s / European Journal of Integrative Medicine 7 (2015) 432–438 437 back pain. Available evidence may not facilitate guideline development for integration into best clinical practice. Practitioner perception of the evidence base is equally important. TCM practitioners in the EU and China vary in their perceived need for research evidence, and the evidence gaps. The complexity and plurality of traditional Chinese medicine theory and practice, informed by comparative effectiveness studies, personalized medicine and TCM pattern differentiation should be incorporated into future research if it is to be effectively integrated into health care provision. Steps are needed to promote the development and implementation of academic training and research programs that support progress in this direction. It is vitally important that competent professionals, both clinically skilled and trained in research are involved in the development of the evidence base to ensure that it is appropriate and ongoing. Otherwise studies will be designed and conducted by researchers who do not understand traditional systems of medicine or by practitioners who do not fully understand research practices. If this persists, good quality effectiveness data will continue to be lacking and compromise integration into any healthcare system. With advances in biomedical, chemical and computational technology, plenty of opportunities exist to provide multidisciplinary approaches to investigate evidence-based aspects of TCM practice. An integrative approach is crucial to connect the multiplicity of expertise, scientific innovation and investigations. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2015.07.039 Acupuncture as part of the health care system: Some key facts from European and a national point of view Wolfgang Weidenhammer 1,∗, Dieter Melchart 1,2 1 Competence Centre for Complementary Medicine and Naturopathy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany 2 Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland E-mail address:wolfgang.weidenhammer@lrz.tu-muenchen.de (W. Weidenhammer). The presentation will follow two approaches to give some insight into the situation of medical acupuncture as applied by doctors in Europe and specifically in Germany. The current status as well as the development over the previous years will be demonstrated. Between 2001 and 2006, three groups of German statutory sickness organizations funded three large reimbursement and research programs on acupuncture. One of them was conceptualized and conducted by the Competence Centre for Complementary Medicine and Naturopathy at TU Munich. Apart from the well-known controlled trials to investigate the specific effects of acupuncture the program also includes a description of routine care and therapeutic safety. Between June 2001 and November 2005, approximately one million patients insured by the participating sickness funds received acupuncture with systematic documentation. Data of about 450,000 patients were analyzed complemented by a more detailed longitudinal dataset from a subsample of about 5000 patients. Moreover, a survey on the participating acupuncturists enabled the analysis of relations between indicators of therapist’s qualification and the outcome of the treatment. As a result of the acupuncture research programs the German health authorities decided in 2006 to restrict the reimbursement by social health insurance funds to low back pain and osteoarthritis of the knee. Additionally, the conditions for certified physicians changed. The consequences of these decisions for the routine medical care with acupuncture were far-reaching. Although not focused on any specific CAM modality, the EU-funded project CAMbrella (2010–2012) could reveal some key points for acupuncture. In Europe, acupuncture is mostly regulated as a treatment that may or may not be provided by regulated health professionals or other CAM practitioners. 25 countries have acupuncture treatment regulations while 12 have no specific acupuncture regulations. A systematic analysis of the provision of CAM in Europe showed that approx. 305,000 registered CAM providers (47% are medical practitioners) can be identified in the EU. Acupuncture is reported as the most available therapeutic method for both, medical (80,000) and nonmedical providers (16,380). Beyond acupuncture, the presentation will end with a brief detour on research in CAM in Europe, with the focus on research promotion by the European Commission. Possibilities for the field of CAM and issues will be demonstrated, exemplified by the Horizon 2020 program. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2015.07.040 The cost-effectiveness of acupuncture
Read full abstract