T o many archaeologists, the contention that humans first trooped into North America 200,000 years ago or more is outrageous at worst, an interesting but unproven assumption at best. But evidence for this controversial view from two archaeological sites located just east of the Calico Mountains in southern California's Mojave Desert, the other straddling the Old Crow River in Canada's Yukon Territory is, after more than two decades, undergoing a rigorous analysis that is sure to stoke up further debate over when the first Americans arrived. my opinion, we're at a critical turning point, says archaeologist Alan L. Bryan of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada. We no longer have any logical basis for proclaiming an arbitrary limit beyond which people could not have entered For the last half century, that limit has generally been agreed to be about 12,000 years ago, or 2,000 years before the end of the Ice Age. Radiocarbon dates of stone spear or arrowhead points found near Clovis and Folsom, N.M., in the 1920s laid the foundation for this view. Some of the stones, carefully flaked on both sides to form sharp edges, were found among the bones of mammoth and extinct bison. It appeared that hunters with advanced methods of tool-making had migrated from Siberia to North America across a land bridge where the Bering Straits are now located and rapidly filtered southward in their search for big game. It is becoming increasingly clear, however, that there were earlier settlers whose way of life was a far cry from biggame hunting on the High Plains, says Bryan. Human occupation at two South American sites was recently shown to extend back at least 33,000 years (SN:6/28/86,p.405). Since migration via the Bering land bridge is, he contends, the most plausible route for the first immigrants, there must be earlier human occupation sites in North America. His view is supported by the 19,600-year-old radiocarbon date for a braided fragment, apparently a remnant of a woven basket or mat, found at the Meadowcroft Rockshelter near Pittsburgh. Furthermore, explains Bryan, the majority of early Americans may have been hunter-gatherers who used simple (not necessarily human-made) stone flakes, broken animal bones and wood implements to obtain and prepare food. Artifacts such as these do not preserve well and are often difficult to recognize as tools if they survive the millennia. Waterlogging of the 13,000-year-old Monte Verde village site in Chile protected an abundance of these simple tools and demonstrates that the inhabitants were foragers, not predatory hunters with sophisticated stone weapons. Indians whose hunting tools were found at Clovis and Folsom had one of the most highly specialized ways of making a living that developed anywhere in the says Bryan. The forests surrounding Monte Verde, on the other hand, were a bountiful source of perishable materials such as bone and wood that could be used in gathering and preparing various foods, including the occasional kill of a large animal. If perishable bone and wood tools were once used at the arid Calico Mountains site in California, they did not have the benefit of a protective liquid bath. Yet thousands of flaked stones excavated from several pits appear to have been modified by humans and, according to a preliminary analysis in a book edited by Bryan (New Evidence for the Pleistocene Peopling of the Americas, Center for the Study of Man, University of Maine, 1986), some of the stones are from a layer of earth that is at least 200,000 years old. A more extensive examination of the Calico stones will appear later this year in the JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY. Early man appears to have crossed over to North America in the midPleistocene and to have used a variety of simple stone tools, says archaeologist and Calico project director Ruth D. Simpson of the San Bernardino County Museum in Redlands, Calif. The Pleistocene epoch stretched from 1.6 million to 10,000 years ago. It is difficult to tell if the new reports out of Calico will meet with the approval of skeptical archaeologists. In the past, some of the stones have been described by Calico investigators as human-produced tools when, to many outside observers, they appeared to have been shaped by natural forces. Another concern with the site, says Dennis J. Stanford of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., is the lack of additional signs of human occupation, such as hearths. Several stone arrangments resembling hearths have been