The slow crack growth behavior occurring in dynamic fatigue and post-indentation fatigue with no applied stress was compared for indented soda-lime glass specimens in six different environments at room temperature. A significant difference between the fatigue behaviors in the two methods was found, indicating that the post-indentation fatigue (slow crack growth) is unique but that such an approach is not appropriate to evaluate fatigue parameters for use in life prediction. The existence of a plateau region in the post-indentation crack growth-time data was attributed to a fatigue limit for each test environment, as verified by the aging strength data.
Read full abstract