We are pleased to present this special edition of Research on Social Work Practice based upon a set of recent selected empirical studies on Chinese instrument/scale development and intervention research. Specifically, these selected articles reflected the types of designs submitted for publication to Research on Social Work Practice in 2015–2016 and also their methodological quality. Prior to presenting introductory comments about these articles, we would be remiss not briefly contextualizing the state of the social work research in China and Hong Kong. China the country and Hong Kong a geographically designated special administrative region within it have seen much growth in the past two to three decades. The landmark SinoBritish Joint Declaration transferred the sovereignty of Hong Kong back to China on July 1, 1997, after 100 years of British rule, under the current idealized ‘‘one country, two systems’’ agreement. Hong Kong and Mainland China have undergone considerable growing pains both separately and together. Social work was first introduced to China in the 1920s but was eliminated in the early 1950s by the Communist government. After almost 30 years, it was restored to the university curriculum in 1988 because social service was deemed useful in addressing social problems triggered by the introduction of the ‘‘Open-Door’’ economic policy of China (Yuen Tsang & Wang, 2008). In 2006, the 16th Central Committee meeting of the Chinese Communist Party released a document which stated the necessity to establish ‘‘a grand team of professional social workers’’ to help in building a more harmonious society. This marked a new chapter for the development of social work in China (Yuen Tsang & Wang, 2008). At present, it is estimated that there are at least 310 tertiary education institutes that have a social work undergraduate program and about 104 with a social work masters’ program in China (Sim & Lau, 2016). Nonetheless, to date, intervention research is not well developed in China. Sim and Lau (2016) analyzed the content of n 1⁄4 206 practice research articles in Chinese journals published in the Peoples’ Republic of China since 1915 and found that only a few studies used quasi-experimental designs (3.4%) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (1.9%). Compared to Mainland China, Hong Kong has much fewer government-funded/supported universities. Hong Kong has only eight government-funded universities, of which five of them offer bachelor(or above) level social work training programs, including The University of Hong Kong, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, City University of Hong Kong, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and Hong Kong Baptist University. However, the social work educational system in Hong Kong is more structured with layered progressions and clearly articulated role differentiations between different types of programs: higher diploma in social work, bachelor of social work, bachelor of social work (honors), bachelor of social sciences (honors) in social work, bachelor of arts (honors) in social work, bachelor of social science in social work, master of social work, master of social sciences in social work, master of social science in social work, and doctor of social work. Unlike North America, the titles of these Hong Kong degrees in social work still have a very applied social sciences connotation in their respective programs. Hong Kong formally started its social work education in the early 1950s, and since then, it has developed considerably. At present, graduates with either a recognized diploma/associate degree or a degree entry-level training in social work are eligible for registration with the Social Workers’ Registration Board, with the practice designation ‘‘registered social worker.’’ On the whole, the quality of these programs is high, even when compared to international standards. Hong Kong scholars are also very productive in social work research publications. A simple search via the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) database in June 2016 indicated that there were N 1⁄4 752 articles related to Hong Kong or China categorized under ‘‘social work’’ in the SSCI. Among the top 10 authors constituting 19% of this set of social work articles related to Hong Kong or China, 9 were Hong Kong Chinese
Read full abstract