REVIEWS 785 Other opportunities existed for ordinary people to learn what the authorities expected of them, including engagement with propaganda, broadly conceived. Yekelchyk makes an original analysis of people’s attendance at public lectures and talks, and their reading of newspapers; his attempts to gauge their enthusiasm make for an important addition to the study of Stalinist subjectivities. Labour was the crucial means through which people exercised their citizenship and expressed their commitment to the Soviet state, and Yekelchyk importantly extends his definition of labour to voluntary work and to investment in state loans. It is useful to read this in the light of Dale’s greater emphasis on post-war workers’ autonomous survival strategies. But Yekelchyk’s most important contribution is to add more weight to the scholarly rehabilitation of Soviet elections as important incubators of citizenship, notwithstanding the lack of choice they offered. He analyses the work of ‘agitators’, the public culture of the campaigns, and the practice of voting, including the expression of dissent. These two monographs offer a fine-grained picture of late Stalinist life in two different cities. They focus on different social groups, use different sources, and adopt different methodologies. They are written by scholars whose personal engagement with this history is quite different. But their conclusions are quite similar: people and power combined to redesign citizenship in a workable way after the Second World War. Late Stalinist life was unstable and dangerous but functional, and Yekelchyk in particular shows that it was capable of being reformed into a new and more stable and responsive variant of Sovietness after 1953. Both these very successful and enjoyable books deserve a wide readership among specialists in Soviet and post-1945 European history. Their fluent and accessible presentation, combined with the interesting questions they raise and the engaging material they deploy, make them very suitable too for students on higher-level courses. Faculty of History Mark B. Smith University of Cambridge Ströhle, Isabel. Aus den Ruinen der alten erschaffen wir die neue Welt! HerrschaftspraxisundLoyalitäteninKosovo(1944–1974).Südosteuropäische Arbeiten, 155. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Munich, 2016. 424 pp. Illustrations. Tables. Notes. Bibliography. Index. €54.95: £77.00: £41.99. Historical references are never far away in ongoing political debate, policy and academic research on Kosovo’s status and Kosovo-Serbia relations. Yet SEER, 95, 4, OCTOBER 2017 786 there has been little international research on political and socio-economic developments in Kosovo during Yugoslavia’s twentieth century. Isabel Ströhle makes an important contribution to this field with a balanced and multifaceted study of the legitimation of Socialist Yugoslav rule in Kosovo up to the constitutional consolidation of 1974. The Yugoslav Communists maintained that the legitimation of their rule in Kosovo relied on the region’s accelerated socio-economic development. The author clarifies that the integrative potential of economic growth paired a new culture of materialism, consumption and individuality made some inroads in Kosovo during the 1960s, especially in dramatically transforming urban environments. However, the reach of the Yugoslav Dream was limited along the lines of the north-south divide in Yugoslavia and ethnic and rural-urban divergences within Kosovo. Particularly rewarding is the chapter on Kosovo’s large rural underclass, which was not only socio-economically but also geographically, symbolically and chronologically isolated from ‘contemporary’ socialist urban society. Ströhle also examines Yugoslav attempts to transform society. Regardless of the Communists’ radically modernist and anti-traditional discourse, in local practice the Party and affiliated mass organizations relied heavily on traditional patriarchal social hierarchies and structures for reaching the population. At the same time, local elites appropriated the Party’s structures to increase social capital within the local, ‘traditional’ community and the wider, ‘modern’ society. It is this interplay between progressive and conservative social relations that characterizes the socialist transformation of society in Kosovo. Except for its socio-economic underdevelopment, Kosovo was also particular in Socialist Yugoslavia for its majority-Albanian population. Based on the thoughtful use of Reinhart Koselleck’s historical categories of ‘spaces of experience’ and ‘horizons of expectations’, Ströhle insightfully analyses the repressive practices of the Yugoslav state security services in Kosovo. She argues that at the collective level, the state...
Read full abstract