DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14244/198271991213 The paper presents a partial summary of the details of an ongoing survey aimed to analyze the research on children and childhood at the UNESCO research program implemented in Brazil, known as “UNESCO Race relations Project” (MAIO, 2004), in partnership with Revista Anhembi, from Sao Paulo, Brazil, between 1950 and 1953. We integrate a genealogical methodology in order to recover the ideas that anticipated thinking about race relations and children from Virginia Leone Bicudo’s (1955) “Atitudes dos alunos dos grupos escolares em relacao com a cor dos seus colegas” (“Attitudes of schoolchildren regarding the color of their schoolmates”) and Aniela Meyer Ginsberg’s (1955) “Pesquisas sobre as atitudes de um grupo de escolares de Sao Paulo em relacao com as criancas de cor” (“Research on the attitudes of a group of schoolchildren of Sao Paulo towards colored children”). The studies indicate a protagonism of racial thinking about children’s ways of socialization, a central theme to contemporary studies, the agency of the child and, in a specific way, the specificity of the agency in terms of race relations. These studies have a precursor character, as they investigate categories as race, gender, nationality, age and social class in an articulate way. Our emphasis is to constitute the historical context in which the Brazilian social sciences developed as a field of study and research in which the issues regarding children and their childhoods are marked by the variability of gender, race, and social class experiences. We seek to conciliate a diachronic sequence in which the authors’ investigations are inserted within the themes of contemporary research on childhood and race relations. Keywords : Race relations, Childhood, UNESCO project. /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:Tabela normal; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:Calibri,sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Times New Roman; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:Times New Roman; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
Read full abstract