Category of mentality has additional heuristic capabilities
 as compared to traditional categories of the mental life. Firstly, it
 serves as an integral characteristic of the uniqueness of the man’s
 mental world, and secondly, gives an understanding of the specific
 type of perception of the world by the subject, thirdly, it explains
 the distinct way of subject’s activity – his behavior, communication,
 performance. Because the mentality determines the mode of activity
 of a social group or an individual; the human activity orientation
 and it’s specificity, so the mentality can be interpreted as a core for
 the group and personal culture, also as a strategic cultural program
 of the subject. One of the basic clashes of society has the form of
 a contradiction between the mentality, containing new cultural
 forms, and the social relations. In the course of the individual
 cultural creativity development as a response to the multiple challenges
 of history, new mental characteristics are generated in the
 mentality of the intellectual elite representatives. They represent
 innovative programs of human being activity – performance, behavior,
 communication. The new mental characteristics spread in
 society and become components of group mentalities. This accrued
 contradiction between the mass mentality and the old social relations
 generates a constructive tension; negotiation the tension
 through the reproductive activity of subjects can establish the more
 progressive social relations. Old elements of mentality, in turn,
 inherent social inertia and conservatism. They can obstruct the new
 social relations establishment. Therefore, mentality has the contradictory
 nature, embodying the dual opposition of tradition and
 innovation. In the same time mentality is a social progress stimulating
 factor, and a factor that holds back excessively large and excessively
 rapid social changes. There is a difference between the mentality
 of the creators of innovative cultural meanings and the mentality
 of the masses. In the mentality of the creators that make up
 the intelligent elite of the society, the innovational component is
 more intense than the traditional. In the mentality of the masses
 is vice versa - the traditional component dominates over the innovational.
 There are many driving motives of the society development:
 changes in a way of material production, in the culture in
 general and in education in particular, in engineering, in science.
 But the most significant force, apparently, displays the changes in
 mentality that generate new forms of reproductive activity of the
 subject in the economic, political, social and mental spheres.
Read full abstract