The long-term hydraulic performance of lightly cemented soils is critical to engineering applications such as water infrastructure and/or remediation systems. Unfortunately there is a lack of literature that has related hydraulic performance of lightly cemented compacted soils (~5%) after freeze/thaw cycling to the morphology changes that result from this type of environmental loading. Previous studies on compacted clay materials have shown the underlying mechanisms responsible for hydraulic conductivity increases after freeze/thaw are attributed to initial cracking and subsequent frost lens formation. It is uncertain if the morphology changes and subsequent damage mechanisms for lightly cemented compacted soil will be similar to that of compacted clays or more similar to that of stronger, more brittle soil-cement reported in previous studies. The primary objective of this paper is to enhance the knowledge base on morphology changes that lightly cemented compacted soils undergo as a hydraulic barrier under freeze-thaw conditions. Laboratory testing is performed on six different compacted soil-cement mixes. The variables of the mix designs included cement content (3% or 6%) and compaction moisture contents (dry of optimum water content, optimum water content, or wet of optimum water content). The hydraulic performance of these samples is evaluated before and after three cycles of freeze/thaw. The mechanisms of freeze/thaw damage are then examined by studying the morphology changes in the samples via optical microscopy and mercury porosimetry. Hydraulic conductivity testing showed that increases in hydraulic conductivity after freeze/thaw cycling was primarily a result of cracking in the samples tested. Thin section results showed little evidence of ice lens formation in the samples after freeze/thaw exposure. However, formation of micro-cracks/cracks and matrix disruption after freeze/thaw were evident. The exception to this was observed for the 3% cement content sample compacted at wet of optimum conditions that appeared to undergo localized macropore increases. Mercury intrusion porosimetry failed to show consistent, small scale increases in porosity after freeze thaw, likely as a result of significant changes in the damaged areas not captured via the porosimetry scale.
Read full abstract