Background: Although adequate research has been conducted regarding smoking and smokeless tobacco, there is a dearth of research exploring reasons for chewing areca nut and betel-quid. Global epidemiology of areca nut and betel-quid shows distinct ethnic and cultural preferences. Areca nut is chewed for its psychological stimulating effects and perhaps, a medicinal value. To develop empirically supported treatments and to promote nonstarting, healthcare workers and researchers must first understand the reasons people engage in the behavior. Aim: To discuss evidence based approaches and strategies for habit intervention in smokeless tobacco/arecanut/betel-quid and nonstarting. Methods: Data were collected from published national and international research, conference reports, WHO reports, tobacco control guides, Clinical Best Practice Guidelines and Cochrane database systematic reviews. Results: Individual behaviors are largely determined by complex range of factors beyond the control of the most individuals. Behavior change is complex and most people are well-informed about the basic health messages. Most people will have extensive experience of attempting to change their health career including quitting tobacco products. It is therefore essential to know a detailed history of a person's previous experiences of change and learn from this. Interventions need to match individuals' desire and ability to change. Encouragement, understanding, support, and empathy are all essential to enable clients achieve their goals. The most effective preventive intervention that a clinician can provide for tobacco-using patients against is an empathic, personalized smoking cessation intervention program with extended assistance and follow-up. The goal of the intervention must be complete cessation. Reduction provides no direct health benefits to the individual. Oral examination by a dental professional who points out tissue damage from smokeless tobacco use in a user´s own mouth, advice to quit, and brief problem solving and supportive counseling are effective in promoting smokeless tobacco cessation. There is also a need to develop culturally tailored areca nut and betel-quid cessation and risk reduction programs, the first step in reducing the public health burden associated with betel-quid chewing worldwide. Interventions are available, but underutilized, in part due to lack of clinician training and organizational support. Conclusion: Although the deleterious effects of smokeless tobacco/areca nut/betel-quid are well known by both users and healthcare workers, the knowledge has not translated effectively into cessation. Proven, brief, repetitive, directed interventions tailored to the needs of the patients can increase successful cessation. Controlling sociodemographic, environmental and personal factors may promote nonstarting.
Read full abstract