236 Purpose: Clinical trials investigating the immunosuppressant sirolimus (SRL) have thus far utilized an oil-based liquid drug formulation. In this study, we converted stable renal allograft recipients from the liquid SRL formulation (L-SRL) to a solid pill formulation (S-SRL).Methods: 12 renal transplant recipients who had received L-SRL for more than 1 year were converted to S-SRL on a milligram-to-milligram basis. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of SRL and concurrent 12-hour cyclosporine (CsA) PK profiles were conducted with the last L-SRL dose and again at 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-conversion to S-SRL. Whole blood samples were drawn immediately prior to and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 12 hours after dosing. SRL concentrations were determined by HPLC, CsA concentrations by TDx. Additionally, the repetitive PK profiles for S-SRL were compared with previous repetitive PK profiles on L-SRL. Comparisons were by ANOVA, while comparisons between S-SRL PK profiles and the previously obtained L-SRL PK profiles were made using t-tests. Results: There were no differences between PK profiles of S-SRL post-conversion and L-SRL immediately pre-conversion or L-SRL repetitive PK profiles for SRL AUC0-12, dose-corrected SRL trough concentration (C0), time to maximum SRL concentration (tmax), relative bioavailability of the solid formulation, or CsA AUC0-12. The only significant differences in the PK parameters were between the maximum SRL concentration (Cmax) measured during the last L-SRL PK profile vs. 4 weeks post-conversion to S-SRL and between Cmax for all L-SRL PK profiles vs. S-SRL (both p<0.02). Table,TableThere were no episodes of acute rejection, nor were there any observed changes in creatinine, white blood counts, platelets, AST, ALT, triglycerides, or cholesterol. Conclusions: Conversion to the solid SRL formulation from the liquid formulation results in similar PK profiles and appears to be safe and well-tolerated in renal transplant recipients.
Read full abstract