme was, however, observed with chimeric UmuD substrates that possess residues 30-55 of UmuDSt. We have further localized the residue predominantly responsible for UmuDSt-catalyzed heterologous cleavage to Ser50 in the substrate molecule. We hypothesize that changes at this residue affect the positioning of the cleavage site of a substrate molecule within the catalytic cleft of the UmuDSt enzyme by affecting the formation of a so-called UmuD “filament-dimer”. This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that mutations known to disrupt an E. coli UmuD’ filament dimer also block intermolecular UmuDEc cleavage.

Mutations affecting the ability of the Escherichia coli UmuD' protein to participate in SOS mutagenesis.

The products of the SOS-regulated umuDC operon are required for most UV and chemical mutagenesis in Escherichia coli, a process that results from a translesion synthesis mechanism. The UmuD protein is activated for its role in mutagenesis by a RecA-facilitated autodigestion that removes the N-terminal 24 amino acids. A previous genetic screen for nonmutable umuD mutants had resulted in the isolation of a set of missense mutants that produced UmuD proteins that were deficient in RecA-mediated cleavage (J. R. Battista, T. Ohta, T. Nohmi, W. Sun, and G. C. Walker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:7190-7194, 1990). To identify elements of the UmuD' protein necessary for its role in translesion synthesis, we began with umuD', a modified form of the umuD gene that directly encodes the UmuD' protein, and obtained missense umuD' mutants deficient in UV and methyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis. The D39G, L40R, and T51I mutations affect residues located at the UmuD'2 homodimer interface and interfere with homodimer formation in vivo. The D75A mutation affects a highly conserved residue located at one end of the central strand in a three-stranded beta-sheet and appears to interfere with UmuD'2 homodimer formation indirectly by affecting the structure of the UmuD' monomer. When expressed from a multicopy plasmid, the L40R umuD' mutant gene exhibited a dominant negative effect on a chromosomal umuD+ gene with respect to UV mutagenesis, suggesting that the mutation has an effect on UmuD' function that goes beyond its impairment of homodimer formation. The G129D mutation affects a highly conserved residue that lies at the end of the long C-terminal beta-strand and results in a mutant UmuD' protein that exhibits a strongly dominant negative effect on UV mutagenesis in a umuD+ strain. The A30V and E35K mutations alter residues in the N-terminal arms of the UmuD'2 homodimer, which are mobile in solution.

Lon-mediated proteolysis of the Escherichia coli UmuD mutagenesis protein: in vitro degradation and identification of residues required for proteolysis.

Most SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli is dependent on the UmuD and UmuC proteins. Perhaps as a consequence, the activity of these proteins is exquisitely regulated. The intracellular level of UmuD and UmuC is normally quite low but increases dramatically in lon- strains, suggesting that both proteins are substrates of the Lon protease. We report here that the highly purified UmuD protein is specifically degraded in vitro by Lon in an ATP-dependent manner. To identify the regions of UmuD necessary for Lon-mediated proteolysis, we performed 'alanine-stretch' mutagenesis on umuD and followed the stability of the mutant protein in vivo. Such an approach allowed us to localize the site(s) within UmuD responsible for Lon-mediated proteolysis. The primary signal is located between residues 15 and 18 (FPLF), with an auxiliary site between residues 26 and 29 (FPSP), of the amino terminus of UmuD. Transfer of the amino terminus of UmuD (residues 1-40) to an otherwise stable protein imparts Lon-mediated proteolysis, thereby indicating that the amino terminus of UmuD is sufficient for Lon recognition and the ensuing degradation of the protein.